Soccer Midgets

>>160202591
>before the inevitable axe?
Dont jinx it.

>>160202591
>inevitable axe?
Delete this.

>>160202787
>>160202883
I want it to survive but it's just not fit for the people who buy Jump sadly
YOKO should try his luck in another magazine
I'd love it if it somehow did well though

>>160202591
>who's father
should be "whose"

>>160204203
Not necessarily. If they want to know whuch child is this father of, then it's "whose". But if they want to know who is this father they see, then it's "who's".

>>160204376
>But if they want to know who is this father they see, then it's "who's".
Even if that's what they're asking, "Who is father?" is still grammatically incorrect. You'd at least have to add 'this' before 'father.'

>>160203034
Everyone said the same for Sesuji and it still managed to survive for 80 chapters and even had a decent ending. And Shudan is even getting a color page and extra pages this week for its seventh chapter, unlike the other new series Cross Account. It may actually survive.

File: 1cry.png (116KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 500x275px

>>160202591
>inevitable axe?
Why must you hurt me like this?

>>160202591
where are chapters 1-3 though?

>>160207726
Search in the archive, Viz anon ripped them.

>>160207726
Somewhere in the archives, it git translated by viz.

Is the not-ballroom-youkoso stil running?

>>160202591
Soccer Loving Neighbor might be the best character out of the whole manga, hell he's probably the most complex and thought out character in all the history of fictional literature.

>>160205047
>Who is

You're wrong since the very basics. One thing is to use an apostrophe to show "possession" and a completely different thing is to use it for letter "omission". Saying "who's" and "who is" are completely different things.

>>160202591
I hope it at least lasts as long as dancing midgets.

File: 1488500919887.png (404KB, 738x738px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 738x738px

I AM! I AM!

>>160207820
Ended with 10 volumes. The dance midgets became nonmidgits.

>>160202591
>axe

>>160208348
There is no apostrophe for possession in this case, you silly ESL. The possessive form of "who" is "whose," and only "whose."