>talking to girl >hitting it off pretty well >look at

>>18041189
Why ask if it's weird or not? It's your feelings, own them. If you have an issue with it I'm unsure it can be "rationalized away". I mean if it's turning you off too much then move on to another girl. I don't really see what your issue is, honestly.

>>18041217
I guess my issue would be hypersexuality and wanting a girl who worships the D just as I worship only the vagina. I think it has to do with not something I'm not able to provide, maybe.

chances are she doesn't give a shit because she's a lesbian. People don't post that many pictures of things just because.

If you think you have a chance this is your moment to realize that you didn't have a shot from the beginning, despite you thinking you were hitting it off, she was most likely being nice.

chances are she's not even interested to you in the first place, go find someone else.

>>18041223
We met on a dating app. I just asked her and she said she doesn't like women somehow. But there are pictures of women masturbating, gifs, lesbians, bare asses, etc.

Feels like a ruse t b h.

>>18041227
She could be bisexual but feel some level of shame or guilt that she likes such things. When it comes to her "regular" posts of those things then maybe it's just something she let slip. You don't have to leave if you think it's a ruse. I mean, if you have doubts you can enter this whole thing with that in your mind -- so if something DID turn out to be that way then you wouldn't be surprised and you'd just not give a shit.

>>18041236
Problem is, my experiences with bisexual women have been the worst ones of my entire life, I don't like to date them ever anymore. This is why I'm torn. I will take the advice on owning up to my feelings though, thanks.

>>18041249
No worries. I get that you're cautious about entering something when the person you are encountering is a certain type. I mean, what we like and dislike are parts of our individual lives that affect our lifestyles. I don't think it's irrational to be torn on this. You could always give it a try and if you feel that things aren't going well or you hint that things will be "downhill", then explain yourself and leave. That is, if you feel that you have the time and interest to do such a thing.

>>18041260
Explaining yourself is the horror part for me, who would understand this in the modern world?

>Sorry, I don't like bi chicks.

>>18041284
Screw what others think, man. It's your preference. You're allowed to have it. No matter how strict things seem right now it's still a free world and you are entitled to your own thoughts and opinions. I get the comedy in what you're saying but yeah, you should just say you don't like bi-chicks. Or you could just do the vague thing and say "I thought you were my type but as we've grown to know each other I have realized that I can't be with you".

That is a hard thing to say, maybe you should just give her the ol' silent treatment. Seems to be popular these days, lol.

Porn tendencies don't necessarily reflect real life tendencies. I watch a lot of nasty hardcore porn, but that's just to get off fast and when I'm not really in the mood. A woman would be making a mistake to judge me by that, imo, because I am actually pretty tender and generous in bed.

I'd be turned off too. If you pursue her, she'll probs cheat on you with a girl and call you sexist and mysoginistic for not being ok with it

>>18041311
Yep, and all the pictures of guys she liked there feature very skinny, feminine men.

The flags couldn't be redder.

>>18041189
Are you positive her tumblr link is up to date and hasn't been hacked by bots? I had that happen with my twitter account, though it got used to hawk merchandise, not porn. Still, I have tons of pornbots following me on tumblr even though I don't post porn.

File: 1394410775751.gif (983KB, 250x197px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 250x197px

>>18041189

>Is it weird to be turned off by this?

Doesn't matter. If you don't like it you don't like it. Arguing about whether or not its weird won't change anything. I personally wouldn't care but whatevs. Different folks I guess.

>For me it's just like a woman finding out some dude is really into bareback gay porn.

For the record, a guy being into bareback gay porn is nowhere near equivalent to a woman being attracted to other women.

>I know 99% of women would be grossed out by that.

That figure you're throwing out there is crazy inaccurate. 99% of women find lesbianism gross? Absolutely not. Not even close.

For what it's worth, lesbian porn is among the very most watched genres for women, if not #1. The reason is not that they're all into pussy in real life, but that it's typically depicted/shot in a softer manner and focuses more on kissing, cunnilingus etc than real porn.

If you're a woman who gets off on being fingered or getting eaten out in a big way, watching standard straight porn just gives you the whole "aggressive mouthfucking while she moans like she's getting railed -> angry humping sex without significant foreplay in visual positions that don't feel particularly good, over the top fake dirty talk and moaning -> a cumshot on her face or body" and is hardly satisfying. Yeah you can try to become an expert in finding the good less standard stuff (that still typically does not focus on the woman in any way) but it's easier to just hop over to lesbian porn and see women do things to each other that you would actually like to have done to you.

File: 1397606604615.gif (2MB, 265x257px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 265x257px

>>18041311

>If you pursue her, she'll probs cheat on you with a girl and call you sexist and mysoginistic for not being ok with it

>>>/r9k/

>>18041352
99% of straight women wouldn't a man who is VERY into gay porn is "man enough."

>>18041352
>different strokes for different folks! Everyone can make sense and be correct!
No. Stop thinking like this forever. Thats thought cancer, a really detrimental meme.

>>18041353
I agree with this

File: 1392790884996.gif (472KB, 245x184px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 245x184px

>>18041356

99% of straight women are straight. I understand that but you didn't say 99% of straight women think lesbianism are gross, you said 99% of women. Your 99% figure is, again, wildly inaccurate. You're just kind of regurgitating /r9k/ propaganda without really knowing what you're talking about. Women are no where near as hung up on raw masculinity as men are, especially adult women.

>>18041359

>No. Stop thinking like this forever. Thats thought cancer, a really detrimental meme.

And this is the problem with kids in this generation, that for some reason EVERYTHING has to be categorized into right and wrong, like its not okay for people to have varying opinions and preferences because one side always has to be the correct side. Thats bullshit, dude. The real cancer is people like you who insist that everyone has to think and feel the same exact way you do or else they're wrong.

He doesn't like bi-girls. I find it sexy. Thats completely okay. Neither of us are right or wrong.

You can take your oversimplified metric and stick it up your ass. Life isn't black and white. If you really can't live your life without trying to quantify everything into right vs. wrong just to feel validated in your opinions you need to go to therapy, not come here and try to pawn off your toxic horse shit as advice.

>>18041385
I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT STRAIGHT WOMEN AND LESBIANISM, YOU MORON

I AM TALKING ABOUT

STRAIGHT WOMEN

DISCOVERING THEIR PARTNER, A MALE

IS INTO GAY PORN

GUY ON GUY BUTTFUCKING

GUY ON GUY CUM GUZZLING

GAY

FUCKING

PORN

>>18041352
>>18041385
He didn't say 99% of women think lesbianism is gross you illiterate fucking autist. He said that 99% of women think that a dude watching guy on guy gay porn is gross.

>>18041393
Yes, exactly. And I've had actual conversations about this. I use Tinder just for shits and giggles and the amount of "I make out with hundreds of girls but I'm straight heheee" women is through the roof there, and I've had several conversations regarding this double standard.

A lot of women have said to me they'd think a guy is not "manly" if he enjoyed taking it up the ass from another man. It destroys the image of a "man" for many.

>>18041390

>I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT STRAIGHT WOMEN AND LESBIANISM, YOU MORON

Then your words should reflect the point you're trying to make. Try slowing the fuck down and communicating your ideas in a sensical manner. When you word sentences like you're retarded I'm going to treat you like you're retarded.

Take your pinky off the shift key and use your big boy words.

>STRAIGHT WOMEN DISCOVERING THEIR PARTNER, A MALE IS INTO GAY PORN

That 99% figure you keep using is horse shit. Female sexuality is a lot more fluid than male. Not to mention that if they "discover" their partner is into gay porn they'd probably be more upset at the fact that it was hidden from them than the fact that he likes to watch men fuck.

News flash: women aren't as insanely grossed out by male homosexuality as you are. I've been 2 or 3 "straight" girls who were into the idea of seeing me with another guy. I think you're projecting your personal reaction to male homosexuality onto women. I can promise you your 99% figure isn't anywhere near accurate.

>>18041406
You also said you liked bissexuals, so it stands to reason that the people you were with were more like you, degenerates. I'm kidding. But more sexually open and into these kinks. So you should know your own experiences don't matter much in this case.

>>18041385
no one thing is deemed right, you're correct

but many things can be deemed wrong, incorrect

I'm not cancer for liking philosophy and phrsuing better understanding.

Here's a little philosophy 101: if OP's current beliefs and actions don't reflect his core beliefs and values then he's "wrong" in a sense

Didn't read your life rant or smartass reacts, dumbass

>>18041410

>So you should know your own experiences don't matter much in this case.

My own experience matters enough to know that the statement "99% of women are turned off by a bisexual man" is a crock of shit.

>>18041412

>I didn't read your post
>I'm going to respond anyway

Nice. I'm sure you got excellent grades in English class.

>I'm not cancer for liking philosophy and phrsuing better understanding.

No, but you are cancer for trying to boil down life into a right vs. wrong metric when the only benchmark you have to grade it on is your own personal sense of morality. He isn't wrong for not liking bi girls any more than I am right for liking them.

>Here's a little philosophy 101: if OP's current beliefs and actions don't reflect his core beliefs and values then he's "wrong" in a sense

That sentence makes no sense nor does it have anything to do with what I was talking about. I think perhaps maybe actually reading the thing you were responding to might of helped in your rebuttal, Mr. Philosopher.

>>18041249
don't rule out all bisexual women; if you're drawing in ones that make you miserable, chances are it's because you're both similar personality wise. That's why most people date in the first place, because they're compatible.

Learn to find people outside your comfort zone and learn to listen to the warning signs before getting into a relationship with someone, bisexual or not.

>>18041423
God you're one of those narcissistic cancerous people who spouts bullshit (untruths that are not intentional lies) to look smart.

That explains why instead of trying to find useful content in my post you just criticize the english (on 4chan) and don't make any attempt to understand what im saying. (Its clear from ur response that u rarely ponder anything but your own thoughts)

Conclusion: get hurt, do acid to change your ego

Learn some sort of lesson, pleb

Bye, cancer posing as a wise man on 4chan

Youve impressed everyone and helped op immensely

>>18041434
PS

Look my point is anyone who says "everyone is right" is spouting good old bullshit

Every honest man knows that, even aub retarded iq

>>18041434
>>18041437
And how a convo quickly becomes about you and ppls interactions rather than the subject or OP

Suicide

>>18041424
I understand that, I'm just overly cautious because I've had experience with two types of behaviour EVERY TIME I've got with one:

1) They're very, very promiscuous, with an enormous number of partners and hypersexual. I wouldn't judge this if I was the same, but I'm the opposite, and this makes me uncomfortable.

2) They hide this fact about them until you start dating, THEN tell you they're bisexual and promiscuous and etc. And many of these girls see being with another girl as "just fun" that "doesn't even count."

This is just what I lived tho, so I'd rather avoid.

File: 1437100512917.gif (2MB, 390x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x285px

>>18041434

Says the guy who just typed several sentences not responding to any of the points I made but just rambled about how terrible I am.

>That explains why instead of trying to find useful content in my post

There was no useful content. It was all badly worded horse shit. You even bragged about how you didn't even read the post you were responding to and now you're coming back and trying to criticize me for not utilizing the "useful content' in your post?

Thats tantamount to sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "LALALA" when ever someone says something you don't want to hear.

Conclusion; you acted like a child, condescended, insulted, and provided absolutely no intelligent discourse for me to work off of and then got all butt hurt when I didn't take you seriously.

If you wanna get treated like a big boy start acting like one.

>>18041449
If you say so, narcissist
keep those reacts coming

reminder: this feirce fight is coming from a man who said "everyone can be right in their own way" and yet calls people cancer

Narcissism is really confusing and disgusting. I hope your real life persona is different (it usually is)

>>18041437

>Look my point is anyone who says "everyone is right" is spouting good old bullshit

I never said "everyone is right". Thats just another shining example of your inability to utilize basic reading and comprehension.

My entire premise was that OP shouldn't feel weird for not liking bi-girls. So often the people on this site fight their natural instincts and urges for fear that their behavior isn't normal enough, which I think is inherently damaging.

Your point is logically dubious and sophomorically plastered without any sense of context. I don't like that this conversation wandered away from OP's predicament but if you're going to try to strawman my advice at least make an attempt to word it correctly.

>>18041458
I'm saying maybe op is wrong (going against his own cores beliefs and values) for turning a girl away over some sexy porn.

You're saying "He can't help it. All feelings are quite valid" but that is untrue.

Whats the more extreme version of op, someone who turns away a girl for watching porn at all?

Op is mistaken most likely

File: 1396339560135.gif (629KB, 295x221px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 295x221px

>>18041453

Yeah, I'm done. You're not even making an attempt to employ logic at this point. No point in engaging with someone only capable of name calling.

>>18041464
>>18041465

>>18041464

>You're saying "He can't help it. All feelings are quite valid" but that is untrue.

That's not what I'm saying at all. You're just employing strawman after strawman and giving yourself a pat on the back for knocking them down without actually addressing the things I'm saying.

Again, I'm out. I can't debate with someone who isn't capable of properly interpreting the information I'm providing in the language I'm providing it in. If English is your second language I commend you for keeping up this much but we're just not on the same sheet of music here.

>>18041464
>>18041467
Although this may not be about porn taste so much as *homophobia* or innocent misconceptions about bisexuality

>>18041477
>*homophobia*

Took waaaaay too long to throw that word around. I actually had none of these ideas and concepts BEFORE going out with and befriending bichicks, so it'd actually be the contrary. Also, I've compromised on this before and it only made the experience more miserable. I'd never do it again.

>>18041472
Ok. I just read more of your posts and didn't find them primo. I don't think that 99% of women are 'straight' and I don't think homophobia is right because "we are all emtitled to our opinions"

opinions need to be founded in more than petty disgust and fear and op needs to grow up

>>18041483
Sorry? Can you reword?

>>18041489
No!

>>18041492
Are you the guy I argued with? Sorry for being mean.

>>18041492
>>18041492
The mean intensity is just witchunting. Im just a miserable guy. Its not ur fault.

>>18041496
I'm OP, I was explaining myself regarding dating bichicks and where my reservations came from. Now re-read, it should be understandable.

>>18041504
I feel you.

The actual numbers on sexual orientation are not in, and I assume that bisexually could correlate with some more negative traits, or at least an inability to be more monogamous

>>18041504
>>18041518
The truth is you are concerned with promoscuity, not sexual orientation. Forget about any correlation and look at the statstics showing *promoscuity* as detrimental to monogamy.

And you get promiscuous ppl on tinder because ot implies impatience in looking for sexual partners

>>18041521
Gayness often correlates with promiscuity, but it is important not to confuse things into homophobia.

Its nihilistic, antisocial anti-monogamy you dislike

>>18041525
Aka cheating