>>152420025
106. I don't want your kisses, old hag.
2nd hint is also useless.
>>152420151
Aren't you tired of getting no replies in most math threads, algebraic topology-kun? Here's a pity (you).
>>152420025
if I say 7 will I be arrested
>>152420025
16/3=5, remainder 1
16/4=4, remainder 0
22/7=3, remainder 1
22/2=11, remainder 0
what is going on? am I being rused?
>>152420225
>>152420556
Like, you cant find any fitting answers? I think mine works >>152420415
7/3=2r1
7/2=3r1
>too much of a brainlet to solve any of these
>>152420025
>divide it by...remainder
Why does nobody say modulo?
>>152420025
>divide it by an
divide it by ANY?
it's not really a problem if it was ANY number 1<n<9 then it would actually be a hard problem
I bet /a/ can't solve this.
>>152420181
2nd hint isn't useless. It discards any possible odd answer, like 15 (15 divided by 7 has a remainder of 1, but since it's odd, it has a remainder of 1 when divided by 2).
This means any even number which fits the 1st hint can be the right answer, like 22. It's still a very easy and dumb math problem, though.
>>152420627
I think you should read the second hint more carefully, anon.
>>152420936
2/8
>>152420936
>>152420936
1:4 is red:area
1:3 is red:blue
>>152421062
oh shit, that makes the puzzle even easier
Gotta need to know if you're a boy or girl first before giving my answer.
>>152420285
It's actually not me this time. I actually take the time to formulate a novel problem instead of copypasting from Wikipedia.
>>152421291
its supposed to be written by kurisu, who is cis female as far as we know
>>152421084
>>152420025
Umm, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 26, 28... fuck it, you can't be any older than 28.
>>152420936
>>152421082
>>152421084
it's 1:5 retards
>>152420971
Actually, I misread the 1st hint. It needs to have a remainder of 1 when divided by 3, 5 and 7 at the same time to satisfy the equation, not only one of the three. In that case, 36 is an acceptable answer.
>>152421483
It is? It says "an" odd number, not all.
I did misread it, I included 9 here >>152421450
10, 19, and 28 are gone.
>>152421483
But dividing 36 by 3 wouldn't give a remainder of 1
>>152421477
actually it's 7:31
>>152421477
Each square section in >>152421084
contains two halves one with all blue and one with two red triangles.
Blue = s*h
mixed = two triangles of height (h/2) and side s
so = 2 * (s)*(h/4) = 0.5 *s*h
making the other 0.5*s*h blue
each rectangle is 25% red 75% blue.
1 seems right
1 divided by 3 through 9 has a remainder of 1
1 divided by 2 through 8 has a remainder of 1
>>152421617
>>152421557
Can't work by that logic, as anything divisible by 6 would be divisible by 3
>>152421433
> tfw I made that pic
> tfw no one was able to use algebraic geometry to give an algebraic expression for the radius
>tfw the closest was some guy using trig to get an answer that is accurate up to 3 decimal places
>>152421557
>>152421583
Yeah, I was retarded. The right answer is 106 (because it's 3 times 5 times 7 plus 1), or 105 times anything plus 1.
And yeah, the 2nd hint was useless, since that will always be even anyway. I didn't think things through. Sorry.
>>152420025
X % 3 = 1
X % 5 = 1
X % 7 = 1
X % 2 != 1
X % 4 != 1
X % 6 != 1
X % 8 != 1
Therefore X = 106
106 % 3 = 1
106 % 5 = 1
106 % 7 = 1
106 % 2 = 0 (not = 1)
106 % 4 = 2 (not = 1)
106 % 6 = 4 (not = 1)
106 % 8 = 2 (not = 1)
Alright fellas time to sleep, 7:49 AM here
>>152421706
did you make the problem?
I also have no idea how to solve it geometrically
>>152420025
841
>>152420025
A million!
>>152421738
>did you make the problem?
That is what I said yes.
>>152420936
whats the ratio of the plane supposed to mean and are we supposed to take it as given that the pattern grows in wholes
if it grows in wholes then why does plane stuff matter
>>152421726
you only need one even and one odd to test for your answer, not all of them
>>152421809
>made that pic
the pic is the anon attempting to use pixels, not the problem image itself.
didn't know if you made the picture or if you scribbled on it in paint.
>>152421866
nevermind, I interpreted it that way but if you take it literally then youre fine
>>152421866
you need to test it against all, else your proof is falsified
>>152421914
the context of age makes the case of OP meaning it that way odd
>>152421877
I made the problem. This should be clear from context.
No wonder /a/ has a rep of being the stupidest board with people like you around.
>>152420025
16.
>>152421959
ESL fag please leave and stay out.
>>152420025
>hint 2
>not get a remainder of 1
What does that even fucking mean, ffs. !=1 could be a remainder of 0, 4, 6, whatever.
>>152422039
>can't read between the lines
>calls other ESL
autism speaks.
>>152421992
But 16%7=2
>>152422044
You have to find the full set of all possible ages, that's what makes the problem challenging.
>>152421914
You don't need to explicitly write out the evens. You can prove that with other axioms.
>>152424021
In other words, it is impossible for (x mod even) == 1 iff x is even
I hope I didn't dyslexia that up
>>152421306
>ω
plz tell me you can make a kawaii equation with proper notation
>>152421374
answer is yes
>>152422070
He's right though, neurotypical.
Hang yourself out of /a/.
>>152424086
stick the pen in kevin's arse, christina
>>152420025
17
I trust my instincts
>>152420025
0
don't cheat on okabe :(
>>152420936
Shouldn't this get the same ratio between red and blue?
>>152421706
I tried.
>>152421433I want to be violently fucked by maid Rin for 24 hours.
>>152426524
>>152427276
>>152421706
Is the circle in the top right meant to touch the right edge of the square?
>>152420025
N % 2 != 1, so the number is required to be even.
N - 1 = a * 3 = b * 5 = c * 7
N - 1 is odd, and the numbers on the right are odd, so logically a, b and c must all be odd.
Additionally, all these numbers are primes, so no common divisors exist. This means that the first possible number is 3 * 5 * 7 + 1 = 106.
Next valid combinations are d * 3 * 5 * 7 + 1 for any odd d:
As the set of odd numbers is infinite, this means there are infinite possible answers to your question. Please come with an actual solvable riddle next time.
>>152424346
Nice samefagging, shit-for-brains.
>math
>>152424173
Thanks for the (You) retard.
>>152421433
This is actually really easy, you just have to look at the four circles in the upper left corner
r = a/4(1+sqrt(2))
>>152428461
No, hold on, upper right circle isn't touching the edge of the square. I assumed it was a trick question.
>>152421433
This is just a guess, but I think the answer is: (2 - sqrt(2))/4
>>152428420
Don't ever fucking reply to me again.
>>152424460
The tessellating element is a rhombic tile consisting of a blue central hexagon and two red diametrically opposite triangles contiguous thereto, which has a red to blue area ratio of 1:4. Presumably your mistake was in thinking that the Star of David figure is the generating tile, which would be in error since the tiles shouldn't overlap.
>>152428193
Nope.
>>152429539
It says that the pattern continues along a plane, means it will go infinitely.
When it goes infinitely, then the ratio of red against blue will be 1:1
>>152429630
>there are people this stupid on /a/
All these brilliant minds and still jobless.
Math is useless Logic is useless Science is useless
Sales/Marketing is the hotshit.
>>152429539
I meant to say 1:4 is the ratio of red to the total plane area.
>>152429630
I am assuming a very standard assumption where the ratio at infinity is implicitly taken to mean the limiting behaviour of the ratio (red area in consideration):(total area in consideration) as the total area under consideration tends to infinity.
>>152432248
I wish I could solve this inside her tight cunt
>>152420594
Already a thing.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcVGDV67L-ghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_rz1bluG_khttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLUjMWRCzichttp://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/keit-ai/list?title_no=36825https://www.fictionpress.com/s/3206139/1/Keit-AI-Tomoyuki-x-Seiko-Keit%E6%84%9B-%E5%A5%89%E6%96%87-x-%E8%81%96%E5%AD%90
>>152429802
>/a/
>brilliant minds
>>152420181
I'd marry any old hag if they look like Kurisu at age 106
>>152420594
top kek
>>152420594
I fap to these.
>>152421084
14 small red triangles, 6 make a hexagon.
there's 14 red triangles and 48 blue triangles
>>152420025
I'm like 80% sure Kurisu's canon age is 18 and the math problem is just a red herring
but I want to kiss Mayuri instead
>>152420936
>>152421084
The answer is don't reply to subliminal Jew shill propoganda.
>>152420025
Bump for m/a/th.
>>152439830
You're not ending up where you started.
>>152439453
Just tell me if this has an actual solution or not.
>>152421374
Orgasm.
Sexed up girls cant deal with orgasm denial.
Girls with little experience cannt deal with many orgasms
Source: me. who studied any of the literature on the subject on sadpanda
>>152428337
>he fell for the math is bad meme
you thought you deceived your teachers by not paying attention in class, but you are the one who was deceivedme to
>>152443138
>always barely scrape by with maths
>study STEM
>get promised the math is light
>it wasnt
>>152443286
>mfw he studies a field exclusively governed by laws he has a poor grasp on
You can get real good at maths through practise, why are you studying STEM if you can't be bothered to get good at maths?
>>152443508
Didnt like the other studies I looked at and what I study now is pretty fun except for the maths. Also some parts they have maths but you can just get by by understanding the formulae, while at other subjects the professor is a math nut and explains everything by deriving formulae.
>ywn receive pity kisses from Kurisu for being dumb
>>152443561
That's like trying to become a race car driver without knowing how an engine works though
>>152443656
They told me I could become anything I wanted.
>>152443763
They told me I'd fail highschool because I'm lazy
Jokes on them, I got into a russel group uni by doing 1 day of revision for each exam
>>152420025
Multiply 3x5x7 and add 1 to it. I think that's the answer
>>152444357
To the right. Buoyancy applies to the metal ball thus transferring it's weight to the water.
>>152444357
Tips to the left as the ping pong ball is linked to the left side of the scale and thus contributes to its mass. The steel ball is suspended from outside the system and as such doesn't affect the right side's mass in any way.
>>152444518
Buoyancy would only add mass to the right side if the object is of less density than the liquid it's are submersed in, steel is far denser than water, so its presence doesn't affect the scales.
>>152439453
Was harder than I thought.
>>152439453
>>152439830
>>152442631
>>152444691
>>152444811
>end up where you started
>>152444811
>end up where you started
>>152444880
>>152444883
Oh. Fuck.
I don't think this has a solution.
>>152444357
Buoyancy means the steel ball still applies a strength to the water equal to the weight of its volume of water. On the left side, for the same volume, we have a ping-pong ball lighter than water, so less force is applied to the scale, which would then tip right. The string's weight isn't significant, or it would keep the ping-pong ball down by weight alone without tying it down (if it IS that heavy, the scale would tip left).
>>152444933
Sure it does.
>>152444691
>tfw math major
>tfw can solve all these
>tfw just choose to watch /a/nons suffer from brain aneurysms instead
>>152445373
>he fell for the 50k starting meme
Fuck you Kurisu, you smug ho. Don't make me leave you in the kennel for another night.
>>152420594
i hate you so much
>>152445856
>implying she doesn't want you to send her back to the kennel
Kurisu is a lewd M bitch.
>>152443821
>pre-uni educators in charge of assessing potential
They should just collectively harakiri honestly
>>152444535
>>152444634
Every time it's posted, at least one anon doesn't understand how buoyancy works.
>>152444706
You have a 50% chance of being correct.
The answer is B, because the true answer is 25% and there's 2 choices.
>>152444357
Just calculate the change in potential energy and it should be clear that the right side goes down.
>buoyancy
>torsion force
Memes invented by engineers.
>>152421433
Christ you can measure it in gimp without doing any math at all
>>152420936
it's 1/3 red to blue guys
>a triangle base is of equal length with a hexagon edge
>that means it takes 6 triangles to fill an hexagon
>let's pick a random hexagon, called B
>we fill it up with all the triangles around him
now we have 1-1 ration of red-blue in the area of hexagon B and the 6 triangles touching it
>we leave for later, the next hexagon in line, C, and go to D, with which we do the same and fill it up with all the triangles touching him
>we go back to C, and notice he is left with 2 triangles touching him, the one on top and the one on bot, since the other triangles where ''eaten'' by B and D
that means in the C area we have a 1-3 ratio of red to blue
>now we go to hexagon A, and is the same story as in C
now round up A B C and D areas, and have a ratio of 2-3 red to blue, which repeats on infinite (if it does not then all my calculations go to shit, is this in an infinite bathroom?) on ABCD line of hexagons
>the story repeats on the the lines of hexagons at an odd distance from the ABCD line, and all the lines at an even distance from ABCD will have no triangles, which means a ratio of 0-1 red to blue on those lines
and now we round up all the even and odd lines and end up with a ratio of 1-3
>>152426524
You can do this with one if use a decimal place to make it 3.0
>>152447045
I think it's a paradox
if you say 25% is correct, you have a 50% random change of picking it
if you say 50% is correct, you have a 25% random change of picking it
if you say 0%, assuming no respond is correct, then you actually had a 25% change of picking it
>>152420025
11