Free advice to men. I see a lot of people here rambling about

>>17482999
> that is all that matters

Yeah naw

If she gangbanged 20 niggers that is relevant

Well, as a guy I can tell that I used to be one of those guys that really bugged out about a girl who had a lot of sexual history before me.

It would not be healthy for a guy with that mind set to force himself to date a girl he resents.

Now I'm older and don't give a shit.

>only marry a virgin. Only them are truly wife-material.

bad bait, or you should get off this board or at least don't GIVE advice.

>>17482999
Why would I date a girl I'll never consider marrying?

This op again lol

File: ROASTIE DETECTED.jpg (69KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x600px

>>17482999
ROASTIE DETECTED

Also how long are you going to keep spamming this shit for? You made this thread a million times already.

Good advice, but I wouldn't see myself fucking a girl who's fucked 30 dudes before me. She would probably have daddy issues and crabs, and both of these things I don't want to involve myseld with.

>>17483031
Lol fucking kill yourself, having a happy marriage with a non-virgin girl is borderline impossible. You have no clue what you're talking about.

>>17483201
>ROASTIE DETECTED
explain

>>17483520
>I wouldn't see myself fucking a girl who's fucked 30 dudes before me. She would probably have daddy issues and crabs, and both of these things I don't want to involve myseld with.
30 is too much
if she's above 5 before her 30s she has serious issues

>>17483619
anon is implying that your vagina, and more specifically your labia majora, is more expansive than average, giving it the appearance of a pile of roast beef

Sometimes I feel like I'm the only man on this site who legitimately doesn't care about past sexual history.

Probably because I've dated virgin girls who were terrible, awful people and because I've met many girls who 4chins would consider sluts who are loyal and have good morals.

>>17483643
Both men and women care about their partners sexual history, unless they themselves are manwhores/whores.

>>17483682
Why?