Would you be a homewrecker

Nope

Plenty of fish and all that

>>17392871
No. Why deal with that baggage when I can date another guy who doesn't have issues?

>>17392871
nope. I think it's wrong on its face, plus it would create a bunch of drama in the household and mess up the kids even more than they already are. and even if my morals didn't stop me, I'd still be afraid of his wife coming after me (even if she supposedly doesn't care, you don't know that's actually the case). even if I didn't care about drama affecting the kids, *I* don't need it.

if he is having problems with his marriage then he needs to get in some marriage counseling and either work out something with his wife or figure out how to have as amicable a divorce as possible. (I say this because I honestly don't know if it's worse for kids to be with two divorced parents or two married parents who are cold to each other. obviously if the parents are fighting I think that's worse than them being divorced.)

source: used to have a crush on a married-with-kids coworker. idk if he ever knew. I always wondered if it was mutual. but I respected him enough not to ever go there.

>>17392890
Interesting.....not even as a no strings attached? If he were charming I think the woman would reconsider.

>>17392948

Women are very feels driven.

If you ask them this question right away, of course they are going to say no.

But if the woman is attracted to the man both physically and mentally, and if she loved him, and this was her only option to have him...she'd probably say yes.

>>17392948
I'm not interested in NSA. And even if I were, I can date a guy who doesn't have issues, so why risk potential fallout with a guy like that?

>>17392957
I'm guessing this would have to be one charming ass man...couldn't be some avg joe

File: image.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>17392953
This.