Why do uggos have the "highest" standards?

Lack of social contact makes people a bit delusional about society. This happens in men as well.

File: 1475734273447.jpg (333KB, 1106x962px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1106x962px

>>18114237

>>18114246
Found the uggo

File: 1477782945418.jpg (14KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 200x200px

>>18114237

>Why do uggos have the "highest" standards?

I haven't noticed this trend in real life at all. I've noticed a lot of dudes on 4chan claiming its a trend but I've never seen any evidence of it myself.

Here's what I think is happening; overweight, unnattractive 4chan manlets meet other women they perceive as overweight and unattractive and think to themselves "Hey, you're ugly, in my mind you're not allowed have any standards or preferences that I deem disproportionate to your looks so I will treat you as such."

When these women reject them they think to themselves, "Wow, this fucking uggo rejected me, who does she think she is? She isn't attractive enough to not like me her standards must be ridiculous".

They never stop to consider the fact that people just don't fit together by attractiveness level. They never consider the possibility that their shitty attitude and gross /r9k/ mentality completely drive women away.

Sure, there are plenty of people with unrealistic standards or who are stuck in delusions about who they are or who they want but no one is entitled to be with an attractive person just because they are attractive the same way a less than attractive person isn't allowed to desire someone with attractive qualities. Everyone has to decide their own balance for what personality to physical attractiveness ratio they want in a partner and in the end, who cares if their balance seems irrational to you? If they want knights in shining armor then who cares? What compels you to decouple people from their ideals because it doesn't fit with yours?

In the end, whether you agree with my analysis or not, if you're a mature, reasonable individual who has a decent life and a good head on their shoulders the how entitled strangers are to their romantic preferences would be a completely non-issue to you. If you resemble anything close to an adult none of this will matter to you. Let people desire anything they want. Its irrelevant.

>>18114262

Found the virgin

File: 1478908178831.gif (68KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x293px

>>18114262

>REEEEEEEEE SOMEONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME! MUST BE A ROASTIEEEEEE!!!!

>>18114275
See this.

This man is a faggot

File: 1396087349643.gif (1MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x400px

>>18114297

>Anyone who has a different perspective than I do is a faggot

Ok.

File: 525250502_1280x720.jpg (35KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1280x720px

>>18114278
>>18114288
>being this butthurt

File: 567345_9ja_jpg25ee9857d5213f80ae98b6f53930a2a2.jpg (47KB, 723x516px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 723x516px

>>18114237
They really don't. Larger the woman the lower the standards.

File: 1375175580345.gif (1MB, 180x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 180x200px

>>18114351

>I insult someone
>They insult me back
>HAHAHAHAHAHA UR SOOOOO BUTTHURT

Ok.

>>18114416
gb2reddit, landwhale

File: 1477089008548.gif (3MB, 309x313px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 309x313px

>>18114425

>REEEEE REDDIT REEEE LANDWHALE ROASTIEEEE HAHAHAHA SOOOO BUTTHURT AMIRITE????

File: tumblr_inline_nufbr34Jr11r0yldj_540.jpg (35KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 540x304px

>>18114275
Nail on the head anon.

>>18114237
Attractive women know they're attractive and don't need a guy as a status symbol. Some ugly women feel that having a super hot guy will suddenly mean they aren't ugly, but in reality they're just ugly girls who scored a hot guy.

>>18114237
Do anons live in the actual world? I have never seen this shit IRL.

>>18114275
What kind of fucked-up 4chan Angel from Heaven graced us with you? Rally on, dear. Tell these sadass muthafuckas what sup.

This interests me because it is sort of like my thread about fat chicks, but kind of inverted. My observation, as a non-obese female, is that what the fuck is up with all the action these women get? I mean, every obese woman I've ever known has had sex thousands of times more than I have (outside of marriage). It's weird because everybody is supposed to hate fat chicks, right? But when I'm in the club it's these fat chicks always got men around them, the same guys who hate my non-obsese ass. What the fuck?

>>18114674
I know a few fatties that fucked over 30 guys each (they are not even 25 yet to give you an idea). 90%+ of their fucks have been thanks directly due to dating apps. Go make a catfish account of a ugly fat girl and see how many messages you get flooded with. Most guys won't ever approach an ugly fat girl in public. Especially to date them, but for a quick fuck they will in a heartbeat.

>>18114243
Makes sense

>>18114237
Women get off on rejecting men. They usually can't deal with being rejected

>>18114674
Fat women get used for sex a lot, so they can afford to be somewhat choosy when an otherwise similarly shaped male would not. Where >>18114275 makes the assumption that men are being rejected based off of height/status, the reality is that fat women are cum receptacles to chad and normie alike. As such, said fat women will not lower their standards because they have an artifically inflated value of their vagina that results due to their promiscuity. These women are not looking for relationships, but instead for a quick fuck (which they can easily get due to thirsty cunts who themselves have no standards), as they realize that they are probably not relationship material. Unfortunately, this disgusting sacks of lard will end up getting pregnant and become single mothers, where they will leech off the state and their baby daddy. Quite a sad state of affairs.

all men have unreasonable standards.

>>18116125
Have you ever interacted with a man? We will fuck and date any woman even remotely cute.

>>18116125
Yeah unreasonably low by comparison. Peace biatch!

File: images.jpg (5KB, 165x160px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 165x160px

>>18116125
My only standard is human decency and cuddles. Your argument is invalid.

File: Feminism.jpg (30KB, 549x540px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 549x540px

>>18116125

>>18114674
it's because they settle for less

sex is easy to get when you let anyone fuck you, duh.

>>18114237
>It doesn't make much sense to me.
They don't have high standards.
They are using the excuse of "high standards" to justify why they don't have a boyfriend.
They realize they are not attractive and are convinced that no one will want them. Some go so far as to turn down interest from reasonable guys because they are convinced that the guys will eventually reject them and wan't to do the rejecting first.

>>18114382
The price of citizenship is measured not in dollars but in pounds.

>>18114275
This desu famalam.

>>18115925
I guess this is right but stop assuming women fart unicorns and rainbows because believe me there are a ton of 25-45 year old 4/10 fatties who are NOT getting pure Chad dick unless its a freak accident caused by drunkenness. Also women exist who are lonely for whatever reason and don't ever get to have sex too.