APOLOGIZE
>>155523810
It isn't. Doesn't even come close to the worst of Ghibli's movies.
>/v/tards
cancer
>>155523761
who /seeingitintheaters/ here?
>>155523761
RT is Prog-infested. I literally filter them in my host file.
>>155523948
what did /prog/ ever do to you
>>155523761
>98%
I liked it but it is definitely not that good.
>>155523987
"Prog" as in "progressive"
>>155523810
From what I seen frequent anime watchers seem to think it's good but not up to Ghibi quality while people who rarely watch any anime or animated films absolutely loved the film.
>>155524110
From my experience it tends to be Ghibli that non-weeks praise more than anything. Weebs just want to dislike Your Name because it's popular and God forbid something be both popular and not shit
>>155523761
>Less than 50 reviews
>>155524179
>Y-y-y-y-y-you just hate it because it's popular
Really faggot? You're going to use that excuse?
>>155524035
So you're regressive?
WE TOLD YOU____Keitæ„›____FINDS A WAY
BUT YOU DIDNT LISTEN
>>155524271
The word is "Reactionary"
>>155523761
>RT
they gave fucking hush 100% rating. I will never trust that fucking site.
>>155524025
I don't think you understand how RottenTomatoes works.
>>155523761
I don't need to.
>>155524242
>>Y-y-y-y-y-you just hate it because it's popular
>Really faggot? You're going to use that excuse?
That would be spot-on for a lot of people.
>>155524385
Not really. The film is just flawed on a narrative and writing level. Normie's are just really impressionable
>>155523948
>prog-infested
What a stupid thing to censor somebody for
>>155524541
It's not censorship if private entities do it :^)
>>155523936
I would but films with gender bending turn me on way to much for sitting in public
>>155524541
Not really, if you're looking for a site that will tell you whether a movie is good or not, you don't want one that will tell you whether the message and themes are something the reviewer agrees with, you want one that will tell you whether it's good or not.
>>155524025
what
that is not how rotten tomatoes works
>>155523936
I am, going alone tommorow
>>155523761
Having seen Kimi no Na Wa twice at the cinema and just got home from the first A Silent Voice screening here, A Silent Voice was on a different level and better to watch.
I loved Your Name but it rides on scenery porn and a good soundtrack more than anything else.
>>155524179
This, it pains me to know that had KNW been 1/2 as popular as it is, /a/ would have loved it.
>>155523761
Stay on Twitter, faggot.
>>155524769
>you want one that will tell you whether it's good or not
So I want a non-existent site?
>>155525035
There have been a lot of appreciation threads though.
>>155526007
Exactly.
>>155523761
never
Waiting for the Blu-Ray
This shit is playing in most US theaters?
What the fuck
>>155524291
MODS
>>155524035
What did Rush ever do to you
>>155524291Blah blah blah already a thing blah blah blah.http://www.reddit.com
>>155524291
The manga was better.
Meme movie
Is not even good at all, fuck normals with no taste
>>155524323
>>155524808
Not him but I assume users either pick a binary "good" or "bad" rating for the movie, and then the % rating is the culmination of how many people liked it, right?
>>155527791
Why not? Ponyo did it a few years ago.
>>155523761
why is RT so shit?
>>155524291
>>155531170
It's because the same (((people))) who own the studios own the review sites.
>>155524291
The webcomic is the best. Comfy kino.http://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/keit-ai/ps-face-to-face/viewer?title_no=36825&episode_no=20
>>155531029
Replace "users" by "critics" and you got it right.
>>155524710
Damn Son