Something something science
>>1582610
Yeah, why not?
>>1580514
Is this implying superman's x-ray vision works in a glasses shape? Or that he's using x-ray specs for no reason?
>>1586174
Clark's lead frames?
>>1580619
Dammit, somewhere there was a program that let you create .gifs that did the paper tear-away thing, but it was all in Japanese and hell if I could find it. It came along with that bukkake gif creator that was around about a year or so ago.
>>1588498
http://mygamestudio.x.fc2.com/paperpeel/index.html
>>1588508
Well, that was fast.
>>1588508
>>1588527
Good app
>>1588595
Really good app.
Bump
>>1588508
I'll be having a lot of fun with this.
Anybody got thsat girl on the subway that transitions into her as princess leia
>>1592925
>>1593445
GIF version: http://toms2435.deviantart.com/art/Chie-Satonaka-Through-the-Glass-Animated-597640809
>>1592979
Thanks famila
>>1588595
Ha, glad to see someone made a gif of my edit!
Who did all these gifs? They are great!
>>1602839
Just look for a picture and a nude variant/edit and stick it into
http://mygamestudio.x.fc2.com/paperpeel/index.html
So, assuming this was a real superpower you could get, or the result of some kind of technology like x-ray glasses that you could buy for relatively cheap: how should they work?
Should they only work on one woman at a time? On every woman you see, regardless of whether or not you want to see them naked? And do you always just see them fully naked, or do you get to decide how much clothing you can strip away?
And when seeing a woman naked, do you see her flesh exactly as it beneath her clothing - her breasts floating in air as they're supported by a bra you can no longer see, her pubic hair matted down by now-invisible jeans and underwear?
Or do you somehow magically see all that flesh in some kind of pristine state where it's not affected by the clothing it's wrapped in?
>>1591352
>x-ray paper tear
>leaves vest/ socks
huh
>>1579477
I don't really care for this fetish but I just wanted to hop in to say that those are some really nice bewbies on 2butt
What a great website
Now I can't stop thinking about what looking through those glasses backwards would be like.
Shit.
Bump, sorry
>>1605674
I mean, anyone looking at you while you were wearing them would just see you wearing a pair of glasses? Looking at them backwards isn't any different...
>>1586171
Man, that image is beyond ancient. Really takes me back.
>>1602868
Still, you did a great job with them.
And thanks for link.
bormp
what do you guys search to find those nude versions of clothed pics?
This one is canon!
>>1591352
Sauce pls
>>1602882
>Should they only work on one woman at a time? On every woman you see, regardless of whether or not you want to see them naked? And do you always just see them fully naked, or do you get to decide how much clothing you can strip away?
All of them, since you should be able switch it on and off.
Deal with it if you stare at grandma.
>And when seeing a woman naked, do you see her flesh exactly as it beneath her clothing - her breasts floating in air as they're supported by a bra you can no longer see, her pubic hair matted down by now-invisible jeans and underwear?
if glasses
>Or do you somehow magically see all that flesh in some kind of pristine state where it's not affected by the clothing it's wrapped in?
if superpower
Anyone have a template/exploitable of the x-ray glasses?
>>1625824
Ask Kidetic.