ITT: anime adaptations better than the source
Hard modeno LNs
>>148161050
I agree that it was good but fuck your opinion about it being better. Still a very solid choice.
Eat a dick.
>>148161050
Pic obviously not related.
>>148161287
The manga is 8/10 when Togashi isn't either flat out neglecting it or drawing it left-handed while upside-down and doing an Ippo punch-drunk imitation.
HxH 2011 has excellent animation, a gorgeous soundtrack, art direction, voice acting, the works. About the only complaints I ever hear about it are BAAAAAAAAWWWWWW ITS NOT 1999 HXH or BAAAAAAAWWWWWWW ITS 94% FAITHFUL TO THE MANGA INSTEAD OF 100%.
>>148161050
Pic unrelated.
>>148161577
>The manga is 8/10 when Togashi isn't either flat out neglecting it or drawing it left-handed while upside-down and doing an Ippo punch-drunk imitation.
So, never?
HxH still on hiatus?
I think last time I picked it up gon's dad was ploting with the blonde fag in some cave and the trap was babysiting or something like 3 years ago
>>148161287
>>148161310
>>148161742
"old is gold" retards detected
Any KyoAni
Fuck you geeks.
berserk went from being edgy gay shit to being laughably bad so I suppose berserk since the adaptation was funny
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Parts Two and Four.
>>148161974Sharnalk and Korutopi are deadLast chapters we got were not that long ago, right?
>>148163733
>david pro quality tho
I like the way David Pro handles the adaptation of part 4 in general, but man is the art pretty shitty most of the time
>badhouse shit adaptations
>better than anything
Nice bait.
Fate zero and aku no hana
>>148164005
>read hxh
>chrollo vs hisoka
>those drawings of the severed people
yuck, what a terrible artist, can't even draw severed people properly and make it look like dolls, anime is definently better
>>148163733
JJBA part 1 and 2 were objectively superior in anime. Part 3 and 4 are much more subjective because this is the time when Araki's art stops being shit.
>>148165260
Part 1 is more debatable than part 4 I'd say. In terms of plot progression, which is always better than art quality, It made DIU a lot better.
>>148166110
I haven't seen or watched either for a while so i can't tell what made it that way but i found the part 1 manga incredibly boring while anime was pretty entertaining, it definitely felt like a (huge) story improvement rather than just looking better visually, even though they didn't change it just presented it differently
>>148166729
Same here. I thought part 1 in the manga was dull as shit but the voice acting and neat coloring in the anime made it fun, though 2-4 are better in manga form.
>>148161050
Every Kyoani adaption
>>148161050
The only time I like anime adaptations is when I didn't couldn't get into the manga.
Kaiji.
>>148163733
Are you tripping? JoJo is such a terrible adaptation, terrible character design adaptations, amount of QUALITY due to shitty budget and planning and let's not even mention the slide-show like animation quality, the art direction in general is lack luster.
Ouran High School Host Club, to a lesser extent Rozen Maiden, and to an even lesser extent GetBackers. I think you actually lose testosterone trying to read those manga.
>>148161577
>excellent animation
Basically a slideshow after the first arc.
>gorgeous soundtrack
Uninspired and used poorly for 85% of the show.
>art direction
Is this a joke? One of the worst aspects of it.
>voice acting
Only gets good in the Palace Invasion.
>>148169862
this is an original mate
>>148169907
The manga came after then? Fuck, still it was garbage compared to the anime
>>148163733
Part 2 is better objectively, but part 4 I'm on the fence about.
>>148161050
Naruto vs Sasuke
it was so much better in the anime...
Actually this. Rem and Subaru are vastly better characters in the anime.
honey and clover
nodame
jojo pt 2
Gintama, like most comedies when adapted well, is better in anime form