You should be able to solve this.

>>159777259
sqrt 6

>>159777259
sqrt(6)

File: Kebab Removal Robot.jpg (61KB, 640x469px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x469px

>>159777259

(2)^(1/2) * (3)^(1/2) = (2 * 3)^(1/2)

QED. Simplification is for plebs.

>>159777339
>>159777340
>>159777412
You can add and subtract with square roots but not divide or multiply.

sqrt(A) + sqrt(B) = sqrt(A+B)

sqrt(A)/sqrt(B) != sqrt(A/B)

>>159777259
sqrt5

>>159777259
Banana

>>159777725
Nice bait

>>159777725
>sqrt(A) + sqrt(B) = sqrt(A+B)
really?
sqrt9+sqrt25=sqrt34
sqrt34=3+5
8*8=34?
no?

>>159777259
It's basically 6x = ?, cannot be solved.

File: 0ab.gif (229KB, 379x387px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 379x387px

>>159777725
Even if you're pretending, it still makes you a retard.

>>159777901
>real number multiplied by another real number
>can't be solved

File: 1496156944717.jpg (45KB, 640x496px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x496px

>>159778091
>real number
All numbers are real, otherwise they wouldn't be numbers.

>>159778131
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number

>>159777259
It's easy, really. You just need to use Euler's theorem to take the Laplace constant of the two so that you don't get a complex number and then you can do a quick differentiation of the integral on the three with only a slight dip into some set theory to define the roots as infinitesmal and you can easily solve this equation in time for lunch.

File: 1342393980255.jpg (274KB, 664x897px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 664x897px

>>159777259
All irrational numbers should be deleted from math.
Yay or yay?
They serve no purpose in the real world.

>>159778131
all numbers are imaginary retard

>>159777901
>6x
that a multiplication sign, not a variable

>>159778262
How do you measure something between the two smallest measurements?

>>159778327
Use your dick.

File: don't ask stupid questions.jpg (54KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1280x720px

>>159778327
With a ruler. And rulers have only rational numbers.

>>159778382
What if it's less than a foot long though?

>>159777259
I'm trained as a Historian and currently an EFL teacher, I can't do math.

>>159777259
√2x√3=?
x=?/(6√²)

>>159778423
How inadequate

>>159777259
Hit it with a rock until the pieces form an answer

>>159777259
3*3=9, therefore 3>sqrt(6).

Using the Babylonian method:
It1: 3 => 6/3 = 2 => (3+2)/2 = 2.5
It2: 2.5 => 6/2.5 = 2.4 => (2.5+2.4)/2 = 2.45
It3: 2.45 => 6/2.45 ~= 2.44 => (2.44+2.45)/2 =~ 2.449

sqrt(2)sqrt(3)=sqrt(6)~=2.449

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2%5E1%2F2*3%5E1%2F2

>>159778131
Define 'real'.
Define 'number'.
Define 'numbers'.

>>159778327
>How do you measure something between the two smallest measurements?

Ignore it. Significant figures.

>>159778262
How about pi?

>>159778131
>merely pretending

File: 1444298301214.jpg (148KB, 286x431px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 286x431px

You should be able to solve this.

>>159779658
Isn't pi more like a constant related to circles than a random irrational? it's like C or G. You could say it's a special number, an honorary rational.

>>159777259
1.8612097182

Are people in this thread really that retarded?

>>159780150
keit-ai

>>159779548
Define 'define'.

>>159779586
>Ignore it.
That's not the way we do things in the real world.

>>159780611
'define': weuuv pjenq jcpiuw aspuoy vabs

>>159780649
Define 'shitpost'

>>159780722
your're mom

>>159780769
at least my mum doesn't need to wait for the earth to rotate to see her feet

>>159780150
Finds a way.

File: Keit-Ai Webtoons.png (553KB, 696x692px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 696x692px

>>159780150
Already a thing.

http://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/keit-ai/list?title_no=36825

File: fe9.png (65KB, 401x473px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 401x473px

>>159780150

>>159779548
#define REALNUMBER long double

>>159781465
>using floats

Hahaha fucking faggot

>>159781369
Ok, that's kind of cool

>>159781595
He said real numbers, not rationals.

File: Untitled.png (5KB, 190x436px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 190x436px

>>159781846
/a/ already solved this it's 20
and the triangle looks like this

>>159778262

I'm no mathematician, but aren't irrational numbers more or less just our current mathematical system being too inaccurate to explain certain problems, i.e. 100/3 = 33.33333~?

It sounds like the practical solution isn't to just say "stop thinking about these, they're useless".

>>159783151
Fractions are rational.

>>159780150
Stop posting that because it's already a thing.

https://www.fictionpress.com/s/3206139

>>159778131
Numbers are abstractions that don't exist in the physical world you fucking 89iq

>>159778262
So circles can't exist ?
If I were to draw a circle with an area of say, 2m^2, that would be impossible ?

>>159784767
*square not circle

1.414*1.732=2.449

>>159780565
I'm not sure how you got you answer but you're wrong.

>>159780150
Can somebody explain to retarded me?

>>159783151
Irrational literally means you cannot compute the number as a ratio of two whole numbers. What you're probably thinking of is that computers have limited memory so can only store a limited amount of digits form an irrational number (which is called a rational approximation since any terminating decimal is rational).

>>159779658
>>159780422
pi is a special kind of irrational number called a "transcendental number". Despite the fancy name it just means it's not the solution of any polynomial equation. So the square root of 2 is the solution to (x^2 - 2 = 0), the golden ratio is the solution to (x^2 - x - 1), but pi isn't th solution to anything like that, neither is e.

Solve what?

>>159785217
Find the letter on the keyboard and move your finger in the direction of the bite mark.

>>159777339
Nice, now prove it.

Why does /a/ fail spectacularly in math?

>>159777259
v2*v3=?
v6=?
v=?/6
There is an infinite amount of solutions to this equation. For every real value of v there exists a value of ? that would make the equation correct.

inb4
>b-b-but v doesn't have to be real
You are not smart, you are a smartass. Solution exists for every complex value of v too. See, I know words too!

>>159784767
just use "lunar" math.

The addition of two digits is the lArgest digit.
The multiplication of two digits is the sMallest digit.

A square of an area of 2 m^2 has a side length of 2 since 2 times 2 is 2.

The circumference of a polygon is the largest side,

Achilles and the turtle would never move.

You can solve Fermat's last theorem for any numbers, since

a^n + b^n = a + b = (a + b)^n

Well, this is going to be silly.

>>159788982
>circles
Sorry, didn't read that. Not sure how to "correctly" find formulas for the area, but if we use or formula (pi times r times r) then the answer is also 2 (if pi >= 2).

>>159787407
Okay:

a^x * b^x = (a * b)^x
Pf)
Base Case- a^0 * b^0 = 1 * 1 = 1 = (a * b)^0
Assume this holds true for n steps
Inductive Case- take n + 1th step
a^(n+1) * b^(n+1)
= (a^n * a) * (b^n * b)
= ((a^n) * (b^n)) * (a * b)
= (a * b)^n * (a * b)
= (a * b)^n+1
QED
Now using this, we have
sqrt 2 x sqrt 3
= 2^(1/2) * 3^(1/2)
= (2 * 3)^(1/2)
= 6^(1/2)
= sqrt 6
QED

>>159784687
But what about this 9?

(2)^-2 * (3)^-2 = ?
2 * 3 = (?)^2
6 = (?)^2
? = (6)^-2

Anyone asking for a full proof is an idiot that doesn't understand how axioms work. The divide between the assumptions one claims this way and the assumptions one makes with a 'full proof' is totally irrelevant. Mathtards love their busywork.

>>159789113
nice try, but this only proves it for integer exponents, and a, b must be not 0, since 0^0 is undefined.

>>159789262
Incorrect
http://www.askamathematician.com/2010/12/q-what-does-00-zero-raised-to-the-zeroth-power-equal-why-do-mathematicians-and-high-school-teachers-disagree/

>>159789262
Why? 0^0 is defined, as 0^0.

>>159777259
>caring about math you will literally never ever use in your entire life if you are in a respectable trade
Who gives a shit? Am I going to ask the cashier for √47 cents in change?

>>159789262
>>159789317
it is undefined as it can have multiple values.

File: 1493249081834.jpg (54KB, 750x624px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 750x624px

Is this the thread where we pretend to be smart
?

>>159789352
An empty product is always the neutral element of multiplication (1) just like an empty sum is always the neutral element of addition (0).

>>159789352
That isn't undefined you dope. Why are mathtards so stupid? They can't even grasp elementary logic*. They LITERALLY make crap up just because it's convenient.

It is 0^0, that is a definition. That is a symbol. Do you claim that symbols now have a hierarchy of validity?

* No, the 'higher matheamatics' your Indian professor and /sci/ told you about is not good logic. Good logic doesn't even exist.

File: 1361398968551.jpg (26KB, 237x198px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 237x198px

>>159789346
This.
It's mindboggling they teach anything beyond long-division and multiplication when you never use that garbage unless you're a maths major, in which case you and your ilk haven't contributed anything of note in the past ~200 years.

We'd be better off replacing highschool maths with a general skills class, like "how to fill out of a tax return", "how to drive a car", basic first-aid, and more advanced sex-ed. Things nobody is taught but which are critically important.

File: [distress].jpg (108KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 900x900px

>>159789262
>but this only proves it for integer exponents
Damn
It's late and I don't want to do a continuous proof ok
>>159789309
>>159789317
>>159789352
There's discrepancy due to combinatorial arguments (1 way to map from empty set to empty set) and calculus (0^0 is p common as an indeterminate form) but a, b are already non-zero so who cares

i hope this thread will still be up 16 hours later

>>159789346
>>159789459
based retardbros
t. retardbro

>>159789495
>retard
>math majors fall for the 200k meme
>all trade schools make it and do respectable crafts for more than anyone else
Using math is like eating with your hands. We used to do it thousands of years ago, now there is no need.

>>159789514
What's your argument this time?
I though it was "math" is useless and we shouldn't learn it.

File: angryburg.jpg (42KB, 542x675px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 542x675px

>>159789407

>>159789459
It's hard enough to get the average student to pay attention in a regular class, what makes you think they're going to want to learn some boring shit like tax returns?

I mean it's a good idea on paper but it falls apart when you realize teenagers are retarded and they're just going to forget half of everything they learn in the next 1-5 years anyway.

File: 1498254602496.jpg (122KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 900x900px

>>159777259
I'm sorry but your expression contains ill-defined objects. For example, the "square root of two" was proven nonexistent over two thousand years ago by Hippasus. As such the given problem does not make sense.

File: 1492895624779.jpg (51KB, 476x382px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 476x382px

>it's a m/a/th thread

>>159789445
When a natural number is raised to the power of 0, the product is always 1. 0^0 is logically 0^0 in your explanation, but that's like saying 1=1, of course that kind of circular statement will be true no matter what. Here's the thing: we're not talking about your retarded monkey equation, we're discussing what its result is. 0^0 differs from natural numbers raised to the zeroth power because any number multiplied by 0 is still zero whereas 1 is the only number that satisfies the condition for natural numbers.

What you said is particularly insulting because not only are you dismissing the works of mathematicians as trivial, you are also demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of how logic works, while claiming that you understand basic logic. Embarrassing.

>>159789772
No kiddo, you don't understand what logic is. No, circlejerking over symbols is not logic.
>abloobloo im insulted ;cCCC
Poor little undergrad... Logic is an idol. Idols exist to be smashed.

>>159789668
Fucking autistic Greeks, man.

>>159789810
Enjoying your office job with your humanities degree?

>>159789810
fucking post-post-modernist shitcunts

File: 1498023497592.gif (3MB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x333px

>>159780639
>Prefers sig fig to irrational numbers
Now i know you're just trying to fuck with me

>>159789668
Tell me about Wildberger, why does he reject contemporary Math?

This explains why everyone in /sci/ is a retarded weeb shitposter.

>>159789984
Of course, anime is the thinking man's media.

>>159790070
It's actually 9/8. Look up, geometric series.

>>159790132
Yeah I know I'm retarded

>>159790132
>>159790070
>>159790046
It's 5/4 you turbo brainlets.

>>159780150
A boy falls in love with a girl.
Unable to confess, he is gifted with by a deus ex machina with the girl’s phone number. Never minding the strange area code, he immediately calls her, and is overjoyed to find out that she has a crush on him as well.
But, the next day, when he recounts the previous day’s confessions to the girl, she only looks at him with a perplexed expression. After some investigation, he finds out that the girl he called is not the same girl he fell in love with. In fact, she doesn’t exist in this universe at all. She is the girl’s alternate universe counterpart, who has fallen in love with the MC’s own AU self, who too is blissfully unaware of her crush.
Hijinks ensue as the two strike up a deal to give each other their darkest, most private secrets in order to equip the other with the weapons they need to conquer the heart of their other selves. While the two chase their respective loved ones, DRAMA ensues as they begin to fall in love with each other instead and question the NATURE of LOVE.

>>159789407
what the fuck is the point of the limit meatbone > infinity if the meatbone isnt even in the fucking equation

>>159790153
I fuckes up an operation, but I'm getting 9/4. Burger ia 6. Donut is 3 cause x*6+6= 24. And pizza is 5 cause 3*x-6=9. So ratio ia 5/9 and the seriea converges to 1/(1-(5/9))= 1/(4/9)=9/4.
>>159790236
Are you blind?

>>159790312
The first term is not 1, it's 5/9, so it should be (5/9)/(1-5/9) = 5/4

>>159790348
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_series Come on anon.

>>159790363
Go ahead, plug the numbers in for the series in a calculator and tell me it doesn't converge to 1.25
(5/9) + (5/9)^2 + (5/9)^3 + ...

>>159790402
Check the fucking formula retard http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeometricSeries.html

File: TOKI.jpg (286KB, 1174x926px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1174x926px

>>159777339
>I was right
Still got it.

File: 1488156801304.png (8KB, 370x159px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 370x159px

>>159790447
No need to be rude anon.

Solve this faggots:

∫ √(tan x) dx

File: dabs.png (88KB, 500x391px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x391px

>>159790487
O shit lel, fucking fries.

Nice /b/ thread.

>>159790548
Anon, you're an dumbass.

File: ss+(2017-07-14+at+05.01.01).png (19KB, 693x321px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 693x321px

I break mirrors with my face in the united states

File: images.png (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>159790582
I...I'm just tired. That's all!

>>159777339
squirt 6

File: the math.png (102KB, 2204x1330px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 2204x1330px

>>159781846
>>159782174

Is my math wrong or what?

>>159789352
>>159789309
>>159789262

You are all wrong

>>159780150
That's a pretty dumb worded question, decoding the letters won't make the message appear, because it's already right there. You'd just be able to read it now.

>>159792422
The answer is I wanna tease Chris-chan

You are buying rice at a poorly stocked store. There are multiple brands of rice, but only so many boxes of each available for sale. Each brand has a certain amount of rice for a certain price. You desire to purchase as much rice as possible without exceeding your budget.
Find a general solution that can be calculated in polynomial time.

These kind of threads should be banned,because they don't have anything to do with anime, and i can't solve the riddles.

File: ss+(2017-07-14+at+04.12.56).jpg (56KB, 810x671px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 810x671px

>>159781846
Whoops

somewhere between 1.3 and 1.6 I would guess

>>159780150
O, Yesu-
A misspelled ode to Jesus

File: 1497149618990.jpg (70KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 500x600px

>>159777259
you can't solve the square root of 2x without having a way to solve for x. Fucking retarded nips.

>>159777259
Just leave it as is or use a calculator

t. Math major

File: 1467089196583.png (420KB, 960x567px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 960x567px

>>159791744

File: image.png (8KB, 537x246px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 537x246px

>>159781846
>>159793651