I want my (theoretical) son circumcised

Most likely b8 but. You do realise circumcision makes the penis less sensitive and heavily reduces sexual pleasure. Phimosis may be a problem but that is a maybe and no reason to get a circumcision instantly.

If you would circumcise your boy but not your girl you should honestly kill yourself.

t. cut

File: cut.png (63KB, 616x512px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 616x512px

Just look up some porn dude. Cut cocks always look dry and stiff and need lube to function.

>>17403089
Only people in the world who are doing it are muslims and jews for religious reasons and americans so jews can make cheap face cream.
You can decide which group you belong to.

File: 03 bob ross 1.jpg (26KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 450x300px

>>17403089
No fucking no
No
No


Cutting a guy takes a way a large amount of the sensation on his dick

>inb4 a bunch of health reasons

No your dick wont fall off if your uncut its called fucking take showers
No you wont be immune to std's if you get cut ask any cut guy out there to stick his dick in a girl with aids and watch his reaction

>inb4 this study here says there is a 0.0000000001% higher chance of getting an std if your cut

Yeah and there is a 0.00000000001% higher chance of getting a burn if you have fingers on your hands, I guess we need to cut them off to mitigate the risk huh

>inb4 cut looks better
Only to stupid americunt women, muslims, jews, and 3rd world sub saharan africans who live in huts made out of shit

If you wanna mutiliate your son and literally cut off part of his dick just to appease them then your a fucking faggot
And even the americunt women dont care that much they just arent used to it

Plenty of them report back that uncut dicks feel better than cut anyways

Fuck off


>inb4 you must be cut and mad

I'm in the US and somehow wasn't cut at birth so awesome

In America, insurance companies aren't covering circumcisions since they're not 'medically necessary' and you have to bring your son back to the hospital AFTER the birth in order to have on done.

I'm 30 and have had zero issues with not being circumcised. When I'm erect the foreskin slide back so it looks like I'm circumcised; during sex, girls say it feels better (like a ribbed condom).

No/less need for lube (at least on my end) and the additional nerve endings allow for more pleasure during sex.

Also, circumcised mens' penis head are exposed constantly and the constant friction caused by rubbing against their underwear can lead to nerve damage which results in less feeling during sex.

Also, morally: Do you really want to not give your son the choice of whether or not he wants to be circumcised?

If you're concerned about health issues then you simple explain to pull back the foreskin when he showers and to shower after sex.

Fin.

>>17403089
WTF is wrong with you asking shit like this?

>>17403089
dont touch another persons genitals mothercucker if they want to get cut they will DO IT THEMSELVES OKAY

>>17403089
I hope you die in a fire in the most painful manner possible, OP

>>17403108
I've never had a problem with the amount of pleasure I get from sex. And I'm pretty sure it's supposed to make you last longer in bed.

>>17403197
shut up cut fag you just dont know anything else

>makes you last longer

fucking train to last longer dont cut off part of your fucking dick

>>17403115
But a girl doesn't have any parts that need removing, only boys do. That doesn't make sense.

>>17403145
I wasn't circumcised for religious reasons, and I wouldn't be doing it for my son for religious reasons either. Also, I'm not an American.

>>17403108
But most research I've seen on the topic indicated that there was about the same amount of pleasure either way.

>>17403127
>>17403153
>>17403159
>>17403162
>>17403166

I don't care if you don't agree, I just want to know how to convince my wife to agree to it. It seems like such a basic thing, I wish it wasn't this much of an issue.

>>17403235
If you have a daughter will you attempt to circumcise her?
If not, as said before, kys

>>17403235
Show her all the studies you can find on it, and let her reach her own conclusions. You should read up on it, too. Don't just do it because it's tradition, make an informed decision that's based on what you think will be best for your son. It's a big decision, don't make it stupidly.

Showing her studies isn't shifty, it's direct, and you can voice your opinions at the same time.

>>17403248
No, of course not, what the fuck?

I think most people in America are cut, I don't know one person who isn't, people in here are making it out to be a huge deal but it really isn't

>>17403266
Exactly. It's my child. I can do whatever I want to him.

>>17403235
Go to hell

>>17403271
Fuck you go die in a fire

>>17403089
Why do you want to circumcise the boy?

>>17403108
That's false.
>Circumcision does not appear to decrease the sensitivity of the penis, harm sexual function or reduce sexual satisfaction.[20][68] A 2013 systematic review found that circumcision did not appear to adversely affect sexual desire, pain with intercourse, premature ejaculation, time until ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or difficulties with orgasm. However, the study found that the existing evidence is not very good.[69] Another 2013 systematic review found that the highest-quality studies reported no adverse effects of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, sensation or satisfaction.[21]

>>17403115
You should honestly kill yourself for equating circumcision to female genital mutilation.
FGM is like cutting a male baby's whole dick off then sewing his testicles to his body.

>>17403250
Well, a big part of why I want to do it is tradition.

And I'll do that. Do you know of any good sources that demonstrate why not circumcising is bad?

File: RaffeyCassid.jpg (71KB, 600x425px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x425px

>>17403256
Then why do it to your boy? It serves the same so-called purpose in females as it does males.
Same impacts.

>>17403275
Not really, it's basically the same thing if done properly.

>>17403271
Children aren't property, fascist.

>>17403216
You arent american and you circumsizing? Do you live in a place with high amount of jews?

>>17403273
Such a saltmeister

>>17403235
you´re physically abusing and cutting a baby because of religion. that´s how much of a faggot you are in fact you´re no different from ISIS

>>17403297
I don't think so. Every guy I've ever known well is circumcised though.

File: 3 types of FGM.jpg (13KB, 334x237px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 334x237px

>>17403153
>Cutting a guy takes a way a large amount of the sensation on his dick
>>17403159
>No/less need for lube (at least on my end) and the additional nerve endings allow for more pleasure during sex.
Where does this misinformation even come from?
>Circumcision does not appear to decrease the sensitivity of the penis, harm sexual function or reduce sexual satisfaction.[20][68] A 2013 systematic review found that circumcision did not appear to adversely affect sexual desire, pain with intercourse, premature ejaculation, time until ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or difficulties with orgasm. However, the study found that the existing evidence is not very good.[69] Another 2013 systematic review found that the highest-quality studies reported no adverse effects of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, sensation or satisfaction.[21]

>>17403248
And you should still kill yourself.

>>17403271
No actually your child is a human being, not your property.
Circumcision isn't nearly as bad as what some people make it out to be, but it's generally unnecessary. A doctor will tell when it actually is necessary.

>>17403277
Showing one-sided evidence is being a piece of scum.

Maybe you guys should just divorce. Sounds like that's going to be a shitty marriage.

>>17403291
Stop being a fucking retard and educate yourself. In even the most benign type, the whole clit is cut off. Again: that's like cutting off a boy's whole dick. And that type is rarely done; the more extreme ones are more common.

>>17403303
Asserting that circumcision is physical abuse is grossly disrespectful to any circumcised person who didn't experience it as any form of abuse.

>>17403303
Jesus Christ, how is wanting your kid to have a normal life at all similar to killing people? I don't want it for religious reasons either.

>>17403303
So when they used to cut the uvula of the babies for no reasons, do you still say that they were ISIS-level?

>>17403313
>wanting your kid to have a normal life
Are you living in a place where the child would be ridiculed for not being circumcised?

>>17403320
Potentially. Depends on the school he goes to, I guess. I just don't want him to feel like he's less of a man because he isn't the same as everyone else. Play I'd know, my wife would know, etc.

>>17403337
Plus*

DO NOT CIRCUMCISE YOUR SON UNLESS ITS MEDICALLY NECESSARY

>>17403344
It's always medically necessary, dumbass.

>>17403235
>How do I convince my wife to mutilate our son's penis
Idk. Maybe threaten to cut off her labia of she doesn't go along with it?

>>17403275
FGM includes a lot more than clit removal. Would you cut off your baby girls labia? Because that's not any different than male circumcisions

>>17403337
Who would teach your son that not being circumcised makes one less of a man?

Not you I hope?

>>17403365
>Would you cut off your baby girls labia? Because that's not any different than male circumcisions
I have absolutely no idea what the short and long-term effects of labia removal would be on a girl, but if it's just as harmless as male circumcision, then I would not be fanatically opposed to it.

I wouldn't do it because you're pretty much sucking jew dick when you give into what they want.

>>17403089
>I thought it was something everyone did
I'm not, and neither are any of my 3 sons. If they want to do it later in life, sure, but i don't want to do something irreversible to them before they are able to give concent.

Also, a brief survey i made in the ATOG-thread a couple of times told me that women preferring cut is a myth. It was around 60% uncut among those who'd tried both.

I get it if it's a religious tradition, but in most cases it's not. I get the hygiene-argument if you plan on your son showering less than monthly.

Truth be told, I don't see a logical reason for circumsition in the western world, and i was suprised to learn how common it is to do it to newborns in the US.

Full disclosure: I'm Scandinavian, and i've only personally known about three guys who were cut. 2 were 14 and muslim when they had the procedure, and the last guy was jewish and was cut shortly after birth.

>>17403357
Why

File: circumcision-comic.png (126KB, 710x870px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 710x870px

>>17403089
Posting in a bait thread. Sage.

>>17403472
Teeth and earlobes are a lot more functional than foreskin.

I'm not pro-circum but dumb equivalence is dumb.

>>17403513
No matter what, metaphors and comparisons are always shitty.