why are women cucks?

Why settle for a loser when you can fuck the best?

>>17896715
So being a side hoe is worth it to fuck the alphas for women?

Beta kek will take care of her once she gets old ugly and won't be fucked by alpha anymore. It's win-win.

>One male can impregnate multiple females
>One female can't be impregnated by multiple males
>Females are about quality
>Males are about quantity
>reproduction 101
/thread

>>17896711
Polygamous relationships exist because one male can provide for multiple female and their offspring.
It's better to be married to a rich man who is married to other woman and can provide for you and your kids well well instead of being married to a normal man that can barely provide for himself, in practical terms.
No normal man has a harem.

>>17896711
I wish your version of reality applies to most women, no, even to only a significant portion of women would be nice, too.

>>17896745
so because of this, women are able to emotionally cope with the fact that they will be side hoes

>>17896752
so women are incapable of true love, is what your saying?

That relationships are just another economic decision that a woman will make in her life

ITT: Beta neckbeards discuss aspects of female psychology that are patently false, and in doing so, succeed only to prove how pathetic their understanding of the sex is as a whole.

>>17896792
>implying you can't love more than one woman
>implying you can't love more than one children
>implying you can't love more than one relative

Love isn't a zero sum game y'know?

>>17896815
Okay? But no self respecting man is ganna say "you can love more than one man xD", so why is it okay for women

>>17896822
>no self respecting man is ganna say "you can love more than one man xD"
Speak for yourself.

>>17896798
They are capable of love. In societies where women well-being completely depends on the person she is married to because she makes no money of her own, it is reasonable to pick a wealthy husband you're not interested in.

>>17896711
How many hours do you spend a day stuck at your computer or glued to your phone instead of interacting with people?

>>17896799
kek. Yup

>>17896822
See >>17896745

It exists though, just not in the same amount of women

...or it depends where you look, go to /b/ check how many cucks are there

>>17896829
>implying self respecting men allow themselves to be cucked, by definition

>>17896832
but this is the west, where women are overtaking men in the work force...

My point is, that women would rather share Chad with multiple other women than ever have sex with a beta

But a man would never (normally) share Stacy with other men.

>but muh pregnancy!

Let's assume birth control here in both situations. The same scenario still applies

>>17896879
Which is why we don't have polygamous relationships and harems if not in very secluded communities.

>>17896882
If it is sex just for the sake of sex, I'd rather fuck an attractive dude than a mediocre-looking guy even if I'm not the only one who he is fucking.
If it is for a relationship... I honestly rarely see a woman being fine with a guy fucking someone else while dating her.

>>17896891
>rarely

still exponentially higher than men being okay with their girl fucking other men

>>17896900
I literally never saw it happening unless in some middle aged couples - the classical "housewife, provider" scenario. You live with it because financially you'd be screwed up if you left, and you have nothing to offer in the job market. Or for kids.

I dont actually have advice for you OP. So maybe I shouldn't be posting at all. But since I got married (I am in my mid thirties), I have had all kinds of females hitting on me non stop. I can't even do my job without an occasional VERY STRONG attempt at hitting me. And this is from those that know I am married.

I get young girls rubbing their fucking boobies on me.

How am I supposed to handle this? No one warned me about this shit.

>this is awesome, what are you complaining about?

True,it is awesome. But what if you want to have a family, a sound,steady life?

What if you are tired of the chaos, but your 19 year-old neighbor insists on rubbing her tits on you """accidentally"""

all of my life I thought it was men that were pervs. I learned a real lesson, females are more perverted, secretive, and horny than I ever thought.

Yes guess what this isn't really advice. This is more about accepting reality.

If you don't accept reality, it's more painful.

>>17896927
What do you do btw

also do tell more stories of booby rubbing

>>17896927
All of those females that fail in hitting on me, are successful in hitting on other men like me, I guarantee it.

There are literally hundreds of thousands, (millions?), of women who love to go after 'taken' men.

There is nothing we can do about it, it might be genetic? But let me tell you, getting married means getting hit on. Aging to thirty means getting hit on. Combine them and you are drowning. I fantasize about all the girls that give me attention, don't get me wrong. But when you look at it as a whole, I begin to realize how many girls I liked when I was twenty were actually flirting with the 30+ year olds in the neighborhood.

I feel wierd just thinking about it.

>>17896965
Well 4chan has my IP and age, I don't think it's wise to give my profession, I will be identified.

I have had booby and ass rubbing since I got married by a factor of 100 times.

I sometimes wonder if they do because they know it might not go anywhere? So they feel more comfortable?

Anyway, the biggest lesson is the raw horniness of females.

When you look at a girl and think perverted thoughts, she is doing the same god dam thing. So many men don't realize (but eventually they do)

File: us irl.jpg (51KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x600px

>>17896711
>The genetic evidence for the evolution of monogamy in humans is more complex but much easier to interpret. While female effective population size (the number of individuals successfully producing offspring thus contributing to the gene pool), as indicated by mitochondrial-DNA evidence, increased around the time of human (not hominid) expansion out of Africa about 80,000–100,000 years ago, male effective population size, as indicated by Y-chromosome evidence, did not increase until the advent of agriculture 18,000 years ago. This means that before 18,000 years ago, many females would be reproducing with the same few males.[36]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogamy

Now obviously 18,000 years is quite a bit of time and humans have a tendency to exhibit "unnatural" behavioral patterns, but at least in the past humans operated in what were essentially harems.

As fun as it would be, I have yet to meet someone that could compete with my girlfriend long term. Plus, the satisfaction I get knowing that we've been exclusive for over 8 years is just worth it. It's nice to have a partner throughout your life.

>>17896711
Because when a man cheats the woman has no risk of paying child support. Fucking obviously.

A chick cheats and you raise another mans kid. A man cheats? No fucking risk at all for the female. In fact women prefer men that other women want.

because theyre not getting cucked, theyre getting exactly what they want. optimal naive female reproductive strategy is to get knocked up by chad and then socialise child care, which in todays world is very possible. in the past, successful civilisations have forced 1-1 relationships (which actually produces the best child raising environment, and more importantly doesnt leave you with a massive amount of males with no purpose and a lot of pent up energy), but as above we dont do that anymore, in the west at least

men and women are different, thats all

>>17897034
I am the other older guy in this thread.

what you said here

> This means that before 18,000 years ago, many females would be reproducing with the same few males

It makes me think there is a real genetic component to this behavior.

It is interesting that in your own life you mention your girlfriend. Watch what happens when you marry her (if you marry her).

The change is astounding. You seem like a learned person who might appreciate watching where theory meats reality.

>>17897040
> knocked up by chad

but getting someone else to pay for it.

Interesting theory.

>>17897049
yes, it makes sense. since Chad has superior genes but won't stick around

this way she can have dank genes and still have someone to support the babies. it's a win-win

So what does this mean for me, the average male?

>>17897046
I'm sure there's at least some genetic component in most humans, but generalizing humans should always be taken with a grain of salt.

I don't see marriage being to much of an issue since
1) we've been together for i continuous years
2) I see marriage as a sign of indefinite monogamy. It's the ultimate gift you could give to a person so I would never give that unless there was no doubt in my mind it would be received with that understanding.

I guess my point is that, surprise surprise, humans are all different. While there could be a majority that are not monogamous many still are. I think people just take it lightly (marriage and monogamy) nowadays because people have forgotten that it's meant to be a good thing.

>>17897060
1. dont waste time chasing girls who are after chad, because you only get them after theyre all used up and strung out (worthless)

2. yes there are plenty of women who do go for men in their league

3. go for them instead, just be aggressive about it. this makes you seem chaddish and also puts you leagues ahead of all the spastics like your current self, opining on the internet that girls dun like me :'''(

if youre a 6, go for a 6 or lower and youll probably win

>>17897085
what do you mean by be aggressive

like persistent?

I'd like to think I'm higher than a 6. Looks-wise I may be an 8 if I dress up (women say I have an attractive face). Problem is I'm shy as fuck and don't really have any cool normie skills like dancing or photography or whatever

>>17897060
>>17897085
>dont waste time chasing girls who are after chad,

This is the best fucking advice that comes out of this thread. People who are forced motivated by genetics are much less interesting than people who contemplate their choices, and even talk about them with others.

>dont waste time chasing girls who are after chad,

bears repeating

>>17897101
You might be worrying too much. Everyone gets laid. People fuck, and children are born. Millions of years.

You worry about how worthy you are to a potential mate. But in reality there is only a very small chance of you NOT finding a mate. Not only that, but your potential mates are thinking (and worrying) about the same things you are.

Relax bro.

Enjoy.

>>17897101
no not persistent, just upfront and 'invasive' if that makes sense. when you meet a girl you like, make an impression. dont fuck around talking about gay shit that everyone else talks about, be exceptional. touch her, express your sexuality to her, show her you are interested (this is the fabled 'confidence' people on here meme about), when you do this most girls will show you back in some way, then you go from there. if shes not interested, fine, finish up the convo and move on to the next one. ofc you have to be more than just sexual in a lot of cases, so get interesting or smart or funny or whatever as well

for example i was talking to a girl in a bar last week and through the conversation she mentioned how in her job people would confuse her for a dude cos of the dumpy clothing and hat etc. so at that point i say 'hmm i cant imagine that, let me check' and then grabbed her hand, held it above her head and twirled her around, pointedly looking her up and down. she found this both funny and alluring, because i expressed my interest in her in a unique and explicit way. ofc if she wasnt into me she probably would have been pretty mad, but thats part of the game, know when to hold em and all that

the point is, i rode out. thats all you have to do, just keep going after as many girls as you can and eventually youll get one you really enjoy

>>17897102
ye, i would generalise it even further by saying 'dont waste time chasing girls who arent interested in you', which seems like common sense but lots of dummies dont get it for some reason

>>17897112
this is true, but if you dont apply yourself youll end up with some fatshit cumdump or something, which you dont want really

>>17896711
If a man can provide for all wives and gfs, and you don't really love him, I don't see why not. I wouldn't mind be a concumbine were I ensured to have a comfortable life.
Men are kind of retarded for not sharing women though. If you don't love her, what's the difference? Sometimes I think man buy the whole love myth way more often than women.

>>17897141
>I wouldn't mind be a concumbine were I ensured to have a comfortable life.

this fascinates me to no end. Where are you from, no American woman would say that.

What about your horniness and sex? What about emotional fufillment?

I Guess here if you just go apply for welfare the government will give you money, so you don't need a man to have a "comfortable" life.

I wonder how your ideas would change.

>Men are kind of retarded for not sharing women though.

This happened until the '60s, after then you could no longer talk about sharing women without an extreme reaction from your dinner party

>>17896711
>Why are women on average more willing to share a guy with other women than men are willing to share a woman with other men?
Because several women can be pregnant from the same man, but the inverse is impossible

>>17896798
You do realize that marrying for love is a relatively new concept, right? Marriage used to be a much more practical matter.