Post old school waifus.
check out this gal:
her name is Motoko, she's a superspy robocop ninja hacker lady!
isn't she cool?
Don't hate me for preferring her over the original
>That's my daughteru you're posting you sick fuck.
An 80s girl? In 2017?
More likely than you'd think!
Akane a shit, Post more Ranma.
Oh Amano. I miss you.
but not as great as this!
Hitomi best apple
Hitomi is a stupid meat popsickle and a loose woman who flirts with other men right under her boyfriend's nose
also she's not very floof
Whichever one of them threw the most anti-tank penises
You think this smug blur hair anime gal is superior to Iria?
> The term basically represents the sound or concept of a penile erection.
Thanks a lot wikipedia.
Hand pick the worthwhile episodes for me will you.
I think I'll watch the ova and read the manga.
Here's another genki brown space gal
>old school waifus.
But she's still mai waifu even after 20 years.
I didn't care for Ranma. Because Ukyo wasn't even in 10% of the show. And Happosai was 90% of the show.
>We will never get a Ranma reboot by Sugito Akira
quite vomitory desu
That's not a thing dude.
Chibi Usa isn't the problem. She was actually quite good in R and S. The problem is the direction the show took in SS. Basically, the best parts of Sailor Moon in the first three seasons was the slice of life filler. But it just wasn't good in SS.
Digital art in the style of a specific fan artist.
You're trying to imply all anime after 2000 looks the same. Which is wrong. Even Mahoromatic and Love Hina have different designs. Just like Slayers and Ranma were not the same in the 90s.
I'm not saying it all looks the same, I'm saying the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of it looks EXTREMELY SIMILAR and therefore deserves to be named accordingly
>just like Slayers and Ranma
no, more like Slayers and Saber Marionette J actually
>I'm saying the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of it looks EXTREMELY SIMILAR and therefore deserves to be named accordingly
But that's still wrong. Even between 'moe' shows, something like Zero no looks nothing like Amagami. Face it dude, you're making a generalization. Which people often do for 90s anime as well. But generalizations are wrong.
>no, more like Slayers and Saber Marionette J actually
Oh nevermind, you're just pushing the 90s generalizations as well. So literally you are the cancer.
Why settle for (the inferior) Priss when you can have Nene? ;)
Never understood why people thought this looked good, even in the 90s. I love 90s anime for its story and characters, but digital art really improved proportions. Girls can actually have something beyond a C cup and flat ass.
All generalizations are slightly inaccurate at best, but without being functionally wrong.
All concepts are generalizations.
The ordinary train of thought of every human being requires them to generalize.
Logic requires generalization.
You can LITERALLY not go through one hour of your life without generalizing, and it's an entirely legitimate, valid, and functional way to think.
What's NOT valid, legitimate, and functional, is millenial artstyles.
And that's a near-perfectly accurate generalization.
Holy shit. I haven't read a post that sounded this much like a parroted psych major in a long time. To think someone spend $40,000 a year on a liberal arts education just to spout this junk on an image board.
What about them? All of those have improved detail thanks to larger resolutions and smaller guidelines as well. At least if the budget is there.
But look at that picture of Tenchi Muyo. That was a high budget OAV and it still looks wonky.
All generalizations are wrong, because there's not one that doesn't have an exception. It's only generalizations in casual conversation that serve a purpose, yet you try to make it all facts and academic.
it's not liberal clichés, it's common fucking sense.
liberals are afraid of generalizations because they somehow think it necessarily leads to intolerance and hatespeech.
Maybe they're right; cause I'm not tolerating your bullshit.
modern anime girls are mostly flabby pigs, probably to match its audience
give me fit, floofy women any day
I usually don't like psychos, but there's just something about Ryoko from Urusei Yatsura that makes her really appealing. Only watched UY two years ago though.
>liberals are afraid of generalizations
HAHAHAHA! Their entire logic is based on generalizations. "All white people are racist", "All Republicans are deplorable", "All [x] is [y]". Literally their entire ideology is creating a sweeping generalization that clearly has exceptions, then trying to explain away the naysayers.
You're the one who's basing his notion of "wrong" on irrelevant academic criteria.
If a generalization works in casual conversation, then calling it "wrong" on principle, is like calling an artwork "incorrect".
Look at your image. Then compare it to the same girl in the anime. Notice how the girl in the anime does not match the detail in that drawing? The same thing happens to post 2000 series, unless you have a massive budget like a KyoAni or Production IG show.
>If a generalization works in casual conversation, then calling it "wrong" on principle, is like calling an artwork "incorrect".
>comparing a generalization to art
So basically, you're pointing out that a generalization is subjective based on the person viewing it? Thereby proving the point people have been trying to explain to you?
Never heard of hypocrisy, little faggot?
You know, what you're doing right now by saying "n-nuh! You can't generalize my moeshit! it's mean! generalizing things is WRONG!" like i'm a big bad nazi trying to eradicate your successful, socially productive black friends for no good reason.
So, you're basically explaining me that, since the other fag's point is "generalizations are wrong", then it means that artworks really are incorrect?
Do not retort, that's what you're doing. You're explaining me that artworks are incorrect because if that's true, then it's also true that generalizations are wrong.
So basically we've reached the part of the argument where the person realizes their point no longer makes sense and starts deflecting. In this case, lashing out at the poster and not his argument. And in the other post, just coming up with a totally new argument that has no ties to the original one, in a hope that the other person will latch onto the new argument and the person who came up with the new random tangent will once again be on the offense.
Takahashi makes the best girls.
Or, more accurately, a smug fag got told that he's wrong.
Just like what's been happening for the past few dozen posts.
There's no real argument, you know, just faggots TRYING to argue away from the fact that the overwhelming majority of millenial anime art looks extremely similar, and is very bad from a stylistic standpoint.
In other words: millenial artstyles are ugly.
bgc looked pretty good m8, i dunno what you're on about
Since most of them are just the same three recycled personalities, I can't really agree. I guess if you just go by how they look and not their personality. But if that's the case, I'd say someone like Kosuke drew better girls.
>you got told
>I'm right, you're wrong!
You're only proving his point dude.
Yes, that is what your argument is basically coming down to. Quite childish.
He doesn't have a point. What he has is a vague liberal cliché that he's using in order to distract everyone from a fact:
millenial artstyles are ugly
Maybe there's a handful of millenial artstyles that aren't ugly, but they don't matter, because
1- they're very few and far between
2- they aren't good enough to redeem the rest
3- they aren't representative of their times
So they're negligible, and the generalization still holds true in almost every context.
>Its like sticking Usagi in Gundam.
I'd pay good money to see that. Especially if she was the lead pilot. Imagine the usual 15 minute slog of pointless Tomino dialogue and then Usagi just suddenly jumps in screaming "Shut up and fight you idiot!"
What? Both Usagi and Minako are impulsive and would act that way. They're basically the same character, except Usagi is more dense.
>from a fact:
>millenial artstyles are ugly
>Maybe there's a handful of millenial artstyles that aren't ugly
So in other words, there's exceptions. And therefore a generalization has exceptions. Which was what the original argument was about.
Good job dude. We just had 20 posts of stupidity for you to just come to the same conclusion.
First logical thing you've said this whole thread. And I'm glad you finally just admitted your whole argument is your own opinion. Which is a subjective opinion not everyone shares. Therefore it cannot be called a 'fact'.
exceptions don't make generalizations wrong.
Even if they did, it still wouldn't matter because exceptions are negligible. So bringing up that old liberal cliché is fucking irrelevant and will not the generalization from being functional in almost every context.
"generalizations are wrong" proves nothing and will never deflate a generalization.
My opinion is correct, and as such everyone ought to share it. It's pretty obvious, actually, as obvious as the ugliness in the picture you posted earlier. But since you're fucked in the head you're impervious to obviousness and ugliness alike.
It looked nice and had a good soundtrack. That's about it.
The issue here is not the threshold of where a generalization is considered right or wrong. The issue is that you used the term 'fact' to claim your opinion is the only true opinion. And your support of said claim was generalizations.
Even if everyone in this thread agreed with your generalizations, generalizations are not a provable fact. And since multiple people are arguing against your generalizations, its pointless to even keep using them to support your argument.
First 3/4 the show was good. But in true Sunrise fashion, they didn't know how to close it. Instead they threw together a ton of crappy symbolism and sub plots that never went anywhere.
Enough bickering post your 90s waifu
My opinion is true because it happens to match a general fact.
There is no argument here, just a simple statement that someone tried to clumsily undermine by implying that if you find an exception to a general statement then it's wrong. And as I explained, that's bullshit.
It is easy to prove that I am right, all you have to do is to stop forcing yourself to ignore the ugliness that is blatantly visible in the overwhelming majority of millenial artstyles.
Very easy. No need for arguments, no need to espouse my perspective, just stop being delusional, stop tolerating what you don't actually find pretty.
Best taste right here. Noa is simply the best.
>show with not one but three Belldandy clones
>every character is better than Belldandy
As a kid, I never understood why everyone was saying Ranma had huge tits. They looked about the same size as every other girl in anime. Now of course I realize the limitations of budget and cels. But still, it makes me wonder why it was a plot point at all. Even in the manga they're not that big.
She's not a Belldandy clone however. And the best girl was this one.
>Old school waifu thread.
>Half of the thread is Ranma.
Just as Keikaku'd.
This image looks better than all the naked Ranma picks. Cute dressed up Ranma is best Ranma.
>be the only person who'd willingly waifu Kodachi
At least I get her to myself.
Guess I spoke too late.
No opinion is fact, though.
I think Saber Marionette's lumpy faces are objectively bad looking, and the hair volume on top of that just makes it look fucking ridiculous.
I'm a fan of most 90s/80s animation, but that specific phase in the 90s was a big mistake.
Most modern art styles are better than this style.
Kei is best though.
Yuri a besto!
Also The Ova opening is best opening:
I just want to help her get over the
could you guys recommend some old underrated anime? I've digested everything worth something from 2000-2016 and 1990s scare me a bit because of its shit animation style. Because of that every anime looks awful.
Pic very related.
the Ah My Goddess movie has pretty good animation (especially in motion)
Wouldn't say it's underrated though.
Looks like we have an anon with a massive hardon for Ranma
My autism compels me to help you get better screencaps than the old piss-stained DVD transfer.
Just remember that it's not gay when he's a girl.
Most are stored just fine. It's just if the studio wants to invest the money in digging them out, rescanning them and digitally touching up the colors.
A lot of the shitty, cheap OVAs of the 80s probably didn't get saved, but anything with a relatively large budget would have kept the film stock preserved.
Ryoko's a cute Hedgehog.
Came in this thread just to see if someone posted Noa. Glad I wasn't not disappointed.
Don't bully the Ryoko.
The series seems to imply that Ranma's hormones actually change as well, since she starts to have feminine reactions to things. And he even seems to become more comfortable being a girl as the manga/anime progresses. I'm willing to bet that if he stayed a girl for too long, he'd start to lose some of his male personality traits.
Pick your poison, can't go wrong with either one.
Adult Skuld > Urd = Skuld > Urds mother > Keiichi's sister > Poerth > megane > that rich bitch > a wet towel > Belldandy
Seriously underrated in my very biased opinion
I want to protect that smile.
I also want to touch fluffy tail
>and flat ass.
Before the socialist kikes brainwashed you into loving oogabooga culture, flat asses were prefered to fat asses in most of the civilized world. Fit women fuck better, they can use their muscles to stimulate your dick. But dem rieal niggas gotta get with dem 300 pound white womens who fuck like dead fish.
>All those naked ladies
Also just leaving this here.
the push towards digital art and using computers as short cuts came because it was cheaper. The anime in the 80s and 90s is so top tier because they had crazy budgets. Japan was rich and could blow mad dosh on cartoons. When japan slipped into a recssion, studios started cutting corners and cg was at the core of this.
Cherry was the best girl. Lime was kind of a waste of Megumi's talent.
You're comparing a handful of high budget shows from the late 90s to hundreds of low budget shows of today. Stop it. There's also high budget, high quality shows made past 2000.
I have zero faith that CLAMP can write anything. I still can't believe they even wrote CCS. And of the little I've seen, they're already rewriting the entire setting. It takes place 2 years after CCS ended (approximately 1999), yet everyone is running around with 2016 smartphones and spouting memes.
I hope lightning can strike twice and Madhouse gets the same team from the original anime conversion. And somehow makes it good.
Cherry was really annoying
I understand the "motherly kind" character, but she surpassed tolerable levels. Never doing a thing, never under fights
Also, in the same fashion of Love Hina, Megumi is the best part of it. The openings are god tier.
I...don't have it
>I...don't have it
BUT I DO!!
It's not like CSS was well written to begin with
Everybody wants lewds with everybo