ITT: Art Evolution

File: AE (2).jpg (23KB, 400x343px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x343px

>>157915035

File: AE (3).jpg (56KB, 600x514px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x514px

>>157915047

File: AE (4).jpg (26KB, 400x343px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x343px

>>157915080

File: AE (5).jpg (46KB, 600x514px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x514px

>>157915117

digital is cancer

File: AE (6).jpg (42KB, 600x514px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x514px

>>157915154

File: AE (7).jpg (25KB, 400x343px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x343px

>>157915186

File: AE (8).jpg (47KB, 600x514px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x514px

>>157915214

File: AE (9).jpg (24KB, 400x343px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x343px

>>157915252

File: AE (10).jpg (22KB, 400x268px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x268px

>>157915289

File: AE (11).jpg (80KB, 417x900px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 417x900px

>>157915672

File: AE (12).jpg (245KB, 1500x800px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1500x800px

>>157915707

File: AE (13).jpg (50KB, 572x594px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 572x594px

>>157915735

File: AE (14).jpg (56KB, 400x421px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 400x421px

>>157915774

>>157915839
Where do you think the images are from, newfag?

>>157915035
>>157915080
>>157915186
>>157915252
>>157915672
>>157915685
Devolved

Why does digital look like someone put lard on the camera lens?

>>157915035
1995 == 2009 (different colours <--> different lighting conditions)
>>157915047
1989 > 2013 (the shading in the new version makes no sense, the proportions are weird)
>>157915080
1992 >>> 2014 (obviously)
>>157915117
1999 == 2011 (mostly stylistic changes, no qualitative change)
>>157915154
1993 < 2014 (the proportions in the old version are odd and the shading makes no sense given the light conditions in the image)
>>157915186
1998 > 2010 (odd proportions - elongated face - and poorly drawn hair for the new version)>>157915214
1974 <<< 2012 (obviously)
>>157915252
2003 > 2009 (odd proportions)
>>157915289
1999 < 2015 (pretty obvious)
>>157915685
Haruhi < Euphonium (the neo-Key/Visual Arts inspired animation design for Haruhi is too damn weird; bug eyes a shit)

>>157915035
a shit

>>157915080

It's like they learned to draw anime from an American "How to Draw Anime" book.

>>157915672

Kubo's facial proportions were absurd for anyone besides Don Kanonji or real square jaws.

>>157915035
You know what's an actual unpopular opinion? Saying that digital is better thal cell.

File: lina-inverse-anime-slayers-13918597-800-781.jpg (46KB, 800x781px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x781px

How about Slayers? 1995 Lina Inverse or 2008 Lina Inverse?

>>157916410
>odd proportions
not just proportions if you ask me.The drab collors makes 2003 stand out more.

Is anime as creatively bankrupt as hollywood?