Digimon were technically isekai.
Prove me wrong
>no harems
>no broken skillset or skill absorbtion
>no generic protagonist
You sure you have the right genre, m8?
>>158879662
There's nothing to prove wrong here. I'm pretty sure everyone knows that.
>>158879662
And it isekai'd a group of kids instead of just one. That was 15 years ago, and they did it better than all this shit now
we posted it in every isekai thread (along with Princess or Mars, Yankee in King Arthur's court, Narnia, etc.)
>>158880218
Isekai doesn't have to be bad.
yes and?
The Divine Comedy is isekai.
>>158881218
Divine Comedy anime WHEN?
>>158881246
Japs seem to like that sort of thing so maybe someday.
>>158879662
They still are.
Am I supposed to prove you wrong because you said "were" instead of "are" as in I have to convince you it's still isekai even though the digimon can come to the human world as well?
Narnia was isekai.
Wizard of Oz was isekai.
Alice in Wonderland was isekai.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of "isekai", just unskilled writers that throw in other shitty tropes along with it.
Isekai is good when is aimed to children or women not neckbeards.
Nobody is fighting this point OP. Especially since the new anime takes them back into the digiworld again.
Also who's /hyped/ for September?
>>158881919
>Also who's /hyped/ for September?
Tri is garbage on par with your average harem isekai trough.
Even Yu-Gi-Oh had an isekai filler arc.
Isekai is a beloved concept.
Would time travel be considered Isekai?
Like is Inuyasha Isekai?
>>158882469
Depends if your definition of 'new world' also includes 'same world but a different point in time'.
Is this the designated Hikari/Angewomon posting thread?
>>158879662
Congratulations, you are noticing an incredibly old and widely used premise was in fact not invented a few years ago by bad LN writers.