So now that the dust has settled, which was better? Why?

>>143201226
>So now that the dust has settled,
Fuck off.

>>143201226
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FMPUhjUmRI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd1V816mVdU

>>143201226
Of course Brotherhood. Now you can delete this thread

The manga/Brotherhood was much more tightly written, and clearly the story that FMA was intended to be.

But they're both fine and it's all up to personal preference.

manga > anime

you should know this by now newfag

File: 1464922684029.jpg (78KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x480px

>>143201274
so now that your jimmies have been rustled...
faggot :')

>>143201386
Not enough meme. Too much logic.

>>143201386
>Reasonable opinions
>On /a/

Git out.

>>143201226
>which
But they are the same anon.

OP, I guess I was wondering if you guys had a preference on the differences -- FMA's homunculi depth, darker character moments vs FMAB's tigher plot, action moments and 'cleaner' ending

>>143201784
OP here*

>>143201784
You sound like an obvious chuuni edgelord who want validation for liking the first one. fuck off

File: 1464707993954.png (2MB, 1893x1079px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1893x1079px

>>143201859

>>143201226
The first one. Brotherhood was just generic shonen shit.

It's been many years since I watched FMA, and I loved the shit out of it back then. I watched Brotherhood more recently and thought it was pretty good, but I didn't enjoy it in the same way. I can't really say that FMA is better than Brotherhood though because I was younger and less critical back then. If I went back and watched it, I don't think I'd be surprised if it's actually terrible but I just enjoyed it at the time.

They're completely different aside from a few things here and there, so it's kind of weird to even compare them. If it were two takes on the same story, a comparison would make more sense, but the stories are completely different.

>>143201226
2003