why japan nevers animate on one? It's always 3-4 BS. It

I aren't known

>>159393917
Could you rephrase the question?

>>159394034
OP refers to the fact anime in tv series is basically done at 3-4 frames per second.

when he talks about being on one, he refers animations being drawn at least 12 frames per second.

Just watch at 1.5 or 2 times speed.

File: 1425001945073.jpg (46KB, 618x618px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 618x618px

>>159393917
>why japan nevers animate on one?
>It's always 3-4 BS.

>>159393917
Before you worry about that, learn to make story continue at least for two weeks straight, Murrica!

File: 1499140746668.gif (259KB, 500x354px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 500x354px

>>159394092
C'mon dude.

On 1's = 24 frames per second.
2's = 12
3's = 8
etc

It's not rocket science. Animators should all be using Iso's full limited style to vary the timing of the drawings anyway.

>>159393917
Singlets ,when will they learn

>>159394225
are there any 2D animation made on 60 FPS?
just curious, it could be a small gif.

>>159394092
That is some next weirdly wrong information.
Animation on "Ones" mean it's 24 drawings per second. "Twos" are 12 drawings per second which was the western standard for cartoons.
Animating on "Threes" doesn't mean it has 3 drawings a second but 8 which is the anime standard altough anime tends to break out of this fairly often. Especially for sakuga.

>>159393917
>But OP, doesn't jiggling the background in the off frame count as animating on ones?
I hate that, but he worst is when they do this in the OP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ73Qv-RQNg

Youtube doesn't show it too well, but the sweep out at 0:48 looks so stupid. It's actually animated on a crazy 3-1-3-1 sequence that looks horrible when it would have taken just a few more frames to do it right. Didn't even fix it for the BD.

>>159393917
Because that's how you get the industry to fucking support itself financially. This should be common knowledge, and I want to call you new for not understanding it, but the people ITT who apparently don't know what animating on ones means makes me think that maybe you aren't the new one.

>vlcsnap
Nevermind, you're new. Fuck off.

>>159394793
>muh money
then make the industry switch to 3D and make better 3D tools for anime.

>>159394847
>>>muh money
>make better 3D tools for anime
Are you retarded? Good 3D is expensive.

>>159394881
the expensive part is employees wages.

faster to produce = cheaper.

wasn't kemono friends 3D in blender?

>>159394291
Just off the top of my head is a small part in the Sakura Trick OP, it's the part where they're dancing in unison.

>>159394975
Kemono looks like trash though

>>159395953
and yet japan eat that shit like hot cakes.

quality != popularity.

>>159395953
Yeah and it's stupid popular so clearly no one gives a damn about quality.

>>159394291
You can always interpolate. There are some examples on youtube.

>>159394975
>wasn't kemono friends 3D in blender?

>Kemono Friends
>better 3D tools for anime
I don't see the connection.

Because most TV anime have no budget.

>>159395953
The trash quality is part of its appeal.

>>159394847
>>159394975
Wait, was your argument here supposed to be that if they care about making money then they might as well just make everything KF-tier 3D? Because if so, that's the most retarded logic I've seen in a long fucking time. Every business cares about money, because they need to fund their next project and their employees need to eat. There is a lot of middle-ground between "let's just do the absolute cheapest thing imaginable" and "let's just ignore reality and pretend we have unlimited budget." Toei tried to do everything on 1s. They stopped as soon as Tezuka provided an alternative, because they weren't making money.

I remember someone mentioning Flip Flappers had some animations on one, but I could never be bothered to check.

>>159393917
Complex character design > MUH FRAMES

>>159393917
Because they're cheap and the culture of the industry prefers detail in the frames, not animation. That's also why you get so many tracking shots and entire scenes of only one character's lips moving.

>inb4 forced animation

File: 1498438675931.jpg (88KB, 678x678px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 678x678px

wHY JApAn neVErS anImATE oN onE?

>>159394291
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YamWNqHQvgQ

>>159400251
looks weird, fuck that

>>159400101
Go back to /co/

>>159393917
There's a remarkable lack of technical understanding.

>>159393917
>this word salad
>vlcsnap
Good thread, OP.

>>159394225
>it's not rocket science
"1s" would be 60FPS on any modern television.

>>159400820
>he doesn't know how film works

File: 4L_TKSEazUW.jpg (21KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x450px

>>159400879
>he doesn't know it's not film anymore

>>159393917
Waifu trash tends to have the worst animation. Like a light novel where it pans across a still image with sound effects and then animated a mouth opening and closing every 3 or 4 frames.

It really makes you appreciate certain blu-ray releases which have the better animated stuff or shows that do put effort in like even chunni as quite a few of its animations are on 1 with lots of movement of the characters. It still cheats, but not in a way that makes it feel like you're watching a slide show.