Is bigger always better?

File: 6c0433655fffc62cb903422400fed3b9.jpg (605KB, 819x1024px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 819x1024px

>>154314983
Yes

>>154314983
No. Tall girl with washboard chest and child bearing hips is ultimate combo.

Usually.

File: 1486954935499.png (530KB, 1280x831px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1280x831px

>>154315053

>>154314983
Me before lucoa: YES
Me after lucoa: NONONOSTOPNO

Probably

Depends, Giantesses stop being any sexy when their fingernails are bigger than humans.

File: a7c0444f4c75e055fcda180a7f0e4c18.jpg (200KB, 723x1023px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 723x1023px

Especially with illfitting clothes

>>154314983
No, "smaller is always better" is actually closer to the truth.

File: lucoa6.png (422KB, 553x678px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 553x678px

>>154314983
I like flatties usually, but beyond a certain cup size I become a mazacon. Only the extremes for me please.

>>154314983
Nope. See obese whale threads they call "healthy" or "thicc"