How much value do you put into visual direction?

>>148297105
All of it

>>148297105
About 4/5 points
So naturally I dropped Returd:Zero

More than anyone on the production of Re:Zero it seems.

>>148297105
You really don't put much effort into shot selection in these do you? You are supposed to look for a diverse selection of the most outstanding shots to demonstrate the range. The same scene should never be in a grid twice. It is probably difficult to make them well if you have poor aesthetic sense which you seem to though.

>>148298242
o.k.

File: Boku no Pico.jpg (3MB, 2112x1980px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2112x1980px

>>148299080
Please go back to whatever anti-art board you came from.

This discussion is for people who understand anime at its core.

>>148298331
why?

Stop reposting this thread anon.

>>148297105
How is it these shit meme threads keep getting made? We've been over this dozens if not now hundreds of times. "Visual direction" isn't a fucking thing, you uneducated halfwit. You're conflating composition and aesthetic and illustration and technically lingering elements of animation into this retarded nonsense term you keep tossing around. There's no such thing as "visual direction." If you can't be bothered to learn even basic art terminology you need to either fucking try harder or resign yourself to going back to banging rocks together in whatever cave you lumbered out of, you drooling knuckledragger.

>>148300348
So, you don't put any value into it?

>>148299224
why are you att whoring?

>>148299224
Literally no one has ever denied that Boku no Pico looks kinda nice.

3 threads already. This thread has been repeated before as shitposting and so on. All of you, please, neck yourselves right now. Die. Just die.

File: kyoani.png (403KB, 490x553px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 490x553px

A lot.