Why is most Shoujo art so fucking bad? How can people even stand

Fujos don't mind the shit quality.

>>148113864
Because girls don't care about art they just want to fap to the rape.

>>148113864
>most

>>148113864
Stop reading shitty ones

>cherrypicking

>>148113864
wow faggot you literally sort of the worst example to prove your shit point, kill yourself

>>148113864
They all fell for the boku no picasso meme

File: ByrEoYDIAAEYLJ3[1].jpg (98KB, 600x949px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 600x949px

>>148113864
Meh you can find shit art in any demographic.
Shoujo shit has both good and bad authors, tho admittedly all of my favourite artists do seinen shit.

File: not a school.jpg (249KB, 1000x1414px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1000x1414px

Like with any genre, if it takes place in a school, it is ten times as likely to be of shitty quality.

>>148113934
I've been seeing people misusing the word fujo so often lately. Is it just newfags or did /a/ decide to change the definition to mean anything female?

>>148116698
>did /a/ decide to change the definition to mean anything female
Basically this, with the implication that all female anime fans are also literal fujos.

File: issho-ni-neyou-yo-2807373.jpg (207KB, 730x1200px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 730x1200px

Thanks for cherrypicking, mate.

>>148113864

>/v/-tier level of shitposting.

Disgusting.

File: nran045-019.jpg (336KB, 728x1040px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 728x1040px

You mean yaoi right?

>>148116592
sauce for this one?

>>148116698
Just /a/ being retarded

>>148113864
Still looks better than most shit Togashi makes.

Shoujo art was beautiful in the 80's, mostly shit in the 90's, decent in the 00's and kinda good in the 10's. There are a lot of shoujos with decent art currently running, the new shoujo style is very soft and appealing.

File: Hunter_X_Hunter_v30054.jpg (4MB, 4074x3056px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4074x3056px

>>148118037

>>148116698
Sadly this has been happening for years.

File: People pay for this.png (77KB, 396x310px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 396x310px

>>148118135
>>148118037

>>148117717
That's seinen, there are loads of seinen with female leads written by women with shoujo-like stories. Ran, Koi wa Amaagari no You ni, Otomeyagatari, Arte.

>>148113864
Is there a source for this? want to see if artist improved

>>148118037
Maybe if you're blind.

>>148113864
>Why is most Shoujo art so fucking bad? How can people even stand to look at this?
It is porn for women.

They run on emotion.

Art is not that important.

File: RfMVgEI.png (249KB, 758x318px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 758x318px

>>148118220
try again

>>148117717
need sauce
search didnt help

>>148118395
It's almost as if series which target a more adult demographic, rather than a specific gender, tend to have better writing and art for some reason. Weird.

>>148118584
that just make shonen shit are just as worse.
you eternally condemned to have shit taste as long as you keep believing that shonen is made for "thinking"

>>148118584
Isn't art a more emotional subject? If a man so much as steps into an art museum or a musical theatre, he is considered a faggot.

That aside, porn for women isn't shojo manga. It's porn (usually written).

>>148117717
Ah shit, whats the name of this again ? Reverse searches give nothing

>>148118591
Post the rest of that page.

>>148113864
Shoujo art greatly improved these past years.

File: Untitled.png (174KB, 664x721px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 664x721px

>>148117965
Technically it's cheating because it's Chinese.

You also could have googled it. Just change the Chinese characters in the text field to something generic like "manga".

>>148118824
>>148116592
A warning on this one.

The plot gets fairly intricate, and is made more difficult to understand by all of the Chinese names that we dumb foreigners can't remember. Furthermore, it doesn't update very often (blame translators, they're behind).

So prepare for a lot of re-reading if you're going to pick it up.

>>148118698
>If a man so much as steps into an art museum or a musical theatre, he is considered a faggot.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>148118770
To be fair, 80's shoujo art could be pretty good. The main problem was the sameyness. Swan is beautiful and the dance was wonderfully depicted.

File: CsIuVlkUAAAkIY-.jpg (179KB, 750x1093px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 750x1093px

Shoujo/Yaoi is just plain surreal.

File: Ran_to_Haiiro_no_Sekai_V01_000.jpg (3MB, 4310x1800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4310x1800px

>>148118597
>>148118700
Ran and the Gray World

>>148119005
Is this real ? I mean it's not shooped or a parody ?

>>148119209
Thanks anon

Because they fetishize the story just like you with your badly drawn furry porn.

>>148119319
proofs?

>enter thread expecting OP to be called out for cherrypicking, while cherrypicking themselves in response
sometimes i want to be disappointed

>>148119005
They can actually have buttsex with those chins.

Or be lewd and swordfight with chins

Muslim people would probably start praying if they'll see those.

File: p013.jpg (208KB, 728x1102px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 728x1102px

>>148113864
>Shoujo art so fucking bad
Go read SAO-manga.

>>148119754
>Go read SAO-manga

Who would read that kind of shit ? The anime is already terrible, I can't imagine how crappy the cash grab manga would be like

>>148116698
It's been the case for ages. As retards started using "otaku" to mean "overweight NEET who owns a daki" instead of "anime nerd," they somehow decided that it was male-only and that "fujo" was just the same thing but female.

>>148118824
Thanks! Gonna pick it up.
>>148118944
That doesn't bother me. I mainly read for the art. Shame about the slow translators though.

File: b023.jpg (380KB, 728x1032px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 728x1032px

>>148119869
>I can't imagine

File: 1447538537805.jpg (10KB, 200x287px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x287px

>>148120569
Oh my fuck