>>190316 Do you have a place where you upload your stuff? Gotta say I really like it so far. This is pretty spot for what I like in bimbofication and I like how you draw the finished 'state' of you girls. I can't find it right now but my other favorite bimbofication comic is Beyond Rubies which you might want to check out. I'd really like to see you do more bimbofication of women with 'power'. Not just super powers, but women with positions of powers ie leaders or anything that can be considered some kind of empowered woman or role model.
>>190687 As a sexually confused feminist with a bimbofication fetish I can see how this work is definitely "cringeworthy" but the technical skill and artistic effort of the creator makes it anything but "shite", that was just uncalled for.
>>190687 >>190763 If anything's cringe-worthy, it's the fact that the artist has drawn himself into the images so he can pretend he's dominating his favorite cartoons. It's a half step up from the people that photoshop my little pony characters into their beds.
>>190779 >it's the fact that the artist has drawn himself into the images so he can pretend he's dominating his favorite cartoons yes, that's what I meant by Gary-Sue (which is a kind of vague term). It's a ""heroic"" self-insert.
>>190763 >sexually confused feminist with a bimbofication fetish that did not contribute to your comment. stop attention whoring. also >not realising that shit can refer to content, not artistic skill/effort
>>190687 >>190763 >>190779 I myself enjoy the maledom, being able to control/dominate/degrade women is a huge part of the fetish for me. And yeah, the self-insert is kind of cringey, it's why I prefer his Darksied comics, but it's easy to pretend it's not the artist. Would it better for you guys if the self-insert character was anonymous? I'd definitely prefer it.
>>190898 >I myself enjoy the maledom, being able to control/dominate/degrade women is a huge part of the fetish for me. And that's fair enough (I mean, there's a lot of stuff about bimbos which is seen as degrading to women, as they are essentially sex objects). I personally am the other end of the spectrum; I'm into femdom or no dom. My issue isn't the self-insert, but the behaviour, as it isn't my fetish and to me is rapey and gross (and of course you can't please everyone so it definitely isn't his fault). And to be perfectly honest, most porn with any males in it are a turn-off for me, which is pretty shit overall as most porn is straight sex.
>>190316 While I'm not too big into the Dom aspect of your artwork, I love the character designs, posing, and the pacing of the transformations. I'd totally commission you if I didn't have student loans to worry about. Do you have anywhere you post your stuff?
On another note, this image contains almost all my fetishes in one pic (hair growth, breast and butt expansion, royal transformations, and of course bimbos)
http://kotep.xyz/post/dont-enable-magic-animals/ Kotep writes the best bimbofication stories. Really want a follow-up like BXBI. Have idea she meets a girl who's also been magic'd by the Fox thus trapping her as a chaste knight. Road trip adventure/slow build romance as they come to enjoy their new bodies (mutual masturbation), ending with both accepting their urges or finding power from femininity/masculinity.
>>194328 scores are subjective of course, and I don't own his full catalog, but here goes Witchwood- 7/10. not a bad first entry D+ct+r- 5/10. Average. not great but passable Hot Robo- 4/10. I found the premise a bit too silly for me.Good for a one off image or two, not a whole comic The girls who dance at the chapel- 8/10. a pretty good cyberpunk tg comic Interludes 1- 6/10. Collection of short comics, so score would vary from each to each The Girls who dance at the chapel part 2- 9/10 continues after the last, and does even better. Wish he would continue this series. Goop- 5/10. not a goop fan i guess, but not a bad comic. Would maybe be 7/10 for those that like goop Love on the plains- never picked this one up, just didn't look interesting to me The Winter King- 10/10. Fantastic. Not just good TG, but its just a plain good story in the style of old fairytales. continues in next post
Alien tongues- 3/10. Bored me, barely even remember it. Woman in the light of the moon- 6/10. Semi silly premise (were-women) but well done Aline Tongues part 2- didn't pick this one up. Interludes 2- 6/10. another collection of short comics The House Guest- 7/10. For many it would be lower, but it hits so many of my buttons at once. Mind control, maids, slight bimboification. even made me like latex more then usual Interludes 3- 4/10. didn't really do it for me. another collection of short comics. just 2. first one is meh, the second is ok. Interludes 4- 9/10. another collection of short comics. The last 2 are ok, and what really drag the score down. But the first... Is fantastic. Just like the winter king it is a fantastic story itself, not just good tg. Another good old style fairytale. This one reminiscent of early american folk tales. Beyond- 7/10. The TG doesn't do it for me as well here, but the story is pretty good Hijacked- 4/10. His latest release. Score is low cause its just not my style. The TG feels cruel here, and I just feel bad for the guy. BUT if you like guys being misled and tricked into tg, [spoiler]and/or having their body taken over by another[/spoiler], then you'll like this
I think BSB's big strength is his ability to tell a good story on top of good tg. It may not always be a good story, but sometimes you really do just want some tg with little or lite story. But when it is a good story, and its got the great TG, it is amazing.
>>194431 no problem. I may actually pick up love on the plains. its part of his "tales from dreamland" series. which was just 2 stories so far. The winter king was great so if love on the plains is even half as good, it will be a 5/10 cause that's how math works. But seriously it may be good. I'll see. fuck it. its my birthday. time to buy myself a birthday present. Give me a bit and I'll give it a score
not buying alien tongues part 2 tho. Part 1 was the only comic of his I regret buying. all the others even if they weren't worth it themselves, I could justify by saying it helps support the artist who makes plenty of free content as well.
>>194440 Love on the plains- 5/10. First thing first. Horse fuckery, and furriness. I don't mind these, some might. the romance was believable, but over all I just thought it was average. not bad, not great.
also pic related face is hilarious to me for some reason
>>190779 If anything is cringeworthy, its the fact that morons from fucking /co/ are acting high and mighty between jacking off to Johnny Test and Marge Simpson. For fucks sakes, its a bimbofication thread. People should know what that entails.
>>193698 Does that guy in back have on a shirt that says John Stamos?
Also, so, I like bimbo stuff, sort of. I'm way more into the mental downgrading, but with more varied physical changes, i.e. toward goth/alt/scene styles. Any particular word that encapsulates that variation?
>>192861 >Brainy Bimbos! It's possible, that was the entire arguement last thread: Are Bimbo's Retarded Cock addicts or just Horny Ditzes.
>>195158 No, I was always a namefag, I'm just one of the people on this side.
>>198214 >Wouldn't this be reserse bimbo? The picture you posted is, but in the one I did there was the implication that her horniness either stayed the same or INCREASED as she gained business acumen and sizable assets.
>>204722 It's because /pol/ literally got taken over by neonazis and they can't stand the fact that the rest of 4chan doesn't blindly agree with them about everything. /x/ deals with this shit all the time, there's "Jewish conspiracy" threads posted there on the lie that it's NOT a /pol/ conversation. They've tried this "porn must conform" crap in /d/ and met with constant rejection so I guess /aco/ is now going to become a satellite /pol/ board because it's new and there's no longtime /aco/ fans to defend it.
And FYI: if they didn't want a "SJW" to complain about their asshole politics on a pink board they shouldn't have introduced politics here by insisting that a fetish for brainy bimbos is a vast liberal conspiracy.
Post some bimbo stories you guys like. Here's a couple I'm fond of. http://www.mcstories.com/EncounterAtTheTicketCounter/EncounterAtTheTicketCounter.html http://www.mcstories.com/NewUSalon/NewUSalon.html http://www.mcstories.com/Retail/Retail1.html http://www.mcstories.com/BunnyIslandIsBimboIslandIsBunnyIslandIsBimboIslandIs/index.html http://www.mcstories.com/BunniesDontMakeBimbos/index.html
>>205846 Oh, and for browsing mcstories.com more easily, there's this: http://www.gregariousfrog.com/svengali/svengali.html which adds tags that you can search for stories by if you click the little binoculars icon.
>>205766 Because that's wrong you fucking moron. You burgers keep making shit up, like definitions, and then feel insulted when someone calls you out on your retarded bullshit. If you don't want to look dumber than a sack of bimbos than try using; timid, appease, or fucking milquetoast instead of being a hypocrite who redefined liberal when berating someone for redefining bimbo.
>>205692 I don't want to prolong this Mulan bimbo argument, but that picture just looks like a sexy version of Mulan to me. Shouldn't there be some sort of superficiality or silliness that would indicate "bimbo"?
Maybe I need to read some more writing, but this whole thing would be way hotter if it happened over time and the chick went in to having higher libido really quickly but the other changes were slower, being a result of their new found sexuality changing their behavior and not pseudo-inflation.
>>208378 Yeah, but didn't she already wear pink in the cartoon? And every porn version of any female character gets bigger boobs automatically, and usually dresses more slutty too. I wish I could say going blonde would have been the boundary but that theory of bimbo identity was debunked a long time ago back in the /d/ threads. I see sexy, maybe slutty, but I'm not reading it as being bimbo.
>>204910 >And FYI: if they didn't want a "SJW" to complain about their asshole politics on a pink board they shouldn't have introduced politics here by insisting that a fetish for brainy bimbos is a vast liberal conspiracy.
Does anyone wish there was SJW Bimbofication art? I don't mean sjws becoming bimbos, but an ordinary girl becoming obsessed with tumblr, growing more busty, dying her hair, putting on more makeup, finding her IQ dip as she embraces her inner pansexuality soulkin, starts talking more vapidly in tumbly cliches. Her mind seems to fizzle away, replaced by political polite cuteness and a hunger for facts. And sex, lots of both vanilla and hardcore sex. She probably gains a lot of fetishes in the process.
>>208443 >what more do you want? If she looked confused or even lustful and her body language reflected that, then the pic would definitely register as bimbo for me. Just standing there... nah But it's a good enough picture as is without me defining it as bimbo.
>>208489 Well yeah, think about it, any gal can be confident or playful and not deserve being labeled as a bimbo. Remember, it's used as a derogatory term in a context that isn't friendly. Unless a girl is being downright ditzy and openly and obviously signaling that she's available for sex it doesn't even seem accurate to think of a girl as a bimbo, let alone kindhearted. You have to know your definitions if you don't want to offend.
>>204910 /pol/'s actually less Nazi than when it first started. It's still WN but the real paleo-Nazi style has really died off there. They used to essentially be the David Duke board, it's weirdly become more fleshed out and diverse in ideology, yet lower in information than it used to be.
>>208610 Yes, it is. And it's a sad truth that in this society bimbos are made to feel shame for being overly promiscuous and enjoying the simple pleasures of a vacant mind, if I had my way these fine examples of innocent sexuality personified would be revered in our world as a zen-like ideal for all women to strive toward! But then, what can I say, I just love women and want them to be happy.
>>208542 Well sure, but on here, in the depths 4chan of on obscure threads we can define our own bimbos and what gets us going. I personally don't like the derogatory interpretation of bimbos, where they have to be braindrained and become so lobotomized that they become sex slaves essentially out of force and cohesion, because they're too stupid to not be taken advantage of. To me that signals a humiliation/degradation fetish where the kink is trying to destroy her personality/soul and make her into a sex object, and nothing kills my boner faster than that.
There are a lot of sluttification fetishes, like corruption, hypnosis and ganguro. But I don't feel any of them gave to do with 'bimbos' persay. A slut might routinely be a gold digger, or some kind of business pro cocksucker executing sex with precision, intent and purpose (To get a promotion, reward a free expensive dinner, earn a rich boyfriend, ect) but not care much about sexuality in itself.
My ideal bimbo is always sex positive, but still keeps her availability even when she's not actually commited for sex otherwise. Sometimes she might act like a cute ditzy flirt, other times she may go all in with sex and make your wildest dreams come true. And yet others, she might just feel like going shopping, seeing a movie and hanging out in the mall like a pink-loving blond girly go. She might load herself on sexual potential (big pouty pink lips, skimpy clothes), but whether or not she acts on it is her prerogative. It's not something she feels ashamed or reserved about, just something she does or she doesn't. >>205692 The most important aspect of bimbos for me is is they ENJOY sex and being sexy, which the above pic depicts. Not for money, gratitude, or any form of degradation. If it's just a character forcibly becoming a sex slave that has nothing to do with bimbodom, what's the point (Like the beginning OP pics)?
Also being ditzy and openly signaling sex isn't always mutually exclusive with empowerment.
>>208789 Now for me some degrading lobotimized exploited sex slave scenario is fine as long as the bimbo herself is happy dappy. I figure the main point of any sex is satisfaction, no matter how you arrive at it. Now, I find the stereotypical sluttification stories are a bit more negative in tone. I don't like those very much either. Like with corruption it's dependent upon a self-awareness of the degradation, bimbofication however is all about the shameless lack of self-awareness and living happily in the moment. No harm, no foul. It burns me that there's so much confusion between the two given the different extremes of feelings they can inspire.
>>208789 >we can define our own bimbos What's the point then? I mean I get that everyone has their own fetish, but when you start calling literally every fetish 'bimbo', that's when you're going to have a bad time. I think even the bimbo/bimbofication subreddit has an argument about that since people started posting regular sluts with no trace of 'bimbo' in it.
I think we should try to adhere to a minimum 'standard' of what a bimbo is, or at least try to.
Go back and watch some of the 80s comedies that fueled the stereotype. There are *A LOT* of bimbo characters that would actually be considered dominant or intimidating.
They're full of things like the uptight college lecturer trying to teach, but the scantily clad blonde in the front seat chewing bubble gum and twirling her hair around her finger keeps distracting him and giggling at his discomfort.
Yet here you get insecure idiots with no understanding of history and who can't cope with the idea of a woman enjoying sex thinking they can dictate the one true bimbo.
>>208977 >but the scantily clad blonde in the front seat chewing bubble gum and twirling her hair around her finger keeps distracting him and giggling at his discomfort. I wouldn't say that's dominant or intimidating in any way, but okay.
>>190316 These are hot OP! You should do more with them as bimbos. Don't get me wrong the transformation is hot but I'd love to see more of these ladies in action with their new master. Mutant power? I make bimbo harems. Aaaaand we have the best omega level mutant power ever.
>>208873 I'm guessing you're that guy going on and on about definitions earlier. Look, I was once like you. I used to think definitions were important here. In fact, I had started to write out a "bimbo rating" algorithm. It'd assign a score based on a few factors; how much cleavage, underboob, ass cheeks, pussy, or nipples showed, how far past DD her boobs were, hip/waist ratio... distance from a "healthy" weight... then I ran into more subjective things. Is a girl who has sex with a bunch of guys more of a bimbo than a girl that has the same amount of sex with only one? Should a stripper be considered more of a bimbo than a housewife? Should pregnancy impact the WHR? Should a bimbo prefer that a guy cum on her face, or in her mouth? Should she try to make him cum as much as possible, or get him to make HER cum as much as possible?
Then I considered applications of the algorithm. Are people actually going to open up a little web app or bookmarklet to calculate how much of a bimbo some girl in a pic was and whether or not it should be uploaded to whatever site? Probably not. It might have applications for girls into the fetish IRL trying to compare themselves to porn stars, but the algorithm would apply to only single girls; the others should be doing whatever their boyfriends ask. And single bimbos likely would not stay single for long. So there goes all the use cases.
Essentially, if you're actually serious about standards (I literally wrote unit tests for RFC4180 and RFC3339 at work today. As far as standards go, I'm serious as a heart attack) then you'll understand that a bimbo standard is just not worthwhile. Now, I could be proven wrong, but I highly doubt 4chan can pull that off in a civil manner.
>>208789 I admit i'm not that smart, but i can see something in here that you maybe not. And that this is a thread about 'bimbofication' and obviously it will be coming with ALL kind of contents and variation of bimbos. Your coment counts but...you like pseudo-bimbos? Like galko styled bimbos? Plainly pure innocent girls with fully developed bodies and with pseudo-idol personality. >pic related
>>211543 badly written, irrelevant, self-promoting dog shit, thats what it is.
The arguing about definitions of bimbo is pointless as different people have different ideas of what defines a bimbo and will ignore your definition, but there is a point when the picture is no longer bimbo-thread related, and those cross it.
Call me what you will, but so far you're all doing a wonderful job of proving me right if you guys are FOR a "bimbo standard". The reason why bimbo threads are shit is because you guys want to keep them shit.
>>211896 It can be useful as a repository for links, which is basically the original, intended design. r/bimboification is the one that's supposed to be dedicated to actual bimbo TF, though from what I've seen, the signal to noise ratio is bad and it's easier to just follow artists who are into it and/or do a Deviantart search for 'bimbo' every so often.
>>212121 You really need to work on your reading comprehension. Contextually, that anon was using his own extreme autism as an argument ~against~ people deliberately trying to be so autistic. Like someone saying 'I used to like playing with matches. Now my eyebrows are on fire'.
>>212447 >Contextually, that anon was using his own extreme autism as an argument ~against~ people deliberately trying to be so autistic Maybe you should get better reading comprehension, since he's still defending making up his own definitions so my post applies.
>>210534 >Your coment counts but...you like pseudo-bimbos? Well, yeah pretty much. Characters like Orihime or Usagi. They may not be sex obsessed or fashion flirty cocksucking tramps but the archetype and personality is the same. I'd say as much so for Marilyn Monroe. It's more a wide range of traits about a girl being either fun flirty and ditzy, or huge and busty + upbeat. There's no exact definition or ideal bimbo, I love the mental aspects as much as the physical ones.
For example you can have a shy "nerdy" girl, who when she tries to socialize actually comes off as spacy, innocent and kind of cute in that bimboish way. Her personality at heart is similar to a bimbo and makes her one, despite her look. That one chick from the anime HxH, Shizuku comes to mind.
On the other hand you could also have a huge well endowed, thick and extremely busty woman with lots of makeup and sexual appeal, but she's smart and mature with a kinda fun personality. The body is what makes her bimbodom.
Of course it's good to have both traits too... But if you have too many of both traits to where the character is just whorish and brain-dead, becoming about pure sex, to me that doesn't make a bimbo. It's more of a slut/ghetto fetish than, like Ganguro. I don't mind that, or even if it's actually grouped in with Bimbos or not, it gets me up the same but the reasons and kinks are different. I like bimbos for emphasizing their innocence, such as the idol-one you posted and the other category purely for over sexualization. It's not that I like one over the other, I just like them for different reasons. It's hard to explain because I cannot exactly clarify those reasons.
>>220864 >Nerdy Nymphos might be a better term. Partially, I do agree with the general consensus that "Bimbo" requires a certain amount of dizziness and/or effervescent personality in addition to the nymphomania.
>>222732 I think its that the girl is just highly aroused by knowledge. Lots of people seem to be turned off by the idea of a normal girl suddenly having the mental capacity of a 3 year old, which is what happens in most fetish content here. There tf subject basically suffers identity death and is replaced by the air headed bimbo. Granted, there's nothing wrong with that, some people just don't like that stuff. There aren't many stories that cater to >>198214 or >>191872, but the closest thing is https://www.literotica.com/s/geisha-2
Also, I really don't get why there's so much hate against it, isn't it just the opposite of bimboization?
>>222750 >I think its that the girl is just highly aroused by knowledge. Not so much this... >Lots of people seem to be turned off by the idea of a normal girl suddenly having the mental capacity of a 3 year old, which is what happens in most fetish content here. There tf subject basically suffers identity death and is replaced by the air headed bimbo. ...But this. I mean, it's a downer if you think too much about it, and stupidity grates on everyone eventually.
>isn't it just the opposite of bimboization? Well it depends. >>198214 Is a reversal since a party girl becomes a serious librarian, but while the subject of >>191872 has her physical and mental assets enhanced, it's clear from the dialog that her libido certainly wasn't dampen by said change.
>>223082 >I have no issue, but I think it's half way between "stop liking what I don't like" and "this is a thread for bimbos only" (and the second argument is somewhat valid). Yeah, though the "THIS IS WHAT BIMBOS ARE AND AREN'T" crowd can get rather booty bothered...
>dialog that her libido certainly wasn't dampen by said change. If having a high libido is all that it takes to be a bimbo, then the term is meaningless. As was discussed at length, all dictionaries and wikipedia associate bimbos with low intellect - it's the one common trait amongst bimbos. Remove that trait and you no longer have a definition for bimbo since we have already ruled out that physical qualities aren't set in stone for a bimbo... so there's nothing else to define them by other than intelligence.
Once again, I don't know why you are trying to force your own fetish on everyone and rewriting definitions.
>>230221 Not the guy you're trying to disprove, but I thought I'd speak up.
I know this is only furthering the painfully unwanted discussion, but I do have to point out the idea of the "idiot savant". As defined:
"noun, plural idiot savants French, idiots savants [ee-dyoh sa-vahn] 1. a mentally defective person with an exceptional skill or talent in a special field, as a highly developed ability to play music or to solve complex mathematical problems mentally at great speed."
This is literally the ONLY stipulation to the entire argument. Anecdotal evidence on my part, but I knew a girl who for all instances was a bimbo, but was so into anime that she couldn't do multiplication tables, but she could tell you everything about the subtext of different shows and how it connected to certain facets of psychology and human interaction. Then she'd go and fuck up the spelling on "coconut".
Like I said, anecdotal, but I felt it needed to be brought up.
>>230221 Bimbo's are ditzy not stupid. ditzyness is being scatterbrained or absent-minded.
The idea that bimbo's have to be stupid is the invention of pathetic males like the manlet in OP's image. They dream of being dominant, yet are worthless failures of men, so have to invent some concept by which women become even worse than them so that they can feel superior to their imaginary wank material
>>232513 Eh, I prefer bimbofication to include an element of dumbing down, but then I also self-insert as the person being bimbofied. Bimbofication for me is right at the intersection of my autogynephilia and my fantasies of submission, loss of control, and degradation.
I always thought of Bimbos as what happens when you just take pure sex appeal (Large breasts wide hips etc) and then try to remove any accept that makes you feel guilty for doing degrading things. From being her dumber then a sack of bricks but is happy when she is being fucked to it being punishment for treating others like a bimbo who aren't one. I mean yea a bimbo doesn't have to be dumb. But that doesn't mean you take it to the other extreme and get mad that she isn't riding an army of cocks while solving some complex math problem.
>>233120 Thats cool. I was more criticising the idea that it's mandatory.
I self-insert a lot too, I like to imagine myself in the company of other bimbos mostly though. :)
>>233793 Rock on NiceDaemonette. I like how your posts in the global fetish thread that are just "Why not make everyone XYZ" are the best ones there.
>>234320 The whole valley girl and heavily fake aesthetic is not in the dictionary yet is compulsory.
However when it comes to intelligence, slavish adherence to the dictionary is compulsory.
You can't appeal to the valley girl and 80s sex comedy stereotype of a bimbo for some things and yet demand the dictionary definition is the final say on others. Keep in mind the word you are demanding a strict dictionary meaning of means 'boy'.
>>234261 >I mean yea a bimbo doesn't have to be dumb. But that doesn't mean you take it to the other extreme and get mad that she isn't riding an army of cocks while solving some complex math problem. Which I try not to.
>>234435 >I was more criticising the idea that it's mandatory. Yeah, there are basically three groups in this argument; Those like Dictionary Anon above you who insist Bimbos HAVE to be dumb. Those like myself who say they don't as long as they are nymphomanic and bubbly. And the vast majority who doesn't give a fuck.
>Rock on NiceDaemonette. I like how your posts in the global fetish thread that are just "Why not make everyone XYZ" are the best ones there. ...DAMN IT 4CHAN, I CAN'T TELL IF THIS IS SARCASM OR NOT!
>>234320 >>Bimbo is a derogatory slang term for an attractive but unintelligent female. Define intelligence. Because by that definition an overly sexual attractive girl with down syndrome fits the definition of a bimbo.
>>220898 the artist obviously has problems being taken seriously by women--he believe because of his height. he uses the comics to live out his violent fantasies that stem from these fears. ironically, women probably don't like him because he is unable rid himself of the belief that women look down on him because of his height and is the sort of person to draw detailed comics wherein he rapes superheroines in order to cope with his feelings of cosmic injustice.
you don't exactly have to be a psychologist to know what's going on here. and if you're a normal sized person it becomes very distracting.
>>234435 >The whole valley girl and heavily fake aesthetic is not in the dictionary yet is compulsory. There are plenty of bimbos posted here that aren't valley girls though.
>>234804 I see what straws you're trying to grasp at, but I'm going to remind you that I was saying that the term 'idiot savant' is something completely different. Trying to claim it's the same as bimbo is silly.
>>236025 Valley-girls are on the extreme end of the spectrum of materialism and superficiality, but aren't necessarily promiscuous or stupid... We really need to make a list of all known bimbo archetypes and variations. I know I'd like to see some recognition for the rule63 absent-minded professor type.
>>234692 >>...DAMN IT 4CHAN, I CAN'T TELL IF THIS IS SARCASM OR NOT!
I was being serious. I remember chatting in the past of my dislike of "boring fantasy where I just make women's lives miserable." Posts in those threads.
>>236083 Absent-minded professor bimbos are probably my favourite kind. For me the mentality of a bimbo shouldn't be based on stupidity, rather that they've had some sort of epiphany where they no longer place a lot of importance on things that aren't looking pretty or having sex and thus are easily distractable or aloof to societal norms.
>>235030 Since you're in the thread, I want to mention to you that you have a problem on your site. The story labeled 'IIIIIII' can't be accessed. I think it's some kind of syntax error or something. I dunno.
>>236123 >Absent-minded professor bimbos are probably my favourite kind. For me the mentality of a bimbo shouldn't be based on stupidity, rather that they've had some sort of epiphany where they no longer place a lot of importance on things that aren't looking pretty or having sex and thus are easily distractable or aloof to societal norms. PLUS, since they are still able to SCIENCE, they are the most likely to create a bimbo epidemic! >>Oh, I didn't realize my retrovirus would affect males, let alone completely change them into females... >It's actually not so bad... But did you put any containment protocols into effect? >>Whoopise, looks like we're going to need to come up with a solution for a world without men... >...How about Tentacles?
>>234435 >Thats cool. I was more criticising the idea that it's mandatory.
That's the thing though. There's shittons of porn of characters being drawn sluttier, and tons of art of characters "letting their hair down" and tons of art of characters made to act sluttier through mind control, and all of the above can come with physical enhancements...
... and only rarely is any of it tagged as "bimbofication" outside of these threads on 4chan. Without mental changes including at least some degree of ditziness, loss of intellect, and/or simplified speech, it's not really the same thing.
It's like the difference between looking for traps and looking for futa. For some people, the difference doesn't matter, and more power to 'em; they can get what they're looking for in futa threads and trap threads. For other people, the difference is all-important and having a trap thread full of futa is like taking a bite out of a chocolate chip cookie only to find out it's oatmeal raisin.
Some people sperg on it a bit too hard, of course, and dictionary fag needs to lighten the fuck up. But pretty much all I'm looking for in bimbofication threads is people getting physically and mentally changed into ditzy sexbombs so that I can fap while imagining I'm the one being turned into a ditzy sexbomb, and for the past few months there've been more and more oatmeal raisin cookie threads that seem to think a that a woman starting out a blonde bombshell and getting fucked by a few black guys totally counts as bimbofication.
>>236123 >For me the mentality of a bimbo shouldn't If you keep that to yourself then it's fine. It's when you go around arguing the dictionary definitions need to be changed to force your fetishes on us is when it starts getting silly.
>Some people sperg on it a bit too hard, of course, and dictionary fag needs to lighten the fuck up. Honestly, I only rag on the other shitposters so hard because of some offhanded comment where someone said the idea that bimbos had to be 'dumb' was a misogynistic male power fantasy and that was wrong. I could've went with the canned >You're on a vietnamese knitting image board for deviants, stfu fag
But it was interesting to see the logic behind 'smart bimbos'. However, the arguments the tripfag presented were flimsy because at the end of the day, it's essentially warping the bimbo to whatever fetish you have. It's even flimsier when you're arguing against established definitions, which is why I said reddit and /s/ had periods where they go ballistic over people posting suicidegirl sluts and claiming those were bimbos.
>>236934 I think my issue is that I'm a big fan of bimbo self inserts, but humiliation/degradation is kind of one of my biggest turnoffs. On the other hand one of my biggest kinks is kind of the opposite, being completely shameness, without worrying about implications or consequences. In that manner I do agree some mental change is necessary, and that slut TFs (or femme fatale TFs) don't count as bimbofication. On the other hand I kind of feel that intelligence loss isn't necessary if the ditz quotient is high enough. One can't spell because she doesn't know the word any more, the other can't because she gets bored or distracted a few letters in. Absent minded professors are borderline, they kind of have to convince me they're not just slutty professors, which are far more common.
I think that also shows in the scenarios - rather than the "Oh gawd, why can't I think? Why am I so horny?" type stories I like the "Mmm, that feels good. Why don't I do this more often? Why work hard on thinky stuff, when it's more fun to feel good?" type story. On the one extreme you have the bimbo jilling off on a park bench because she can't control her lust, dreading but secretly hoping that someone joins in. On the other extreme you have the bimbo that's doing the same, but meeting the eyes of passers by and giggling, getting off on their arousal, waiting to see if someone wants to join in or if she's going to have to walk up to the choicest guy and convince him to drag her to the nearest alley.
I mean, you can get good mileage off both types - sometimes a degrading transformation leads to a fun type of bimbo, or a fun transformation takes it too far into the extreme dsl braindead fuckdoll territory - but different tastes in a fetish are fine.
This smart bimbo "debate" actually kind of reminds me of a half finished story from a year or so ago I might pick back up.
The basic premise is that a mid ranking science guy from a spy agency (think Qs lackeys in James Bond) gets sent on a seduction mission, because all the other agents are indisposed or MIA and he draws the short straw to field test the new tech. So he gets put into a curvy bimbo body and is loaded with Matrix/Dollhouse style seduction protocols that basically make him autopilot to sexy and filter anything he says into bimbo babble. The aim is to get in, check out what the bad guy is unveiling at the soiree, flirt any info she can out of him, switch to some dormant athletic/combat/break-in protocols to do some investigating/theft before getting out. Standard spy movie stuff.
The body basically fakes attraction to the main bad guy a bit too well. Too many new sensations for the mind, a body that's screaming "fuck me", and an overlay that makes everything sound flirty. I won't spoil the nature of the twist, but the bad guy's pretty hot on tech himself, and pulling one over on a bimbo is /easy/.
Anyway, my question is: If your sexy airheaded armcandy can gleefully give you answers to complex equations and reveal high tech state secrets, but only if you ask whilst fucking her, and is otherwise barely able to finish a complex sentence without giggling and getting distracted, is she a bimbo?
>>237279 >Anyway, my question is: If your sexy airheaded armcandy can gleefully give you answers to complex equations and reveal high tech state secrets, but only if you ask whilst fucking her, and is otherwise barely able to finish a complex sentence without giggling and getting distracted, is she a bimbo? I'd say yes. My counter question is: If said air-headed armcandy can gleefully give you answers to complex equations and reveal high tech state secrets when NOT fucking, does she still count as a Bimbo?
Depends on how hard you have to bribe her to get her to turn her brain on.
Complex equations or simple math, for me it's not the power of the processor but how easy it is to get her to use it. Thinking just sounds like far too much work. It's pretty much a waste of time.
But I know not everyone agrees with that. I tend to keep my geniuses for when I'm writing for one of my many other fetishes. "Hot scientist" is one of my favourite TG results, up there with "sexy villain", "succubus" and "doting housewife". Sexy ladies that find using their brain gets their engine started better than dirty talk are a fun niche, and I don't think I'll ever use my biochemistry innuendoes elsewhere, but I don't really see them as falling under bimbo territory which makes them off topic for this thread.
Speaking of which, Just found that Mr DNA's librarian-bimbo TF has two extra steps that I've never seen before (though they're mostly just for flavour). http://imgur.com/a/6OMQC
>>237467 >Depends on how hard you have to bribe her to get her to turn her brain on. >Complex equations or simple math, for me it's not the power of the processor but how easy it is to get her to use it. Thinking just sounds like far too much work. It's pretty much a waste of time. Ah, but that isn't a matter of cognition, but attention! I think this is where the true basis of Bimbo lies; Their minds don't linger too long on anything outside of their personally enjoyment or satisfying their carnal desires, hence they are "Air-headed" or "Ditzy." They could have an I.Q. of 300, but don't want to devote their time to anything more than usually bimbo activities like shopping or fucking.
>>237604 >Ah, but that isn't a matter of cognition, but attention!
Yeah, that's what I was saying:
*I* find attention is more important than cognition for my enjoyment of bimbos (and know I'm not the only one).
I think some *others* that come here for content feel strongly in the other direction.
But basically, that's my deal, that's theirs. Most of the art that gets posted is vague enough when it comes to the details that anyone can enjoy it, and we're content starved as it is. If I have stuff that's new but I think might be a bit borderline I'll throw one or two in for people with my tastes but won't clog the thread. If I write something I'm proud of, I'll stick a link in, and if it's not someone's bag (80% of my stuff is bimbo TG, so that's already a smaller market) then they can ignore it, or start on it, bail part way and sulk. I write for myself in any case. If I wanted my bouncy arm candy to give up being a bimbo, swear off sex and become an accountant at the end of the story, that's what would happen, and I'd probably still post it here for the (hopefully) good bimbo content in between.
This kind of argument isn't really ever going to change anyone's opinion, and whilst I find this kind of discussion fun at times, it's just gotten increasingly angry and repetitive over the past few threads, both things I find boring. I post what I like and consider to be relevant. It's worked so far. All I got to say on the matter, really.
>>237712 >I think some *others* that come here for content feel strongly in the other direction. Like I said, I personally don't care what you like, but it sounds to me like you just like the physical aspects of a bimbo, but hate the mental aspects so you try to downplay it as much as you can or outright have an 'off' switch, which isn't really bimbo anymore. Like you admitted yourself, you simply find the idea of a sex crazed 'genius' very appealing and are trying to apply that to bimbodom. I mean I can understand your kink, but it came off very hypocritical last thread when people like you (or you) were saying that it was 'degrading' to like the mental degradation part of the fetish.
I think the bottom line is that you, or someone else, tried to force your fetish on us whilst simultaneously saying that only 'losers with no control' want dumb sluts to fuck for some perverse power fantasy. You have to understand coming into 4chan, into /d/, then into a transformation thread regarding a classification that is already well defined and trying to change that is the epitome of >lol
Anyways, we're about to 404 so I just want to say that when the mental degradation goes too far it just gets creepy (Lisa stories are a good example for me), but low intelligence is pretty inherent to bimbos - they don't have to be drooling idiots, but they shouldn't super geniuses either.
First time I'd spoken up on the matter, and it was going to be the last but since it *is* the end of the thread, I'll bite. I was actually against whoever was kink shaming. Nothing wrong with being into degradation, giving or taking, as long as you don't insist on doing it to people that don't want it.
I've followed /d/'s bimbo threads for years. Some of the stuff isn't what I'm into (not a big fan of John Parsons' art style), some of the stuff is (bsb hits the mark pretty often). In terms of content it's the same fetish. Sure, I prefer things like BXBI, pushing towards the whole "Case of the hornies" series over some of the hardercore stuff, but just class me as a lightweight. Apart from the aco/d split I don't think I'd change anything about how the threads run, except for less arguing and more discussion of scenarios/story prompts.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.