What would you do if you gf lied about partner count

>>17829999

your fucking digits are insane, brah

sleeping with people isn't shameful, lying is

There's no such thing as an unacceptable number of people to sleep with. It has no impact on anything.

A lot of women lie about that shit anyways. What matters more is the type of woman you have.

Haha sucks to be you bro.

You aren't suppose to ask, care, or worry about that you moron, but hey go ahead and keep being a jealous insecure bitch.

>>17830012
>What matters more is the type of woman you have.
A lying slut?

>>17830030
This

>>17830030
I know right. Why care if the person you are with used to molest little kids. You aren't suppose to ask, care, or worry about that you moron. Don't be a jealous insecure bitch you didnt get a chance to rape little kids.

>>17830008
Well I mean, it sounds nice, but I'm sure you don't believe that.

It's not that we can't handle the fact that our girlfriend's have had sex in the past, it's the way they approach sex. If a girl had two boyfriends in the past and had sex, whatever. But if she had sex with everybody from your High School, it'd bug you. It is basically a numerical scale that determines how "slutty" a woman is.

It's hard to respect a woman who has stooped to being the personal cum dumpster of random men.

>>17830008
I the same way you can say cheating on someone has no impact on anything. Its all really up to the person who you are in the relationship with. I know I would care a lot.

>>17830056
The difference is that having sex with consenting adult men is legal, and withholding that information wouldn't make her a criminal.

>>17830058

everyone from my high school? lol. the girls who get around sleep with thousands of guys. and you would never know

as long as she keeps is clean and keeps it tight, literally what difference does it make to you? life is long

>>17830005
If sleeping with people wasn't shameful, why would anyone lie about it?

>>17830089
Depends on the country. Its all in the eyes of the beholder.
Telling a person what they shouldn't care about is ridiculous. You can apply it to anything you want to hide.

>>17830095
I would like to be with someone capable of having loving intimacy.

Probably the wrong thread to post this in, but I'm a woman who has slept with 60 men. I found this out by joking with a friend that I lost count of them, and she responded with "you slut!" (in the girly, nice friend way.) So I had to think hard and write them all down. I lost my virginity at 16, waited to fuck again until I was 18, and have been in 8 relationships in the last 6 years. (I just turned 24.) I've never had a relationship last more than 6 months- most have been around 3 months, and otherwise I've used tinder and met men at bars to have one night stands. I always have safe sex, I get tested once a month, I've never had an STD, and my vagina is still tight. I don't even feel like I'm "damaged" or that anything is wrong with this behavior, but seeing men talk this way makes me think there is something wrong with me. So please, what is wrong with this?

>>17830099

is farting shameful? no, we all do it. would you want to fart loudly in front of a girl you just met? no. do the fucking math

>>17830008
Taught yourself to believe that huh?
Speak for yourself, it can explain a lot about a persons character and will.

>>17830030
Haha yeah! Who cares about their past, it's not like the past has any meaning or reflection of what you might get out of that persons personality or trait. My gf sucked 30 cocks and I'm so proud of bae.

>>17830130
>is farting shameful?
You damn right it is. Get a better diet. I dont fart. But Im a vegetarian so maybe thats why.

>>17830130
This is one of the dumbest attempts at a comparison Ive seen in a while. Doing things in private is not the same as lying about them. You lie about the things you are ashamed of.

>>17830114

so if you went and slept with 100 girls would it mean you were incapable of intimacy? sometimes sleeping around is just a phase, it happens to a lot of girls and guys who all of a sudden find themselves able to get laid at a moment's notice.

>>17830123
only religious people, neckbeard virgins, and betas care. you're a fucking human being with needs. if you keep it clean, and keep it tight, you're fine.

contrary to popular belief women feel zero pleasure during sex

the only reason they do it is because they're hard wired to want babies and to control men

that's why they're so stupid too

dum bitches

>>17830153
>so if you went and slept with 100 girls would it mean you were incapable of intimacy?
Yes. Any intimacy in the form of sex is tarnished. Thats not the type of relationship I want. Id never want to have something as superficial as that. Im sure that phase was worth it to you though.

File: 1477971119394.png (280KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 500x380px

>>17830123
You don't value sex as something intimate and important. This means that the relationship between you and a future spouse can never run deeper than a one night stand. It also makes me look at you as if you are something to be used for pleasure and not a real person with values worthy of respect. You are in my eyes the same as a prostitute, just that you do it willingly and dont get paid. The same dirtiness and lack of self respect is still there. In the end you will probably end up alone.

>>17830139
People don't seem to understand that their actions reflect who you are.

>>17830168

youre a fucking loser virgin who has no perspective. get the FUCK over yourself. stop trying to rationalize the shitty life you've made for yourself. it confers no advantages

File: 1478808233332.jpg (330KB, 1216x1538px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1216x1538px

>>17830201
>it confers no advantages
Im sure you actually believe this.

>>17830123
I think's it's gross that someone with multiple partners actually liked (or had sex with) someone that isn't me and/or someone I don't like.
I don't think it's a deal breaker, but would make someone more lackluster to me; but also, I would never ask because mentioning it would make it seem like it really does matter.

>>17830192
Thank god, someone with reason.

>>17829999
Look. It's natural to feel uncertain. But in nature, if a woman was to sleep around often she would gain distrust from the opposite sex in a particularly close-knit community of old. She would be considerably unable to find the right mate to settle down and raise children with. It is a males natural instinct to be sexually outgoing and want to copulate as much as possible. It is a womans instinct to be conservative with their body and choose the correct and best male to share genes with.

Ignore sympathizers.
Do you really think you can have share some sort of true harmonious convergence with someone who is dishonest or unwilling to wait?
You didn't hesitate to list the amount of partners you had, neither should she if she is for you.

>>17829999

I'd consider your attitude an irrational response.

>>17830217

>durr hurr christian propoganda from the 20th century

get real, idiot, we live in the modern world where people have fast fun sex with no consequences

My number one policy as a man: I don't ask a woman I'm into about her past number of fucks! I don't want her asking me about certain things either. The past is the fucking past. Much of it many of us are not proud about. Don't ask, don't tell. Your with her, not her past. Grow the fuck up.

>>17830267
>statistics don't matter
Sure thing.

>>17830276
>The past is the fucking past
I know right. Im definitely not proud of the kids Ive molested. Please dont ask. I dont want to tell.

File: 1470796797445.jpg (3MB, 5100x3300px)

3MB, 5100x3300px

>>17830099
because social constructs imposed by religion make people think it is

I mean, okay, if a girl fucked some crazy number like everyone in town, in the 100s, I probably wouldn't like her, but not necessarily because of the number itself, but because of what that implies, that she doesn't have respect for herself and her pussy is not in demand and is very high in supply, and therefore of lower value. Kind of like how girls dont want a guy thats too easy, and high in "supply", but would rather have the guy thats a little bit of a challenge, the hot guy that every girl wants, the one that she actually has to put some sort of effort into fucking. This is why if the first thing you say to a girl is: "hi let's fuck" it will pretty much never work, and then why if you play it like a game of poker, keeping her guessing, your odds are much better.

That being said, if it's a more realistic number like >>17830123
it doesn't matter much imo, women love sex almost as much as men, and it's much easier to get laid for them. Half of you pathetic beta virgins dont realize if you were women yourselves you'd probably be huge "sluts". Sex feels good, and it doesn't need to be special for everyone, every time. And someones value as a person doesn't necessarily always correlate to their sex count

>>17830322
>because social constructs imposed by religion make people think it is
Keep telling yourself thats why people don't like sluts.

>>17830285

as a statistician I know just how easily these things are manipulated. you are nothing more than a sheep, eating the pre-processed "knowledge" that your overlords graciously provide to you. fucking animal.

>>17830327

YOU don't like "sluts" because you're a virgin with no self-confidence. rest of the world doesn't care.

>>17830322
>60
>more realistic number
say it ain't so, that's disgusting.

I'm a 23 year old male virgin (by choice)

Sex is somewhat of a sacrament to me. The most personal human connection to be shared. (I know, I know: pussy on a pedestal)

I'm waiting for the right girl (not necessarily marriage) I am not a temporal pleasure seeker, I'd like my sexual encounters to be more meaningful and awesome. It would bother me quite a bit if I fell in love with a woman and found out she had a high partner count. After all these years of trying to keep my sexuality tamed, it would almost seem like a waste. Sometimes I think about breaking, and just DOING it. I AM very sexual. I have (unreasonably?) high standards, and I'm unfortunately not currently in a life situation where I'm meeting new people, having many social experiences. Times like this kinda make me want to pursue temporary pleasure. It could be fun... but then what?

Anyways, if a girl lied to me about something so personal, I would have a serious issue with that. What else has she been dishonest about? Can she be trusted? That's a red flag. Not to mean that you can't work things out, quite possibly she is ashamed of a period in her life of low morals and insecurity. Who is she now though?

I dunno

>>17830179
^^This

>>17830355
>statistician
Sure thing. Deny the statistics all you want.

>>17830192
^^This

>>17830355
>rest of the world doesn't care.
Most of the world would behead a slut on sight. Im kind and merciful.

>>17830276
Don't expect to find anyone long term with that attitude. Communication.

>>17830383
Nice

>>17830383
I'm a virgin by choice too and I'd be creeped out by someone with such a complex about sex. I'm waiting for the right person but I don't have a fucking worldview based around it.

>>17829999
You should be mad she lied not that she fucked people. You have no right to get angry over a sexual history that has NOTHING to do with you.

I would break it off because she broke trust but to call them a slut is wrong

>>17829999
YOURE A FUCKING KEK

>>17830496
>You have no right to get angry over a sexual history that has NOTHING to do with you.
When you are in a relationship with someone everything has something to do with you.

Every time I visit /adv/, I leave feeling even more thankful for my boyfriend than I was before. Thanks /adv/.

>>17830355
It's not that we hate sluts. It's that we refuse to consider them as long term partners. Women are free to do the same thing with the men they choose as their partners. It's a good standard to live by.

>>17830525
Why is that?

I'm 23 and have had sex with two (2) men
Rate

>>17830538
Where they one night stands?

>>17830547
No, relationships, the first one lasted 1,5 years, the current one is 9 months

>>17830493

My worldview is certainly not based around sex, but let's be real, no matter how complex and evolved we think we may be, sex is LIFE literally. It's one of the biggest motivations behind everything. If you're waiting for the right person, I'm sure you have your reasons and paradigm behind it too.

>>17830557
you are fine. Just dont get over 5.

>>17830145
this.

the difference between privacy and secrecy is huge.

>>17830217
> moar STDs
duh
> other three stats
Correlation does not imply causation.

>>17830841
You dont need causation to predict the future. Only a trend.

>>17830817
people with things to hide often use privacy as an excuse

>>17829999

So you're here asking for advice about something that hasn't even happened yet and tacking on a 4chan buzzword onto it for relevance?

>>17830948
I don't think it's a bad idea to think about things happening before they do.

>>17830955

Lol.

>wahh what if i got cucked lads xD

I think the real question is how can you tell if they lied about it?

I used to think they were male trolls

But i'm seriously starting to believe there are many used up whores here giving bad advice and trying to excuse slut behaviour

If a woman has slept with many guys in a short span of time she is NOT a valuable woman.

>But what about guys who sleep with many women
I don't think that behaviour should be encouraged either, but for an average looking man to sleep with many women he needs to work hard and prove himself valuable through other means, whereas all a woman needs to get sex is say she wants sex. So, if a woman has sex with a lot of guys it clearly means she has issues, makes poor decisions, has trouble maintaining a relationship, and above all has bad judgement, otherwise she would not be sabotaging herself like this.
I don't treat women badly regardless of social standing because i was taught to be chivalrous, but i certainly do not treat a whore like i would a honourable woman, and it would be disrespectful of me to do so.

the bigger number
the better
i feel the need to outfuck all the other guys
i want to rail the slut harder than anyone else
i want her to choose me over all the other dicks
it helps that i have a big cock

>>17829999
It doesn't matter how many people they've slept with faggot.

It matters if their drug (420 is fine) and disease free (mainly stds)

Woah, its like a virgin convent in here

>>17829999
>feels uncontrollable rage at a completely hypothetical scenario

what you need to worry about is your obvious mental illness. you're terrified that people are out to get you or fuck you over. if your imagination is causing you to rage, you need to get fucking help

>>17831073
This.

File: whorelife.jpg (195KB, 780x927px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 780x927px

It's nice to assume a woman's sex count doesn't affect anything, but it does. Higher numbers indicate a higher likelihood of cheating and mental instability.

"Analyses using new cases of these disorders showed similar patterns. This study established a strong association between number of sex partners and later substance disorder, especially for women, which persisted beyond prior substance use and mental health problems more generally. The reasons for this association deserve investigation."

This is just one paper discussing the matter, there are many more. I don't care if women want to fuck the whole football team, more power to them. But when it comes down to a serious monogomous relationship, I'll choose the one who didn't bang 100 dudes to fill the "hole" (pun intended) in her life. You feminists and degenerates can all fuck off.

>>17831085
Forgot to link study, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400516

>>17830089
Is legality really going to be what dictates our values? In some countries the age of consent is only 14, so some guy perving on teenagers is entirely legal. Pretty sure most women would be extremely put off if they ever learned about that past of his, and no one here would fault them for that and for good reason.

>>17830276
Yeah, because if you don't want to be with somebody who has a video up of ten guys running a train on her then you clearly need to just grow the fuck up. It's not like your past could possibly have any affect on who you are as a person because clearly people exist in a fucking vacuum where their choices even a year ago don't matter, don't give any examples as to their nature, and shouldn't affect people's opinions on them nor should they face any consequences for any potentially morally reprehensible things they do. "Oh, your gf cheated on her last boyfriend? lol, grow the fuck up, the past is the past."

>>17829999
Im not reading the rest of your post only the subject....
DO NOT ASK AND DO NOT TELL. EVER.

>>17830056
>molest little kids
>had sex with someone who is not me

Totally equal in the eyes of teenager virgins. And Sharia law.

>>17831239
my past is none if your business. Who I molested has no impact on you.

>>17831007
Being this much of a cuck. I don't think about the guys before me. As long as the number is low it's fine.

>>17830008
I'm a femanon and I don't even agree with this.
I don't want some manwhore to be my husband.

>>17831073
Anon you should finish high school first. You can't read.

>>17831227
DO NOT ASK AND DO NOT TELL. EVER. Those kids have no impact on you.

I remember some article about women, how many men theyve have had sex with and how that can affect their offspring. It said something like a woman's body stores up all the dna from the men she has been with and when the woman finally has a child, the dna can actually go into the kid. Is this even real though?

>>17831989
Yeah it's true. Though the article is for fleas.

>>17830267
>get real, idiot, we live in the modern world where people have fast fun sex with no consequences (and then have to take medication for the rest of our lives bc we look like tree man when we break out)

>>17832393
Dont forget they are unhappy later in life. But consequences are a foreign concept.

>>17830168
quick question OP.
Do you watch and masturbate to pornography?

>>17831989
That's for flies faggot.
are humans flies? No
Do research.

>>17832449
It probably applies to all species.

>>17832443
Who doesn't watch and masturbate to pornography?

>>17829999
don't worry about anything after that get

>>17830089
>my values are determined by what I can legally get away with

>>17829999
>Im starting to feel second hand cuckdom from just thinking about it.

So thanks for writing one of the worst sentences ever written.

>>17829999
>I would say at best I would call her a slut and break up.
Irrational. What I consider reasonable is calling her a liar and breaking up.

>>17832833
How is that irrational? Anyone in the situation described in the OP would probably say that.

>>17832839
Emotional responses can be irrational even if most people would have the same. It is irrational because "slut" isn't a clearly defined thing, and even if you agree on a definition, it isn't really a slur - just something OP happens to personally dislike. Lying about it, however, is universally bad if she knew it was important to OP.

>>17830123
>I've never had a relationship last more than 6 months
And you likely never will. Don't be surprised that men who long longer relationships avoid you.

>>17832842
Slut is pretty clearly defined. Its like stating a fact.

>>17832846
Need I remind you of global rule number 2?

>>17832855
sure. Though Im sure its unrelated

>>17832533
if OP watchs porn how can he say that he holds sex in high regard and that its a sacrament? Thats what I never understand about these guys, they watch and masturbate porn yet they can say that sex should be a special act with only one person.
>>17832521
flies are not even mammals

>>17832876
Watching sex and having sex are completely different. I never understand people like you with this bad analogy.
I play shooting games. That doesnt mean I dont have the right to complain about people shooting each other.

>>17832844
Its hard for women to look into the future

>>17832876
Basic processes like this usually carry over.

>>17833259

Bullshit.
My SO tried to pull that study up with me when I was pregnant with my first because of how insecure he used to be. There is no way that past partners can influence the DNA of your child, if that were so paternity tests wouldn't be accurate, and females would become pregnant during periods of celibacy.
DNA comes from 23 chromosomes from the father and 23 from the mother, none from past partners.
The study on the flies was also speculation and wasn't proven to be fact.

File: 1464109910377.jpg (33KB, 314x353px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 314x353px

>>17829999

>>17833453
>There is no way that past partners can influence the DNA of your child
The study literally shows that it does.
>if that were so paternity tests wouldn't be accurate
They still would be. The child only needs to have your dna for it to be possible. Having your dna and someone elses wont effect the test showing positive.
>females would become pregnant during periods of celibacy.
Thats not how it works. The past males dna goes into the blood. You still need a males sperm to fertilize you.

>The study on the flies was also speculation and wasn't proven to be fact.
Except it was

>>17833456
Where have you seen this thread before? Im curious.

File: 1471192686029.jpg (18KB, 452x548px)

18KB, 452x548px

>>17833467

>The study literally shows that it does.

>Thats not how it works. The past males dna goes into the blood. You still need a males sperm to fertilize you.

What study? Do you care to share a link with the class?

Seeing as how you know just as much about genetics as a monkey knows about flying a helicopter it would be cool to have some sort of quantifiable scientific data to back up the slew of specific medical processes you are claiming.

>>17833475

This entire board is infested with them. You new here?

>>17833483
If you havent read the study you havent read the study.

>>17833487
Spend 4 hours a day here reading the threads. The boards not infested with them. I've never seen this thread before.

File: 1391148550144.gif (2MB, 250x220px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x220px

>>17833492

You are making the claim that when a man ejaculates inside of a woman the genetic information from his sperm is somehow permanently stored in her blood stream and then when an egg is fertilized that genetic information makes its way from the blood stream to the uterus and combines with the DNA of the sperm that fertilized the egg.

When I ask you to provide some kind of medical proof, reference or citation to prove that any of the information you are saying has a basis in quantifiable, scientific proof your response is "If you haven't read the study, you haven't read the study"?

Are you being for real right now?

>>17833508

Well, maybe you don't read so good. This "waaa waaa boo hoo my gf slept with guys and i want a pure virgin waifu" thread is copy pasta'd here literally a thousand times a fucking day. I don't know what board you've been reading for 4 hours a day but it sure aint this one.

>>17833509
Im not the anon who made the claim. Im the one who pointed out that it was for fleas>>17832014
You said you read the study so I corrected your interpretation. But apparently you didnt. Im not invested in it so have fun being wrong.

>>17833513
If there were true youd see a
>waaa waaa boo hoo my gf slept with guys and i want a pure virgin waifu
right now.
Those threads never exist.

>>17833483
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12373/full

Here is the study that this dude probably hasn't even read thoroughly.
There is no factual evidence stated in the article, it is all speculation. Stating this experiment as factual evidence is nowhere in the study.
The theory suggests that the flies born from the female with previous partners are larger than the father fly due to the first fly being larger than the father fly, but the study also acknowledges that this could be due to the female's genetics.
you may wonder how could this be due to the females genetics, ever think of family history?
My parents are tall, but I'm a short-ass, this is because my mother has short people on her side of the family.

>>17833514

>You said you read the study so I corrected your interpretation.

I've only made two posts in this entire thread. I've never once claimed I read the study.

This is the post I was responding to

>>17833467

this post, that blatantly implies that the study proves that past partners can influence the DNA of your child. If the poster would of mentioned that by "child" he meant "flea children" than we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

>>17833516

>Those threads never exist.

I suppose you and I share different definitions of the word "exist" then.

>>17833523
If you didnt read the study you didnt read the study. Im not about to explain it to you. But its not a flea specific mechanism. Thats where they found it first but it could extend to other lifeforms. The study was a few years back so I dont know if theyve progressed it.

>>17833530
>If you didnt read the study you didnt read the study.

Sounds like you didn't read the study either, considering that the experiment was done on flies, not fleas.

>>17833526
Im always here. They never exist. It would be easy to spot one if they did or find one in the archive but they don't.

>>17833534
You dont understand because you didnt read the study. Humans are never tested on. You extrapolate from similar processes.

>>17833547
I know that humans aren't tested on. If I 'didnt read the study' why was I able to provide a link to it that you could not? >>17833518

>>17833530

>Im not about to explain it to you

Yeah of course not, why would you possibly "explain" to me why there's proof for anything you're saying. Thats just silly, to make a claim and then provide proof for it. I apologize for expecting people to provide proof for their scientific claims. My bad.

>But its not a flea specific mechanism

Ok, then please state any scientific source at all that says this "mechanism" applies to other lifeforms.

>Thats where they found it first but it could extend to other lifeforms

Yeah, and my dick "could" grow 6 inches over night but without scientific proof to imply that my theory has merit then I'm kind of just making shit up, aren't I?

>The study was a few years back so I dont know if theyve progressed it.

So what I've gathered from your post is that the study you didn't read about fleas (because the study was actually about flies) COULD apply to other species but you don't know anything and you're pulling all of this information out of your ass because you haven't done any research at all to see if the study has progressed.

That sound about right?

>>17833547

Do you seriously not understand the concept that flies are biologically different from humans? Not to mention the fact that you keep harping on people for not reading the studies yet you have given us this gigantic wealth of blatantly incorrect information that proves that you, yourself, either didn't read the study or didn't understand the information it provided.

>>17833554
Reading and linking are not the same thing. You didnt read it. Im not going to argue about it when you didnt.

>>17833590
I have read it multiple times, especially last year when I was pregnant and my husband was as ignorant as you are right now.
I refuse to believe that you read the study, you do not want to argue about it because you know nothing about the subject.

>>17833602
Okay anon. Im not here to argue with people who don't read.

>>17833547
>Humans are never tested on.
Don't pull this shit. Flies aren't even mammals. They are so far from humans biologically that it's not even funny

>>17830123
Please never have children

>a persons past behavior is a poor indicator of their character and the way they will behave now
>promiscuous people are more likely to cheat
>having a problem with this in LTR makes you a loser

>>17830123
>So please, what is wrong with this?
>I've never had a relationship last more than 6 months
You answered your own question. If you've been in 8 relationships and none of them lasted past half a year, you are at least part of the problem. Something here has gone wrong and it would be a pretty fucking bad idea to start a relationship with someone with your track record. I'm not saying it's your partner count, which is the subject of this thread, that is the problem. But your anecdote is providing a correlation. Why are your relationships fucked? You answer. Is it partner count or something else?

>>17830179
>You don't value sex as something intimate and important.
This is all fine and dandy if you plan on abstaining yourself, but most men look down on women with a partner count like her and come up with arguments like this yet fuck all the women they can possibly get.

Everyone is allowed their dealbreakers and preferences, but in many cases it's not about valuing sex as something intimate (or not) but about pride and how you view that person. They think women with a high count are icky, or they feel less like a winner for getting with a girl who wasn't picky about who she slept with, they want to crack someone where they feel it's quite something that she slept with them to begin with.

I wouldn't lie about body count cause guys who get upset about that sort of thing tend to be really insecure, it helps weed them out early on. On the rare occasion I haven't cut and run from a guy who was unhappy with the number of people I've had sexy with, they've ended up being ridiculously controlling and petty. No thanks

>>17834655
>ugh i cant believe men care about the fact that i took literal miles of dick. so insecure :/

>>17834662
the fact that you immediately jump to the assumption of "miles of dick" is hilarious. I've talked to guys who get upset about girls having 2 or 3 past boyfriends. Some of them are, like I said, ridiculously petty over it. That's not going to make a healthy relationship.

>>17834703
It's obvious you've taken miles.

If she's willing to lie to you about partner count, think about what else she could be lying to you about. You have to decide if that's what you want from your relationship and act accordingly.

>>17830056
almost as bad as a food analogy

>>17835198
Are you judging my past?

>>17834655
>take miles of dick
>its the guys fault for being insecure
How do women come up with this.

>>17835166
>>17835233
The samefagging is strong with this one

>>17834662
>>17834703
>>17835166
>>17835233
When you think about the average woman has literally taken miles of dick.

>>17834628
>This is all fine and dandy if you plan on abstaining yourself, but most men look down on women with a partner count like her and come up with arguments like this yet fuck all the women they can possibly get.
No most men are abstaining as well.

>>17835266
Most men are not voluntarily abstaining.

>>17830095
THOUSANDS

>>17835283
>No most men are abstaining as well.
This meme. Ive only had sex with 1 girl who I was in love with and wouldnt have sex with another girl and unless I felt that strongly for her. As in strong enough to marry her.
I am certain the other men who feel the same way about women who have copious amounts of sex feel the same as I do. That sex is something special. You disagree that sex is special which is exactly why I don't want to be in a relationship with you. Well maybe you dont feel that way and are just playing devils advocate.

>>17835256
The next car I buy better have it's speed measured in dicks per hour instead

>>17829999
Shit the bed
Wipe my arse on her bedsheets
Leave

>>17835602
How can you even shit the bed.

>>17829999
break up

it is not weird, just desapear. leave her

File: 1477277481193.jpg (118KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 612x612px

dude you will never meet a girl that has had less then 30.
get over it or something.
girls are shit.

>>17836967

This fucking cancer of a thread was dead and you just had to revive it. You're the worst.

Sage.

>>17837003
Sage doesnt work anymore

>>17836984
>dude you will never meet a girl that has had less then 30.
Why do people think this scare tactic will work.

>>17837003
Bump

>>17829999

I'd be wary, because if she lies about something as simple as that, it's obvious she's lying about other things

>>17838333
You dick lol

>>17830058
What about if you had sex with every grill in your high school?

Holy fuck threads like these make me grateful that i'm not a woman and might have to deal with men like these.

>>17839514
If you were a woman you wouldnt have to deal with women being whores.

>>17839514
although I can say that these mentalities are good for weeding out guys who are insecure

>>17839769
>He doesn't want me
>he's just insecure
Woman are professionals at mental gymnastics

>>17839802

Firstly, that's mostly just terrible strawmanning You made that logical jump on your own, no one even came close to suggesting that any guy who isn't attractive to them is insecure.

Is it really that difficult for you to accept the concept that some guys aren't threatened or turned off by a girl who has slept with a couple of guys?

Some guys mind, some guys don't. Some guys are insecure, some have religious regions, some just really view sex as the most intimate act between a man and woman and some are just retarded /r9k/ warriors.

We're all different people with different values. Why does it always have to be right and wrong?

Yeah, some guys are insecure. Are you seriously so intent on fighting for yours side of the argument that you can't even admit that insecurity often plays a role in these kinds of situations?

>>17839814
Insecurity only plays a role in men who have slept with many women themselves. But women have done so many mental gymnastics that they believe that all guys are insecure for not wanting them. Im sure thats a comforting thought.
>Why does it always have to be right and wrong?
Aka dont judge me. Haha morals aren't relative.

File: fp.png (232KB, 630x342px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 630x342px

>>17839802
>Woman are professionals at mental gymnastics
We have to be. You men give us so many hoops that we have to jump through.

>>17829999
male/22/straight/virgin but thinking of settling for a loose girl i cant respect...

>>17829999
Grow up manchild.

>>17839873
Dont settle. When you feel like giving up, instead of taking one of the women you hate, become the man you hate. You'll be happier that way.

>>17839873
You're retarded

Don't want to the potential answer that she slep more men than you consider appropriate, then don't ask.

She's not with them now. What came before can;t come back now.

Truth be told my boyfriend is the only man I've ever slept with, but I had plenty ex boyfriends. I have no feelings for them now and don't see the point of talking about them or even thinking much of them now.

>>17839873
None are going to settle for you while you have that backward and retarded way of thinking. Fuck it amazes me how many guys pretend like they're virgins by choice and the women in their life should be as well.

>>17839886
>I can't fathom people respecting virginity
This is why no one wants you beyond your vagina.

>>17839885
>Dont want to know your SO molested kids in the past
>then don't ask
>They arent doing it now
>What came before can't come back now

>>17839891
I totally get people who are religious being retarded enough to think that being a virgin is something profound and important. However, everyone knows of that one guy who no one wanted to sleep with and then he pretended it was because he was "waiting for someone special" and wanted to wait for a virgin. Pretend all you like i don't care anon. I'm a guy but you implying that a chick who is sexually active is somehow useless really goes to show just how toxic your mindset is. I think you fit in nicely at /r9k/.

>>17839894
Jesus imagine being so warped that having a decent sex life is the same to you as molesting children, fucking insanity.

>>17839917
Nah its just you are so desperate you are pretending to not see the connection.

>>17839910
see>>17830217
Its cute you want to defend whores but they bring nothing buy misery to the world.

>>17839922
There is literally no connection, you trying to make one doesn't mean there is one. You could use murder or terrorism instead of child molesting, it's rubbish logic from a rubbish mind.
>>17839926
It's cute that you're the one that's miserable purely by your own means. These "whore" and the guys that fuck them mostly aren't miserable. Big concidence that is huh? That people who have a healthy outlook on sex aren't telling other people online that they cause misery or calling other people names. Might want to reflect on that anon.

>>17839845

>Insecurity only plays a role in men who have slept with many women themselves

What a stupid thing to say.

>Haha morals aren't relative.

What a stupid thing to say.

>But women have done so many mental gymnastics that they believe that all guys are insecure for not wanting them.

Your anecdotal ramblings are tiresome.

>>17839894

Yes, because sexually assaulting a child is equivalent to having consensual sex with a fellow adult.

>>17839922

There is absolutely no connection. That's why we're not seeing it.

>>17839935
>There is literally no connection
You are saying the past doesnt matter. But you are so blind to your whorish ways you cant see what you really want to say is the past doesnt matter when you dont want it to.
The past always matters. Thats the connection you are acting to dumb to see.

>>17839940
>Youre stupid
t. woman
My fucking sides. I didnt expect much from a woman but thats just outright hilarious.

>>17839940
You meant
>Yes, because doing thing I dont like is equivalent to doing thing I like

>>17839946
I'm a different anon to who you arguing with, you've only replied to two of my post. I'm also a male (interesting the amount of projection going on here). An adults past sexual history doesn't matter. If a chick i'm considering sleeping with has had consensual sex with other adult i just can't give a fuck. I believe she should be honest if i do ask (or decline to answer). As long as she doesn't have STDs i'm fine. Sex isn't some mysterious magical thing. It's sex. It can be intimate and fun but that's it. Go live in a disney fairy tale somewhere else.

>>17839935
>Statistic shows they are miserable
>THEY ARENT MISERABLE YOU ARE
kek

>>17839961
>An adults past history doesn't matter
I fixed it for you

>>17839963
>A page of cherry picked graphs means i'm right
>Not just anyone can make a page of these graphs
>Every sexually active female is in a marraige
Nothing on the internet is ever biased anon!
>>17839968
Sure thanks anon. I made it specific to try to prevent any more derailment.

>>17839974
You didnt make anything specific that wouldnt apply to anyone elses past actions. Let me help you out further.
>An adults past history doesn't matter. If a chick i'm considering sleeping with has molested kids i just can't give a fuck. I believe she should be honest if i do ask (or decline to answer). As long as she doesn't have STDs i'm fine. Molesting kids isn't some mysterious magical thing. It's molestation. It can be intimate and fun but that's it. Go live in a disney fairy tale somewhere else.

>>17839974
>A page of cherry picked graphs means i'm right
>Not just anyone can make a page of these graphs
>Every sexually active female is in a marraige
You heard it here first everyone. The CDC is just anyone on the internet. They dont regulate the medical community at all or set the standards in them. They are just people cherry picking on the internet. The most important group of people in regulating the medical community has an opinion that doesnt matter.
How fucking desperate are you btw?

>>17840004
CDC also tells people that herpes isn't a big deal and does not disclose it during std test unless you ask.

>>17839885
Why is it so hard for some people to respect the fact that your partner might care for things you find unimportant? Or are you gonna only going to get together with people who have the exact same view on every issue?

>>17839885
>Don't want to the potential answer that she slep more men than you consider appropriate
OP didn't say he didn't want the answer. OP wants the answer. He doesn't want to be lied to.

>What came before can;t come back now.
No, but what came before can affect what's happening now.

>all the butthurt femanon sluts ITT lashing out and calling everyone virgins

Lmao.
Face it, you're not as valuable as a woman who respects herself and guys will never see you as anything more than an easy whore to blow a load in.
You're not worth the time and effort that goes into a serious relationship.

>>17840354
>I don't care about giving someone a lifelong disease. Totally not important. at all.
You're clearly fucking delusional.

it not being on a standard std test says nothing about it's importance. It's tested differently. The standard test uses one method, the method that catches the vast majority of stds so it's the best one to get.

Doesn't find HIV either, that's a separate test as well you have to ask for.

Heard it right here. AIIIIDDDSSSSSS isn't a big deal.

>>17833259
>Basic processes like this usually carry over.

They kind of don't. Some species of animals can have sex once and store the sperm for decades and keep having kids from that single insemination.

Clearly, this is not the case with countless other species.

>>17829999
first of all, don't ask if you don't like the answer!
second - why does number count?
my bf slept with about 12 girls at least 4 i knew as friends before we got together
i've slept with about 40+ some my bf knew but though never someone he have been friends with.
we've been together for 3 years now in a happy loving relationship and neither of us gives a fuck about past sex partners, why should we?

>>17841574
Your Bf is a fucking cuck who settled for a low value woman like yourself.

>>17841574
Lmao, your bf is literally settling for other men's scraps and treating their cheap whore/cumdumpster like his princess
Kek

>>17841730
>>17841748

lol you don't know me, my story or reasons, i've never had a one night stand and well i might have been with many but at least i'm faithfull and trustworthy
because you aren't men enough to accept a privous sex life doesn't mean othet men are as scared like you.

>>17841787
>you need to MAN UP and take responsibility for my shitty life choices
>be grateful for my worn out pussy that tens of other men already had

Kek, you'll never be relationship material, you're forever destined to be fucktoy material in the eyes of any self-respecting man.
Your bf is fucking pathetic.

>>17841574
You don't have to care, but some people do, and you should respect that

>>17841787
Theres really not any acceptable reason to have a partner count over 10.

File: bad-idea.jpg (109KB, 400x333px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 400x333px

>>17829999
As far as my values go, I'd definitely not want a partner with the amount of men they've slept with goes way far over the amount of men they've had been in a relationship with. With that being said, I'd rather not date a girl with the amount of relationships she has had is over 15, while she may just be only 20 years old.

Along with my idea I just gave, I have a few exceptions. I wouldn't call what I said previously as a 'rule', as this is only based on my personal preferences and how I sympathize, which can shift dependent on the situations. If she was gangbanged and raped by several dudes in a conga line in an alleyway then yeah, that'd definitely be something I could consider an exception since rape is rape. If she hid that from me and used what I just gave as an explanation (on why she hid it from me) if I found out, then I'd be concerned in lots of different ways.

If she was sleeping around before dating me and lied to me about it, I'd lose her asap. Lying shows that she has something to be ashamed about. If she acts impulsively and just fucked whoever then that's an immediate red flag. What if she was to do the same while in a relationship?
If she's hiding it because she's self conscious, then this could predict miscommunications if the relationship were to continue.

Or I'm just a moralfag.

>>17842279
You are out of luck because women always have a bf in their life. They swing male to male.

>>17830005
Both are shameful

File: Neckbeards.png (127KB, 345x337px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 345x337px

>>17830056
>>17830058
>>17832644
>>17831098
>>17830114
>>17830217
>>17830240
>>17830327
>>17830524
>>17831967
>>17831085
>>17832833

>>17843295
>if you dont like whores you are a neckbeard

>>17843297
t. neckbeard

>>17843301
Youre just salty. You know a person is salty when all they can do is make assumptions to insult people over the internet.

>>17843309
t. neckbeard

>>17843312
please keep bumping this thread with your salt. It doesnt ever need to die.

>>17843315
t. neckbeard

>>17841926
It sounds like a massive amount of insecurity, which is universally unattractive. No one likes dealing with other people's insecurities, especially if they lead to high tension emotions like OP.

>>17843317
Thanks for helping me keep this thread on the front page. Only way to make other people reply.

File: 1457247501336.jpg (11KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 200x200px

>>17843320
t. neckbeard

File: 1471280203918.png (144KB, 530x530px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 530x530px

>neckbeard is triggered
lmao

>>17843318
Thats like saying that anyone who doesnt like short people is massively insecure. Its really a way for short people to try and make themselves feel better. Same way sluts try to make themselves feel better by calling others insecure for not wanting them

>>17843323
Thanks seems the thread revival was successful. You did your job.

>>17843334
t. neckbeard

>>17829999
Honestly the only thing worse than sleeping with many people, is lying about it and trying to trap some innocent sucker because you only want to manipulate him.
Can you imagine finding this out years after the relationship started. Having to get a divorce because she felt the need to lie.

>>17843325
That is a horrible analogy and convinced me of nothing. Also yeah, if they don't like all short people because of their height then that hypothetical person is an asshole, without a doubt. Really bad analogy m8.

>>17843362
In what way is it not analogous mate?

>>17843339
This is all hypothetical and the kind of person you've created to fit this mold you made is far from representing every woman.

This site is useless unless you want to circle jerk with a bunch of manchildren.

>>17843371
The only person I created is someone who lies about how many people they slept with. Which is the point of the thread. The only reason to lie is to manipulate.

>>17830008
The partner will feel unspecial when meeting a girl that had a hundred guys before.

>>17829999
And this is why she lied to you. To make you feel better. She cares about you anon. She doesn't want you to think she's a slut because you're apparently important to her.

>>17843379
You realize thats the same excuse for lying about cheating. Its not for the other person. Its really for you so that you dont lose them.

>>17843379
>The partner will feel unspecial when meeting a girl that had a hundred guys before.
Thats because they are...

What is the most intimate act a couple can do if not sex? I'm a virgin and I actually cannot fathom anything more intimate, but that may be to lack of experience. I ask because some of you in this thread acted like sex is not the most intimate behavior between two people.

>>17829999
How is sex VERY IMPORTANT to you if you've only banged one person? Fucking idiot.

>>17844240
>marriage is important to you
>HOW IS MARRIAGE IMPORTANT TO YOU IF YOUVE ONLY MARRIED ONE PERSON
kek

>>17844218
Whores like to pretend sex isnt

>>17844218
Obviously a virgin who has never had a relationship wouldn't understand.
Being in a relationship with someone for over 5 years, doing everything together, being there for eachother during the good and bad, knowing eachother truly, etc is on an intimacy level that just fucking will never reach.

>>17844218
Honestly, to me, the most intimate thing a couple can do is be completely honest about their flaws and truly admire each other for them.

I do also believe sex to be an intimate behavior. Promiscuity is an absurd behavior indulged in simply because someone has the option to like eating an entire bag of chips in one sitting.

>>17844259
>this is what whores have to settle for because sex isnt special to them
Lost my virginity with my gf. That connection is unique to us and honestly its an experience that separates everyone else from us.

>>17844249
False equivalence. You truly are as dumb as you seem.

>>17844259
5 years of very vague behavior defined by you is an intimate act between a couple? You cant name anything specific because there is nothing that even comes close.

>>17844293
>exact same situation
>false equivalency
kek those desperate tears are delicious

>>17844277
Believe whatever you want. Just don't come crying when she breaks up with you. Losing virginity is something every 16 year old does. OF course you think it's more important than a couple who stays together for over 5 years because it's the only experience you have. Just how a guy who works at MacDonalds claims going to college (non-american college) and getting a degree is a scam.

>>17844305
Bro Ive known my girl since elementary and have been dating since the start of highschool. We are too young to get married though in my opinion 22-23. You don't see sex as special because you threw it away. It really sucks to be you.

>>17844305
This sounds less about you trying to convince us, and more like you trying to convince yourself that your 5 year relationship isn't doomed. The sad thing is that when your relationship finally does break (statistically probable for people like you), you will still not be convinced it was because of you.

>>17845095
Everyone rationalizes their choices. No one wants to believe they fucked up. It does lead to a vivid world though.

Ugh this thread is disgusting.
Girls are free guys! Get with the times!
So what if she slept with 80 men? You need to MAN UP
And if she wants to fuck someone else while in a relationship? Its her RIGHT. You should just prep the bull

>>17830030
Who someone was is who they'll be.

>>17830123
you're a fucking whore who will grow old with a bunch of cats. you are the type of person who sleeps around, and being married won't change that.

>>17831163
They say the same thing about presidential candidates. The past is the past, only the now matters. That's why when Trump was blasted for saying "grab em by the pussy" he just said "the past is the past" and everyone immediately forget.

>>17839845
stop responding to this person. they are obviously a troll and this board needs to be shut down.

>>17845274
To be honest no one really cared. It was clearly banter bit to be taken seriously.

>>17845287
>Anyone who disagrees with me is a troll.

>>17845367
>no one cares that Trump said "grab em by the pussy"
>"grab em by the pussy" isn't a current hit meme

>>17845452
Its hilarious. Like eat the booty like groceries. But its not going to affect a persons decision on who they vote for.

>>17829999
if it's over 5, then it's time to cut the line

>>17830095
>as long as she keeps is clean and keeps it tight,
That shit not gonna be tight if she's a cum dumpster beta

If sex isn't that important, why not let your partner fuck who they want during your relationship?

>>17830153
>not being in a relationship with a 50+ men fucked whore is being a beta
How the cucklife Mr. Louis?

>>17839814
>can't even admit that insecurity often plays a role in these kinds of situations?
First off, you implied it's almost always the case. Second, don't even make the claim that it is "often" if you can't base that claim on something

>>17845973
Thats just woman logic

>>17839847
LMFAO

Are you trolling?

Here's your hoop: Don't be fat and don't cheat on me, and be reasonably interesting.

THAT'S LITERALLY ALL I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR, FOR FUCKING YEARS!

>>17830123
Public health fag here.
You have like a 95% chance of having an STD with 60 partners.
Many STDs arn't symptomatic, but still shed virus, so you're likely Typhoid Mary-ing around.