What is up with this?

Whats the problem? 2016 looks way better than the older one

Use the catalog

One has a 90s budget and the other is a 2016 nostalgia cashgrab

One was a flashback in a TV series while the other was the most important and emotional scene in a movie.

With what?
Anime is dying, this is common knowledge

>>144845884
The animation has improved because it's 13 years later and new tech makes animation easier. How is this hard for you OP?

>>144845884
>this faggot is still comparing a long running anime episode from Toei to a OVA
Fucking retard

>>144846268
>13 years later
you can count to potato?

>>144846635
It's almost like the 2 key is next to the 1 key.

>>144845927
None

What's with all these MUHQUALITY faggots on /a/ today?

File: 1469470852117.jpg (228KB, 845x807px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 845x807px

What is up with this?

>>144845884
It's almost like animation isn't the same as it was a 20 years ago.

>>144845927
>>144849360

You two have to have eyesight problems to think that 2016 looks better. The dark, somber tones, the hand-drawn animation, 1993 looks beautiful, a hand-crafted work of art.

>>144851044
You have to have brain problems to be surprised when an anime-original cashgrab for a battle shounen looks worse than a companion movie from the original series.

>>144849766

Woah, they did a remake of that at one point? I need to crawl from under my rock and binge watch this right now.

File: TadayoshiGoku.png (403KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 640x480px

>muh "it's a movie vs running tv" apologists

Here have a shot of goku from a filler episode of Z.

You faggots need to shut the fuck up already, the only "Super" thing about Dragonball Super is its Super low budget.

Fuck everything, GT had shit animation but at least its art style was close to toriyamas and the actual art was good.

>>144852260

this looks like shit tho

Why did they give Future Trunks blue hair, when present-day Trunks clearly has purple hair?

Why was this flashback scene re-drawn, when all other flashbacks before this one just used original DBZ footage with stretched resolution & filters?

Goddammit, this shit makes no sense.

File: 1461310110990.jpg (137KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1280x720px

>>144852482
k

>>144852260
>Here have a shot of goku from a filler episode of Z
There are canon episodes with terrible drawing (like Trunks vs Cell), what's your point?

File: vegetarecoome.webm (3MB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 900x506px

>>144852680
Trunks vs Cell looked great, fag.

Db supers low is MUCH MUCH lower than DBZ.
All series have up and downs but super when its shit, its shittier than the most shitty badly drawn episode of Z, and that happens all the time in super not just once every 5 episodes.

On the other hand its best animation is used once every 20 episodes or so and even then the art will be complete crap because the only one that can animate for shit in super is Naoki tate and his style is always off model.

DBZ looks better and even the fights feel better, have better sound effects and each punch has weight and impact. That's my point.

Super is shit.

>>144853074
>Trunks vs Cell looked great, fag.
It didn't, that episode looked like crap for Z standards. Get your eyes checked.

>Db supers low is MUCH MUCH lower than DBZ
Toei has been half-assing their anime series for a while now, it's not surprising.