women body type

3 for me.

>>16619188
Everything but 0 and 7.

3-4-5

>>16619188
2 & 8 for me, but if she is really cute I'll go to 5

>>16619188
I'm a dude with the body of 7 so obviously since I fucking loathe myself I'm picking 2 as its everything I wish I could be.

>>16619188
Supersize me.

>>16619188
Anyone between 1-5.
8 and 9 too. 9 having some limitations attached to it, but I have a fetish for muscular/toned/cut women with muscle. Just as long as they aren't Arnold big and make me feel inferior.

>>16619188
1-5, 8,9

To fuck or to have a relationship with?

To have a relationship with, I like 2 and 3 only.

To just fuck, like a one night stand or a friends with benefits, I prefer in order 4, 5, or even 6 but will reasonably fuck anything on there except for 7.

File: large.jpg (114KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 500x334px

>>16619188
fit with big tits

White women cannot compete

>>16619188

from 4 to 6,5

File: 00168488-01.jpg (77KB, 750x1125px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 750x1125px

2 maybe 1 best body type is that petite looking tall model type.
pic related is 5,10" btw

>>16619188
1-4
i'm kind of an ottermode/average guy.

2 3 4 5 8

File: 1451354131671.jpg (116KB, 600x881px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 600x881px

>>16619252
BROTHER

>>16619199
This

gf is a gymnast and she's somewhere between 2 and 8.

feels good, man.

2-3 is absolutely perfect body IMO.

Then, in order of attractiveness I like

1-0-5-8-4-6-9-7

For some reason the average is worse than a little chunkier and ripped muscles are a huge turn off.

>>16619188
2-5 and 8. Maybe 9

>>16619188
2-8-1-3 in that order.

Wonder how no one has said 2-3 and 8-9 yet

>>16619188
3
5
6

Sue me.

2-3 only for me.

>>16619188

I feel like for most men it's more of a question of what's a dealbreaker, given the actual situation. And that'd probably only mean the extremes of anorexia, or too much fat or muscle.

>>16619188
Prefer 2, 3, 5, and 8

Could fuck 1 and 9

Burn 0, 6, and 7 with fire

>>16619188
1 2 3 4 5 8

>>16619499
>8,9

Latent homosexual detected

>>16619511

Not that guy, but boy do I love to fuck her from behind and push her down and then see the muscles in her back and in her arms and her round shoulders...

No homo.

p.s. too much muscle would make it really weird though

I feel like this chart is terrible at displaying range. I could easily imagine how with better camera angles and the same model pose, numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9 are exactly the same level of sexiness.
Force me to pick one number and it would be 4.
Why are you naming number 3 curvy?? How? What? Why?

>>16619188
Man picture 5 could be me that's almost exactly how I'm shaped even the cinched waistline. I always say average chubby. I guess I'm chubby, I'm okay with this.

>>16619511
I am that poster,

I am bisexual, your point?

File: 1451133878762.png (168KB, 503x474px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 503x474px

Anywhere from 2 to 5. 5 probably being my favorite, with no interest for 6.

>>16619532

Number 3 is curvy because her breasts are big and her hips pronounced, thus giving her a curvy or "hourglass" figure. More so than "fit", for example, who simply doesn't have the bone structure or fat tissue to support such extravaganza.

File: body_fat_illustration.png (391KB, 608x483px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 608x483px

>>16619538

>>16619546
It's not hard to tell you're a fruit. Straight men typically don't want a muscle woman, women are supposed to be soft.

1-6. I'll take whatever I get so long as we mesh well.

>>16619538
Are you tall too
Please say yes

>>16619576
Nah I'm 5'7 and my boobs are probably smaller...

File: 1438459782283.jpg (90KB, 500x428px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 500x428px

>>16619590

Well I would say that it would be the middle of that spectrum, men want a woman who is fit, healthy and strong to nurse their children. Otherwise, the offspring would die off or the children would malnurished. Also she would need to be confindent and capable of protecting herself and her children.
I'm glad you asked this question.

2
8

>>16619188
5 or 4 depending on the girl..I like my women with some meat..

>>16619757
I like my women like i like my beer, wet and bubbly.

>>16619228
Why do guys have different standards for relationships and sexual attraction?

>>16619788

Because sometimes it's ok to just fuck and see what it's like. Doesn't mean you want to wake up and be seen with that for an extended period of time.

2,3,4

2 and 5

>>16619788
Not all guys are like that, but some separate the standards between "momentary bliss" and "I want her to be my wife!"

What we jerk it to might not line up with the type we'd ideally settle down with. I'm kinda projecting here, but I'd imagine I'm not alone on this one.

ex. "I'm into blonde petite russian gals, but I'd settle for anyone who gives me attention"

>>16619788
>relationships
The total package

>sexual attraction
She's either very sexual looking, known to sleep around, had multiple sexual partners or would otherwise be embarrassing to bring around friends or family.

>>16619188
2-3-8

>>16619812
>russian
:3

File: 84383984.jpg (29KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x450px

>>16619821
>russian
;[

I have never been so disappointed by men until I read this thread. You care more about what other people think of your so than what you actually are into. Saying some women that aren't a perfect bodied woman are completely worthless and even though you'd fuck them you wouldn't want anyone to see you with them. Go over and read the females answers. Then tell me again how women are so mean to you.

>>16619821
>:3
Okay, now you got my attention.

>>16619837
Why the long face? ;3

>>16619841
you miss the key point here, dear.

pretty girls are mean :(

>>16619843
>:3

>>16619841
>You care more about what other people think of your so than what you actually are into.
Not really.

>>16619856
Jesus christ

>>16619862

>>16619813
>>16619799
>>16619228

>>16619868
Because three guys is a representation of all guys.

Is that true that boys mostly measuring girls by how sexy they are and little caring about other aspects of the human being?

>>16619866
Yes, He is my Lord!

>>16619207
OP here. What is it about 7 that you're attracted to?
>>16619252
Do you like the smaller boobs? Why?
>>16619497
Are men not as picky as women? Why not?
>>16619630
Do all guys think in terms of bearing children when picking a partner?
>>16619841
OP here. IMO, men are not very picky it seems like. They'll fuck anything that walks with two legs, but not introduce her to the family or anything. Women can be the same, but less likely depending on what they're
looking for.
>>16619852
It's not just pretty ones. It's all girls. But pretty girls are more superficial.
>>16619874
I think they measure by sexiness when it comes to one night stand because they want to fuck something nice. And for relationships, because they want to wake up next to someone sexy. But also maybe care about other things to ensure its long lasting.

2, 3, 8, 9

>Is it bad that I prefer women who can lift and run and fight?

2-5 is a pretty good range, athletic is a maybe.

>>16619874
In general, no? I won't lie and tell you that appearances don't matter, as initial impressions can also hinge on how you look. The gap between there and a relationship is where the real meat comes in.

In other words, some guys will care more than others. Then, you gotta consider that different guys are attracted to different features. It's not too complicated.

3-5 8-9

>>16619883
>maybe
>they care

>>16619891
It can be very complicated if you're ugly as f*ck.

>>16619841
The good old generalization.
Look! 5 or whatever more guys are this way, so every man in the earth is this way also!!!

>>16619883
>Are men not as picky as women? Why not?
Some are. Some aren't.

>Do all guys think in terms of bearing children when picking a partner?
Yes and no. If it's about a lasting relationship, then ideally you'd want a partner who would be a good parent. This falls more on personality. I don't think I'd want to have kids with someone I feel is unfit to be a parent.

>>16619188
1-5 and 8 are acceptable
2,3, and 8 are preferred

File: aa0aee9cb0ec4f1d718cb57917d78260.jpg (177KB, 473x1600px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 473x1600px

OP again. Men, when it comes to boobs, what do most men like?

>>16619916
B-D, Not too little, not too much. D is on the big end, but they're comfortable for snuggling. Smaller Bs can be on the small side, but they're still boobs.

These are really just preferences, though. Boobs are boobs, and boobs are awesome.

>>16619916
a is an a
b is a a
c is a c
d is a c
e is a d
f is a c
g is a dd
h is a dd

>>16619916
Show us your body.

>>16619916
most men like medium to big boobs

>>16619916
A through D. Though I'm more of a guy who thinks that the best kind of breasts belong to the one I love.

OP are you a female?

0 1 and 2

>>16619950
Congratulations! :3

>>16619958
":3"
Do you know that under aged people are against the rules?

>>16619971
"There are rules?" ;3

>>16619978
You did it, I"m triggered

>>16619958
Congratulations?

>>16619983
:P

File: fit girl she squats.jpg (54KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x640px

>>16619188
8 or 9 is best
2 or 3 is also good
I like fit girls, especially women who get their squats/deadlifts in. Something like pic-related.

Also
>this delusion
5 is not "chubby" that's just fat.
6 is morbidly obese, she's >50%bf by that point.
I hate modern America, our standards are so twisted about what we consider "fat" today. 50-60 years ago 2-3 was the average, 4 was fat and 5 was rare for any woman under 40. And even for older women it wasn't that common.

>>16619984
yup

>>16619188
2,3,4,5,8

>>16619992
Why are you congratulating me?

>>16619991
you haven't seen "morbidly obese".
Poor things around 400-500 lbs

>>16619188
1-5, 8 and 9

>>16619188
My girlfriend is "average", she is great for the sexy time and very beautiful to me.

>>16619991
>squat meme

niggers

>>16619188
2,3, and 8 are the only ones that look remotely decent to me
but this chart is really stupid, body fat percentage has very little to do with fat deposits (if they have big tits/ass or not) and nothing to do with bone structure. I like skinny and fit girls with wide hips, tiny curvy waists, and b-d sized breasts, with a round but as well.
I can't stand 'thick' girls which are actually usually just chubby girls who happen to have really big tits and asses, but no waists. If they got the fuck in shape they'd still have big tits in proportion to their bodies.
I'd take a girl that was skin and bones over a chubby girl any day though, curves are your bone structure not excess fat, I feel like skinny girls have an inherently more graceful, feminine shape even if they do not have wide hips, big tits/ass, etc.
When they are fat they are shapeless, like a fat man.

>>16620006
For your taste in women

>>16620030
m-m-m Pegasus

>>16620020
6 is still definitely morbidly obese. Obesity has become so normalized that we think you have to be a lot fatter than you need to be. You don't need to be 400 pounds to be morbidly obese. A 5'4" woman is "morbidly obese" at 235 pounds.
#5 on that chart is regular obese. #4 is still pretty overweight.
Just because you see fat people everyday now doesn't change the fact that they are fat.

>>16620040
what

>>16620035
Oh um thanks?

File: fit girl nice legs.jpg (95KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 640x640px

>>16620030
>not wanting a muscular woman who goes hard in the gym

faggots

>>16620040
>>16620045
xD

File: C7dwoNB.jpg (126KB, 700x1066px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 700x1066px

>>16620056
>wanting a woman that looks like a man and wastes time at the gym

no thanks

>>16620056
Everyone have it's own taste.
Stop being a bitch because people don't share the same taste as yours. So childish...
And also, I'm probally sure that "taste" is the wrong word but I can't think in another. Not american btw

>>16620056
what do if you're out of her league?

>>16620060
Dude, nice.

New question: How many of you guys are into thighhigh socks and stockings? Are you more of a bare leg guy? Do you even have a preference? Do you just like lady legs?

>>16620098
I'm crazy for fishnet stockings and leggings

>>16620093
it's a pretty good word imo
and childeren also are supposed to be smart

>>16620107
Guess "being child" is a relative term.

File: hqdefault.jpg (24KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x360px

>>16620060
If this is what you think a man looks like, then I don't know how to save your soul

>wanting a woman that needs a corset to mold her mediocre body into something respectable

>>16620098
fetish for legs, plz

File: Attractive scientist.jpg (94KB, 495x700px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 495x700px

>>16619188
Fit is best, although her either being skinnier or having a bigger ass and titties would be hotter still. So like a ripped curvy or an anorexic athletic :)

Maid outfits: yay or nay?

File: fit girl dat ass.png (456KB, 450x575px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 450x575px

>>16620093
>get called a "nigger" for not having the same taste as somebody else
>somehow I'm the bitch for responding
k

>>16619188
I'm cool with 2,3,4, and 5 but mostly depends on face

>>16620120
maid - yay
outfits - nay

File: 008.png (2MB, 1468x2166px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1468x2166px

>>16620120
it depends

>>16620126
nice chocolate ass

>>16619470
Same and maybe 4

>>16620126
Both of you are bitches.
Happy now?

>>16619188
between 2 and 6

>>16619916
D and over, the bigger the better for me, i guess C is acceptable too

>>16620120
maid outfits are definitely yay.
Do you have one? Post it

>>16620111
>puddems is mediocre

hah

>>16620098
legs are amazing

dress them up in lots of things

File: 1438971760185.jpg (145KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 640x640px

>>16620126
Great ass. Quadricep is too big :/, hamstring ever so slightly. I cannot find the perfect ass leg ratio pic :(

>>16619188
7

2-5. I don't really agree that 5 is "chubby." As far as I'm concerned, for a woman (not a dude) that's in the higher end of, but still solidly within, the healthy range.

2, 3, 4, and 5 are fine. Anything outside of 2 and 5 are not attractive to me.

>>16619188
all except 0, 1, and 7

>>16620203
Haha, 5 and 6 you'd fuck, but not 1 and 2? 1 is hot, 2 and 5 passable, but 6? ... If you fuck 6, why not 7?

>>16619465
wonder why you can't read.

File: 20150725064439-b682a5d0.jpg (87KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 720x960px

>>16620211
6 is just enough what I can tolerate. 7 is too far gone.

I like big girls. but there is such a thing as too big

here, have a sample

>>16620211
Not that guy, but I seriously would not fuck 1. I'd happily do 5 and I'd even take 6 over 1.

Dude, that girl's body does not look healthy. There are some girls (cf. Asians) who look good that skinny. Not her. That's not attractive unless you fetishize thinness.

Why people even hate +++fat girls that much? Are they overreacting? 1

>>16620227
>too big
Hypocrisy

Aww, guys. All of you here have sexual life...

>>16619188
god tier:
2
8
3

acceptable tier:
4
1
5
0

meme tier:
9
6
7

>>16620252
Just pretend you have also and enter the board mate

My whole life I went fucking chubs and curvies and thinking sex wasn't all it was cracked up to be

Then I got a QT fit gf and realized what I was missing out on, holy shit.

>>16620277
Hasn't been my experience. Curvier girls are more fun to fuck & more fun to cuddle up to afterwards, and also just plain more feminine in my opinion. Sharp angles and hard muscles are for dudes.

>>16619188
2 and 3 are best. Some girls can definitely pull off 5. 4 might just be a bad example of that body type, either way it's not doing it for me.

2-5 & 8

>>16619232
But she is white anon(???

Could fuck any of them, except 6 and 7. I literally would not be able to get hard (I've been in those situations, haha).

3 and 4 are most attractive to me, but the athletic and fit girls get minor bonus points for dedication. Makes them more attractive as life partners.

>>16620538
What in the world would compel you to get into a situation where the prospect of sex with 7 even comes up? Where the fuck are you meeting girls like that?

>>16619188
Five or six. All the way. Skinny bitches are gross. If I wanted to fuck a bag of bones, I'd be scoping out the local graveyard.

>>16619188
fit, curvy, average, chubby.

>>16619188
Easily 2 or 3. Everything else is unfuckable.
Saying this as a /fit/izen.

>>16620577
Small town rural USA

- 2,3 as favorite
- 4,5 as fuckable
- 1, 8 as fuckable if i'm really into the girl

>>16619188

3 is the ideal for me, but i do go for 5 too if she is cute

0 and 1

Im weird ig

>>16619930
This. The breasts in that picture aren't accurate.

In reality, I'd want a C-D breasted girl.

Like most people have said here, and as >>16619936
said. Medium - Big.

Good enough.

2,3,4 and sometimes 5

>>16619188
I like 2-4, but I admit that my liking of 4 isn't normal.

2-5 and 8 are good, but if shes chubby she better have redeeming qualities cuz chubby just leads on to fat eventually.

>>16619188
3 - 5

>>16619188
2 through 5.

Last ones aren't bad but I like soft women a little more.

>>16619205
Damn bro, start working out.

>>16619188
2-3-8 and maybe 4

Something between 1 and 2 is also acceptable.

>>16619188
3

>>16619188
2 and 3. This chart doesn't accurately describe all the things you could consider "types". It's about proportions and the physique as a whole more than just "is she curvy or fit". There is a lot of fit that isn't appealing, there is a lot of curvy that isn't appealing.

These charts are near worthless.

>>16619188
2-3-4 Depends on the face too.

>>16619188
5 boy ... 5 all the way that shit is hawt af

2-3-8 definitely

>>16619188
3 all the way

She can go as thick as 4 if she's fit

2-4 and 8. Gf is a 3

1-5, 8

>>16619188
2, 3 and 8 are best.

1, 4 and 5 are still acceptable.

0, 6, 7 and 9 are gross.

>>16619916

Wow, that's a stupid picture. I know plenty of slim women with large natural breasts, myself included. F means fake? lel

>>16622022
What normal man wants to be smothered in f sized tiddums

>>16620213
Switch that "you" for an "I" and you´re right.
I said AND, meaning 2-3 AND 8-9 at the same time to be true.

File: h8 is short for hate.gif (485KB, 500x297px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 500x297px

>>16619188
2-5

>>16622048

Well eh, every man I've been with have absolutely adored them, they're probably my best trait and gets me an incredible amount of attention. So quite a few, I'd imagine? My mom is slim and has a natural G-Cup, she's stunning and all my male friends have had a crush on her, lel. I think a lot of men are into big breasts.

>>16622071
Ugh big tiddums gross me out

>>16620577
America.
The fact that 6 is just labeled "fat" instead of "super fat" tells you that this was made for Americans. That woman is like 200 pounds overweight but they think she's just a normal fat. And 5 is somehow chubby despite beingy obese

>>16622071
Sara?

>>16622147

Well, that's fine, we all have our preferences. Saying that no normal men are into big breasts is just stupid, though.

>>16622160

Nope haha, not a Sara :p

File: maryline.jpg (41KB, 500x549px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x549px

>>16619916
I really don't care about boobs. I guess c-cup is ideal, but a flat chest isn't a dealbreaker. I care far more about her being in good shape. No fat chicks.

>>16620172
... What? 5 isn't healthy or even chubby she's just plain fat. Your standards are just warped because of how fat most people are today. In the past, women didn't get much fatter than that. Well maybe some did after they got old and had 6 kids, but certainly not at her age.

>>16619902
Unless you're fat, you won't be ugly as fuck as a women. A lot of men primarily care about fitness when it comes to physical attraction. Go to /fit/ get in shape and you'll be fine.

Other than looks the biggest mistake most women make is expecting men to be traditionalist. A lot of men would rather be treated more or less like equals but it's almost impossible to find a woman like that. If you're willing to take initiative and ask men out instead of expecting them to do everything, you can make up for a lot of deficiencies elsewhere

been with a 1, fucking awful
love me a 5

>>16622396
You were with a 1 damn lucky son of a bitch

>>16622187
>In the past, women didn't get much fatter than that.
Man, you're just objectively wrong. Look up some medieval & Renaissance nudes, or even paintings from the late Baroque period (up til the 1800s.) Rembrandt, Rubens, Francois Boucher and so on, you can google for them. Many of the women look ... basically like that. While they're not pornographic (well, usually), the women in them are not meant to be repulsive and in some cases are clearly meant to be attractive.

And that body type IS a healthy one. Not for all women -- some genetically just tend towards being very slender -- but I guarantee you the girl in that picture has a robust immune system and (provided she maintains that weight through a balanced diet and not, like, hot pockets) isn't going to experience any health problems as a result of your weight.

Your standards are the ones that are skewed. That's fine; everybody's picky in their own ways (personally I'm not into girls with really long hair.) But don't act like you have the medical community or most of history on your side.

>>16619916
That isn't how cup sizes work

>>16619188
2 is best

>>16619188
Mix between 3 and 5

>>16619188
2 at a minimum.
8 preferred, 9 okay within reason

Not interested in anything else.

>>16619916

Foe the plebs in the audience.

.medicaldaily.com/treasure-chest-what-mans-breast-size-preference-says-about-his-personality-traits-319504

>>16619188
2-5 is just fine, 8 can be tricky because that often means they work out a lot and then you'd easily feel bad if you didn't want to.

But I have very specific fetishes, and if any of the body types I listed can pull of being short with C cup or above boobs, or tallish (5'8) girls with whatever sized boobs but enough leg to make skinny jeans look amazing. Twigs are rocky territory, but I've seen a pretty face make up for a lot of skinny chicks.

>>16619188
Anywhere between 0 and 5.

>>16622710
You know what? Make that between 0 and 6 in all honesty, and I don't mind 8 at all.

>men are attracted to women of all shapes and sizes except extremes
>more news at 6

>>16619188
>>16619188
Something between 5 and 6 are what I prefer.

>>16622737
I disagree. I think this thread has been very interesting. The problem is nobody's really sure where the "extremes" are. I thought most guys had pretty narrow tastes, but except for a handful of /fit/izens, most of the men in this thread have been attracted to a reasonably wide range of body types, which I think is a good thing and suggests our society's a lot healthier than some people would have you believe.

>>16619916
A-D for me. But I'm the kind to turn a woman away because her tits are bigger than that. I suppose all I care about is if they're real. I don't like fake tits but they're not an automatic deal breaker.

>>16622830
>nobody's really sure where the "extremes" are
0, 7 and 9 (6 is maybe borderline) are obviously extremes in the picture, and that's what the men here are referencing. They're also mentioned the least often when they're giving their preferences.

>most of the men in this thread have been attracted to a reasonably wide range of body types
That is literally what I just said

>>16622830
We create myths about ourselves and then project them onto other people. example: Men worry about their dicks being small and always feel like everyone is bigger, some have poor luck with women and project their dick envy onto women so all of a sudden women love huge dongers only when it's actually just that guy's shitty personality chasing women away.

>>16619916
A-D. B is best though.

>>16619916
D-F for me

>>16622836
>>16622873
>>16622874
Are you guys referencing those pictures?

>>16622878
>>16622836
I wasn't.

>>16622836
But I'm NOT the kind* NOT the kind

>>16622847
Dude, when I said "I disagree" I meant with your implication that this thread was uninteresting or pointless. Frankly going into this thread I expected most people would consider 1 and 5 to be "extremes" (moreso 5) and for very few people to admit they found them attractive. I agree with you on where the extremes are. I'm just surprised everyone else does too.

I expected posts like these to be the norm.
>>16622150
>>16622187

>>16619188
5 and 6 the most. So soft, and (subconsciously at least) attainable.

>>16622878
No, I was referring to cup sizes. Those pictures don't look that accurate to me.

8 or 9.

Every other example is needy / lazay as frak

>>16622925
These two are also the best at sex

>>16619188
For sex? Just about any shape or size or color so long as she has a alright face. For keeps? Exactly the same but with a strong moral character, who doesn't stress over eveything, and really loves me and trusts me enough to make a family. Kinda picky when it comes to personality.

File: 1449601119585.jpg (924KB, 680x6153px) Image search: [Google]

924KB, 680x6153px

>>16622512
Lol. The medical community would class her as borderline obese and tell you that your HAES nonsense is a myth.
As for history, pic-related for that.

Sorry, neither doctors nor history is on your side. Go back to your fat acceptance blog on tumblr if you want to pretend otherwise.

>>16622898
The fact that people ITT don't consider 6 an extreme is sad. She's morbidly obese. People like that shouldn't even exist, and historically they were incredibly rare outside of carnival freakshows.

If a guy has a fat fetish fine I won't judge but the people ITT need to stop deluding your selves into thinking she is at all normal. Thinking that a woman who is over 100 pounds overweight and will barely even be able to walk by the time she's 35 is somehow not an extreme is how we get to an obesity epidemic in the first place.

>>16619199
This all the way

File: f9e88fff809ea71c278acc8188e0be29.jpg (116KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 612x612px

OP again. This thread has been interesting.
Men of /adv/, which butt do you prefer the most?

>>16623138
Anything thick or bigger except wave as long as it maintains some degree of firmness/shape.

>>16623138
Smaller than average

>>16623138
Apple and Bubble

>>16619188

Here's something key, you really need to know about men:

Appetite for sex is a lot like appetite for food. We might have some preferences for what we like, and some of us might be pickier than others, but ultimately all men become less and less picky the hungrier we get.

Make sense?

BTW, for me 3 is best.

>>16623138
No preference at all. I like them all.

>>16622969
Hi. I'm an actual archaeologist. I've studied this in a formal setting. I not only have a degree but several years' experience working in the field. I'm not going to claim to be some hotshot (still working on my Master's) but the fact that you're trying to school me about fucking Venus figurines is beyond laughable.

As it happens I don't believe they were meant to be erotic either, but that image contains several factual errors. Neither you nor the author are qualified to talk about this.

As regards Rembrandt, I mentioned him because he's one of the only painters of that era anybody's ever heard of. You'll notice I named several others. To that I might add Titian, Botticello, Giorgione, and hell, dozens others. Tintoretto too. Bordone. I've named only several of the most famous ones. There's literally dozens. If you or the author of that image knew the first thing about art history you'd know how absurd it is to chalk all the paintings in that vein as the work of "one well-known fetishist."

You simply have no idea what you're talking about.

Also worth noting that my fiancee is probably somewhere between a 3 and a 4 on that image. I'm not bragging, that's not a fucking accomplishment, but I'm clearly not a fat fetishist. And as for your medical claims, all I have to do to refute them is google "bmi chart woman" and look at pictures around the 30 BMI mark (you know, the point at which you're medically considered obese.) Do most of the images look like that? They don't, do they? Notice how in most of them fat has started to collect disproportionately in certain areas rather than being quite smoothly distributed like in the OP pic? Funny, huh?

0-5 and the last two.

I was with a girl that looked like 5 and she was the most fun. Great in the bedroom and soft and cuddly.

Was with a girl that looked like 1 and she thought she was too hot to do anything in bed and cuddling was like cuddling a cutlery drawer.

>>16623210
>archaeologist
>not anthropologist

I love it when autists lie on the internet

8/10 someone will buy it

>>16623242
What? Almost nobody works as an actual cultural "anthropologist" outside of a handful in academia and a few physical anthropologists in criminal justice / forensics. My Bachelor's was in anthropology, with a concentration in archaeology, and I went through archaeological field school.

3 and 9 for the win, everything else is shit tier

1, 2 and 8. Boyish, fit or athletic.

3 (curvy) is usually alright too, as long as she isn't actually fat, just naturally curvy.

I don't like soft bellies, I don't like when you can tell a woman never did a single crunch in her life. Lack of discipline turns me off.

>>16623303
t. latent homosexual

>>16623331
t. chubby chaser tripfaggot

>>16619188
Ottermode dude here.

2 is best.
1/3 are ideal. 0 and 8 are acceptable.

4-5 are bangable, but I'm not attracted to that.

Actually, you know what;

ITS REALLY EASY WITH DUDES

JUST DONT BE FUCKING FAT

>>16623391
Reading the replies now.

HOLY SHIT there are so many chubby chasers. These are definitely betas, don't take what these sad fucks say as gospel.

Thin and healthy is beautiful.

>>16623239
>cuddling a cutlery drawer.

this is my fetish

>>16623391
>Ottermode dude here.
Post pics pls

>>16623399
> betas
How's the manosphere looking today?

8, then 2, then 1. I never got that curve shit and like strong/boyish girls.

>>16623399
>cchheecckkeedd
It's sad. Some people have a fat fetish but I think half the guys in here are just sad pathetic and desperate. They convince themselves they want a morbidly obese woman because they think they might have a shot with her and would feel insecure around a woman that looks like a human instead of a manatee.

I'm guessing most of them are fat themselves too, which is why they can lie to themselves and claim these fat women aren't that fat.

Put the fork down and hit the gym anons. Maybe if 80% of your contact with women didn't come while waiting in line at McDonalds you could develop some standards instead of all of these "they all look attractive, I'll take anything somebody please love me" comments

>>16619188
3 is perfect <3

>>16623447
I don't know what that is.

>>16623479
+1

File: 38384-evangelion-30-you-can-not-redo-shikinami-asuka-langley-souryuu-asuka-langley.1543ab8c40dbc3831639286986a16521.jpg (154KB, 1000x1143px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1000x1143px

>>16623479
t. gym shill

3,4,5

>>16619188

2-5 and 8. Those are my preferences, personally. I'm a slim/athletic guy, so there's that. I get it if dudes are okay with near-obese or obese women, but that's often an unhealthy size.

>>16619188
9 then 8 then 2
The rest dont really excite me a great deal

>>16623553
You seem like a fat, bitter, self-conceited cuckold.

You are currently maneuvering towards the top of my "worst tripfag posters" list.

2, 3, 8

File: b090160471e63b5aa5b36145c5c2be70.jpg (69KB, 600x572px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x572px

OP here. Does hair style matter to men?
If so, out of these, which would the men of /adv/ choose as favorites?
Also, which hair colors are your favorites?

>>16623691

Hairstyle is more dependent on the individual/face.

Long>>>short always though

>>16623691
exceptionally long, natural red hair is the only correct answer

>>16623691
I like all of them except the ones with high pigtails

>>16623713
You'd like my boyfriend's sister then. Too bad her personality's shit though.

>>16623691

I guess so. Sometimes the hair reflects certain characteristics and can act as red flags. But generally I wouldn't say so. 16 stands out to me, would be wary of 13 and 29. but then again it would depend on the individual so what do I know.

1,2,3 and 8
depending on the 0 and 4 that's ok as well

Why do so many of you not like the average woman?

>>16619188
2, 3 or 8

2 is prime

File: BotiJello.jpg (153KB, 800x502px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 800x502px

>>16623657
If you're looking for something to push them to the top, they're also either Stormfront or a teenage edgelord >>16620030

>>16623391
>2 is best.
>1/3 are ideal.
>best
>ideal
bro DYE English?

>>16623210
Is this a pasta? It should be.
Anyways Mr. Archaeologist, by "Botticello" do you mean "Botticelli"?
>being condescending while getting the name wrong

And by Botticello/i did you mean pic-related? Who is actually slightly slimmer than #4 and is certainly nowhere near #5?
God you're as bad as the fatties that claim Marilyn Monroe was fat.

Even the art of that era that did display fatter women doesn't mean most women of the era were fat. Much of the art was for rich people, whom could afford to sit around getting fat. Or for the commoners who aspired to one day be rich enough to just sit around getting fat. The fact is, obesity is a relatively new phenomenon. Even just a few decades ago #5 would have stood out as a fatty. Go back much more than 100 years and women like her were pretty uncommon.

1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 are all good.
6&7 are gross to me.
0&5 are maybes.

I read a study somewhere that the whole "beyonce curves are what boys want~~" or "guys really likes curvier womynzz" thing is bullshit. It was something like guys actually ended up liking women with a bmi of around 16.5-18.00 rather than the expected 21-24 like they all scream whenever an image of a thin model or a girl says " wish i was skinnyyy"

>>16623816
This thread proves the complete opposite of that, you know.

File: Marilyn Monroe was fatter than todays models.jpg (224KB, 1071x788px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1071x788px

>>16623816
>>16623816
Men do want curvy women. The problem is that fat girls have hijacked the term "curvy". It used to include pic-related. Beyonce is basically just a more muscular, athletic version of that curvy and tons of guys would consider her ideal.

What men don't want is fat chicks, regardless of whether or not those fat girls lie to themselves and say they're curvy. #5 in the OP is probably less curvy than #2. #5 is about as curvy as #1. Having a fat ass doesn't make them curvy if they also have a fat waist.

>>16623825
no, this thread proves that /adv/ is full of fat, desparate losers who have lowered their standards in the hopes of finding somebody who will settle for them.

>>16623691
Anything that's long, not short.

Hair contains a great deal of femininity.

Explains why most feminazis are short haired.

>>16623843
>Anonymous 12/30/15(Wed)17:29:31 No.16623843▶
>File: Marilyn Monroe was fatter(...).jpg (224 KB, 107
No know that and wasn't referring to fatty curves, I still meant beyonce curve vs vs model curves

File: ZARql[1].jpg (96KB, 649x547px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 649x547px

>>16623843
Women, in their solipsism, are incapable of understanding men are sexually aroused mostly visually. Gain too much weight = lost attraction. It's not even a matter of "he doesn't think I'm pretty anymore!". It's more like 'MY DICK LITERALLY DOESN'T GET UP TO FATTIES AND THERE'S NOTHING I CAN DO ABOUT IT"

Curvy does not mean what they think it means.

>>16623978
>feminazis
Oh, shut up. Plenty of long haired, make up wearing, skinny, cheer leader esque feminists, you only see what you want. And short hair is cute, depends on the girl

>>16623825
surprise, surprise, you mean to tell me that what people CLAIM they want is different from what they ACTUALLY want?
pffttt

And the "0" there is probably more around 15 bmi, but if she just had tits or longer hair then everyone would be more into her

File: nerdy-awkward-guys[1].png (183KB, 458x419px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 458x419px

>>16624015
then again

>>16624020
Nah. Stop twisting words.

Long hair, although a feminine trait does not mean a woman is necessarily feminine. It is, however, ALWAYS better than short hair, no exceptions.

>>16622187
Where did the "Marilyn was curvy and REAL" meme come from?

>>16619188
lmao, those pictures tho. Idk about you guys, but I have a different image in mind for almost all of those descriptions.

not in context to the images you provided, i like my grills:

fit, athletic, and curvy. Maybe average as well, but I am from california, so the average is a lot different than somewhere in the midwest per say.

>>16624015
... no they're not, you bucket of your father's cum.
Plenty of guys I know fuck fatties, though, but of course women know fatties aren't sexually desirable- psst there's a reason there are millions of women suffering from eating disorders and body image.

Most women know curvy doesn't equal fat, you're just brainwashed from all of the fat acceptance retards making you believe that.

Also I know a lot of men who believed the whole "marilyn was a size 16" bullshit.

>>16624079
>Plenty of guys I know fuck fatties

Yes, we call those low-value men "beta providers".

a.k.a. "the guy you marry".

>>16624083
As a girl, why wouldn't I want a 'beta provider'? If he's providing for me, he's the complete opposite of low value. He's willing to invest his time and money in me, as opposed to a Chad who'll pump and dump. Literally nothing sounds unappealing about an average guy who'll do shit for me.

>>16624079
>Most women know curvy doesn't equal fat,
Sounds like somebody's never been on OKCupid.

>>16624110
Because, Sally, you aren't attracted to him and sex is dying down, it feels kinda icky nowadays. Maybe you should tell him you have a headache, he's been a bit abusive lately. Besides, Fabio is coming over tomorrow to fix the refrigerator and you need to look pretty then.

>>16624111
>OKCupid is an accurate representation of women as a whole

>>16624083
Oh, hi Elliott Rodger. So tell us more about WoW from beyond the grave.

lol, plenty of scumbags and low life fuckboys fuck fat women as well. Typically men want women of higher value to settle down with, weight comes along in a lot of cases because of whatever reasons, and it is harder to seperate because of reasons, etc.

But wanting to reproduce and have awesome kids and a good family must be le beta~

God I feel bad for you, you cum dumpster for your father's anal drippings.

>>16619188
>preferred: 2-3-4-5-8
>acceptable: 1-6-9
>not really: 0-7

>>16619916
>preferred: C-D-E
>acceptable: everything else

>>16623138
>preferred: Petite-Norm-Apple-Bubble-Donk-Thick-Hourglass
>acceptable: Badonk-Wide-Double wide- Muslce
>not really: Bone-Flut-Wave

>>16623691
Does not matter that much because unlike your body, tits or ass you can easily go to a saloon and get almost anything you'd like at the time. But having a nice hair adds character and it shows that you care about your appearance and yourself which leaves a great impression. Hair style and color greatly depend on your facial features and the rest of you body as well as clothing, tan and makeup so it's hard to pick a favorite because on style can look perfect on one girl while it looks hideous on other. That being said:
>preferred: 12-13-21-25-27-30-32-41
>acceptable: everything else

colors:
>Dyed unnatural (red-orange-blue): goes better with shorter hair and it gives a predatory feeling unless accompanied by a nice smile and relaxed eyes which then makes it sexy and seductive. Also goes well with a longer straight hair and with dyed hair locks
>Natural (brown and black): looks better on long hair where brown goes really well with curly styles or braids while black fits better on straight hair. Both give a more relaxing look than unnatural colors but it all depends on the rest of the body
>Blonde: goes better with longer hair but can fit almost any hair style. It blends really well with the rest of girls features so it can look cute and lovely or it can be sexy and seductive

>>16624111
Are you serious, anon?

Obviously women on OKcupid dont' want to straight up put "FAT" because of obvious reasons, and go to the next option.

>>16624116
First of all, just because a guy is average, doesn't mean I'm incapable of being attracted to him.

Secondly, sex with the beta provider is shit, but Fabio is willing to fuck me? What's the problem here? And even if I'm not sleeping with Fabio or Xavier or whoever, what's to say I don't mind forgoing sex if I have everything else? Sex toys exist anyway

>>16624079

Women getting almost unanimously fatter and having "body image" problems is almost exclusive to western countries and that is because of laziness, entitlement, a society that cushions it for the sake of their feelings and pure gluttony.

You don't think fat men have equal body issues and self loathing? The difference is they don't try to delude themselves and forcing others to think its acceptable.

Men see the ideal and want to attain it, women want to move the goalpost to where they are. This is not the case in other cultures, only our own.

>>16624122
>standards so low and so desperate for female attention he's willing to fuck fatties
>whiteknighting #notallwomen in an anonymous internet forum
>calling anyone else Elliot Rodgers

Nice try, Elliot.

>>16624116
>insecure beta whose father left him.

And typically the whole "other dude" thing is a myth with women, women just don't like sex as much (not always but typically)

now go back to being the ultimate beta, elliott, and continue to bathe in your own anger and frustration on 4chan.

>>16624132
>almost exclusive to western countries
Have you seen ANY part of Asian media?

File: 1451005819997.png (402KB, 567x559px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 567x559px

>>16624122
>>16624079
Why is "father's cum" a reoccuring motif?

>>16624133
>turns around and uses the same shit I said because he's so bitter
>assumes I am attracted to fatties because he got schooled
>raging in anger over non-sensible opinions

Nice try, Elliot.

>>16624142
Because nothing is more degrading than a son imagining his dad using him like a bucket

File: projecting.jpg (95KB, 486x330px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 486x330px

>>16624134
Noope. Parents happily married, fucked more girls than most people in this board. But nice projecting.

Face it, most women in 2015 aren't worth commiting to. And most women aren't aware of the fact that they aren't attracted to their (beta) partners enough to sustain a LTR, which is why you see so many dead bedrooms, couples that "lost chemistry" and cheating girlfriends.

Hypergamy is deeply programmed into the female subconscious. They know the beta is a good guy, but they want to fuck the alpha. You'd know this if you weren't a little cuck, you know.

>>16624139

I've lived all over Asia for 8 years before coming to NZ at the end of 2014. Women are all in good shape because of diet and literally 9/10 do regular exercise. Laziness and gluttony is not accepted. Men and women are held to the same standards

File: 1442209909257.gif (147KB, 400x324px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 400x324px

>>16624148
Whatever works for you, I guess.

>>16624132
>misgoynist bullshit
NOPE.JPG
There is not nearly enough pressure on men as there is on women, but yes fat-as-fat-ass men get insecure. We're talking about full-blown eating disorders, though, and men throw a tantrum and say "oh yeah what about men!?!?" at every turn (such as yourself.)

Secondly, women AND all over the world are getting fatter, but there are more fat men than women, and more women suffering from EDs than men by a long shot.

Men cry and complain about other men being too muscley or fit or skinny all the time. Women look at vs models and say "le goals~" plenty too. Personally I don't have any friends who say "fat acceptance" but instead want to work toward being skinny.

Stop trying to shit on women at every turn, for everything possible.

>>16624150
Are you going to ignore >>16624129?

>>16624150
>HEY GUYS I'VE TOTALLY PLOWED MANY WOMENZ
no one cares and no one asked, but judging by the way you type you haven't.
You're just a brainwashed bitter beta, but I suppose your happily married parents are just a lie then?
lol, or maybe you've had everything handed to you? Hmmm?
There are plenty of cheating boyfriends, shitty males, etc. The friends of mine who are happiest area with sweet hearts.
>calling me cuck
You realize men want to fuck "alpha" women, right? The girl who has men chasing her, doesn't give a fuck about what others think, is confident, etc?

Lots of girls get screwed for being "too nice", too. Everyone's pretty much the same.

You're so brainwashed, I don't know why but I guess I feel bad for you so I'm trying to explain and knock some sense into you but oh well.

>>16624153
There are more fat men around the world, including the US, than women. Pretty sure all this fattening is correlated to capitalism. BUY BUY BUY SPEND SPEND SPEND diet diet diet but EAT EAT EAT

Yeah, those "alpha's" crumble once a woman who acts like them comes into play and treats them like shit

It's a two way street

>>16619188
3-5

>>16624186

More often than not they'd just move onto the next girl. You're clearly talking out of your arse or you lost someone by trying to play a game

>>16623785
>what are typos?
I'm not proofreading this shit before I submit it. I like BottiJello though, that's actually pretty cute.

The painting I had in mind was Primavera, not the Birth of Venus, particularly the woman on the far right (Chloris.) You can say she's thinner than the picture in the OP. She is. If you want to argue that she's particularly slender I ... don't know what to say to you. To be really fucking clear, I'm not trying to claim that thicker women were the absolute Renaissance and Baroque ideal of beauty, as there certainly wasn't one single ideal -- there were several. As with our culture. I'm arguing that women of quite varied body types are well-represented within art right up until the 19th century and even into it, and it's not hard to find thicker women who are clearly meant to be attractive. This doesn't square with your claims that 1. they were particularly uncommon and 2. the paintings that do exist were the work of a couple of fetishists. Unless practically every painter who dabbled in erotic art between 1500 and 1900 was a fetishist.

Look up Titian's Venus Anadyomene, actually almost any of Titian's reclining nudes, Bordone's Venus, Grien's Judith, Chiari, Reni OR Tintoretto's Susannah and the Elders, Ruben's Judgment of Paris, Boucher's Odilesque, and no I am not claiming to have come up with all of those straight off the top of my head (although several I did) and it'll be a fucking miracle if I spelled every one correctly, but frankly with a little googling or digging in my art history textbook I could have come up with a dozen more. Look at those paintings -- the composition and lighting. Are you going to tell me they're not meant to be erotic? They're just meant to be aspirational paintings of rich people, not beautiful ones? Really? Yeah, you're a liar.

It's just not true that you can find a hundred slender women for every one who's more full-figured in Ren., Victorian & Baroque art, although both are certainly represented.

>>16624182

I never said there wasn't, but there's no movement to accept fat men and its not at all a faux pas to make fun of them for it even to their face.

Yes you are right in that it is a whole culture of consumerism which is very sad.

Its also simply that there is a lot more sugar and carbohydrates in most meals in UK/US/NZ/Aus. Some European countries like Belgium, where deep fryers are a common household utility, also have an obesity problem. However much of Europe does not, particularly the nordics because they have much more regimented and conservative eating habits.

>>16624230
>there's no movement to accept fat men and its not at all a faux pas to make fun of them for it even to their face.
Do you live in the same world everyone else does?

>>16624222
Let's say overweight-looking women were in fact the superior ideal in centuries past:

What exactly follows from this? That women 200 years ago had an easier time with body image than women today? That the 20th-century fashion industry conspired to create anorexia? What's the signifigance of all this? What course of action does it suggest?

>>16624234

Bar a few people on reddit I really don't think its part of common knowledge, whereas women's acceptance is at least known by practically everyone.

>>16624240
>whereas women's acceptance is at least known by practically everyone.
So are body image pressures on women. Just because men are overshadowed by women in these things, doesn't mean that they don't exist. There are a sizeable number (pun intended) of men in the fat acceptance community. Women are only more vocal about it because body image pressures affect women more, therefore they have more to gain by pushing the movement.

File: 1450377481204.png (161KB, 1252x736px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1252x736px

>>16624182
No there aren't. You're looking at bmi stats which include people with muscle. It's common for men to lift weights, rare for women to do so.
Pic-related, if you add the bodyfat obese numbers you get 46% of men and 74% of women who are too fat. And even with that a lot of the fat men will have some muscle to compensate for being lards.

Sorry, despite the memes about unfair beauty standards men are held to higher standards and take fitness much more seriously than women. There's a reason /fit/ i s overwhelmingly male. Fat guys will strive to make themselves better. Fat women will blog on tumblr about how unfair it is that society expects them not to eat cupcakes and pizza every day.

>>16619188
I will always love 8

>>16624237
First, and I'm seriously not trying to be unpleasant or pedantic, I thought I made pretty clear that I don't believe overweight women to have been the one true Renaissance ideal (and the fact that I'm aware some people have made that claim is why I bothered specifying.) I also disagree with the term overweight -- to me girl #5 in the OP /just is not fat/ and despite what that screed about Rembrandt would have you believe, most of the women in his famous paintings aren't THAT heavy even by modern standards.

It's not like I'm out there campaigning for fat acceptance, man. I do think there are problems with our cultural standards for male and female bodies, but that's probably not even tenth on my priority list of things I'd like to change about the world. Not insisting that basically healthy people are 'borderline obese' or posting misleading and counterfactual rants with enough instances of the word 'fatty' to base a drinking game off of would be a good start in my book.

(Also, something I'm not sure anyone's pointed out is that there's a HUGE gap between image #5 and #6 in the OP. The woman in #6 is obese. You don't just jump from having a clearly-definable waist to having a sagging gut and belly folds in one leap.)

>>16624169
I'll take that as a no. Or is 'I have no response to that, I'm going to ignore it' more accurate?

2, 3 or 5

File: men women body standards.jpg (79KB, 775x666px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 775x666px

>>16624162
>feminists plz leave
Seriously are you retarded? Or trolling? Both maybe?
On /fit/ RIGHT NOW there is a thread about DNP (potentially fatal weight loss drug), Clen (another potentially fatal weight loss drug), and steroids. Two of those are generals that are on /fit/ 24/7. There are also numerous injury threads on there because it's common for men to get chronic joint injuries from pushing themselves. Zyzz, the patron saint of /fit/, died when he was 22, shortly after his brother was arrested for steroid possession.

>but muh eating disorders!
maybe stop starving yourself and do some fucking research on fitness dipshit. Women don't starve themselves because of beauty standards they do it because they don't know anything about fitness.
Men take fitness far more seriously than women. You will not find a fitness forum out there that has more women than men. Just because women sit there whining and bitching about "muh oppressive beauty standards" more than men doesn't mean women are held to higher standards. It just means women like to bitch more than men do. Probably because society lets them. Any man, fat or fit, who bitches about beauty standards like that in front of a woman has zero chance of sex or dating with her, because complaining is seen as weakness and women hate seeing even the slightest sign of weakness from men

Female privilege is being able to sit on your fat acceptance blog bitching about beauty standards instead of just getting /fit/ like men do.

>>16624305
>to me girl #5 in the OP /just is not fat/
>to me
Well I'm afraid to modern medicine she just is fat. And modern medicine's opinion is more important than an archaeologist's

>It's not like I'm out there campaigning for fat acceptance
fat denialism is part of fat acceptance anon. Shifting the line of what's "fat" so much that you think #5 is just a healthy normal weight is absolutely part of this fat acceptance, HAES nonsense. In another 5 years you'll be telling us Tess Munster is just a little chubby.

>>16624340
>instead of just getting /fit/ like men do.
there are other boards.

>>16624340
This is very true. I feel like women will never understand how hard it is to be a dude in this society. If you're not the 15% social elite, as a guy, everything is a struggle.

Not that I mind, I would be bored if life was easy. It's just sad seeing so many girls unable/willing to see how things actually are.

>>16623691
A body like a 2 with short black hair is basically the hottest thing in existence.

>>16624352
Go ahead and put all your cards on the table. What do you think that woman's BMI is? (of course BMI is imperfect, but let's work with what we've got)

>>16624283

Your numbers don't show what you think they show. Men are fatter than women, period. And muscles doesn't cancel out fat.

>>16624359

Yeah because /fit/ and /tv/ have dozens of threads dedicated to slimming down fat males and telling fat men to kill themselves. Oh wait...

>>16624412
>Yeah because
>Oh wait...

Why does the most played-out, obvious sarcasm come exclusively from people like you?

/fit/ plz go

>>16624356
It's not just /fit/ itself it's the concept.
>instead of getting elitefitness.com like men do
>instead of getting forums.bodybuilding.com like men do
Point is, men are getting fit. Women are just sitting around whining about not wanting to get fit. Just because women make more noise doesn't mean they're the ones actually facing more pressure and certainly aren't the ones responding to that pressure the most.

>>16624412
>Your numbers don't show what you think they show. Men are fatter than women, period. And muscles doesn't cancel out fat.
They literally do show exactly that
Look I know women, and especially feminists, are bad at math but...
74% > 46%
Can you at least do that? Is that really too complicated for you?

File: Tess Munster standing.webm (2MB, 718x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 718x404px

>>16624412
As said in >>16624340 /fit/ literally has a daily general dedicated to men risking their life to slim down on DNP.
And all the other stuff.
Men tell themselves to get fit. Which is why men are in better shape than women, and why fat acceptance bloggers are almost always women.
There is no male version of Tess Munster. Now ask yourself why?

super-sized. yum

>>16624447

But you're trying to equate scientific measurements of fat with how someone looks, which doesn't work.A person could be 5'4'' and 110 pounds and still be %body fat obese, but no one would call them fat. BMI on the other hand DOES pretty much correlate to looks. 27% of men are what you would call a fatass. 26% of women are. Men are fatter. Again, muscle does not cancel of fat, the "fat" is in builtfat for a reason.

>>16624458

Are there are eating disorder forms out there full of women who also use DNP and ingest tape worms and all kinds of shit.

Nobody tells other men to get fit, especially other men. There's no male version of Tess Munster because men don't have a need for one, they aren't given half of much shit when they're fat.

>>16624563
>But you're trying to equate scientific measurements of fat with how someone looks, which doesn't work.A person could be 5'4'' and 110 pounds and still be %body fat obese, but no one would call them fat. BMI on the other hand DOES pretty much correlate to looks. 27% of men are what you would call a fatass. 26% of women are. Men are fatter. Again, muscle does not cancel of fat, the "fat" is in builtfat for a reason.
I just... I want to believe this is a troll. I really do. You said so many things that are so not true I can't even address them all. Good night femanon, I'll leave you to your tumblr blog. Maybe some day you can do some casual research on fitness and realize what a fucking idiot you're being.

5&6 I love me a big girl!

>>16624575

We're not talking about fitness you spreg, we're talking about body types people find attractive. This is why you should stay in your containment board.

>>16624609
To be fair the last, like, 200 posts have been about what is or isn't fat. And some dumb anon thinks that measuring how much muscle somebody has is somehow a better measurement of how fat they are than actually measuring how much fat they have.

>>16619188
As a femanon with a body of 6, everything but 0 and 7 is what I'd totally fuck.

>>16619188
From 5 to anything at least slightly less than 6.

>>16619188

> god-tier
fit > curvy > athletic > boyish > anorexic

> shit-tier
average > chubby > fat > muscular > supersized

>>16619188
ill take 1-4 pls

>>16624961
For references' sake, how much do you weigh to consider yourself a 6?