If you aren't a persons type, don't bother dating them

>>17640358

a 'person's type' or 'people person' has many different definitions. its really subjective. the same way that 'extroverted' and 'introverted' have become subjective despite their stricter definitions.

not being a 'people person' could simply mean you dont like large groups of people, or meeting lots of new people, etc. they could still be very happy to meet people one on one, especially those who share their interests.

its like the supposed nature of geeks not being very talkative. its not true. they just wnat to talk about stuff that 'normies' dont know much about. get a group of digimon nerds together and they wont shut up.

so even if you aren't a 'people person' if you still enjoy dating and can find someone who is comfortable sharing a similar life style, there is no harm.

99% of relationships come back to bite you in the ass. break ups are not exclusive to introverts. we all break up. its always dramatic. its how relationships work.

>>17640379
Autist

>>17640390

I am? for answering your question thoroughly?

>>17640398
That's not even an answer it's just autism, here I was trying to give adv some sage advice and you had to confuse them with your autism.

>>17640379
I was talking about a persons preference in terms of aesthetics for a romantic partner.

>>17640413

so what ur a furry?