I had unprotected sex with a trans. What the chances of me (or

Take the bait xD You should've worn a condom dude. I'm clean and not a trans!!!! Hate to hear you going through that though -__- best of luck, get tested

>>17425047
>her

It's a him, faggot

Hopefully you both got aids and can't afford the treatment.

>>17425047
lol the picture is very related

You might have Aids, you might be fine. The only way to know for sure is to get tested. Trust me, just do it. The stress from not knowing will slowly drive you mad.

>>17425047
Get tested. I'm pretty sure people legally have to admit to HIV, but don't take your chances. Also, STDs are transmitted through bodily fluids so it doesn't matter whether there was blood or you were on top if your dick was wet.

>>17425077
You're right its driving me crazy. I believe that the trans was clean it's just the uncertainty that's worrying me.

I honestly believe that I didn't contact anything because we there was no rectal fluid because we have sex with a condom on first. There was no blood involved either.

Get tested it gives you a peace of mind. I wave my mine proudly :p clean bitches

>>17425047
Well, what you did was quite high risk: not as much as needle-sharing, but high.

At this point, I'd say it depends mostly on your partner's status. If your partner was HIV-positive, thwn there's a fairly strong chance of you contracting it. If not... well, you can't get HIV from someone who does not have it.

>>17425102
Thanks.

>>17425117
Thanks for this as well.

>>17425117

So wait. Is getting circumcised actually make you less likely to catch HIV? Or is it just the percentage of circumcised men with HIV lower?

>>17425191
It makes you less likely to catch it, because the foreskin absorbs fluids. Which at one hand means it absorbs fluids from your partner creating a stronger bond but at the other hand makes you also absorb viruses such as HIV.

>>17425092
Lol. Doesn't matter if there were fluids, there are microtears going on. If (s)he had AIDS, you now do too.

>>17425199

Shit . . .

I've just googled it and found that men with foreskin are more likely to catch the disease, but less likely to spread it to females.

Where as men without foreskin are less likely to become HIV positive, but if they do they typically pass it to women easier. . .

The more you know!

>>17425047
>her
anon pls

>>17425202
Let's just hope that she doesn't have AIDs or am I killing myself.

>>17425327
God I hope it had aids

sure because proof doesnt suite baiting nosy assholes

just because i reply or get on a page doesnt mean im the op or who theyre talking about. cant i just have shits and giggles? why so nosy asswipe? rs im clean im just trollin

>>17425203
>but less likely to spread it to females
dumb ass he fucked a guy in the ass no vagina was involved

>>17425511
Who the fuck are you talking to dickhead?

honestly i dont know anon. im retarded ignore me xD

Depends if you have aids anon. If she's a slut or a hooker that does this often the odds are high for you though odds for transimission one time arn't that high. If she's a pure virgin odds are very very low.

Ask her to take a test. Odds are if she has hiv she's had it for a while.

>>17425047
>>17425047
Goddammit it Griffith casca is a woman

>>17425047
It depends how old the car the trans came from. If its like a 2016 undriven you might be fine. Why would you fuck a trans tho?

>>17425117
Wait a sec, how does income come into play for vaginal sex?
Is it politically correct speech for female circumcision or something?
The data already only takes into account hiv positive partners, so that can't be it.