Possibly getting sued

>>18053070

I would imagine it would depend on whether or not what you wrote is true.

If it is you're probably fine. If it isn't I would guess he may have some sort of a case. I'm not a lawyer and don't know, but I do know this kind of shit is pretty expensive. It would seem retarded to waste a shit load of money suing a student over what seems to be a reasonably tame review.

>>18053070
Pretty sure that would be libel, not slander. On top of that, those are anonymous.

Even if they weren't, he'd have to prove some kind of damage to his character, which would be hard because basically every professor in the world has at least one bad RMP review.

how does he know it was you

You could have offered actual criticism rather than just trying to belittle him. Your writing, too, is bad.

>>18053117
He knows it's me because he heard about it from my ex girlfriend who went out of her way to tell him

>>18053224
so he heard about it from someone with a vendetta against you? Sounds reliable.

>>18053224
"Your honor, you see this guys ex girlfriend totally told me he definitely was the one who wrote this. That's how I know for a FACT he did it. It's not like his ex has any reason to say, tell lies about him to make him look bad."

He said she said does not stand in court anon.
Tell your professor to eat a fat cock lol. Also be sure to complain to his department head that he's not doing his job.

>>18053131
Doesn't matter, nothing he wrote was illegal. OPs professor is a petty little moron if he thinks he can sue for this, and clearly knows nothing about the law.

You know what my professors do about rmp reviews like this? Put them in their powerpoints for the first day of classes to laugh at and mock.
Then they move on with their lives and jobs.

>>18053233
She has me on tape admitting it. I did a youtube vid posting it as a tutorial to rate my professor but I did censor his name on screen in the vid. Ive since deleted it. But she saved a copy of 47 videos I made she wants ammo in our custody battle.

>>18053244
women, not even once

also OP was any of what you wrote untrue? Because if not I suggest you approach the department head at your school about this. Threatening a student like that simply for stating the truth will get him in big trouble.

Dont even worry about it. Just deny it till the end. Tell him to provide proof that it was you. An ex-girlfriend blabbering her mouth doesnt mean shit.

>>18053244
Kek, well you fucked yourself then bro.
Still though, nothing you did was illegal. Tell him to eat a fat cock. Well, maybe not that because then he might cry sexually harassment. Tell him to eat a steaming pile of shit.

Pro tip, don't ever fucking do something that suspposed to be anonymous and then turn around and attach your identity to it you moron.

Also, fuck this bitch up lol. Share every dirty secret you have on her, if she's gonna be a petty cunt you might as well too lol.

>>18053261
Well I do still have the password for her aol/reddit account. She posts on r/gonewild and deletes them.

>>18053272
Kek, save em up boy. Just hold onto them though, until she starts spilling your shit around.

Idk why she's concerned though, I mean it sucks for you but if she wants custody she's fucking got it just because shes a woman. Shitty way the courts work, she's working way too hard.
Unless she's literally trying to make it so you'll never see your kid ever again. In which case, you can probably use this behavior against her. Tell the judge she's trying to dig up every little thing, not because she actually thinks you'll be a bad father, but she's being childish and wants to just "stick it to you".

>>18053282
Here I just shared one on a nsfw board
>>>/b/722567562

>>18053294
Kek.
Just be careful, this can work against you. Pretty sure even though common sense is that if you're a dumb cunt enough to post nudes online, sharing nudes without permission is frowned upon by most people. Judges included.

>>18053244
even then he's got to show that this particular libel was damaging to his reputation as a professor, which it almost certainly was not. because it's ratemyfuckingprofessors.

>>18053304
in some US states it's revenge porn and that shit is illegal.

>>18053309
This.
Lord knows anyway the site is worthless because its not like colleges even really give you a choice on who you can take the course from.
At least my college doesn't lol. You might be lucky to get 2 sections of a course, and the one is always full. I just use RMP to give me a heads up, not to actually strategically select my professor when signing up for classes.

>>18053312
Yeah but I'm pretty sure that just applies to private photos. Not saving and reuploading photos they already elected to share with the whole world.

>>18053312
If its illegal explain why the owners of myex dot com are still in business after all these years?

File: stell.jpg (44KB, 584x431px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 584x431px

>>18053294
I don't think there's anything more disgusting than plate sized nipples

>>18053336
because of the "in some states" part. Also, most of those revenge porn ex girlfriend sites are fake

>>18053070
I'm not a lawyer, but I'd imagine that would get thrown right the fuck out. Think about all the false rape claims that got kids kicked out of college, and nothing happens to those girls. Slander laws really don't ever get enforced.

>>18053338
Google Blue Waffle