Why is it so hard to find a wife in this day and age?

File: 1476003240439.jpg (80KB, 909x939px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 909x939px

>>17691787

It isn't. Stop projecting your personal experiences onto the rest of the world. Anecdotal evidence is not evidence.

Just because your house in on the beach does not mean the world is covered in sand. Understand?

File: marriage454340056.jpg (143KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x600px

>>17691789

funny because the evidence suggests that I am correct.

>>17691787

Because it's no longer socially frowned upon to be an unmarried woman after a certain age. Women have more time and liberty to look for a partner they might or might not marry.

They're going to cheat on you and take away the kids anyway.

>>17691797

Also, because women don't need a man to financially support them, but can get a decent paying job to support themselves. Marriage is less common, because it is less important in today's world.

>>17691797

This is not it at all.

Women are getting worse, more sluts, more drug users, more bisexuals, more girls that do not know how to cook and how to clean.

As a result, men are unwilling to get married to these women, because why should they?

If you look at the marriage rates of girls that know how to cook and clean and do not sleep around I am sure you'll see that it is still very high

>>17691794

This, sir, is not evidence. This is a picture off of the internet. It doesn't cite anything.

You don't believe every bullshit line graph you stumble across, do you? Also, even if it was true it doesn't absolve you of your inability to maintain a healthy long term relationship.

>>17691813
>tips fedora

File: 1476828488469.gif (2MB, 400x303px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x303px

>>17691813

This is the most /r9k/ thing I've ever read.

>>17691813
You're an idiot.

>>17691821
>>17691823
Bravo, sirs

File: donotmarryaslut.jpg (56KB, 633x360px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 633x360px

>>17691821
>>17691823

I'm on 4chan right?

Since when are there SJWs here that believe that being a slut is not a huge warning flag for long term relationships?

It feels like I'm on reddit. Granted it's been a while since I've posted here, but damn, this place went to shit.

If it makes you guys feel better (or worse) I'm married to an amazing woman so there are some good ones out there

Not that you reddit tier faggots will ever attract one

>>17691818

you don't see the citation at the bottom you fucking liberal?

>>17691839
Cool, I'm also married to a wonderful woman. We have our fist kid on the way.

Your chart has been debuncted as crap a long time ago. Correlation does not prove causation.

>>17691855

>We have our fist kid on the way.

I hope you, your wife, and your wife's son have a happy and healthy wife.

>Your chart has been debuncted as crap a long time ago.

'It offends me' is not a debunk.

Also, enjoy being married to a woman that is used goods and going to cheat on you.

File: 2016-10-21-18-08-57--1129515815.jpg (7KB, 381x132px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 381x132px

>>17691839
Maybe they just ate too much margarine.

File: 1476238839270.gif (3MB, 240x135px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 240x135px

>>17691845

Listing an agency that does studies is not a citation. Like if I do research for a paper at the public library I can't put "Public Library" as a citation, numbnuts. You have to actually cite a study with a quantifiable, verifiable test group.

Improperly cited studies are usually a pretty good sign that the study is just another photoshopped piece of /r9k/ propaganda.

>>17691839

This particular study has been debunked here probably about 500 times. Again, this contains no cited studies, no source as for where this study was taken or where the numbers came from.

The problem here is that everyone has a different definition of "slut" and a different idea of what a functional relationship is so I'm done trying to swallow this giant fucking /r9k/ meme that uses made up studies and anecdotal evidence to try to explain away why women don't like you.

>>17691866
Ok, so you're literally just trolling with no legitimate point. Good to know.

>>17691839
>amazing woman

Cuck detected.

>>17691881

>tall
>cute
>virgin when we met
>20 (18 when we met)
>smart
>sweet
>kind
>great cook
>gorgeous

How else do you describe that anon?

File: reddit.png (58KB, 520x754px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 520x754px

>>17691823

This is the most insecure thing I've ever red(dit)

>>17691872
>different idea of what a functional relationship

Yeah you probably think prepping your wife's bull and cleanup is normal

Let me clarify it for you:

1 woman
1 man
Monogamy

>>17691891
>virgin when we met
>20 (18 when we met)

Enjoy your divorce afrer she grows bored of you and makes up for the lost time.

>>17691881

Your inability to find and keep amazing women is does not mean they don't exist. I know its hard for you to accept that plenty of other people are in happy, functional relationship but trying to tear down anyone who is happy with a woman who they perceive as amazing will not help you understand women nor achieve the things you want in your love life.

Trying to destroy and invalidate the good things in other people's lives won't make yours any better. Stop being such a baby.

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A FUCKING NORMAL CONVERSATION FOR ONCE

WHY DOES IT ALWAYS DESCEND INTO THIS SHIT

File: 1463956411132.jpg (27KB, 596x324px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 596x324px

>>17691895

How does thinking you're an idiot make me insecure and/or from reddit?

>>17691903

>growing bored of me

I will cut you slack because you don't know who the man behind the screen is.

>makes up for lost time

Muh 'Women need to slut it around or they are losing out meme'

She could sleep with 1000 men and I would still be the best so what is she really losing out on here

Enjoy your old, used goods wife dude. I know a lot of guys in the neghborhood are enjoying here so you might as well

>>17691896

You're a fucking idiot. 1 man + 1 woman + monogamy does not equal a functional relationship. There are millions of 1 man 1 woman monogamous couples that don't stay together.

I think you're being dumb on purpose so you don't have to give any intelligent responses to whats going on here.

>>17691907

Because /adv/ and the people who come here are for most parts shit.

File: i-make-fun-of-myself-better-than-you-lol.jpg (87KB, 495x650px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 495x650px

>>17691909

Because you're only thinking I'm an idiot to pacify your insecurity about your obvious lack of coherence.

LOL

>>17691912

You're an idiot. I was saying that it is a PREREQUISITE for functioning not a GUARANTEE

>>17691787
because hoes and sluts and rap music

combine all that with hillary clinton's underused genital roast beef sandwich and bill's nihilism and you have a recipe for being too weak to get a divorce from a man that has cheated on you because you are afraid that you can't make a politician of yourself without his support

>>17691906
this
>>17691907
about half of 4channers are under the age of 18. i would know because i started coming here in 2006, when i was literally 12 and what is this

>>17691906
Isn't that exactly what you did in >>17691866

Are you purposely being retarded?

Why are people continuously responding to the obvious pol/r9k troll?

>>17691975

I made this post >>17691906

I did not make this post >>17691866

Get your facts straight, numbnuts.

>>17691930
>and rap music

Fcking listen to yourself, Christ.

>>17691982
You just respond to his replies then?

>>17691926

Making a statement such as "only one man, one woman monogamous relationships can be functional" is really retarded. I think you have no idea what you're talking about.

>>17691986

Ok, don't try to say I contradicted myself by comparing one of my posts to another post when I didn't even write one of the posts.

>>17691982

Newfags have trouble keeping track of who they are talking to

There is a clear infestation of tumblr/reddit SJWs here.

Crab in bucket stuff. They married whores, they want everyone else to do it because then they will feel less bad.

Me having a qt virgin wife makes them feel *terrible* about their own mistakes

They will realize it when they catch her with another man. And then get divorced. And contribute to the 'debunked' chart.

File: fedora.jpg (30KB, 479x720px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 479x720px

>>17691980

Why are some unable to argue their own points and instead have to rely on making up boogymen to distract from the conversation?

>>17691992
So you just randomly respond to posts directed at him?

>>17691995
You're obviously just saying stuff trying to rustle jimmies.

>>17691997

I think you're not understanding the way 4chan works.

File: 13436474.jpg (97KB, 759x1092px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 759x1092px

>>17691813
The rates of marriage are going down because economy is different.
You can't just settle down in a new home at your 20's that easily and our culture is on a constant change.
And this /r9k/ stupid crap is not true, at least not just women.
Both men are women are more liberal but you're also way, way, WAY exposed to this fact because of the internet.

There's slutty horrible women with the mind of a child, yes, there's also stuck up sleazy dude bros

File: snicker.jpg (19KB, 385x383px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 385x383px

>>17692004

You obviously have nothing to say

Women can earn as much as men, so men have to actually work at not being shit to get women rather than just have a basic amount of money. Sucks to be u lol

File: tmp_22227-Screenshot_20160921-222218-507179894.png (222KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1440x2560px

>>17691787
Because you ain't even tryin', bitch nigguh

Oh boy, it's this thread again.

It's not hard to find a wife. If you spent as much time improving your lot in life as you do complaining about everyone else's, you'll find that out that many women will marry the first half-decent guy who asks. Most of the time they won't even wait for that.

>A bloo bloo bloo 'Chads'

You're right, people should love your fat ass for your caustic personality.

>>17691994
Heh, I get called a SJW five times a day, and I've been on 4chan longer than you've had pubes.

Believe it or not, not everyone falls under your blanket terminology of "us" vs "them"

>>17692107
>men have to actually work at not being shit

So we can achieve this amazing quality:

>>17692139

?

LOL

>>17692150
Is it difficult to understand my post?

Women probably don't like you because you act like a cunt, not the other way around.

Monogamy is nearing death

>>17692165
Good, it's outdated and outlived its usefulness.

I don't get it, supporting Christianity or really any major religion on 4chan is an invitation to get bashed, and yet there are 10 threads a day that are specifically about the decline of Christian influence in the west.

>>17692165
I guess we can't all fuck dogs.

File: hamstering00.png (51KB, 254x209px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 254x209px

>>17692159
>Is it difficult to understand my post?

Is it difficult to understand mine?

You're free to point out how I'm acting like a cunt. Here, I'll do it for you:

>>17692139
>people should love your fat ass for your caustic personality.

Feel free to point out where these comments are actually justified, and not just you projecting your own venom.

>>17692172
Are you saying monogamy is a purely christian trait?

File: tumblr_mbnc1g6qBq1r0wqrdo1_500.jpg (50KB, 500x442px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x442px

>>17692139

This is a fantastic post. God bless you, anon.

>>17692174
I just jumped in this thread, m8, don't with this goalposts bullshit.

I made a general statement and it struck a nerve, so why don't YOU tell ME why you're replying?

>>17692174

>Feel free to point out where these comments are actually justified

Based on the things you said, I think. I don't know if you understand the principals of causation but when you say things that only an asshole would say people are going to assume you're a bit of an asshole.

File: 3dff985d715cce8341121ed0c72b15a12f1f111ef0fa9d991756386e076bf660.gif (916KB, 245x285px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 245x285px

>>17692188
>deflection and denial

because you've been bested duh

No nerve struck, would just like to provoke someone into being something more than cliche

>>17692179
I'm saying monogamy originally provided incentive for families to stay together and produce many children. It was to enforce a collaborative effort on children, instead of the (biologically) superior option of just 'fucking as many women as possible'. It was 'popularized' by organized religion, and in the west the Christian marriage is considered the 'traditional' marriage.

Now in 2016, while we face overpopulation, economic collapse , etc etc, having kids is little more than a vain effort to appease a biological derivative that's pretty impossible to ignore. I'm not saying nobody should have kids, I'm just saying the actual reason for getting married in the first place isn't even the same. And yet, every teenager with a chip on his shoulder wants to come here and tell us why it's soooo important to preserve the 'old ways'. I wouldn't be surprised if I was the only person in this thread who actually remembers Columbine when it happened.

>>17692196
>He says, after responding twice to a comment that was directed at no one in particular

I know that YOU don't notice it, but you're pathetically transparent.

>>17692193
>Based on the things you said

What things? Did you forget or what?

>>17692210
Like this
>>17691787

>>17692212
>Asking questions is not allowed

No, you're not caustic at all. What answers are you afraid of?

>>17692214
Nigger what are you even talking about? I joined this thread 5 minutes ago, and literally every post you've made (to me, and others) has been a flighty "I know you are but what am I?"

And we're trying to tell you. You're a cunt. Just because you say nuuuuuuuh uh and throw in a couple buzzwords doesn't mean you're not a cunt.

You wanted an example, I gave you one. You're welcome, you mong.

Don't forget to reply with some more greentext, and make sure to state that you're right, just in case it isn't inferred hard enough. Bonus points if you use the word "objectively" wrong.

File: opinion.png (71KB, 500x151px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x151px

>>17692219
>I gave you one

You basically said asking questions is being a cunt.

I guess we should just accept whatever you say and shut up then?

OH FUCK I DID IT AGAIN

File: 1375606906145.jpg (139KB, 604x454px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 604x454px

>>17692210

Someone jumped in late in the thread and dared to suggest that maybe some of the users here should take some personal responsibility for their negative experiences with women and relationship and you immediately took it personally and jumped to accusing people of "projecting their own venom", implying as if, somehow, no one who spends their time online peddling the ideology that their love life sucks because all women are terrible could possibly just be constantly facing all these issues because they're a fucking asshole.

I dunno, man, you really seemed to take it personally and as soon as someone mentioned something about people possibly having troubles in life because they behave like cunts you immediately personalized the entire post, responded as though the poster was talking directly about you and started accusing everyone of projecting while completely ignoring the fact that people were simply responding to YOUR inflammatory responses to a generalized post.

Seems kind of fishy to me, dude. You seem highly triggered for some reason. Perhaps you should investigate the reason this strikes such a deep chord with you as opposed to trying to dismantle the opinions of strangers over the internet.

File: reddit-censored-640x480.jpg (22KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x480px

>>17692224
>YOUR inflammatory responses

If asking simple questions triggers you this much, there are websites that cater to that level of group think and pampering.

>>17691845

>you fucking liberal

Well done for exposing yourself as a /pol/ and /r9k/ browsing aspie, you fucking virgin. Stop eating up whatever shit confirms your bias. I know it's tempting to do, especially when you're a teenager or young adult who likes to think they have the world figured out, but stop it.

>>17692222
Do you really think you're fooling anyone? Really?

You're not asking a genuine question, you're making an extremely thin-veiled, virulent assumption out of spite and pain, like it isn't the 10th one we've seen today. Like none of us have ever been burned and can't recognize familiar, but erroneous, behavior. A genuine question would have been "what can I do to improve my chances of getting a good wife?" But you didn't ask that, because you assume there are no good wives.

And that's the worst part. I'm trying to help you, because you're WRONG, and the sooner you internalize that, the sooner you'll be able to move past this circular logic you're carrying around.

Not all X is Y. There is no such thing as the group, only the individual. Furthermore, and I'm going on a hunch here, I'm gonna guess your personal life isn't bustling with female presence. For what it's worth, mine is. Women are just people dude, and you attract the kind of people you deserve.

If you're caustic, you attract caustic people. If all you see are caustic people, well there you go.

>>17692241
The worst part is you think that we're mad, and not that we're laughing at you. Because I'm literally laughing at you, right now.

>>17692224

Can't even answer a simple question... maybe that's why it triggers you so much?

>>17692253
I answered your question with my very first post in the thread. You've been moving goalposts to try and repeating yourself over and over in some poor attempt to seem like you still have some foothold in the argument.

>Why is it so hard to find a wife in this day and age?

>It's not hard to find a wife
>...
>You're caustic

And then you took it very personally for someone to whom it doesn't apply, and in true <18 defensive fashion, you resorted to image macros and buzzwords, with exactly 0 substance in what your point is supposed to be. You can't defend your inexperience with women, so you keep asking us to repeat ourselves because our original posts were too mean, so you can't comprehend them without getting viciously defensive.

I gave you genuine advice, my conscious is clear. I'm only in this to watch you dig the hole deeper, now.

>>17691839

>People who aren't crazy fundamentalist Christians are more likely to divorce than crazy fundamentalist Christians

Fuck why can't /r9k/ into basic statistics?

File: 1377250691723.jpg (18KB, 379x374px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 379x374px

>>17692241

1. You ignored everything I said.

2. I lay out several examples of you taking a statement not directed at you personally and responding to generalized criticism of an entire group of people separate from yourself, I call you triggered in response to this glorified hissy fit and your only come back is "NUH UH, YOU'RE TRIGGERED".

3. You ask a question and I answer your question in explicit detail yet you just keep repeating "I WAS JUST ASKING A QUESTION." as if that is somehow supposed to invalidate the small essay I wrote specifically describing the ways in which your "question" was full of logical holes and anecdotal bullshit.

I'm totally done with you. Its obvious you're not interested in responding at all to anything I'm saying and are simply here to troll people into giving you (You)s and parroting our own criticisms back at us like a fucking toddler.

>>17692246
>you think that we're mad

You typed YOUR in all caps bro, you aren't fooling anyone. You seem to have a major problem with people questioning your beliefs. Why do you think that is?

>>17691787
Wasn't hard for me and I'm too crippled to ever work (lung problems.) We can't even fuck because my lungs might go. We do foreplay. No kids. Ever.

You suck.

File: 1375763438758.jpg (9KB, 251x190px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 251x190px

>>17692293

You're not questioning anyone's believe. You're just repeating what we're asking you back to us. At this point we're not even discussing the topic at hand, we're just trying to decipher your stupidity and figure out what the fuck you're talking about.

>>17692289
>I lay out several examples of you taking a statement not directed at you personally


Nah, you didn't, you just verified that you actually are just projecting your own venom.

File: boards.4chan.org 1473184934968.jpg (62KB, 428x410px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 428x410px

>>17692293
>You seem to have a major problem with people questioning your beliefs

>"Why is it so hard to find a wife in this day and age?"
>It's not, here's why...

Not once, not a single response so far, has been about the content of my post or anyone else's. You've literally not questioned anything that anyone has said. You just took a quite mild, vague insult super personally and are trying to pull the "le too intelligent to actually respond" meme.

What point are you even trying to make anymore? That you're not caustic? Because so far, you're doing poorly at convincing us of that. Is it that there's no good women left? Because it's clear you haven't spoken to one in person for quite a while.

I'm genuinely confused, what are you trying to convey, here?

File: 1396339560135.gif (629KB, 295x221px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 295x221px

>>17692303

Alright man. I'm done. You've exhausted me into submission.

>>17692301
>You're not questioning anyone's believe.

You can't even remember the dialog?

>>17691787

>>17692319
Ok, ok, do me next

>>17692313

You're a butt ugly, under accomplished motherfucker

File: 1472738094089.png (33KB, 205x252px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 205x252px

>>17692313
>you're doing poorly at convincing

I have nothing to prove, you're the one running your mouth about things you can't even remember anymore.

File: boards.4chan.org 1473196096489.jpg (55KB, 600x398px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x398px

>>17692323
>That image
You can't even begin to comprehend how ironic it is that you posted that.

File: leg-to-stand-on-for-you.jpg (14KB, 300x358px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x358px

>>17692328

I'm sure you can come up with some story about how it's ironic that will make perfect (non)sense if you type up another three paragraph lecture for us.

>>17692333
I'll try to keep it short.

The image you posted >>17692323 here?

Is

LITERALLY

the point I was making in my very first post in this thread, waaaaaaaaaay back here >>17692139

You imagine it's hard to find a wife, even though in all likelihood you haven't ask a single women to marry you ever, because you have a complex built up from internet strawman greentext stories and cherrypicked image macros from anonymous, biased sources.

>>17692333
Also, I want to add that I like that you chose to say "us", even though the only other people in the thread the entire time I've been here have agreed with me

>>17692347

Sorry, but you're misinformed. All you have to do is go outside to see what you're saying is bullshit.

And misinforming people is caustic. So keep projecting.

File: boards.4chan.org 1470982115432.gif (425KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 512x512px

>>17692354
Ohhhh, I'm getting tired. But I want to respond so badly...

File: uhoh.jpg (108KB, 750x734px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 750x734px

>>17692371

Sweet dreams friend

>>17691787
because you are a faggot kill yourself

>>17691794
Men realized 'pussy' wasn't really worth it. We're in a weird transition where woman (some) are pushing a equality with benefits belief.

Men don't wanna deal with some woman that wants to be treated equal but also wants him to pay etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71o3hq6iSPM

File: dickbutt.jpg (73KB, 1080x1310px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1080x1310px

>it's much more likely that all women are awful than it is that I just have a bad personality

/r9k/, pls stop

If marriage rates are dropping, it's probably because people stopped selling their daughters into marriages as often as they used to.
Or less people get married straight out of high school.
Or the million other things that have changed since 100 years ago.