Old thread was in need of a change
Asked in the last thread but I think I misstated. I remember a version of this with a long attached caption. Something about being drunk and not understanding why guys didn't want to bang her or something.
Nth for we need more diapered warframe content.
If anyone has suggestions I could give something a try.
I'm more of an unrealistically thick kind of pamps person, but I like this idea a lot.
basically two of the top on my list right next to equinox, so I'll definitely work towards that then.
She did? Oh man, that sucks. So promising.
Oh well, it's a thing people do for 50 different reasons.
A femmy Rhino would be nice. Having Valkyr lounge around in a thicc diaper, neglecting her litter box would be cute. Maybe something with Stalker being forcibly diapered?
That girl needs to be more careful with her butter.
It's weird to see Influx's art in color .
Nah Nezha is the only one in pull-ups mate, he just slides across the floor into a pair of pull-ups readily waiting for him he aint got time to tape up!
Volt can just go "Bzzzt" im super fast! He has time to change into tapes.
What has my life become that im now fighting with people about what warframes wear diaper wise!
I imagine zephyr would need them too
have to be extra lightweight to be able to navigate well in the air, can't have heavy pamps weighing you down.
STOP! STOP IT RIGHT NOW!
Warframe Diaper List
Ash - 2 Tape
Atlas - 4 Tape
Banshee - 2 Tape
Chroma - 4 Tape
Ember - 2 Tape [Enviroment Resistant]
Equinox - 2 Tape
Excalibur - 2 Tape
Frost - 2 Tape [Enviroment Resistant]
Hydroid - 4 Tape [Heavy Duty]
Inaros - Cloth Diaper
Ivara - Pull-Up
Limbo - 2 Tape
Loki - 2 Tape
Mag - 2 Tape
Mesa - 2 Tape
Mirage - 2 Tape
Nekros - 4 Taped [Always Used]
Nezha - Pull-Ups
Nidus - 4 Tape
Nova - Training Panties
Nyx - 2 Tape
Oberon - 4 Tape
Rhino - 4 Tape
Saryn - 4 Tape [HEAVY Duty]
Titania - 2 Tape
Trinity - 2 Tape
Valkyr - 2 Tape [Heavy Duty]
Vauban - 4 Tape
Volt - 2 Tape
Wukong - 4 Tape
Zephyr - Pull-Ups
Here I wasted my life categorizing each warframe to a diaper type cause I'm a bored retard
Is 2 tape in this context the more babyish variety, and the 4 tape the more DL type?
Ok, so I'm going to use google to both practice terrible Japanese caligraphy and also try to sorta translate these images.
It's dry this morning! Can I (something something) bathroom (something)?
I love the concept of nova trying to be the big sisterly type to mag and the other frames, but always failing terribly.
I feel baby-ish can be applied to any of them, I just mean in terms of needed tapes, I feel some frames would need more support to be fitted on right while others not so much.
To me I feel only the petite warframes would fit a babyish aesthetic for their diapers as the others would be more of a plain white or following their design layout.
Ex: Nezha would have Pull-Ups styled around bright red colors and some ribbon like patterns with little circle indicators while Excalibur would be more of a plain blank diaper if not a simple white with grey trim.
As you can see I saw padded warframes and have started thinking too much into it.
this is the cheesiest thing but I love brainstorming stuff like this.
It's always fun to think about what characters would wear what kind of diapers
I kinda imagined that too minus the Mag bit!
I imagined she cheated using Molecular Prime to make it in time honestly
I was thinking more because she's a tiny spaz in hysteria but that works too but >>1140793 could probably be twisted into it
It seems so hence this has now been made:
Nidus diaper is just a whole bunch of different diapers combined. Like one part is cloth, another part is training pants, some regular diaper thrown in for good measure.
After a few days
Today, it was bad
Did you keep (something) at school?
(something) only a good insurance when it's holding up properly, let's change it.
Sorry to disappoint your efforts anon but this set has already been translated. Though A+ for the effort!
I just finished the third one though.
(something) next day
Hey mom! I didn't wet the bed!
I'm sorry to bother you? Is it a disaster? I do not want to die! Help mother!
. . . . . . .
I don't see art of her either, though.
I could probably work with some twincest stuff with that game, honestly.
Why the fuck would you do that. Fucking disgusting.
This might seem weird from a DL, but I honestly find pretty much everything about poop and pee disgusting. Images are okay, but in person its just nasty. Piss less so.
Pissing yourself without anything to catch it is even grosser, though
If you like the idea of it you'll get there eventually, it starts out nasty, then you teach yourself the basic things, like it's just my own waste, it's not dangerous, it's not as unclean as one normally thinks, the smell is my own and it's not dangerous.
Do it some more times and try to sustain the initial feeling of disgust, let the things that disgust you wear off as you realize it's not as bad as you might instinctively think and calm your body down. Then you'll start noticing the good things about, like the feeling of warm tap water.
I find there is a HUGE difference between water and urine, despite hitting the same warmth they are experienced so differently, with water being very inferior.
>clean girl bullied by messy girls
A unique situation, if that's what's happening
Haha love it.
Right so here is the thing guys.
I am violating DAs terms of service when I upload edits to it without permission, right? That's not an issue, if DA takes down my account at some point it's not something to whine about.
Now then what I want to ask, what do you do when somebody DMCAs your edit for not being permitted to use it, when they themselves do not have permission to use (and on top of that commission) a piece? This is a piece of NGE fanart sold to a person which my edit was DMCAd by this person.
I'm not looking to restore my deviation, but I am looking to report their piece for breaching copyright law in revenge, since fair is fair right? If my edit of their illegal piece can't stay up I find it reasonable that theirs shouldn't either.
Fanart is only legal derivatives if approved by the copyright holder, which 90% of fanart on DA breaches and is technically not allowed to be uploaded on DA, which is why I feel justified in breaking literally the same rule with my edits.
Problem is that DA seems to only work with a "you need to be the owner" or "you need to counter-claim your takedown" shtick. Countering it is stupid because yes, my deviation is breaching this copyright, it's just that this is not the copyright owner.
It's not about giving them attention, it's about talking to DA themselves.
DMCA takedowns are serious business and can lead to lawsuits if you counter-claim them. But the person has no right to DMCA pieces they do not legally own themselves and should not be abusing such a system when they have no legal right to.
That adds to why I would obviously not counter-claim it, but especially adds to why i think it needs a consequence, because they didn't just simply ask, they just went to a DMCA without the necessary rights to do so.
It's a thief reporting a thief for stealing a bank, but they both stole from the same bank, but the thief pretends to be a lawful citizen that did nothing wrong.
Ya, except that the copyright holder hasn't come to them and asked them to take it down, so it resides in a grey area of fair-use. The min the holder asks, then you're in the illegal territory.
But fuck that legality stuff, you're hiding behind that, trying to pretend that you're both wrong. But this isn't a case of you drawing something new, it's you editing *his* work. If the artist didn't care, sure your edits are cute, have at it.
I know it's disappointing, but being a dick about it, and laughing at them, thats just stupid. And since this might be that groups major exposure to diapers as a fetish, you're making us look like a bunch of assholes.
Fuck man, there are a ton of other pics to edit, or god forbid keep working and draw your own stuff.
But honestly grow a pair and accept it. Apologize for being a dick, and take down the man's work.
Sorry, apparently your rustled my jimmies in the not sexy way.
tldr; While I think your edits are fun, I think you're being an asshole about this whole thing, so I'm sayin' something. That's all.
Technically, I believe the edits could fall under parody/satire, since they do somewhat change the meaning and context of the piece, giving it a different meaning than the original artist's meaning. So, much like when someone puts a mustache on a print of the Mona Lisa, it's a relatively small change that changes the entire piece's meaning for existence.
No, that's the thing you see, it's not legal because they haven't said anything. The lack of action does not make it legal. Perceiving it as grey area does not make it so.
Until proven otherwise it is illegal, we're all just ok with it, and totally I am too. You can not hold the rights to a piece of fanart unless explicitly given it. Deviantarts terms of service disallows fanart without permission for this exact reason, and in the same way they do not go out of their way to look for it, doesn't make it right just because it stays there.
You and others percieve it as an asshole behaviour because you are ignoring the double standard and the copyright law. I am no more asshole than they are, they look at something they like and make illegal art of it, I get a request for something people like and make edits of it with my own art. They get angry about it "because I made it" but it's not theirs, they never had the right to make it.
I understand that people perceive an edit and a full work differently, and they are, but they are both illegal.
I take down anything no fuss if the copyright holder tells me to, but I will rather thave my account taken down than take down something people pretend to own the rights to when they don't. I ask them to show or get rights to the work and then come back.
I expect the artists to treat me the same way they treat others. If they take whats not theirs and make something out of it, they can not say "oy" to me for doing the same.
It doesn't take a pair to take down the work, it takes a pair to stand against a tidal wave. IMO.
It's called derivative work, and can be legal if the piece gets a new meaning that is no longer present at all if removed, and yes that moustache is the first simplest and best example of that.
It's a fair point, and a lot of what makes parody/satire is intent. So from a legal standpoint, you could argue dgg by not taking of the signature isn't 'stealing' from the artist, and that clearly wasn't his intent. I totally get that.
It's the response to the whole thing. "legality" aside, the artist takes umbridge to it. So what's the harm in saying, okay cool, sorry, and taking it down? There's plenty of other artists who would either turn a blind eye, or not care. I think it's a terrible response especially as another artist.
Look at weird Al, man even makes his living by parody, but he's respectful about it, even goes so far as to ask permission.
Personally I'd rather be the Weird-Al of diaper edits, than the Kanye of diaper art. *shrugs*
Weird Al is great, but the point is just furthered by that. He chooses to ask for permission but has literally no reason to.
Well, in the US the law recognized parody/satire much better than it recognizes derivative works. DA is an American website, so they'd be going by American law.
And, technically, Fanart also falls under the same classification as long as it isn't advertised as official art or something.
Well, weird-Al doesn't make socially taboo fetish art out of normal tier art, so he doesn't have the same kinds of problems. It's doubtful many of the artists would allow Dgg to make the edits if he asked permission.
"It's easier to ask forgiveness than permission"
Oh certainly Derivative is hard to pull off legally. And like I've said it's not that what I do is legal to begin with, it's just that I'm being approached by people doing something illegal as well and claiming rights.
I'm super pro artists right to their own work, but it if they don't own it I'm not going to treat it like it is.
Parody is not fanart at all though. Haven't read too much up on it but you need to do more than just present the copyrighted character or thing, it needs to be incorporated into a bigger whole.
Yea, Dumb Starbucks was a bit of a thing poking into parody and satire law, it was found to be mostly legal, and Starbucks determined not to press charges.
The laws for parody/satire in the US are vague enough that as long as you're not making money on it you're generally in the clear.
Totally, companies generally don't care, but that doesn't give them the right, they just are highly unlikely to go to court because it would harm them more than do good, so they only target those who makes big dosh out of it or make a big company out of it.
They would all still be fucked over if they were sent to court however, because they actually do not hold the rights.
Non-commercial does not make it legal, just puts you in such a safe-zone for being put in court you have nothing to worry about.
My DMCA situation is with a guy which sold work they had no right to though (which again I am totally ok with people doing, Merunyaa is fantastic for example) and claimed ownership over it.
No. That is absolutely wrong.
It is their art. They do own the work of their own hand. They might not own the character, but it's their drawing. This isn't about owning the character, it's about the work of their hands. That's HIS artwork you're using.
How can you not see that?
You keep trying to turn it into this quest, "I'm going to prove that what we're BOTH doing is illegal!"
Fanart is an industry. Cons are based around it. Artists are found everyday and hired by the companies that they're doing derivative works of. It's the reason companies don't go after people for it as a general rule. What they're doing adds to the culture, and the fandom. It's creative and awesome.
Your edits are fun, you add to our diaper culture (or sub-culture whatever you want to classify us as, lol.) I think you should keep doing them.
But what does ignoring this guy do other than make you an asshole? Right, you're proving that you're both wrong to be drawing other people's characters? That's dumb. You're mixing up the idea of being wrong, and being legal.
If you couldn't copyright a character, or lets say the art you happened to edit was of dracula, a public domain figure. Guy draws drac, you edit his picture, he asks you to take it down. He still doesn't own drac, but isn't doing what you consider to be making 'illegal' art. So you not respecting his wishes on what you're doing with his artwork, that's where the wrong is.
And that's my point. You're making this big deal about him not owning the character. Who cares? It's his artwork, how you're acting isn't the moral high ground.
You can make this about the legality of doing fan art of copyrighted characters, but that's not what this wave of people are seeing. I think it's safe to say we're taking umbridge on how you're treating another artist, another person.
No that's what you get wrong, clearly you have not looked into the legality of fanwork, you do not own any work made from fanwork unless given permission from the copyright holder to own it.
As long as your work is using a copyright infringing character you lose the rights to the fanart unless given permission to use the character.
Fanart is an industry made up of smaller companies doing it illegally and bigger companies given the right to create derivative work.
People are hired for their fanart because they are ok with under-board but it is actually illegal.
Yes I am proving that they are doing something they can't, if they are ok with what they do they need to by proxy be ok with what I do. If they want to believe their art should be allowed to stay on DA (because it does breach their terms) they should believe mine should stay as well. If they gain permission their work is legally there and they can decide to have my work removed.
If Dracula is public domain then the work he makes from it is his, since he becomes the owner of it since the character is not copyrighted. I would take down my work.
I treat artists literally as I want them to treat me (general way of life). When I get good enough (and I sure fucking hope, to put my money where my mouth is) I would have no qualms with people doing what they want with my artwork, and any fanart I made I wouldn't be able to object to peoples usage of even if I didn't like it as long as I hadn't asked for permission to use it.
I practice in the boring stuff like estate management/planning and trusts/wills, but I do have basic knowledge of the IP/copyright field. That being said:
>fan work is technically illegal, but it is shielded by the concept of being a parody
>however, this shield instantly disappears if you're selling your work (cons, commissions, doujins, etc)
>most IP holders will not pursue legal action though because it costs too much and takes too long for it to be worthwhile (the most they'll do is send you a scary C&D letter), but they do have the right to do so if you're making a profit with their IP's
>an individual such as yourself CANNOT claim copyright or ownership of an illegal item (namely, a picture/commission that uses an IP they do not own)
>you cannot initiate a DMCA claim in place of the IP owner, but you can notify them of any DMCA violations (although they likely won't pursue it, as noted above)
My personal advice is to just flat out ignore people if they whine about it. Continue making edits, and do not give them the time of your day. If you really must say something, politely inform them that they are just as in the wrong as you are because they are inappropriately using someone's IP (which they do not have permission to use) for their own personal profit. If they cite the parody clause, notify them that making a profit means the parody clause no longer applies.
If you have any further questions, go right ahead.
Love you man, all your greentext is about how I've understood it too.
I ignore those who are not willing to discuss. I respond to artists with the "get the rights and I'll comply" response. Those who seem willing to discuss I do so with, clearing up missunderstandings.
For example one of them clearly had the wrong idea but wasn't out to fight, turned out he also thought I was doing it for money, but I'm not, and he hadn't noticed I link the source, artist and copyright holder on the works (new thing, added yesterday).
I reported the work of the NGE guy to DA stating that I don't disagree with the DMCA claim but against this person taking ownership of their commissioned fanart they do not own. Nothing may come out of it, but seemed like the best solution.
DA, being a privately owned site, retains the right to act in any arbitrary fashion they please. They could ban people for using the color green in their work for example. That being said, DA does not remove things due to DMCA claims. The only time this would occur is if DA was given specific instructions from the IP holder to remove something from their site.
I would just ignore everyone, period. Keep doing what you're doing (give credit/source to the original artist), and politely ask them for written notice from the IP holder if they claim to own something if they keep badgering you.
Either way, ultimately people should understand that doing commissions is NOT a legal job most of the time. I hate to break it to all your aspiring artists, but drawing characters/IP's that you do not own for your own personal profit is an act that leaves you vulnerable to being sued. I would either suggest you go be fancy and draw landscapes or your own characters, or pursue a different field of work.
Or writing fetish stories that you get paid per chapter for on patreon. If you have good enough writing and have somewhere that you can advertise some teasers or older work you could make better than starving artist money.
Oh certainly, Hiccears did not want to go into the copyright side of things and just told me they would not allow my edits but is ok with fanart.
So I removed all my fanart there, they decide what is and isn't allowed on the site because they own it, no problem, a (long) question and an answer, done.
If DA only takes DMCAs from the copyright owner, why is not the original work I edited taken down? It's still there. That sounds weird. Timing issue maybe, possibly jumped to a conclusion then?
I think having her bound in a box showing her skin-tight suit wrapper around her ass is more NSFW than a diaper?
diapers a bit big for me but it's ok
oh no, it's what everyone already knows, that I'm a person that makes art.
We've already been here Nora. I have already been doxxed and we've gone through all of this.
It's illegal the same way piracy is "oh yeah well, it's technically illegal, but nobody gives a shit", literally nobody jailed for that without the actual reason being real child porn.
You see, they care much more about actual abuse and protecting living children, not fake illustrations about things that never happened and isn't real.
Very, and for such a long time.
Actually, I experience with the legality of fanwork, and it's a frequent reach. I've worked the con circuit at 3 different shows for years. Even worked with a small company licensing a few products with a major copyright holder, successfully I might add. So yes, I have some experience. I made a mistake trying to talk to you about that assuming that you have more than internet experience with it, or more than have just read articles.
When I'm saying they own the work of their hand. I'm not talking about right to distribute, I'm not talking about legal rights to the character. I'm not talking commercial rights.I'm not talking about licensing or DMCA take downs, or a cease and desist. I'm talking about that's their drawing. Theirs.
It's pretty clear though, you're not worried about if what you're doing is disrespectful, you just care if it's illegal. So nothing I say is going to convince you that how you're treating the artist and their artwork is wrong. Not illegal, wrong. Rude. Disrespectful.
Especially if you're a fan enough of Chris Oatley to be quoting his works and articles at me, it seems a point that you should understand pretty well.
Oh sure sure, I get that, I get that people can feel a bit salty about it and they attach an ownership they do not truly own to. As I have said they are the maker of it, and makers feel about what they've made.
But like I said I treat people as I want them to treat me. If I can be objective about something I am.
I agree the easiest no-issue being nice to people way is just removing it as they want, but I don't buy into that, they never asked the copyright owners to make their stuff and feel like they own what they made when they don't, yet get upset when somebody doesn't ask them, treating them literally the same way.
You are absolutely right I won't change my opinion on this because I believe that's how people should act, and not be anal about their work, take all flattery they can get, that someone liked their work enough to want it altered is flattering, but some people are more obsessed about it being theirs and what they want and do not want to see done with it. And I totally comply with that if you own it, but if you don't? No, sorry bud.
I'm so tense right now. I balled up and finally bought some tabbed diapers. Praying no one spontaneously looks in the dryer in the garage.
Nigga you can't hide them in your room or some shit?
Those must be some horrifying sheets.
Posting that here isn't going to set off anyone's morality compass.
Plus can you prove that connection, or what?
Holy Shit Marty, it's the Libyans! I don't know how the found me, but they found me.
Seriously, how the fuck did they find you?
Don't get me wrong, just because we're having a discussion, on different sides of an issue doesn't mean I'd side with the nuclear terrorists over there trying to embarass you in front of friends and kin. That's WAY fucked up.
Oh yeah she is way fucked up, but I fucked up in giving her what she needed when she turned psycho.
So dont worry anon its my fault, this shit doesnt happen by accident, haha.
Reminds me of that one scenario Tamae did a pic for a while back. The older Pokegirls keep picking on Preschoolers by beating them in battles and taking their money, so the Daycare Lady "accidentally" spills something on their clothes then forces them into diapers, eventually leading to them staying at the Daycare.
Some of them might take quickly to that kind of new, carefree life. Others...not so much. That would make for a pretty great short story.
Well, that was fast. Hopefully the idea works okay, I didn't want to do something too babyish, but it seemed fitting for her.
one thing i gotta ask, not discouraging you, but wouldn't it make more sense to diaper the operators considering spoiler reasons?
Counter-question: Who the fuck cares about the operators?
It would definitely make more sense, but, as with most people who have lewd interest in the game, the attraction is definitely in the weird featureless flesh robot things, boring old human kids just don't feel interesting at all in comparison.
I think it's less that their trash gameplay wise, and moreso the fact this is the one MMO with cool robot suit monsters, instead of humans, so that's what most people wanna fug.
Honestly, the question of: "Why associate a character with this fetish?" is about as stupid as the question of: "Why do you like this fetish?"
There's no real reason to it. You have a character you like, there's a fetish you have, naturally, people combine characters they like with fetishes they have.
So what are you getting at? You're confused that people find faceless robots/flesh golems attractive even though they only vaguely resemble humanoids?
What's the point of her sniffing if there's nothing to sniff?
but what if you aren't a fuck-up?
I'm not a fuckup at all by society's standards, but I'm certainly unhappy. Can't really say if freely wearing diapers would've helped me with that, but it probably would've made me more comfortable with my emotions and interests. They were definitely my longest-held secret.
Wouldn't say I'm a fuck up considering I lead a pretty healthy life with job and school but I think I probably would have been a bit more risky with things if I could freely wear if not lazy.
Though now that I do wear more freely considering im mostly surrounded by ABDL friends I would say I would have loved to been more social during HS because somehow openly wearing more I've gotten more friends to hang out with.
Help me friends, I recently bought some Small Molicares but I can't help but feel of needing something printed rather than medical, only thing I can think of is Goodnites but pull-up styles wont cut it and ABU seems to have delayed till Feb for smalls.
Any printed diapers out there for the small folk?
you could get medium bellissimos, put those over a small diaper?
I don't know much about the other Bambinos choices, I kinda liked classicos but i've only tried those twice and then six times on the bellis (since i only get sample packs), but you could try there. Magnificos come in small at least.
>Without the scat.
I'm not into messing, anon, but there's a difference between that and scat.
I have considered that but I rather not waste 2 diapers at once if I'm not doing a movie or video game series marathon.
Looking more for something that is a printed but size small for adults. Can't really find anything since ABU pulled their Smalls to update the diaper design.
I know Tamae (Pic Related) has some poke girl art but if you're looking for Carrotte/Meru quality art then it'll pretty much just be reposts
Like I said, I've only tried Bellis and Classicos. I'm sure another anon will know for sure. I've heard the safari are extremely thick.
Not that anon, but I love safari diapers. They hold a lot and are so cute / crinkly.
I wet a lot so I have to use a booster with them, but they're my go to night diaper. I'm able to sleep the whole night most of the time and change in the morning without any leak issues.
If you're in the south east I can also give you a website to get them sooner than if you ordered from the rearz website.
What do you guys think about food play with this? Been playing Stardew today, and keep thinking of maybe a scene where a character gets crushed blackberries put down the back of their diaper.
Question about rashes: Is it possible to clear up a rash (in the area of the leg guards and under the scrotum) without using cream?
I'm planning on just washing the area gently in the shower and switch from wearing diapers to training pants for a few days.
I don't want to use a cream and get it on my pants, that's why I'm curious.
>Is it possible to clear up a rash (in the area of the leg guards and under the scrotum) without using cream?
Obviously your skin will heal itself so yes it most certainly is possible. But aren't training pants just pull-ups? If I am to understand you correctly why do you are going to be wearing them in lieu of diapers why care?
You're a funny guy, anon
You mean like a Perineal skin cleanser? I have some foam cleanse stuff that cleans the area really well.
Well they're cloth training pants that I'm using. I don't want to have to wash them all the time or get lots of cream in the fabric.
I've already been wearing them for a day with only a few close calls. So I'd have to wear something with some padding just in case.
Well I've been 24/7 for about 6 months.
I didn't have any problems before. Then I used a Johnson's nighttime lotion (the purple bottle) on my diaper area one night and I guess that made my skin sensitive. Since then I've gotten a few rashes just from wetting and not changing soon enough. I've always used cream before and didn't worry much about it though.
This rash is pretty gnarly though, so I'm going to go a few days not wearing to try and give it time to air out and let my skin build up it's resistance again. (if that's even a thing)
I might do something with sometime, then. Thinking about some gal helplessly tied or cuffed or pinned to a tree as some folks go through her stuff and fill her diapers with the more liquidy/mushy food items. Cracking open eggs, smushing berries, things like that. Maybe she bumps into someone and splashes some milk or something all over them and they get upset?
Have her tied to a tree under one of the sap collectors and have it seep into her diaper?
That'd be pretty great for a punishment scene. But, come to think of it, it'd all be pretty great as a punishment. Every time she gets her diaper changed, she also gets various food items put within. Or maybe she doesn't like some food and gets a "One way or another, that's ending up in your diaper." And ends up with the meal stuffed down her pants.
I always kinda liked farms and diapers, if only cause as a kid I thought it'd be a novel idea to shovel manure into a girl's padding, but now that seems like kind of a gross thing.
I might do something with this. If not, I'm sure someone will.
>order a onesie with pacifier from onesies downunder for my little for christmas on december 6th, hoping to have it here so I can gift wrap it and ship it to her for a late christmas present.
>the shipping option with tracking is over three times as much as economy, whatever, they're good for it right?
>next to christmas, no sign of them
>send em an email asking what's up
>"Should be in the mail keep lookin, typical shipping time is 16-20 business days but holidays might cause slow downs"
>it's not over 30 business days later, check the mail, still nothing, send em another email
>"We would recommend checking with your local post office to see if it is currently awaiting collection.
We have not received this item back in the mail."
Not impressed. I've ordered shit from china on a friggin app that got here quicker. With no tracking, I've got no real reason to believe it's even on the way and hasn't just been delivered to somebody else by accident. Gonna ask for a refund. Anyone else had problems with these guys?
Neither of those are right, actually.
>I didn't wet the futon today! I can wear training pants now, right?
>One day later
>My my, looks like today was no good.
>Are the diapers at school enough? When you have accidents at school, make sure to get changed in the nurse's office, okay?
>Yet one day later
>(hic) Hey, mom! I didn't wet the bed today! (sob)
>My, that's a good girl.
>(sniffle) Is there something wrong with me? Could it be a disease? I don't wanna die! Help me, mommy! (hic)
>Even though she's a big girl, she's still wearing diapers!
>Her butt's all fluffy!
>That's so silly!
>This girl, you see... even though she's already nine, she's a baby who can't go without her diapers.
sure, have some fresh oc made by me it's not finished tho
Hah, nice, I like it when artists do these camera interface kinda things, it's silly fun.
Most artists tends to make their diapers too much like balloons, you might want to consider rounding the bottom of it a bit more, the length of the front and back should be about the same, but here the back is much further down than the front, and then it goes flatly into the short length of the front which makes it weirdly flat looking.
It's correct that that area is not round however, it's not a ball, the roundness of back and front could just do with a better invisble bridge.
Again, looks very nice, always nice to see new work.
Working on something spontaneous and silly that i have finished silhouetting now to relax, might not end up in anything postable but we'll see. Wouldn't be sexy either way since that's not the point of it.
I forgot to say in regards to balloons that you might have the opposite problem, not implying you have that problem at all, it's quite nice whenever people don't do that.
You might be overcompensate for what you believe is right. I know I have problems making the plastic correctly fit around the ass in ass-views and in sitting views like the Moxxi one.
Note to Self: Do not attempt to mess while sitting down again. It just immediately goes out the back
With that attitude, you aren't likely to be getting any sort of girlfriend anytime soon. Diapers are fun, but they shouldn't be any sort of basis for a relationship. Find a girl you like who'll love you for who you are, then see if she'll engage in diaper play for you (if she's not into it on her own.)
That's just physics Anon, where did you think it was going to go? Get yourself showered off and into a clean diaper right this instant. You don't want that messiness getting on your clothes, do you?
Actually looks really good so far in my opinion.
Oh anon, just the sentence alone is enough to show that you wont get any kind of girlfriend let alone in the fetish anytime soon. If you're gonna base it off a fetish, where you have already gone wrong with fetlife, the relationship will never last to be anything meaningful.
Your best bet for a diapered GF?
A) By some luck you find an actual girlfriend with a foundation revolving around your actual compatibility where you can slowly introduce the idea of diapers in bed and that is assuming she has an open mind.
B) Talk to a Girl in the ABDL community and try to get to know her outside of just diapers and see where it goes
I honestly have no high hopes for you given your post though.
I want to bite, i want to taste, oh giddity! It looks sooo good! Have a (you)
are you two(?) defending a person claiming that women are meant to serve men sexually and should be emotionally manipulated? Do you really believe that a claim like that isn't coming from a person with a deep seated hatred towards women, typical of an /r9k/ member?
>le wacky reaction image
Not an argument
stop getting serious in a porn thread you shits my boner is too fickle for this
the point of that list is to know a good response to empty insults, not to post the list whenever you find one
like how you can shoot down a fallacy by just arguing around the flaw instead of saying it's a fallacy and claiming victory
Ditto that. I also didn't get into it until after puberty, so a childhood spent in diapers would've only further ostracized me. I would likely have come to resent them as a symbol of my loneliness, awkwardness, and general inability handle certain situations. Thus I would be deprived of something that later in life I would have taken pleasure in as a relaxant and temporary escape from my adult responsibilities.
>Women aren't into diapers, or any fetish, really. They don't have a sex drive of their own - their sexual behaviour is oriented around serving men, not obtaining pleasure for themselves.
Are you actually fucking retarded?
>When women hold all power to shame and accuse men
Let me enlighten you about the world, Anonymous: every single person you have a personal relationship with has the power to fuck you. Your girlfriend, your best friend, your mother, your father, your siblings...every single one of them could turn on you. Relationships are built on a foundation of trust, and while romantic relationships typically involve more trust than other types, they can all be equally damaging.
If you're going to limit yourself to cutey diaper grills only, who will sign a contract to never betray me, final destination, well...don't expect to be in a romantic relationship anytime soon. Diapers may be an important part of your sexual and self identity, but if they're important enough to be a deal-breaker you should really re-evaluate your priorities. Open-mindedness and non-combative personalities are far more important traits to be looking for.
Alright well since your assertio is so sound, I guess that there must have been some sort of mistake in me and a friend of mine, who are both into diapers and ageplay. In fact, we met in the ABDL community. We've both seen each other on camera as well, so its not "catfishing" or anything like that.
Or how about lesbians. Clearly they're not oriented around serving men, now are they?
Please give whatever batshit insane thought you spew from your fingertips a few more seconds before hitting enter next time, assuming this isn't just bait
Apparrently turning your partner into a sex slave and basing your relationship completely on a fetish is romantic. Wew lad
>Thinks being a virgin means you don't know any girls or anything about them or anything about their sexuality.
I took a bite anon, but I had to, I mean, what. You can't generalize all women by how you have experienced some and supposedly yourself. It's literally half the population you're generalizing here.
It's literally what you said tho.
>Thinks imperial evidence is good evidence that can stand on its own
>women are meant to serve men sexually
That's true, though. All of history prior to the past 50 years or so bears that out, and even today many women, even self proclaimed feminists, freely admit that that's what they want. Look at the popularity of 50 shades of grey, for example. Liberals think that bringing this up means you hate women because they see it as inherently degrading. But it's not at all. It's as normal and natural as women having breasts or wide hips. Value judgments don't enter into the equation.
Liberals like to accuse everyone else of hating women, yet they find everthing about women's desires and actions offensive. Silly.
>[ ... ] you're best off making a woman serve you sexually and it is well within the realm of possibility to make them do so, as this is in their nature
That's an unbelievably warped interpretation of what myself and that other poster were saying. Sexuality is an important need that should be considered in a relationship, but you seem to be laboring under the idea that it's the foundation.
A woman is not "serving" you sexually if she indulges you in your fetish; she's working together with you to meet your sexual needs. Odds are you'll never convert a non-ABDL to like the fetish, turns out she just liked YOU the whole time. Go figure. Ideally you would do the same for her, since a relationship is a partnership.
>but you seem to be laboring under the idea that it's the foundation.
That's a bit like saying salary isn't the foundation for seeking employment. Why do you want to be employed if not to be salaried? Why do you want a sexual relationship if not to have sex (or your own equivalent).
Whoops. I meant this one, sorry:
Free (you) tho?
Goddammit, anon. Make a tumblr and post everything, even your unfinished shit. Your pokegirls are both love and life.
requesting skelly (left) in a diaper crying for the black girl(right) to pick her up
Yup. But it would only fade if you were lying on your back and had an accident (or just went) like that. The stars are likely just decoration, but there could be some fade-when-wet stars on the front as well
Here's how it looks under her tights
sorry anon but i wish to remain as low key and anonymous as possible, i got plenty of both sketches and full drawings nobody but me have seen, i'll occasionally will drop a few in these threads as my thanks for all the good pics you anons have been posting
Damn you, anon.
Ah well, so long as you share sometimes, thanks for the content anyways.
>Elisa Maza diaper art
Holy fuck i didn't realize i needed this.
I really love that pic. The diaper just looks so crinkly. I think it's the high waistline and leg guards that do it for me.
Plus the way the bottom one is sneaking a kiss by holding the training pants way back there. It's just such a cute scenario that I want sometime.
Elfen Lied's manga has a single diapered character in it in the form of Nozomi, but that's not a read I'd recommend for fapping unless you need to lubricate your member with tears.
I'm sure you can find her specific pages easily if your Google-Fu is strong enough.
I read through that in middle school, I think. Possibly high school.
Actually read that manga because there was a diapered character.
I also read through it in high school, as one of my first mangas. It hits me in all of my sensitive buttons, and that was back when I had a tougher time with that sort of content. Nazomi was a surprise to me at the time as I started to read it to see the differences between it and the anime, and then "wham", diapered character out of nowhere.
I just wanna say thanks, anon. If it weren't for creeps like you, I wouldn't seem like such a catch.
i dont know if this is the right place to ask, but is there a diaper doujin of her?
43, 44, 72, 75.5 and 82 are the main chapters that involve her diapers. 47 has a nice yuri scene with her too.
>being an elitist
I hope that with all the new Fire Emblem games announced, and the mobile one about a week and a half away, we get a good influx of FE art.
I'm crossing my fingers for some of Veronica because she looks like she could use some love and care.
Veronica looks to have TharjaFace, and, if so and possible, I want to marry the fuck out of her
I just hope she's usable. I doubt the game will have a marriage thing, but they did show hearts on the character cards and you get hearts whenever you converse with a character.
If there's hearts, there's a good chance there's a bond system found in a lot of mobile games, such as the one in Fate/Grand Order. Whether full affection results in a cool item or marriage, only time will tell.
Any editfags see potential on this image?
So the New York Times had this article today that might be of interest:
>New York Times
What the fuck? WHAT THE FUCK? Why is this on the new york times? If she really needs to go on about how much she loved shitting her diapers, couldn't she just do it behind anonymity like a normal person?
But Anon, late potty training makes her *quirky* and *interesting*!
That still doesn't belong on the news. And goddammit, reading that actually does make me think she's either a diaper fetishist or a scat fetishist. Why does this at all matter to anyone?
Get me pictures of her in a diaper and I will.
>Why does this at all matter to anyone?
In fairness, it came from the 'Arts' section, which usually has a few light/personal interest type articles written by people in the entertainment industry, and not so much "hard-hitting journalism". Why *she* chose this topic is anybody's guess.
I mean I guess. It's still an odd place to put it. I can't imagine she hasn't at least considered wearing a diaper again. If she really likes pooping diapers that much, she's probably indulged.
Maybe she's doing it to help 'merica during this difficult time? She's like, "oh learning to use the potty was something scary that I didn't wanna do ever, but I had to eventually embrace the change and I'm better for it." Or some crap?
Ya know like how change isn't always bad and things that seem scary and almost life ending aren't always what they seem to be.
Pfft. Life may have taken my diapers away, but you know what I did.? I got stronger.
I. Took. The Diapers. BACK.
Yet she still talked about how she loves shitting.
You guys are so obsessed with your own fetish you don't realize that it's plainly written by the end there, like summarized and everything, that it is about embracing change.
You may be comfortable where you are now and you don't want to accept or deal with the change you have to do or are expected to undergo, but once you do it you might find that it wasn't all that bad after all, actually, you enjoy the change once you gave it some time and now you can't see yourself going back.
Like she said, she loved being in diapers back then, pooping them led to her best "me moments", but now she's gone full 180 and fucking love going to the bathroom because that's become her personal space and gives her her "me moment", something she never could have had without embracing that change.
And she could never had had that me moment now without also being considered really weird, also saved by the change.
That doesn't make it any less fucking strange, she implied she'd still be in diapers if she knew about the abdl thing.
>implying I'm taking this seriously and not as a goofy piece of 'fluff' journalism