Is this appropriate underwear for a 12 year old?
No, there aren't enough 12 year old vaginal secretions for it to be accurate
>>156315171
She bought them for research, so she could take pictures of herself wearing them as reference.
>>156315171
No, she'll be encouraged to grow up into a slut.
>>156315171
Slut wear.
>>156315239
I wonder if she uploaded the pictures somewhere.
>>156315171
Fucking drawing porn at 12. I was struggling with long division at that age.
>>156315171
I'm a man and I did wear panties like that when I was 12 years old. It's pretty standard underwear, anon.
Probably not, but then again seems like parents let their kids wear thongs and provocative underwear. Pretty sure if it's done in anime then it doesn't really matter. It's like mothers know what kind of underwear they're buying their daughters, or their daughters pick out slutty underwear and the moms are like "Oh that's so cute! Let's get it!" Because they want to have sexy underwear for their 10-13 year old boyfriend, I blame subliminal messaging, bad parenting, and the media.
>>156315171
Who cares. I like girls who dress for the dick.
>>156315171
I was doing the laundry and found a condom in the pocket of my 14 years old brother.
>side-tie
Appropriate for all ages.
>>156318196
What's his boyfriend's name?
>>156315171
No, because she doesn't have the necessarily hips to hold it up.
>>156317988
I still can't do long division. Never learned. Worst thing is I'm in STEM as well.
>>156315171
Not in the slightest
>>156315171
It is appropriate for all ages and genders.
>>156315171
Yes, it's cute and easy to remove.
>>156323283
>panties inner lining sewed from both ends
>>156323283
>>156323370
Every artist seem to draw her panties in a different way.
>>156323476
Then they are mostly men and have no knowledge how women panties work.
>>156319234
>STEM
good lad.
Shitty STEM is still better than barista training.
You have to look good for underwear inspection day.
>>156315171
No, THIS is the best pantsu for lolis.
>>156319234
>S"""TE"""M
It's telling that you didn't specify the presumably brainlet subject you actually study.