Now, be honest...

>>147541989
>which one has more positives than negatives?
Neither. Naruto was the better one though.

>>147542241
Pack it up, guys. Thread's over.

File: da hando.jpg (67KB, 664x586px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 664x586px

>>147541989
Holy shitpost
They're both shit and neither of them have more positives than negatives.
I'll just admit that Bleach has more positives.

>>147541989
Naruto.
Bleach went to shit faster and had the shittier ending. Naruto managed to stay entertaining for longer and ended on a high note.

>>147541989
Why don't you find out yourself after killing yourself?

File: 1471588762044.jpg (432KB, 1024x748px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1024x748px

>>147543598
Not to mention Naruto had more engaging worldbuilding/society/fight system. There's a reason so many tards are into it, the whole ninja-kunai-jutsu stuff and comfy hidden villages + character designs are just so damn accesible while Bleach has nothing but swords.

Naruto was more consistent (and had a non-shit ending), but Bleach had one of the best arcs in all of shounen manga.

>>147541989
Naruto was good at the start. Bleach was good at the middle. They were both shit at the end.

I absolutely love Bleach but I have to admit ending was shit tier, I'm not talking about shipping, I'm talking about how we know nothing

I've not watched/read any of them but Naruto designs are really fucking weak in comparison.

File: 6619e1982b5f9a02d25897e8d415d5a784a754330a6054280ef3311416397d91.jpg (62KB, 625x483px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 625x483px

>>147543630

I think the only thing Bleach has on Naruto is art and female designs.

Everything else is either at the same level or worse than Naruto

>>147546659
You've never read or watched any of them and you think your opinion fucking matters in this?

>>147550275
Well he is a tripfag, those clowns think their opinion matters everywhere.