Hidden Gem Thread.

>>143838501
Read the rules and start lurking or you can just fuck off. It's clear as day you're a complete newfag, judging especially by the image you just posted.

File: 1467564734238.png (106KB, 379x600px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 379x600px

>>143839419

>>143838501
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9SCTtszIyc

File: 1467505858288.png (213KB, 606x416px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 606x416px

>>143839419

File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>143839419
Lol. what the fuck are you talking about?

>>143839759
>asking for recommendations
>image for ants
>image is from a very popular series
If you couldn't figure it out yourself you're most likely a newfag as well and should read the rules and lurk the fuck more.

>Lol.
Well that settles it.

>>143840913
Dude just how much of a retard are you?

>>143840913
The most obvious bait and you took it. You're fucking retarded anon.

>>143840913
Kotaku seriously needs to Fuck off this board. Please leave before you embarrass yourself any further you fucking Retard.

>>143841109
>>143841294
I'll tell you I didn't write those posts with any anger. It's just that one usually remembers negative things like that easier, at least compared to if it sounded just neutral. You're only writing insults and nothing more, you're clearly very angry.

>bait
Please explain why OP's post is bait, I know Berserk is not "hidden" (as evident by me writing it's "very popular") if that was what you were referring to. Otherwise you can fuck off immature anon.

>>143841728
Anon, you must have mild autism. Everything OP did was to get that kind of respone from you.

Posting Berserk in a "Hidden gem thread" Adding to that, The really shitty new version, being the complete opposite of a gem.

Plus the pic.

Like it or not. You are retarded anon.

>>143841916
You ignored the last part of my post (intentionally), here let me quote it for you:
>I know Berserk is not "hidden" (as evident by me writing it's "very popular") if that was what you were referring to.

Though it's not the first time you've ignored what I've written:
>>143840913
>image is from a very popular series

Whether it's a gem or not is subjective, clearly you (should) already know this, as you refer to it as "shitty":
>The really shitty new version, being the complete opposite of a gem.

You're very likely OP, judging by your reactions. The image/gif/webm of an OP isn't always related to the topic, therefore doesn't it imply that always is. How about you try writing a reply without any kind of insult and instead present actual arguments. It isn't hard.