Thread replies: 616
Thread images: 251
Thread images: 251
File: B5gaAvCCcAAQBiB.png (257KB, 416x313px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 416x313px
Yuyushiki?
>>
File: 49445424_p0.jpg (226KB, 570x838px) Image search:
[Google]
226KB, 570x838px
>>
Is it Tuesday already?
>>
Speccy Yuzu!
>>
File: yuyu_eyecatch.webm (3MB, 720x404px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 720x404px
>>
File: CgIlRXKUAAA7NWu.jpg (226KB, 1500x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
226KB, 1500x1500px
>>
File: 1443072790376.gif (834KB, 500x300px) Image search:
[Google]
834KB, 500x300px
>>140720721
I swear it's only been a few days since the last /yys/
>>
File: ibp2e70s.jpg (301KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
301KB, 1280x720px
Something is wrong
>>
File: CgtyBPdU4AAuR3l.jpg-orig.jpg (154KB, 900x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
154KB, 900x1200px
>>140721312
Just your imagination.
>>
File: 4bb068db-fae8-4ad5-ca12-26163e38b0582.jpg (244KB, 672x458px) Image search:
[Google]
244KB, 672x458px
>>
File: yuyushiki pic 01.png (115KB, 650x475px) Image search:
[Google]
115KB, 650x475px
>>140720593
Yuyushiki.
>>
File: 5397248627864.jpg (32KB, 739x415px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 739x415px
>>140721050
Do you prefer /yys/ to be every 2 werks anon? Huh? Is that what you want?
>>
File: deathbed_yuzu.png (1MB, 900x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 900x1200px
>>140723470
The first Tuesday of every month would be nice, because look at us: We are dying. It was too soon to summon /yys/
>>
>>140723726
Spring season is too strong, when summer comes the threads will pick the pace again.
>>
File: 1456615306195.gif (685KB, 293x400px) Image search:
[Google]
685KB, 293x400px
>>140723726
Is no a bad idea to reorganize the threads last Tuesday we had 2 threads because the first one died too soon because someone made the thread too early.
>>
File: 1458964013169.gif (1018KB, 396x568px) Image search:
[Google]
1018KB, 396x568px
The best time of the week is finally here!
>>
File: THurssy.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 480x360px
Should Yuyuesday be changed to Thursday.
It just feels more Thurssy to me.
>>
>>140725510
My sister asked me to post her drawing
>>
>>140725560
She's good!
>>
>>140725560
Your sister seems cute.
>>
File: 1452263437282.png (251KB, 512x512px) Image search:
[Google]
251KB, 512x512px
>>140725510
soon
>>
>>140725510
>>140725560
I hope she'll someday have to do one where the whole cast spells out 'Season 2'
>>
>>140725510
Whats the O V A mean?
>>
I want to make Okaa-san into an Oku-san
>>
I feel like Yuzu is an under appreciated yuyu.
I only see people fawning over yakari and yui
>>
>>140726782
>no golden statue for praising Yui
>no tinfoil hat wearing anon spouting the puppet nonsense
shit drawing desu
>>
File: 1447625687745.jpg (90KB, 896x504px) Image search:
[Google]
90KB, 896x504px
>>140726919
I love my Yuzu no matter what I'm always posting her.
>>
File: why was i even born yui.jpg (229KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
229KB, 1280x720px
>>140726782
>nothing about beans
you had one job
>>
File: 1455336357658.png (124KB, 259x367px) Image search:
[Google]
124KB, 259x367px
>>140726971
>bullying in /yys/
You're a monster.
>>
>>140727155
Theres litteraly a bucket of beans in that picture, look again, top right.
>>
File: kei_face.jpg (54KB, 414x291px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 414x291px
>>140727155
There's a bucket of beans in the corner you bilnd baka
>>
>>140726782
where are the yui wigs
>>
>>140727207
>>140727217
I feel retarded now
>>
File: 1446350963339.png (218KB, 388x476px) Image search:
[Google]
218KB, 388x476px
>>140727155
There's literally one whole bucket of beans there.
>>
>>140727221
Inyour heart
>>
>>140727238
It's ok anon we're all retarded here
>>
File: 1447505352393.png (213KB, 274x476px) Image search:
[Google]
213KB, 274x476px
>>140727238
It's fine anon.
>>
File: 1451959890160.png (176KB, 420x372px) Image search:
[Google]
176KB, 420x372px
>>140727279
No, we're allYuyus here
>>
File: 1430351768886.jpg (78KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
78KB, 1280x720px
There must be more to life.
>>
>>140727221
Yeah, what's the deal with that anyways?
>>
>>140721312
I want to see a topless Yui.
>>
File: purpleosaka.gif (3MB, 684x390px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 684x390px
>>140721036
All Yuyus equally have Keion feet.Yukari simply more equallier has Keion feetieriesterererererererererer.Er.
>>
>>140726371
Original video animation
>>
>>140727421
What's the difference?
>>
File: 18f188864473c71c34b97b9e2baed960053effa6.jpg (43KB, 729x843px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 729x843px
>>140726371
Oriental Vagina Animation
>>
Alright I'm finally going to give this show a shot since the last few seasons have left me starved for something good.
Will yuyus disappoint?
>>
>>140728173
You know that's not what I meant.
>>
File: 1456505866867.jpg (62KB, 494x385px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 494x385px
>>140728378
Are you implying that my Yuyus are retarded? Ifs that so you sir need to leave now
>>
>>140728416
I'll be disappointed at you if they do.
>>
File: yukari_hyperbolic_tiling.png (471KB, 540x540px) Image search:
[Google]
471KB, 540x540px
>>140728378
You shut your whore mouth
>>
File: yukari hands.gif (322KB, 392x522px) Image search:
[Google]
322KB, 392x522px
>>140728554
>Wall Street... why do they need the wall?
>>
>>140726782
This picture is so old, it shocks me that there are still people that are coming in these threads and seeing shit for the first time
>>
>>140729152
>3 years
>old
>>
File: 1e14f4c1-0377-4dff-b3ec-e98c19f45234..jpg (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>140729382
Now just go back and look at when a movie you haven't watched in awhile and look at the creation date. You'll be surprised sometimes.
>>
File: 51b9a3af9d5fe350dba2e2538ba1e930.jpg (389KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
389KB, 1000x1000px
Ai-chan.
>>
File: aikawa_beermaid.jpg (38KB, 793x1150px) Image search:
[Google]
38KB, 793x1150px
>>140730013
>>
File: 1456870887335.png (384KB, 533x601px) Image search:
[Google]
384KB, 533x601px
>>140730013
>>
File: 1461093342897.jpg (52KB, 1000x562px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 1000x562px
>>
File: 150px-TrefoilKnot_01.svg.png (2KB, 150x150px) Image search:
[Google]
2KB, 150x150px
>>140731729
>>
>>140731729
Like pottery.
>>
>>140731729
Is that what Yui's bean taste like?
>>
File: a61e2474-4f76-4421-bdf9-26de71a86703..jpg (574KB, 1100x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
574KB, 1100x1500px
>>
>>140731729
Strawberry banana is best smoothie
>>
File: 55683095_p0.jpg (694KB, 1239x910px) Image search:
[Google]
694KB, 1239x910px
>>140727273
Why is there hair in Anon's heart?
>>
>>140732067
>mixing two shit-tier fruits together
That's heresy.
>>
>>
File: 1431274700341.png (102KB, 232x235px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 232x235px
>>140732138
DELETE THIS
>>
File: yuzu_giggle.png (287KB, 600x644px) Image search:
[Google]
287KB, 600x644px
>>140732138
I bet her bush tastes sweaty
>>
I WANT TO EAT YUZUKO'S BUTTHOLE
>>
File: 1445572772745.gif (1000KB, 500x250px) Image search:
[Google]
1000KB, 500x250px
>>140732138
Whoa Anon, going a bit far.
>>
File: 1449615518156.png (533KB, 615x647px) Image search:
[Google]
533KB, 615x647px
>>140732304
>>
File: 1399410741400.jpg (322KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
322KB, 1600x1200px
>>140732438
Time for evasive maneuvers!!
>>
>>140732104
Birth defects?
>>
>>140733048
I'd tonguepunch her fartbox
>>
>>140732136
Just what do you have against strawberries?
>>
>>140733456
I had a great panic attack once while eating strawberries when I was like 14 and got scarred for life and I hate them ever since.
Bananas are just shitty though.
>>
>>140733554
Caused by the strawberry?
>>
File: yuzu_pet.png (245KB, 850x939px) Image search:
[Google]
245KB, 850x939px
>>140733470
Yuzu will come to love it.
>>
>>140733656
Caused by my autism and hypochondria.
>>
>>140733693
So you can never watch moeblob anime for fear of strawberry panties?
>>
>>140733554
>tfw I want to bully an anon with strawberries
>>
File: 56a44f1919ebb4668ecf3d01a805cb2eccecc194.jpg (662KB, 1200x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
662KB, 1200x1200px
>>
>>140734177
Chika gets my dick rock hard.
>>
File: 1445399538580.png (132KB, 267x314px) Image search:
[Google]
132KB, 267x314px
>>140733929
No, I just can't eat them, or more like, I'm scared of doing so. But now that you mention not being able to watch anime, I will never forget it happened when I was watching the second OVA of Shoujo Sect, so even if it has been over 6 years I have never touched the animated series or strawberries ever again. Fucking hell, I'm still not over it.
>>
File: sample_34da5c0ce456df6228235e9bc21ecbc4f93f4f07.jpg (297KB, 850x583px) Image search:
[Google]
297KB, 850x583px
>>140734212
Don't lewd the Mashimaros
>>
File: 53201189_p27.png (673KB, 600x802px) Image search:
[Google]
673KB, 600x802px
>>140728811
I could tell you but that's best delegated to/pol/.
>>
File: 1461249600324.jpg (103KB, 1000x562px) Image search:
[Google]
103KB, 1000x562px
>>140731729
>>
File: 1422409696202.png (348KB, 560x508px) Image search:
[Google]
348KB, 560x508px
>>140734263
I have a similar thing but with dumplings. It makes me feel better in a weird way to know there are people out there as autistic as me in the same ways.
>>
File: 1370395848042.png (305KB, 342x469px) Image search:
[Google]
305KB, 342x469px
>>140734600
We now have each other, anon.
>>
File: shitty_shop.png (213KB, 500x492px) Image search:
[Google]
213KB, 500x492px
hallo /yys/
>>
File: yuno_ayy_lmao.jpg (37KB, 291x195px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 291x195px
>>140735517
AYY
Y
Y
>>
>>140735637
lewd
>>
File: 55536950_p5.jpg (98KB, 1023x682px) Image search:
[Google]
98KB, 1023x682px
If /yys/ dies while I'm asleep, I'm not gonna wake up.
>>
>>140736764
rip
>>
File: tumblr_nv8rykc1T71rhrm9ro1_1280.png (505KB, 656x988px) Image search:
[Google]
505KB, 656x988px
>>140736764
Fumi is a sexy bitch
>>
File: 1453921303341.png (487KB, 800x800px) Image search:
[Google]
487KB, 800x800px
>>140736880
yes
>>
Ok, I'm awake now, /yys/. New JSB blog post, baby!
http://dataprocessing.club/TLDR: Chapter 29 is basically done and coming this week. We have cleaners now. Translators, too, but we want more.
>>
File: 53323931_p0.png (1MB, 1600x2200px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1600x2200px
>>140737303
>>
File: 957ac900fd8ce8fc709d3b465bf612f2.jpg (306KB, 707x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
306KB, 707x1000px
>>140737324
Thanks mate. You're a doll
>>
File: 1403583416786.gif (589KB, 420x236px) Image search:
[Google]
589KB, 420x236px
>>140732067
My fellow negro
>>
File: 1456947688225.gif (122KB, 254x408px) Image search:
[Google]
122KB, 254x408px
>>140737324
You guys are awesome, thanks!
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hsc9XrzqDg
>>
>>140736764
last week I woke up and there was /yys/ but it was gone when I took my lunch break from work. Made me sad.
>>
File: yui_pfft.gif (732KB, 250x355px) Image search:
[Google]
732KB, 250x355px
>>140738666
>>
File: yuzu sees your dick.jpg (106KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
106KB, 1920x1080px
>>140738666
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHpCVk3o2Q
>>
I'm willing to bet that Yuzuko has genki pink panties.
>>
>>140739987
Don't you mean a genki pink penis?
>>
>>140740487
There are no dicks in the world of YYS.
>>
>>140740544
Even Yukari's Onii-chan is actually a girl.
>>
File: bd8d256c-2337-46dc-be5f-682f7b29bb3e..gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 500x281px
Is the anon who made this around this week?
>>
nantsutte tsuchatta
>>
>>140740783Nantsutte tsuchatta
>>
>>140740827nantsutte tsuchatta?
>>
>>140740827POP
>>
>>140740879NANTSUTE
>>
>>140740879なんつってつちゃったの
>>
>>140740904
TSUCHATTA!
>>
File: 1459640356658.gif (285KB, 424x240px) Image search:
[Google]
285KB, 424x240px
>>140740729
BELIEVE HARDER I TOLD YOU!
>>
>>140740931なんつってつっちゃったの
>>
Who /pop/ here?
>>
https://youtu.be/4G-CEv45Jtk
>>
File: 1443291978957.jpg (247KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
247KB, 1280x720px
>>140740985
Y-Yamete
>>
File: comfy_yuno.jpg (71KB, 846x476px) Image search:
[Google]
71KB, 846x476px
good night /yys/
>>
I want to chew Yuz's bubblegum hair.
>>
File: 1457536464114.png (349KB, 529x545px) Image search:
[Google]
349KB, 529x545px
I want to lick Yuka's grape bangs until they turn raisin.
>>
File: 93417038d5e97db0f87742fa0426821f.jpg (68KB, 586x922px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 586x922px
Are you guys watching anything this season?
Only thing I enjoyed last season was Galko-chan. Seems like CGDCT is a dying genre for some weird reason.
>>
File: 1458155070961.png (264KB, 528x586px) Image search:
[Google]
264KB, 528x586px
I want to deepthroat Yuyui's cream banana tassel.
>>
File: 1391796872659.png (253KB, 600x592px) Image search:
[Google]
253KB, 600x592px
what does the teacher character smell like?
>>
File: 1445088812981.gif (999KB, 500x268px) Image search:
[Google]
999KB, 500x268px
>>140741986
Like mom
>>
File: 1455203375275.jpg (43KB, 496x800px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 496x800px
>>140741971
>dying genre
>anne happy
>sansha sanyou
>bakuon>haifuri
CGDCT is not selling well tho.
>>
>>140741971
At the moment, I'm just rewatching Girls und Panzer, and I'm considering starting NieA Under 7 or Anne Happy next.
It's also about time I rewatched K-On...
But that's all old stuff. What new and comfy?
>>
>>140742428 here again. I know Anne Happy isn't old, I just fucked up.
>>
>>140742428
Tanaka-kun is comfy as fuck.
>>
File: mom (2).jpg (129KB, 408x688px) Image search:
[Google]
129KB, 408x688px
>>140741986
Laundry. She has to wash her clothes because I'd cum on them every night.
>>
>>140742482
>Tanaka-kun
I'll add it to my "to check out" list. Thanks, anon!
>>
>>140742593
You're welcome. Same director who did NNB if that means anything.
>>
>>140742363
>Talking about sales
>3 weeks in
>>
>>140742363
Sansha Sanyou is the surprise of the season. It impress me that the manga has been running for over a decade and just now it got an adaptation. It's pretty good.
I'm looking forward to New Game next season the most.
>>
File: 1458681708559.jpg (110KB, 1024x576px) Image search:
[Google]
110KB, 1024x576px
>Mug of cocoa
>Trump wins blows out 5 states
>It's Yuyuesday
>19-21C
So comfy...
>>
File: 535b9347262aed1ca1cd13f8efcdc7c2.jpg (537KB, 1024x768px) Image search:
[Google]
537KB, 1024x768px
>>140741971
Nothing. I'm going to watch Amanchu next season and probably quit watching new anime altogether.
>>
>>140742611
Yeah, NNB was good as shit. Pumped now.
>>
>>140742878
Picked up. Usually when there's a "surprise of the season" it's really good. Thanks anon
>>
>>140741971
CGDCT
>>
What show is this?
>>
>>140743117
It's CGDCT, but it's been kinda unengaging so far IMO. Although the latest episode was better, there's better SoL in this very season.
>>
>>140743267
Don't ya dare try a
>Anne Happy vs Sansha Sanyou
here, m8. I'll cut ur mum, I swear.
>>
Guys I'm addicted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D5BDoMlUZs
Help
>>
>>140743318
Anne Happy is shit. I'm talking about Tanaka-kun, Kuma-Miko, and Flying Witch. Not CGDCT, but still SoL and they're all more enjoyable thus far than Sansha.
>>
>>140743328
It's over for you.
Soon, you'll develop a dependency, and you'll find yourself needing to listen to it for longer and longer before you get your fix.
Eventually, you'll need to constantly watch it and just die like that.
>>
>>140743432
God I dunno anon
Like, first time I watched Yuyushiki, I liked all the Yuyus about equal, thought Yuzuko was the funniest, but.
I rewatched and just started really falling in love with Yukari. She's just got this perfect personality that really fits into her friend group. She's malleable and goes with the flow and she's just good-natured and a fun person to be around. And holy shit is she cute. She's just a little bit dopey but in an endearing way, like cute and airheaded but not to the point of being a complete space cadet like Osaka or something, just to the point that it makes you love her more.
I dunno anon but I think I'm falling in love with Yukari. Crazy right? Maybe not so much. I dunno.
>>
File: 1461308523595.jpg (42KB, 653x603px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 653x603px
>>140743422
>Anne Happy is great
ftfy
>>
File: Nonohara.Yuzuko.full.1435137.jpg (157KB, 1670x2494px) Image search:
[Google]
157KB, 1670x2494px
>>140743510
Yuzuko is best though like real talk?
>smart
>wears glasses
>funny
>genki
>best butt
>most likely to try anal with you
>>
>>140743696
i want to kiss her thighs
>>
>>140743696
0.01% is not much bigger than 0%
>>
File: yuzuko1.jpg (545KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
545KB, 1280x720px
>>140743696
I love Yuzuko so much anon. Good taste.
Maybe my favourite genki girl in anime. Imagine how boring the data processing club would be without her.
>>
Seems like everyone in /yys/ either falls in love with Yuzuko or Yukari. Does anyone actually like Yui the best?
>>
File: yuzuko_cardiobunny.png (129KB, 483x750px) Image search:
[Google]
129KB, 483x750px
>>140743753
Leave this place, Jamal.
>>
>>140743791
Nigga EVERYONE loves Yui.
>>
>>140743696
Forgetting
>Best Yuyu to bully
shame....
>>
File: yuiyui.png (283KB, 718x595px) Image search:
[Google]
283KB, 718x595px
>>140743842
This. I just assumed it was a given so I never bothered mentioning it.
>>
Guys Yukari is literally my waifu.
>>
File: 159b4fcba0251d111cb5e5f2037df00d.jpg (237KB, 600x624px) Image search:
[Google]
237KB, 600x624px
>>140743968
>literally
Post pics of you two together
>>
>>140743884
I-is Yui really taller than Yui!?
>>
>>140744054
no man I am just fucking in love with her is all.
>>
File: 15dd811b-d373-496b-a843-97d5102a379d..png (519KB, 605x733px) Image search:
[Google]
519KB, 605x733px
goodnight /yys/
>>
>>140744105
You need to become Yui then, how you become Yui?
>>
File: guyuyu.jpg (561KB, 1500x1128px) Image search:
[Google]
561KB, 1500x1128px
>>140744127
pls don't leave us...
>>
>>140744127
Good night shitty elf
>>
>>140744146
I dunno, hug my pillow and wiggle my ass around?
>>
File: sex-crazed lesbian (1).gif (846KB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
846KB, 500x281px
>>140744280
P-post pics of you wiggling your ass around
>>
>>140744380
You wouldn't be able to tell that it was wiggling if they were just pics.
>>
>>140734263
Is this what true autism is?
>>140741971
Yeah, this season is fantastic. I'm watching a shit-ton of shows
>Haifuri
>Sansha Sanyou
>Anne Happy
>Space Patrol Luluco
>Flying Witch
>Tanaka-kun
>Kuma Miko
>Joker Gameu
>Twin Exorcists
>Stray Dogs
>Iron fortress
>Bakuon
>>
>>140745226
Everything but the last 4. Bakuon especially, I stopped paying attention when they revealed the talking motorcycle was transgender. And Iron fortress is EDGE the anime.
>>
File: 1394267505887.jpg (34KB, 249x251px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 249x251px
>>140742878
>it impress me that the manga has been running for over a decade and just now it got an adaptation
>Published: Jan 9, 2003
God damn, I had no idea it was that old
>>
>>140742593
>>140742482
Has one of the best op/ed this season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg4K9OukNUs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Uoit21gVHg
>>
File: tumblr_o6811g63N81tlyjpto1_500.gif (237KB, 480x270px) Image search:
[Google]
237KB, 480x270px
>>
>>140746319
the Luluco ED clears them all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olpUQdsKqv0
>>
>>140746319
>>140746549
KumaMiko has the best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97tYc6X1E-k
>>
no more love for the Yuyus... on a Tuesday nonetheless...
>>
File: wasa_the_following.jpg (141KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 1280x720px
>>140747718
>nonetheless
I think you mean "no less"
>>
File: 1461110405060.png (258KB, 512x512px) Image search:
[Google]
258KB, 512x512px
>>140747799
it truly is a dark age
>>
>>140747978
It's ok anon just calm down
>>
>>140747978
We can talk about Yui's boobs?
>>
>>140731729
>WacArnolds
REEEEEEEEE
also what happened to the rest of that anime? Did they just do that one ep?
>>
File: 7c2297ac47f0472d16a2891f87f3ed6c.jpg (135KB, 444x900px) Image search:
[Google]
135KB, 444x900px
>>140748273
Do you think she massage them every day?
>>
File: 90bde20e3daf4c7295efde195e6ce9391367447726_full.jpg (58KB, 640x404px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 640x404px
Hiro made a new board.
>>>/film/
>>
File: 1ec57f9cdd6143f0117e74227978b0bb1367447597_full.jpg (72KB, 640x469px) Image search:
[Google]
72KB, 640x469px
>>140748881
Oh that link yet works.
boards.4chan.org/film/
>>
>>140748881
For what purpose? Isn't /tv/ enough?
>>
>>140748881
I might be excited for this once the shitposting stops. Whether it is necessary or not is another question.
>>
>>140720593
why are they so gay?
>>
File: e78a738f16bfdefcc13823e409e32a0d1367447433_full.jpg (127KB, 640x651px) Image search:
[Google]
127KB, 640x651px
>>140748930
Simply put, /tv/ is a big fat mess.
Who knows if /a/ would get the same treatment if things get bad.
Also, Yui's birthday on May 1st?
>>
>>140749306
>get bad
>get
ohohoho
>>
File: 52518622_p0.jpg (453KB, 700x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
453KB, 700x1000px
Brown Yuzuko.
>>
File: yukari bad things.jpg (193KB, 550x512px) Image search:
[Google]
193KB, 550x512px
>>140749890It's not THAT badyet.
>>
File: 1371072938493.png (105KB, 277x360px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 277x360px
>>140750249psssssssssst.It was a stab at your grammar.
>>
File: 1457639859566.png (183KB, 506x330px) Image search:
[Google]
183KB, 506x330px
>>140750249
Every thread about a new anime is filled with a dozen people who have read the manga and want the world to know it, choosing to express this fact by spoiling things for no reason. There's a bizarre mentality that an opinion can only be presented if one also demonstrates that they are also completely aware of everything that happens at its very end. Because of that, there's no real discussion here. Either you know everything about the show already, or you aren't licensed to talk about it. People don't use spoiler tags unless they're joking, too. All /a/ is good for is talking about SoL shows because they don't have plots to spoil.
>>
>>140750521
Gakkou Gurashi threads were horrible.
>>
File: yuzu bad things.jpg (235KB, 550x512px) Image search:
[Google]
235KB, 550x512px
>>140750521
That is a problem. Hard to report because mods aren't particularly aware of what is considered a spoiler. Something could be done about it I'm sure.
But relative to the shitshow that is /tv/, it's not too terrible. I'm glad the film enthusiasts got their own space.
>>140750489
Was it? "If things get bad" or "how bad things get" seems like a common phrase, maybe only America.
>>
>>140750738
become
>>
>>140750841
Irregardless for all intensive porpoises you got the message.
>>
File: 1398410172010.png (333KB, 457x614px) Image search:
[Google]
333KB, 457x614px
>>140752166
Dogberryism
>>
>>140750521
Threads for original anime are the best. Mangafags can ruin SoL shows too though Bakuon! threads are full of mangafags bitching about everything the anime does wrong.
>>
>>140726371
Oral Vaginal Anal
>>
File: 1436357776186.jpg (28KB, 397x352px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 397x352px
Selamat Pagi /yys/
>>
File: Aikawa_edit.png (1MB, 1362x1346px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1362x1346px
>>140730013Ai-chan here
>>
>>140753195
Selamat malam.
>>
File: 1455775087357.jpg (42KB, 364x459px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 364x459px
Yuyushiki is one of the best things ever created.
>tfw i will never be able to watch it again for the first time.
I used to take a shit ton of xanax and watch an anime and then forget it the next day. This allowed me to watch everything for the first time twice
>>
File: download_20160217_220419.jpg (283KB, 1280x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
283KB, 1280x1080px
>>140753683
>>140753683
I also made these because they're cool.
>>
File: recent.jpg (150KB, 1280x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
150KB, 1280x1080px
>>140753776
>>
File: 1456870776896.pngXX0001.jpg (102KB, 1280x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 1280x1080px
>>140753810
>>
https://a.pomf.cat/isczpa.webm
>>
So when was the OVA gonna come out?
>>
File: 73493af6-96c0-41c5-8755-e815dbbfc2bd..png (162KB, 360x516px) Image search:
[Google]
162KB, 360x516px
good morning /yys/
>>
>>140753683
>tfw I watched Yuyushiki over the course of two days and only while high as fuck
>tfw get to experience it all over again sober next time I watch it
It's a good feel
>>
File: yuyushiki2-1-1.webm (977KB, 710x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
977KB, 710x1024px
>>
File: 1457205089024.jpg (71KB, 720x405px) Image search:
[Google]
71KB, 720x405px
>>140753390
>>
>>140753911
It's on TV right now.
>>
File: 09b83ec1-6761-4e05-a327-1bc60bd9eea5..png (199KB, 338x403px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 338x403px
>>140754848
WHAT
>>
File: 1456210725294.jpg (70KB, 413x319px) Image search:
[Google]
70KB, 413x319px
>>140754848
I don't believe you.
>>
>>140750521
>anime-only ADHDs worried about people talking about the manga
>>
>>140755469
>>140755683
Hourly reruns too. It's pretty cool, but I can't believe Yui is fucking dead.
>>
File: 1392165642785.jpg (257KB, 1280x1346px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 1280x1346px
bump
>>
>>140756917
I'd lift her skirt up just to see her crying
>>
Which Yuyu would you like to see crying?
>>
File: 1447806203752.jpg (59KB, 482x666px) Image search:
[Google]
59KB, 482x666px
>>140757182
You, Anon. For being an awful person.
>>
>>140757252
Maybe it would be tears of joy.Don't hate me.
>>
>>140757182
Shame on you, anon.
>>
File: [Commie] Yuyushiki - 03 [064228A1].mkv_snapshot_18.02_[2013.04.25_00.49.33].jpg (52KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
![[Commie] Yuyushiki - 03 [064228A1].mkv_snapshot_18.02_[2013.04.25_00.49.33].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/e6L5op3.jpg "[Commie] Yuyushiki - 03 [064228A1].mkv snapshot 18.02 [2013.04.25 00.49.33]")
52KB, 1280x720px
>>140727630
But what if there isn't?
>>
>>140734509
Are those BKUB yuyus?
>>
File: go_away.gif (1MB, 263x368px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 263x368px
>>140756885
Stop that. Right now.
>>
File: 56491763_p0.png (1MB, 1500x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1500x2000px
>>
File: 1451446537755.jpg (165KB, 636x867px) Image search:
[Google]
165KB, 636x867px
>>140757872
I'm sorry for the spoiler, it's very inconsiderate of me.
>>
File: 1392197489987.gif (3MB, 350x197px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 350x197px
>>140756885
I can't believe Yui is fucking Yuzu and Yukari.
>>
>>140758636
What are you implying, Anon?
>>
File: 1366142858179.jpg (13KB, 370x370px) Image search:
[Google]
13KB, 370x370px
>>140753390
Tabetai!
>>
>>140757332
>Don't hate me.
T-too late.
>>
>>140758181
Yui looks stumpy there
>>
>no Yuzu bullying
Weak thread.
>>
File: 1388995931998.png (462KB, 676x671px) Image search:
[Google]
462KB, 676x671px
>>140760844
no bully
>>
File: 1460495731308.png (177KB, 251x421px) Image search:
[Google]
177KB, 251x421px
>>140760844
You're weak, nerd.
>>
Imagine how good it would be to comfort crying Yuzuko.
>>
>>140760982
Would it feel good, Anon? Are you sure?
Would you feel good knowing you were unable to protect her from the thing that made her cry? What if you're too much of a failure to successfully comfort her? Do you enjoy the suffering this scenario would cause for the both of you?
>>
File: 1459623519583.png (1MB, 1017x765px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1017x765px
I want Yuzuko to give me a rimjob.
>>
>>140761079
She's a teen. She is probably upset because of some triffle.
>>
>>140761263
>trivialising trifle
Terrible
>>
>>140761368
Yeah, missing pudding totally worth a depression.
>>
>>140761159
I want to suck Yuzuko's fat cock
>>
File: 1398196015805.jpg (46KB, 325x398px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 325x398px
>>140761482
Fuck you mom, you don't know how hard it is to be me.
>>
File: 1459926703268.jpg (104KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
104KB, 1280x720px
>>140761523
I want to french kiss Yuzuko's butthole while milking her penis.
>>
>>140761159
I'd masturbate next to you while watching her giving you a rimjob
>>
>>140757441
Yes, BKUB made one of the new endcards that were shown on the reruns.
>>
File: 1451587117175.png (544KB, 530x674px) Image search:
[Google]
544KB, 530x674px
Stop saying weird sexual things about Yuzu.
>>
File: 1459756567461.jpg (34KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 640x480px
>>140761653
I could fap you instead, Anon.
>>
File: 1452630792983.jpg (80KB, 735x546px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 735x546px
>>140761762
If you have washed your hands first, then yeah
>>
Please no ERP again
Stop this
>>
>>140761932
I can wash your hands if you want.
>>
File: 144604531753.jpg (20KB, 279x244px) Image search:
[Google]
20KB, 279x244px
>>140753195
Nyanpasu
>>
File: puzzling puzzle piece of puzzlement.jpg (397KB, 1265x701px) Image search:
[Google]
397KB, 1265x701px
>>140720593
>>
File: 1461129238987.png (162KB, 800x500px) Image search:
[Google]
162KB, 800x500px
>>140743842
>>
>>140761729
How about ordinary nonsexual things?
Yuzuko brushes her teeth in the morning.
>>
>>140762306
I'd like to brush her teeth.
>>
File: Yuzuneko_Hnnng_2_49464969_p1.jpg (316KB, 1464x2070px) Image search:
[Google]
316KB, 1464x2070px
>>140761729
So you'd rather I show you weird sexual things about Yuzu?
>>
File: 1444390022874.jpg (117KB, 821x1188px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 821x1188px
>>140762389
You don't have the guts
It's against the /yys/ guidelines
>>
File: ee0b4573718f49508fac73c3e5049feb.jpg (592KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
592KB, 1920x1080px
>>140762454
Don't temp me
>>
File: turned_on.jpg (58KB, 387x506px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 387x506px
>>140761580
I want to use my tongue to massage her prostate
>>
File: 19599f656bea8cc4e05d3ed938c31af3.jpg (1MB, 2014x2992px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2014x2992px
>>140762889
I want her to sit on my face and pee in my mouth.
>>
File: Lucinda Creighton (born 20 January 1980) is an Irish politician and the leader of the Renua Ireland political party. She was a Teachta Dála (TD) for the Dublin South–East constituency from 2007 until 2016..jpg (61KB, 577x547px) Image search:
[Google]
61KB, 577x547px
>>140762454
He might not have the guts, but I sure do.
>>
File: 1450099406979.jpg (27KB, 327x378px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 327x378px
>>140763123
dont do that
>>
File: Canada competed at the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, Japan. 115 competitors, 95 men and 20 women, took part in 92 events in 16 sports..jpg (86KB, 599x849px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 599x849px
>>140763263
Instructions unclear, try again later.
>>
File: 1461287917391.gif (619KB, 684x488px) Image search:
[Google]
619KB, 684x488px
>>
>>140763600
It looks like she needs a professional medical help.
>>
File: 53139138_p0.png (1MB, 1637x1157px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1637x1157px
>>
>>140763600
https://u.pomf.is/zamycv.webm
>>
File: why_agiri_can_clone_herself_by_stevosstuff-d79cjvn.png (462KB, 856x471px) Image search:
[Google]
462KB, 856x471px
>>140728554
curious
>>
File: numbers.png (50KB, 209x193px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 209x193px
>>140733554
>bananas are just shitty
they are by far the best fruit, not even a contest.
>>
File: grrrrr.jpg (41KB, 297x422px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 297x422px
No more lewds in this thread until Friday.
>>
>>140764455
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
gotta catch my breath
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAH
Yoshiko, go to bed
>>
File: 1458680546810.gif (1MB, 291x320px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 291x320px
>>140764597
>>
File: 50201934_p36.jpg (257KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 1920x1080px
>>140764539
It's already friday in my time zone.
>>
File: 1446715262892.jpg (167KB, 413x442px) Image search:
[Google]
167KB, 413x442px
>>140764455
>they are by far the best fruit, not even a contest.
Tomatoes are better.
>>
File: HagtlTj.jpg (168KB, 1000x750px) Image search:
[Google]
168KB, 1000x750px
I want milk
>>
File: 1392203017297.gif (820KB, 420x544px) Image search:
[Google]
820KB, 420x544px
>>
>>140765259
You're right. Milk is the best fruit.
>>
File: 5810189+_7e89b147cf6fd344f0caad189dfa5973[1].gif (238KB, 480x480px) Image search:
[Google]
![5810189+_7e89b147cf6fd344f0caad189dfa5973[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/rkyqhAP.gif "5810189+ 7e89b147cf6fd344f0caad189dfa5973[1]")
238KB, 480x480px
>>140766799
how quickly the yukari turns
>>
File: 1459976242308.gif (594KB, 200x200px) Image search:
[Google]
594KB, 200x200px
>>140767013
Faster than this?
>>
File: how QUICKLY the tide turns.gif (257KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 500x500px
>>140767152
>>
>>140752927
I guess when you see good or important parts being completely skipped you tend to have issues with that. When you are ignorant of the source material you don't know what has been changed. Zombie Dog Gurashi is a perfect example even though that other poster was crying about it here.
>>
Somebody post one of the sped-up Yukari swivelling gifs / webms.
>>
File: 1455166691192.jpg (419KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
419KB, 1280x720px
>>140764455
This
>healthy
>high source of potassium
>high source of protein (among fruits)
>tasty
>works with anything in a smoothie
>sinulates cock sucking
Literally no downside
>>
>>140768091
I think I see one.
>>
>>140768091
>Literally no downside
lack of genetic variety in banana plants. they will be wiped out soon
>>
>>140768091
>shit mushy texture
>shit taste
>isn't refreshing
>doesn't keep well
>is easily damaged
>>
File: wasthatfunny.jpg (30KB, 480x360px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 480x360px
>>140744083
actually Yui is taller than Yui
also Yui>Yui
>>
File: 1437669613624.png (98KB, 275x275px) Image search:
[Google]
98KB, 275x275px
>>140769171
>also Yui>Yui
Actually it's Yui>Yui>Yui>Yui>Yui>>>>>>>Shit>>>>>>Yui
>>
>>140752710DONDURMA
>>
File: nyanpasu.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>140762198
Nyanpasu-pasu, Ren-chon
>>
File: Aikawa_edit_FIXED.png (1MB, 1362x1346px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1362x1346px
>>140753390
This AGAIN? I swear I fixed this at least once before.
>>
File: CcuwZ-fVIAAl2uq.jpg (77KB, 662x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
77KB, 662x1000px
>>
>>140770661
Her shorts would probably fall down if they weren't being clenched by her vagina.
>>
>>140768793
>doesn't require refrigeration
>easy to gauge ripeness
>is refreshing
>fills you up
>quick to eat
>best ice cream topping among fruits
>cheapest fruit
>not messy
>banana boo
>>
>>140771911
Don't you find bananas lack enough sharpness, though?
>>
>>140772135
... As opposed to what fruit?
>>
>>140772251
As opposed to most fruit. For instance, mandarin oranges or apples.
>>
>>140772492
No way. You're just basing that on the stems, which isn't fair. A banana stem is just as sharp. You just never notice because you grip it by the sides. The bottom of a banana is pretty sharp too. You would tear the heck out of your sphincter if you tried it.
>>
>>140772135
eh, I like pineapples to but that citric acid can actually slightly dissolve the inside of your mouth. If you eat too much you may experience mild pain or discomfort. But as far as flavor goes the less acidic taste makes the sweetness more prominent. I like that.
>>
>>140762290
I don't understand this
Am I stupid, or just innocent?
>>
>>140773141
Sounds like you're just an indie rage band, friend.
>>
>>140773252
Oh no
How will I tell my parents?
>>
>>140769256
All Yui are cute
But Yui is cutererer
>>
>>140772251
>>140772608
If you wanna get autistic about it banana isn't even a fruit. It's technically a berry. We should call them banana berry.
>>
File: f4f54a88-4e11-4852-951e-fae032a475fe..png (126KB, 256x272px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 256x272px
>>140774191
delete this
>>
>>140774297
>The banana is an edible fruit, botanically a berry,[1][2] produced by several kinds of large herbaceous, flowering plants in the genus Musa.
>>
>>140760260
Goddamn, actual dwarf Yui
>>
>>140774191
>>140774386
Being a botanical berry doesn't exclude something from being a culinary fruit. For instance, blackcurrants are both a botanical berry and a culinary fruit.
Or perhaps you're trolling and I'm an idiot for taking the b8.
>>
>>140774806
>Being a botanical berry doesn't exclude something from being a culinary fruit.
No one claimed that was the case.
>For instance, blackcurrants are both a botanical berry and a culinary fruit.
Just like bananas then.
>Or perhaps you're trolling and I'm an idiot for taking the b8.
No, I'm not trolling and yes you're an idiot. We got that in common at least.
Today's topic is bananas.
>>
File: yui_check.jpg (79KB, 521x717px) Image search:
[Google]
79KB, 521x717px
>>140775006
If dubs then bananas are fruits
>>
>>140775794
if dubsor trips or singles or quads or septs or hexts or anything elseYui is cuter than Yui
>>
File: 47603462_p0_master1200.jpg (295KB, 719x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
295KB, 719x1000px
>>140775875
If dubs then you're wrong
>>
>>140776005
Yui is far cuter than Yui, pal. Accept itJust kidding they're equally cute and I love them both. Also, that singing voice is cute as fuck senpai
>>
>>140775006
Your post:
>' banana isn't even a fruit. It's technically a berry. '
What do you call that, you stupid cunt? How do you even figure out how to work your computer to get here?
>>
>>140776005
>master1200
>>
Berries are a type of fruit in the most technically accurate and thus most pedantic and best way possible. Arguing that bananas aren't technically fruit because they're berries is fundamentally wrong and completely absurd. Bananas are fruit are berries.
POP.
>>
File: yuyushiki truck.gif (1MB, 420x236px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 420x236px
apparently banana flavoring is based on the breed of banana that used to be mass produced(?) and it is now extinct
>tfw you will never eat those god-tier bananas while watching the Yuyushiki OVA
why even live?
>>
File: yuzu_orly.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
57KB, 1280x720px
>>140776281
You can eat mine anon
>>
>>140776281
That's the most fucked up thing I've heard today and I heard my friend got fired
>>
>>140776281
Monocultures are a bitch.
>>
what did she mean by Yui's classy bean??
>>
File: yukari.gif (979KB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
979KB, 500x281px
>>140776427
don't threaten me with a good time.
I've been feeling a bit banana-curious lately
>>
>>140776509
clitoris
>>
File: triple_yui.jpg (294KB, 882x876px) Image search:
[Google]
294KB, 882x876px
>>140776005
Yui is the cutest
>>
File: 75052ed6-8706-4bbe-8126-8f0a80066772..png (645KB, 722x525px) Image search:
[Google]
645KB, 722x525px
>>140776570
>>
File: 1440972902074.jpg (24KB, 702x720px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 702x720px
>>140776509
A bean is a bean you dense idiot.
>Hurr it's something lewd
No, it's not. Yui carries beans with her.
>>
>>140776918
Go away Yui, we're talking about Yui here.
>>
>>140776281
It's not extinct, it's just that it's not farmed for mass consumption anymore due to a virus that wiped out entire plantations and has no cure.
Soon the same will happen to the bananas we eat these days, and the next generations will eat different bananas.
>>
File: 1457653053337.png (131KB, 1356x631px) Image search:
[Google]
131KB, 1356x631px
>>140776918
If that's true, then how do you explain this?
>>
File: yukari.png (370KB, 544x579px) Image search:
[Google]
370KB, 544x579px
>>140777227
Capitalised? Has Yuyushiki got a light novel?
>>
File: 31aeb940-c1e7-475d-807d-1fc677dc93bc..png (368KB, 923x760px) Image search:
[Google]
368KB, 923x760px
>>140776712
>>
>>140777761
What type if bean exactly? Ricin?
>>
>>140740729
I don't get it, who's /gg/?
>>
File: assad and sg.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 500x281px
>>
>>140778187
It's out of context but basically there's a thread I spam yuyushiki images in
>>
https://youtu.be/YT-BA6hyRvg
>>
File: yukari_lick.jpg (536KB, 1003x1228px) Image search:
[Google]
536KB, 1003x1228px
>>140776527
Then maybe we can share a banana
>>
File: yuwouldntdownload.gif (835KB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
835KB, 500x281px
don't die okay
>>
File: letsdoit.jpg (8KB, 300x168px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 300x168px
>>140778060
what's the difference between a garbanzo bean and a chickpea?I've never had a garbanzo bean on my face
>>
>>140780390I've had neither on my face
>>
File: Matsumoto.Yoriko.full.1517973.jpg (125KB, 400x600px) Image search:
[Google]
125KB, 400x600px
>>140765259
I want to GOMMAD (gallon of Mom's milk a day)
>>
File: yeahthisisfromgooglesowhat.gif (968KB, 500x281px) Image search:
[Google]
968KB, 500x281px
>>140780480
it's ok to be a late bloomer
>>
>>140780530
Only if you also do SS (scissor secretly).
>>
File: 1459533492111.jpg (215KB, 1280x1439px) Image search:
[Google]
215KB, 1280x1439px
How can a bean be classy?
>>
>>140780769
Such t'is the pond'rance of such noble Men as I, so callously stuck in this age of "swag". All that t'is long'd for by this Euphoric Gentleman ti's a "bean" (as you brutes call it) that shares such class. Ach, but then t'id be the Friendzone for me! Ha, ha, ha.
>>
File: aho-guard-o.png (656KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
656KB, 1280x720px
>>140770617
I've been posting this for a long time and I'm not changing it
>>
File: oku-san_drunk.png (148KB, 446x764px) Image search:
[Google]
148KB, 446x764px
>>140780732
>secretly
>>
File: 788534e4-b73d-4e46-a073-087a8d3af935..jpg (63KB, 592x572px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 592x572px
>>140780769
Part of me wonders what yui's classy bean tastes like.
part of me
>>
>>140781453
Yuzu's eye is fucked up.
>>
Yuyu futa size speculations?
I can't decide which are the large-dicked dom and the small-dicked sub in the Yuzu x Yui pairing
>>
File: Yuyu Shik-Ai.jpg (265KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
265KB, 1280x720px
A cute girl feels the urge to do cute things with a cute girl.
Unable to do cute things, she is gifted with by cute ex machina with the cute girl's thing. Never minding the strange thing, she immediately does cute things, and is overjoyed to find out that cute girl wants to do cute things as well.
But, the next day, when she recounts the previous day's cute things done with the cute girl, she only looks at her with a uncute expression. After some investigation, she finds out that the cute girl she did cute things with is not the same cute girl she originally wanted to do cute things with. In fact, she doesn't want to do cute things in this universe at all. She is the girl's alternate universe counterpart, who wants to do cute things with the MC's own alternate universe cute self, who too is blissfully unaware of her desire to do cute things.
Hijinks ensue as the two strike up a deal to give each other their cutest, most private things in order to equip the other with cute things they need to do cute things with their other cute selves. While the two do cute things with their alternate universe cute girls, NOTHING ensues as they begin to feel desire to do cute things with each other instead and question the NATURE of MOE.
>>
>>140781640
There's a serious lack of sexual stuff in this post.
>>
>>140781558
None of them have dicks they just have regular beans.
>>140781723
Cute things can be sexual things too.
>>
>>140781751
But I have tons of pictures I've drawn proving they have dicks.
Trust me I'm an expert.
>>
File: 831795337205ded118b1434e009838aa.jpg (307KB, 800x630px) Image search:
[Google]
307KB, 800x630px
>>140781640
A lewd girl feels the urge to do lewd things with a cute girl.
Unable to do lewd things, she is gifted with a lewd ex machina with the cute girl's bean. Never minding the strange taste, she immediately does lewd things to it, and is overjoyed to find out that the cute girl came.
But, the next day, when she recounts the previous day's lewd things done with the cute girl, she only looks at her with a Yui-like expression. After some investigation, she finds out that the cute girl she did lewd things with is not the same cute girl she originally wanted to do lewd things with. In fact, she doesn't want to do lewd things in this universe at all. She is the girl's alternate universe counterpart, who wants to do lewd things with the MC's own alternate universe lewd self, who too is sexually unaware of her desire to do lewd things.
Hijinks ensue as the two strike up a deal to give each other their lewdest, most private parts in order to equip the other with lewd things they need to do lewd things with their other cute selves. While the two do lewd things with their alternate universe cute girls, ORGASMS ensue as they begin to feel desire to do lewd things with each other instead and question the NATURE of BEAN.
>>
>>140781812
Rori?
>>
>>140781812
>I'm an expert on dicks
>No homo tho
>>
File: yuzuuzuuzu.png (99KB, 420x420px) Image search:
[Google]
99KB, 420x420px
>>140781879
Who else?
>>140781910
>No homo
>In /yys/
I'm not that delusional
>>
>>140781558
Small is Yui.
The biggest is Yukari either way.
>>
File: 1423891788201.png (347KB, 500x582px) Image search:
[Google]
347KB, 500x582px
>>140781558
>>140782049
Yui: average penis, tight hole
Yuzuko: small penis, stretchy hole
Yukari: large penis, average hole
>>
what is the appeal of this? is it just for homos in denial?
>It's not a boy, it's a girl with a dick!! it's not gay!!
okay okay.
>>
File: yuckari.png (182KB, 528x666px) Image search:
[Google]
182KB, 528x666px
>>140782158
>>140782049
>Yukari is biggest
That's unfortunate, I can't see her in a sexual way at all. She's too silly. It must be her eyes.
>>
>>140782448
It's like those faggots that talk about how it's straight to get rammed by their girlfriend's strap-on because it's a girl.
>>
>>140782454
Ok, YuixYuzu is still good.
>>
>>140782448
>>140782480
Are you saying with two completely normal girls having homosexual sex, that that's more straight than two girls having sex where one or two of them has a dick?
Also I'm definitely not in denial, I'm very confidently bi.
>>
>>140782598
Misleading question. Girls don't have dicks. Wanting to add dicks onto girls isn't something a straight man would do.
>>
>>140782454
Yes, obviously the purest and most innocent girl would have the biggest penis.
>>
File: a8a50fba2fe91f4ddef156c8faa08bbc.jpg (179KB, 600x870px) Image search:
[Google]
179KB, 600x870px
>>140782723
This man gets it
>>
>>140782674
Sexuality isn't black and white you homo. Gay men don't like girls with dicks at all, they like burly sweaty buff macho men.
That only leaves straight men to like it, but obviously that doesn't mean ALL straight men.Some people have different tastes and preferencesshocker
>>
File: 1424724584506.jpg (457KB, 805x714px) Image search:
[Google]
457KB, 805x714px
>>140782766
It feels wrong to enjoy this picture so much
More please
>>
File: 5523ae74-3e47-4dc9-b028-b887ecb17648..png (103KB, 600x450px) Image search:
[Google]
103KB, 600x450px
>>140782448
a futa fucking a girl is more straight for a heterosexual man to watch than a man fucking a girl. If you were as straight as me you'd understand this.
>>
>>140782842
>no-true-Scotsman fallacy
You can't argue that something is straight because it's not gay. Weren't you talking about bisexuality earlier? If there's anything this autistic fantasy could be categorized into, it's bisexuality. Wanting your "wife" to have a dick isn't straight. It's deluded.
>>
File: f48ef07958f05fa55b9c33f2e84bc9f9.jpg (483KB, 1210x860px) Image search:
[Google]
483KB, 1210x860px
>>140782967
This man is right
>>140782970
That's not what no true scotsman is.
>>
File: 1453551754996.png (180KB, 599x355px) Image search:
[Google]
180KB, 599x355px
/yys/ is being gayer than usual
>>
>>140782970
I'm bisexual because I'm fine with men as well. But I know a lot of people that are into futa that are completely straight. And yes getting pegged with a strap-on by a GIRL is completely straight, as is fantasizing about a GIRL with a dick brutalizing you anally.
Straight = Likes girls
Gay = Likes men
It's not really complicated senpai
>>
>>140783017
Nigga was saying that a man ain't gay unless he likes what he likes. What about the gays who like "traps"?
>>
>>140783075
If I liked men I wouldn't watch an anime where male characters don't exist.
>>
>>140783101
bruh I like women and I watched saving private ryan once but there were no girls so no I'm bi-curious
>>
File: n-no_homo2.png (295KB, 563x460px) Image search:
[Google]
295KB, 563x460px
>>140783085
It's fact that gay men in real life don't want the average twink though.
t. Homo
>>
File: a89d5e27e8e5074b9e25b59cac9cb663.jpg (237KB, 820x623px) Image search:
[Google]
237KB, 820x623px
>>140782967
Well yeah, but girl x girl is the straightest.
>>
>>140783075
Straight != Likes having dicks in the butt
Gay = Likes having dicks in the butt
It really is simple. Just as soon as you break out of your sexual delusion and realize that your sexuality is better described as "Low Standards" than anything else. People who like futa have just gradually stopped caring about reality. They fap to cartoons which already deviate from true anatomy, and from there they just let their standards slip as they go further and further down the rabbit hole of degeneracy. It's the same thing as drawing a girl, giving it a dick, and calling it a "trap". You aren't gay for liking it, just pathetic.
>>
>>140783169
>I represent all gays
>There is no gay that disagrees with me
Grow up.
>>
>>140783189
Liking something in your butt is as gay as liking armpits or feet or having a smell fetish
It has nothing to do with sexuality you retard.
>muh degeneracy
Oh alright, hi /pol/
>>
>>140782967
I'm one of the straightest people you'll ever meet. 90% of what I fap off to is either solo girl or lesbian and the other 10% is male on female, but I self insert. I'm not actually fawning over the dick.
>>140782842
>Gay men don't like girls with dicks at all, they like burly sweaty buff macho men.
wait a minute, you aren't a gay male, so how could you possibly speak for them on your behalf? I'm not gay nor do i have gay friends, but I'm sure there are plenty of gay males who like futa.
>>140783075
>Straight = Likes girls
>Gay = Likes men
okay, youre backpedaling now. didn't you just say that it wasn't black and white?
anyway, here is a comedy skit that i think you could all learn from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyNJZ-2Dod4
>>
File: are_you_fucking_serious (1).png (210KB, 456x355px) Image search:
[Google]
210KB, 456x355px
>>140783224
>implying I don't have more experience interacting with gays than you
>implying your opinion matters at all in this conversation
Why are you this defensive? Just ask around lmao.
Oh wait, that'd actually require you to leave your mother's basement.
>>
Didn't you guys have a trap thread the other day bumplimit arguing the same shit?
>>
>>140783171
I like creampies
What's straighter than that? I just don't want to look at hairy ass while it happens. Futa on girl is straighter than girl on girl. Girl on girl doesn't speak to male sexual urges.
>>
>>140783344
Girls can have hairy asses as well
>>
>>140783258
If you're telling me that wanting to have a dick in your butt has nothing to do with sexuality, then you're telling me that there is, practically, no such thing as sexuality. You're only trying to reduce the criteria of the terms we're arguing about until anything can fit under them.
And it's still missing the point that futa isn't real. Adding dicks to your fictional women is obviously gay.
>>
>>140783288
We have this argument everyday. And probably will til the end of time.
>>140783344
>I like creampies
Liking man spunk is pretty gay m8.
>>
>>140783280
No human being could have enough "experience" to know that much. You're deriding me in an effort to dismiss my opinion on the basis that I'm a loser or something. You've shut your brain off.
>>
>>140783279
>I'm not gay nor do I have gay friends, but I'm sure
I don't think "sure" was the word you're looking for
>>
>>140783344
>Futa on girl is straighter than girl on girl. Girl on girl doesn't speak to male sexual urges.
holy shit, is this what homos actually believe?
this anon has more denial than Tojo had in 1944
>>
>>140781640
FINDS
>>
>>140783370
It isn't
Lesbian sex is boring, is watching lesbian porn that involves strapons gay? Futa is the least gay form of porn because it involves women with cocks, ensuring you don't have to involve a man at all while still getting cocks pounding pussies.
I don't see how you can't understand this.
>>
>>140783344
>Girl on girl doesn't speak to male sexual urges.
Yes it does. The male brain would, upon seeing women having sex, conclude that they are sexually starved and in need of a male. It would also make the man feel dominant, important, and successful.
>>
>>140783401
You are a loser though, for projecting your preconceptions onto a group of people that you've never interacted before in real life.
I don't even nee d to turn on my brain to know that you're full of shit desu.
>>
>>140783434
The only lesbian sex that is attractive to straight men involves dildos or strap ons
If futa is gay then that is also gay
The fact is that penises are not homosexual by their own virtue, otherwise you'd be a faggot for watching porn involving a guy fucking a girl
>>
>>140783443
>my opinion is fact
>>
>>140783443
>Lesbian sex is boring
Maybe if you are a fruity homo man.
>>
File: bait 4.jpg (21KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
21KB, 500x500px
>>140783482
>The only lesbian sex that is attractive to straight men involves dildos or strap ons
holy fuck
>>
>>140783443
Watching lesbian strap-on porn is only gay if you like to imagine that the strap-on is a real dick and wish you were taking it. Would it be gay for a man to watch a woman use a dildo on another woman? There's little difference. The act itself is only gay from a female perspective. They're using inanimate objects in order to have sex with each other. What kind of faggot would be busy thinking about dicks?
And futa isn't real. The closest thing you have is tranny porn and that's completely homo.
>>
>>140783370
What does it being real have to do with literally anything? There's so many fetishes I have that are impossible in reality, I don't know what point you're trying to make.
>>140783279
I know for a fact that GAY men do not like GIRLS with dicks. Basically all the bi people I know like futa/traps/girls but not normal men.
>>
>>140783484
It isn't an opinion, penises are not gay on their own
Do you get aroused just thinking about vaginas? Can you fuck a fat girl just because she has a vagina? Can you fuck a trans "girl" because "she" has something approximating a vagina?
Women are attractive because of their bodies, the vagina is mostly irrelevant to wanting to fuck them except in the actual act of fucking
>>
File: [Commie] Yuyushiki - 07 [CC63AD85].mkv_snapshot_08.59.jpg (144KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
![[Commie] Yuyushiki - 07 [CC63AD85].mkv_snapshot_08.59.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/rlBfID0.jpg "[Commie] Yuyushiki - 07 [CC63AD85].mkv snapshot 08.59")
144KB, 1280x720px
>>140776509
>>
>>140783460
It isn't valid to dismiss my arguments on the basis that I'm a loser. It isn't valid to insinuate that you can attest to a global statistical trend because you've talked to a few hundred homosexuals.
You might want to re-think that bit about needing to turn your brain on. If you hadn't decided not to, this argument might have gone better for you.
>>
File: no go away.jpg (199KB, 761x800px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 761x800px
>>140783523
>I enjoy watching two girls eat each other out
Your tastes are boring
>>140783554
Now you're just outright trolling in an obvious manner.
>>
File: 1456287811820.jpg (419KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
419KB, 1000x1000px
>400+ posts
>not even thursday
/yys/ is not comfy this week, /pol/ get /out/
>>
>>140783573
>I know for a fact that GAY men do not like GIRLS with dicks
I didn't know that you were the arbiter of what is and isn't gay. gay men like dicks, so why wouldn't that like a girl with dicks? doesn't make any sense to me desu. you're backpedaling real hard after just saying that it wasn't black and white
>>
>>140783620
A few hundred is in fact a valid statistical pool which you'd know if you weren't a mouthbreather
They predict entire elections rather accurately on the basis of a few hundred people and globally there are only about 70 million gay men
>>
File: 11c17b18-cf97-468c-a4dd-4fe559d4ca19..jpg (33KB, 265x379px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 265x379px
>>140783450
It doesn't satisfy your sexual urges, it frustrates them. Not wanting to fantasize about fulfilling your sexual urges is definitely less straight than wanting to imagine fulfilling them.
By your logic seeing women orgasm without a man would make a make a man feel useless. The conclusion your actually coming to is that girl on girl is sexual motivating because it makes you think about something else, namely actual sex. That's like saying a suggestive pose is straighter than sex.
>>
>>140783654
>gay men like dicks
They don't just like dicks, they like MEN. MEN WITH DICKS. NOT GIRLS.
Is this really hard for you understand, mate?
>>
>>140783573
Are furries zoophiles? Friend, degeneracy and sexuality are not the same thing. I was accused of being /pol/ for even mentioning degeneracy, but it is only through the maxim I just outlined that one can even consider homosexuality valid to begin with. People who are into futa have merely stopped caring about what is real and what is not. They have allowed their standards to slip. Through such a process, someone could be brought to masturbate to anything. Some people masturbate to inflation, does that mean that they're sexually attracted to obesity? It's foolish. If you link sexuality to nothing more than desperation and failure, you're insinuating that heterosexuals are inherently superior.
>>
>>140783654
This is just weak bait
Gay men like men. They like muscle men, they like skinny men. Maybe they even like fat men. However the fact is they find the male aesthetic attractive, not the female aesthetic. A girl with a dick isn't attractive because it is a female aesthetic rather than a male one.
But then you knew that because like I said this is just weak fucking bait
>>
>>140783578
>Do you get aroused just thinking about vaginas?
absolutely
>Can you fuck a fat girl just because she has a vagina?
with enough alcohol
>Can you fuck a trans "girl" because "she" has something approximating a vagina?
absolutely not because a "trans girl" is just a male body without a dick. male bodies are very different from female bodies in curvature, bone structure, size, etc.
>>
File: [HorribleSubs] Hello!! Kiniro Mosaic - 08 [1080p].mkv_snapshot_05.36_[2015.05.24_16.08.31].jpg (77KB, 578x682px) Image search:
[Google]
![[HorribleSubs] Hello!! Kiniro Mosaic - 08 [1080p].mkv_snapshot_05.36_[2015.05.24_16.08.31].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/EGvOqot.jpg "[HorribleSubs] Hello!! Kiniro Mosaic - 08 [1080p].mkv snapshot 05.36 [2015.05.24 16.08.31]")
77KB, 578x682px
>>140783620
>It isn't valid to dismiss my arguments on the basis that I'm a loser.
First of all, you have none. Second of all, it is valid, since the reason that you're a loser directly discredits your claims.
>It isn't valid to insinuate that you can attest to a global statistical trend because you've talked to a few hundred homosexuals.
>he thinks gay culture all around the world doesn't share common interests
>he thinks he can dismiss my claims without ever presenting any valid counterargument
Cute.
Were you born yesterday or something? It's ten years too early for you to face me.
>>
>>140783625
>Like, OMG, I just can't even. Like, how could you even say that? I really just can't, though. Like, wow. You're just, like, so wrong.
If you plan on tumblr'ing out of the argument then please do so quickly.
>>
File: 1458375857548.png (43KB, 199x208px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 199x208px
>>140783629
/yys/ is dyingand I'm not saying it because we're hitting bump limit
>>
>>140783654
That's like saying, because I like ice cream, I would like ice cream with a penis on it.
>>
>>140781640Threadly reminder that you should stop posting that because it's a thing.https://www.fictionpress.com/s/3206139/1/
>>
>>140783737
I hope this is bait. Otherwise anon you are just insecure saying you'd fuck something unattractive "bcuz it is girl" but wouldn't fuck something attractive "bcuz used to be man".
>>
>>140783660
They really don't. Just a few months ago people were "predicting" that it would be Jeb against Trump. Sample size means everything. If you've asked 200 people from a sample size of 70 million, you haven't even canvased 0.01% of the population.
>>
>>140783768
it was a shitty anime full of yuriniggers anyway, hence it attracts ebin baiters like >>140783763
>>
File: 9170f7f4-16fb-46bb-8dde-134c6d07b517..jpg (3MB, 1299x1890px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1299x1890px
>>140783707
>>140783737
At least we agree on this
also it's not gay if it's rock n' roll
>>
File: [Commie] Yuyushiki - 02 [7A4486FD].mkv_snapshot_13.22_[2013.04.17_03.30.10].jpg (101KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
![[Commie] Yuyushiki - 02 [7A4486FD].mkv_snapshot_13.22_[2013.04.17_03.30.10].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fBA7s0E.jpg "[Commie] Yuyushiki - 02 [7A4486FD].mkv snapshot 13.22 [2013.04.17 03.30.10]")
101KB, 1280x720px
>anatomy PhDs straight from /pol/
Everytime. And you idiots are even worse for responding.
>>
>>140783692
okay, but you (or someone else) said that it wan't black and white. so if you are the person who said that it wasn't black and white, then how can you can you give an answer like that? by your logic, shouldn't being gay and straight be a gradient since it isn't black and white
>>140783707
>anything that I don't like is bait.
that's right, no one could possibly think differently than you do.
>>
>>140783842
Except the part where recent polling is extremely accurate
>but polling months ago said
Isn't valid because the election wasn't months ago and people change their support over time hence why there are polls every week rather than a single poll taken once a year
>>
File: 1385797895543.gif (563KB, 448x670px) Image search:
[Google]
563KB, 448x670px
>>140783704
>People who are into futa have merely stopped caring about what is real and what is not.
Who cares if it's real, it's a fantasy to jack off to.
>They have allowed their standards to slip
>Fantasizing about things that can't happen in reality is somehow immoral and degenerate
When did this place get so normal? Disgusting.
>>
>>140783667
What on earth are you talking about? Lesbian sex arouses men. That's fact. If you don't understand that, why are you even trying to talk here?
And no, seeing women orgasm without a man wouldn't make the man feel useless. Sexual urges come and go. In nature, women would always be sought by men. For two to be so sexually frustrated yet still not be taken by a man is a dream come true for a man. Besides that: Who fantasizes about orgasm? Isn't that like fantasizing about the end of a roller coaster?
>>
>>140783890
It's bait, we both know it's bait. You're just mad because I can see through your shitposting and I'm only humoring you because I have nothing else to do right now and enjoy shitting on retards who get their kicks from trying to make people mad by acting like a retard. I don't even like this anime I just saw you shitting up the thread on the front page and decided to join in to shit on you.
>>
>>140783759
>shitposting
I know that it's embarrassing to lose an argument, but you don't have to be a faggot about it.
>>
File: smug40.jpg (15KB, 203x285px) Image search:
[Google]
15KB, 203x285px
>>140783967
>hurr look mum I wont an argument on the internet
Whatever you need to tell yourself in order to sleep at night, little boyo.
>>
>>140783820
>wouldn't fuck something attractive "bcuz used to be man".
NO! you fucking dipshit moron. I'm saying that I wouldn't fuck something that used to be a man because I find the female aesthetic attracting and the male aesthetic unattractive.
did you even read my post or are you going to keep straw manning my argument?
a tranny still has a male aesthetic. cutting off your dick won't change your curvature, bone structure, and size, you inbred faggot
>>
>>140783906
Recent political polling is only accurate because the voting is happening right now. It would be weird if it were otherwise. Anybody can take a poll and wind up with the results they want. I could flip a coin and see it land on heads every time, then conclude that coins have a 100% chance of landing on heads. It's just perspective. If you canvas less than 0.01% of the population, even a 100% affirmative verdict would only show that 0.01% of a population supports something.
>>
File: Keit-Ai OP.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1280x720px
>>140781640
>Keit愛: TVアニメ OST
ED1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXDNGS9V4Us
ED2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4DyTjrruVo
OP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycfdfinG_P8
ED 1 Full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIX9aoN7g4o
ED 2 Full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woiMYzVTl9c
OP Full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NShEKYoPXw
>>
>>140784018
>mum
>>
File: elaborate ruse.jpg (35KB, 515x518px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 515x518px
>>140783952
>I don't even like this anime I just saw you shitting up the thread on the front page and decided to join in to shit on you.
wew lad
>>
File: Keit愛「君の名は」.webm (3MB, 426x240px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 426x240px
>>140781640
Soon.
>>
>>140783952
>the NATURE of /a/
>>
File: implying.gif (260KB, 266x207px) Image search:
[Google]
260KB, 266x207px
>>140784081
why would you interlace such a blurry image
>>
>>140783939
I don't deny it arouses men and I said that exactly in the post you're responding to. You're making it very difficult for me to make a point just by making me repeat myself. So instead, here's a concise way of putting it: anything can make you fantasize about sex, or success as a male, but those things are not sex.
Whether you would rather be teased or not doesn't have much to do with your heterosexuality as far as I can tell. Why I say actual sex occurring is more straight is it is unambiguously straight. I'm not saying that watching it or preferring it is more straight, but rather that the porn itself is more straight. As in, if you are watching it and not fantasizing about something else related, you are only turned on if you are straight.
If you go on the premise that it's gay because you can fantasize about some part of it or rearrange the scenario in your head, you can construe any porn as straight or gay. It's a silly way to compare things. In your argument you claim girl on girl is more straight because of the fantasy it evokes in you. That speaks more to your logic than the sexuality of the porn itself.
>>
>>140784081
>OPs and EDs
>for a meme
Has memeing gone too far?
>>
File: yuyu_diffeomorphism,.png (220KB, 994x516px) Image search:
[Google]
220KB, 994x516px
Let's talk about something else
>>
>>140784264
*more turn on
not only turned on
>>
>>140784264
>In your argument you claim girl on girl is more straight because of the fantasy it evokes in you. That speaks more to your logic than the sexuality of the porn itself.
I'm not the guy whom you're replying to, but I'd make an argument that lesbian sex evokes erotic fantasies in almost every straight man alive.
Obviously I cannot speak for ALL straight men, because I have not met the 3.5 billion straight men on this planet, but as a straight man myself, and my experiences talking to other straight men, I can extrapolate and say that lesbian sex is very pleasing for straight men
>>
>>140784264
Girl on girl is "straight" because it is in line with a man's natural sexual role. A normal, healthy man finds girl on girl to be arousing. The reasoning as to why does not matter. The fact alone proves that it is straight for a man to like it.
It is more straight than futa (which doesn't even exist) because the attraction is derived from women. Not dick. Being turned on by dick is not straight for a man. Obviously. It doesn't matter how you construe it: A man is straight if women arouse him. A man is gay if dick arouses him.
>>
>>140784484
again, I am not the person that you replied to.
I agree with you that a male masturbating to lesbian sex is inherently more straight than a male masturbating to futa-on-female sex.
But I'd also like to point out that it's not as black and white as you say it is.
Sexuality is a gradient from gay on one side of the spectrum to straight on the other.
>>
File: 6e4ac3d1-9a57-4ae4-8c5a-4e3b394b4465..jpg (380KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
380KB, 1280x720px
>>140784435
As the straight man you are replying to, I'd say that while lesbian sex does evoke fantasies in me, it doesn't always. For example, if I'm very tired I'm not very turned on at all by lesbian porn. The fact that you have to imagine something else for the pron to be effective to me makes it less straight. For example, you could get turned on as a straight male by a picture of a man with his penis in a glory hole. You'd be imagining that on the other side of that hole is a women, which would arouse you. But in the same way it's kinda silly to say something like a woman blushing is more straight than futa on girl. You've gotta at least give some value to the fact that it is THE inherent heterosexual desire to stick your dick into a vagina.
>>
File: yuyushikiowaowow.jpg (585KB, 1382x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
585KB, 1382x2000px
Could you guys go take your gay-o fight somewhere else?
>>
File: 765ee3fef404b050f4c86e6a58ae231c.jpg (77KB, 400x233px) Image search:
[Google]
77KB, 400x233px
>>140784748
Where do you think you are?
>>
File: every thread.jpg (76KB, 399x593px) Image search:
[Google]
76KB, 399x593px
>>140781640
>>
File: yuyushikibeanzone.jpg (69KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 1280x720px
>>140784831
a friendly bean zone
>>
>>140784659
I agree. I'd like to point out though that I don't think anyone is 100% straight all the time. everyone's bound to have a homosexual thought at least a couple times in their lives.
That's why I don't subscribe to this notion that a lot of the people here are perpetuating that "a person can either be straight or gay and that's that". it's simply not true.
I've stated before that I believe sexuality is a gradient. I don't think there is any set definition for what is and isn't gay besides wanting to have sex with a female and wanting to have sex with a male. people can fall in all sorts of places in between.
>>
File: 1461790884875.jpg (477KB, 2400x2400px) Image search:
[Google]
477KB, 2400x2400px
So that's how you play with them.
>>
>>140784484
what is normal ≠ what is straight.
It's far less normal to do a lot of things I'll save us the discomfort of enumerating than to have sex with a man. Your definition of normal/healthy seems to be a society definition, which is a very good definition, and don't get me wrong, the best definition of healthy/normal. I see that there's a correlation between normality and heterosexuality but I don't think something more sexually normal is more sexually heterosexual. >sexually heterosexual
The fact is sexual pleasure involves your penis. Quite literally without a penis you can be aroused but not feel sexual pleasure. I guess there are some other nerve endings in the general area but you get the idea. To say if you like futa you like dick is unfair in this way. There's a dick involved, but that doesn't necessarily mean you are aroused by the dick rather than its sexual role, one which is obviously relatable. For example, I am far less turned on by an image of a futa girl (doing nothing) than an image of a girl. However, I'm more turned on by futa on girl than girl on girl. There's no contradiction there.
You often come back to "turned on by dick" but there are erotic scenarios which simply cannot happen without dick. And as someone who is less inclined to enjoy hinting/teasing/fantasizing and more inclined to see the actual act, this appeals to me. I want to see a woman orgasm as a result of a creampie. It's erotic to me. I do not want to see a man any more than is strictly necessary to fulfill that desire. In no way does that mean I'm aroused by dick itself! Just that I'm aroused by sexual acts, which to absolutely no one's surprise involve a penis.
>>
>>140785037
I want to paint mannequin lines on Yuzu and have sex with her like one
>>
>>140784984
Honestly I wholeheartedly agree with this but it's more conductive to my argument if I refer to the absolute, or even very nearly prove the absolute, since I can more clearly define my arguments. It might be unrealistic but the nice thing about this is you can often change somebody's view if they have to concede a point in order to "win" and disprove your point. I did that to my roommate in college and I think we both gained mutual respect for each other's views and better formed our own. Usually people don't hold exactly the view they'd have after vigorous debate.
>>
>>140785088
What is normal factually = what is straight. That's the point of the word. "Straight". Not twisted, not bent, not odd. Have you heard the expressions "Straight and narrow" or "Straight up"? The overwhelming majority of the population is "Straight". "Straight" refers to having biologically sensical desires above all else, with few others. It isn't straight to want to watch a woman with a penis have sex. There is no such thing. It is not your biological imperative to interact with such a being. If you desire such a thing, you are hardly straight. If you like it because of the feminine side, you're a degenerate. If you like it because of the masculine side, you're not heterosexual and possibly a degenerate. There isn't any room for doubt on this matter.
>>
>>140785310
I'm glad you agree, and I'm glad this whole argument was able to come to a close with such well thought out discussion. in other threads, this would continue with "your a faggot" "fuck you, dumbass" until auto sage.
I think this speaks for the yuyushiki fan base more than anything else
>>
File: 1455772625021.jpg (54KB, 366x588px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 366x588px
>>140785410
>What is normal factually = what is straight
Wait, what? I'm pretty sure straight means you like girls and not straight means you like men. Just because you like something weird doesn't mean you're "not straight".
You are fucked up on a fundamental level, my man.
>>
File: the_superlative_laugh (1).jpg (100KB, 731x319px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 731x319px
>>140785410
>he thinks sexuality is a social construct
>>
>>140785531
>>140785578
I think that we can all agree that WORDS are constructs. Sheesh. You act as though it's blasphemy to cite a dictionary.
>>
/yys/ - Queer Theory
>>
>>140785410
Not the guy you're replying to, but lets evaluate this scenario:
A man masturbates to lesbian sex every single day, but on every 30th day of the month, he masturbates to pictures of dicks.
by you're logic..
would he be straight? obviously not because he faps to penises
would he be gay? obviously not because he almost always faps to lesbians
so then what would you classify him as?
>>
>>140785721
No lmao. Citing a dictionary should literally be the last thing you do in a debate.
>>
>>140785410
you're saying straight → normal and also normal → straight. You see, while being straight is the normal thing, being normal isn't the straight thing. Do you see what I was getting at there? With that clarified, you might want to reevaluate the point I was making about normality and girl on girl. I should have tried to be more clear.
>>
>>140785819
In a world in which people acted completely and utterly arbitrarily, it would naturally be hard to create criteria to match them. The world is not so. Your post is pointless.
>>
>>140785860
The word straight is factually synonymous with the word normal. In context, that is biologically normal. Make a point or don't post.
>>
>>140785845
If it's a debate about definitions, I fail to see why. In fact, I fail to see why in general.
>>
>>140785956
because that just degrades into an argument about semantics
>>
>>140785410
Once again, you are completely disregarding the girl in the phrase "futa on girl". Please stop looking at it like a futa fucking a pillow case. When I'm watching male on female, I'm not thinking about the guy.
The appeal of futa on girl is is simply, "a slight improvement over male on female." Don't say that I have to be attracted to the futa to enjoy it. I've already explained that I don't find futa outside the context of futa on girl attractive, and that's a totally fair premise.
>>
>>140786000
How can bringing fact into the matter make it a matter of semantics? If you use the wrong definitions, you're wrong. It seems to me as though you just have a fear of being fact-checked.
>>
File: is_this_bitch_serious.png (70KB, 797x333px) Image search:
[Google]
70KB, 797x333px
>>140785956
Because the dictionary definition are often times not the same as those used in a formal context in a debate, my friend. You're going to get laughed out of the classroom if you use the dictionary definition of "open" to argue that sets cannot be both open and closed in a topological space.
>>
>>140786028
no because people will just argue about different definitions of the same word, the context it was used in etc without ever addressing the actual meat of the argument.
>>
>>140786008
Rather, I'm disregarding your argument that anything is straight as long as it has a girl in it.
Futa isn't real. How you feel about it is entirely in what you take away from it. If you like to think about the female side of the "futa", you just aren't grounded in reality. If you like to think about the male side, you aren't straight. What about that is hard to understand? There's no reason to have a significant desire for futa unless you aren't straight and really want the D. That's obvious. The D isn't important to you unless you want the D. You can go on about how you can fap to it if you kind of squint your eyes, but that's very different from liking it. And we are talking about liking it. Not tolerating it, not knowing about it. Liking it.
And holy hell you people: Start talking about Yuyushiki with each other so that this discussion gets drowned out. Unless you really have no complaints about /yys/ being an abstract discussion about sexuality and degeneracy.
>>
>>140785905
erm, okay. Let me try this again, without the logical operator. While doing straight things can logically result in the conclusion "he is doing normal things," doing normal things cannot logically result in the conclusion "he is doing straight things.
To put this in a concrete example:
If you see a man kiss a woman you may say, "that's normal," however,
If you see a man driving to work you may not say, "that's heterosexual."
This is semantics but if I accepted your misinterpretation I would be forced to concede your point which would definitely make you think I was admitting my argument was completely wrong, which I'm not yet prepared to do. I really don't see how we can continue to debate without clearing this up.
>>
>>140786049
I have absolutely no care for formality. If something is wrong, it's wrong. If something is right, it's right. It doesn't matter how people treat me or how they think. All that matters is that I am right.
>>
>>140786216
Hence that I specifically said "biologically normal". Do you want me to add more criteria? How about "biologically, sexually normal"? We're talking about normalcy in the context of sex and procreation.
>>
>>140786219
You're literally wrong though lmao.
>doesn't know what context is
>thinks "formal" means "politeness" in this case
>this adamant
I have some bad news for you anon.
>>
>>140786219
>>140786249
Please tell me you're a devout Christian or something
>>
>>140786321
What am I wrong about? Put it into words.
>>
>>140786351
I'm not a devout anything. I haven't yet found a religion that reflects my beliefs. Why does it matter?
>>
>>140786366
That dictionary definition of words can be used in debates/arguments.
>>
>>140786249
I'm not talking about the category of the word normal...
Please, plwase understand that this comes down to me saying biologically normal !→(does not imply) straight, while straight →( DOES imply) biologically normal.
There is a very strong correlation between biologically normal and straight, but as long as you treat biologically normal as the independent variable and straight as the dependant variable(or result), you can't make very sound arguments, but more importantly my entire argument is defeated before I even start. I simply cannot accept your rebuttal on the basis of this logical fallacy.
>>
>>140786473
How am I wrong? Express yourself.
>>
>>140786535
>literally this retarded
It's getting really difficult to not insult you, my friend. Read >>140786049.
>>
>>140786497
I don't care about variables. If the word "straight" doesn't mean "biologically, sexually normal" then what on earth does it mean? There's no other useful definition you could find.
>>
>>
>>140786185
>The D isn't important to you unless you want the D
This is unfair to say. While you specifically might feel that way, 90% of the straight population watches male on female porn. I feel bad for making a somewhat shallow argument, but in this case I think I'm refuting a shallow enough point.
I think you would be wise to accept the premise at least in whatever your best case scenario is, that the existence of a dick in a piece of pornography does not mean that the viewer wants the D.
>>
Fuck you all for shitting up the thread. In the end you're all faggots anyways.
>>
>>140786701
So I take it that you don't understand what "formal" means? Should've just said that you're completely mentally dysfunctional from the start, anon. We wouldn't have wasted both of our times here.
>>
>>140786705
But specifically adding the D to a fictional situation does mean that you want the D. Why else would you add it?
>>
Thanks for the bumplimit """""""""fags""""""""
>>
>>140786737
What do you want me to do, check the dictionary?
Why not prove that I'm misunderstanding the definition of the word "formal"? All you have to do is open the book. It's not like you've been foolishly arguing that nobody should use dictionaries in debates, right?
>>
>>140786573
DEFINITIONS ARE NOT BI-DIRECTIONAL AND IF YOU TREAT THEM AS SUCH YOU WILL BE WRONG ABOUT ANY CONCLUSION YOU EVER MAKE.
Synonymous means bi-directional. When you say "biologically normal is synonymous with straight" you are committing a logical fallacy. I don't know if you realize how serious a logical fallacy is. It makes your entire argument bullshit, literally even if you were making the same argument as me. It's the reason why this whole debate has come to a screeching halt.
>>
>>140786729
>>140786786
If you wanted the thread to discuss something else, you should have discussed something else.
You're the same as those euphoric fedoras complaining about being friend zoned: No initiative, but plenty of sensitivity.
>>
>>140786775
Technically that is "wanting the D", but not a dick in your as, like the "not straight" definition of that would be. You could say that someone that prefers male on female over female on female also "wants the D".
>>
>>140786806
A word either means what it means or it does not. Obviously. I have told you time and again that the statement you quote should be corrected to "biologically, sexually normal is synonymous with straight". Tell me if the statement is wrong and, if so, why. It's not hard. You're too busy drawing logical proofs to see that this is a simple matter.
>>
>>140786854
Well a man who prefers male on female over female on female does want the D. To determine whether he's straight, one would have to know why he prefers male on female. I don't see why it matters.
>>
File: is_this_girl_serious1.jpg (58KB, 270x380px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 270x380px
>>140786798
>what does "often times" mean
>what does "depending on context" mean
Yes, check the dictionary, little autistic Bill. The "formal" used here refers to "formalization". I'm not surprised that this is new to you though.
Also before you call me a hypocrite, we're discussing very basic semantics here, literally the meaning of a word used in common English. Worry about the fact that actual debates don't use dictionaries when you've actually grasped the language.
>>
File: yuzulewd.png (279KB, 752x1062px) Image search:
[Google]
279KB, 752x1062px
>>
>>140786775
It's unfair to look at it that way. You're acting as if we're simply adding a dick to a girl on girl situation without changing anything else. But the sex is completely different.
Don't think of it like "adding a dick" think of it like "removing the hairy ass."
We're adding female to a male on female scenario, not adding male to a female on female scenario. The distinction is fair and also in my favor because you could replace the male with a futa in any given male on female sex act.
You CANNOT replace any futa with a female in any futa on female sex act.
>>
>>140786965
More
>>
>>140786927
That's interesting, hypocrite. So what about a debate being "actual" makes it above the dictionary? Do you have license to just not care about whether you're right or wrong when you have some arbitrary pomp and circumstance to focus on?
>>
>>140786968
You really are adding a dick to a girl on girl situation. You say yourself that you prefer girl on girl to guy on girl. So, logically, your preferred porn would start out as girl on girl. It's not like there's scarcity or anything. And for every sex act that requires a phallus, you can just use a strap-on or dildo. Yet you (apparently) specifically want a penis instead.
>>
File: yukarilick.png (603KB, 1600x1033px) Image search:
[Google]
603KB, 1600x1033px
>>140787003
>>
File: is_this_girl_serious.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1366x768px
>>140787021
>So what about a debate being "actual" makes it above the dictionary?
When it's in formal context. Yes, you can look up the word again. The semantics of technical jargons specifically should not be argued from a dictionary.
>Do you have license to just not care about whether you're right or wrong when you have some arbitrary pomp and circumstance to focus on?
Right or wrong is established after both parties have an agreed upon set of definitions, which are not made from the fucking dictionary you stupid idiot. Also that's not what "pomp and circumstance" and "arbitrary" means.
>>
>>140786882
I don't know how I can possibly better explain this than I already have. For your sake I'll say it's my shortcoming. Let me give a classic example that anyone can understand.
A square is defined as a rectangle.
A rectangle is not defined as a square.
A has a set of features, one of which is that it is a rectangle.
Now, replace "a square" with "sexually normal" and replace "a rectangle" with "straight".
Take your time with this.
If sexually normal was synonymous with straight, than you could be the most fucked up dude on the planet and still be sexually normal as long as whatever depraved, deviant, homicidal, and self destructive desires you have are directed towards women.
>>
>>140787156
Yet if the entire debate centers on the "semantics of technical jargons" then it is essential for such things to be argued. What is right is right and what is wrong is wrong. Being in a "formal, fancy shmancy 2deep4u" debate does not change this fact. Right or wrong is an unchanging constant that has nothing to do with the consensus.
You're also wrong about the meanings of those two terms. No big deal. Are you going to crack open a dictionary and make yourself a hypocrite again?
>>
>>140787080
A girl with a strap-on or dildo can't fill another girls' womb full of semen.
>>
File: CIcSFsiUsAAL65Z.jpg (48KB, 656x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
48KB, 656x1000px
>>
>>140787197
Your application of platitudes is wrong. A man isn't sexually normal if he wants to hurt women sexually. If he wants to hurt women, but not sexually, he's sexually normal. "Sexually normal" and "normal" are two entirely different things. A man can be sexually normal and abnormal on average. It doesn't matter. Isn't this all obvious?
>>
>>140787268
Who cares?
>>
File: are_you_fucking_serious (2).jpg (128KB, 548x575px) Image search:
[Google]
128KB, 548x575px
>>140787266
>Right or wrong is an unchanging constant that has nothing to do with the consensus.
Yeah just like how the Riemann hypothesis or the continuum hypothesis is right or wrong right? It's not like they were proven to be independent of the agreed upon axioms of set theory known as ZFC or anything (which, for your information, defines exactly what can and cannot be sets). If they used the dictionary definition of a set then the entirety of mathematics would fall into a pit of circlejerking, akin to what you're trying to do here.
Fucking Christ how can someone be this dense?
>>
>>140787364
Me, because as a straight man I enjoy that sort of thing. You faggot.
>>
Post lewdest yuyus you have.
>>
File: backingup.gif (221KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
221KB, 500x375px
>oh boy /yys/ I wonder what everyone is talk-
>>
>>140787378
Are you actually trying to argue that right wasn't right until a hypothesis was formed about what exactly "right" is? That's ridiculous. The facts of the matter have nothing to do with our understanding of them. As though to say that nothing was true in the age of neanderthals.
>>
>>140787080
A women doesn't derive physical pleasure, or at least enough to reach orgasm, from wearing a strapon. A woman derives emotional pleasure and sexual arousal but not primarily pleasure from wearing a strapon. To me, it's way, way hotter if both women are getting off. Is that so unreasonable? A strapon cannot impregnate a woman.
With these very basic things pointed out, suddenly you have to jump through 100 hoops just to avoid including a dick in your porn. And I would LOVE it if such porn existed. Unfortunately people are nit that creative, and you can't set up a scenario so detailed in the space of a fucking porno.
>>
>>140787413
You specifically enjoy the thought of filling a girl's womb with semen? Cool. Why does that matter?
>>
File: fuck_off.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1366x768px
>>140787503
I'm saying what's "true" or "false" depends on the axioms of you accept, moron.
>The facts of the matter have nothing to do with our understanding of them.
Except "true" and "false" are human construct you silly homo lmao.
>>
>>140787533
Because that's the single most important thing in our lives according to nature.
>>
>>140787507
Why would a man care about whether or not a woman is experiencing pleasure? That isn't a man's role, and honestly it's also a guaranteed way to fail to pleasure a woman. Men are meant to focus on their own urges, not worry about how the woman feels.
But if it's way hotter for you if both women are getting off, then why don't you imagine girl on girl instead of mutant on girl? Girls don't need dicks to pleasure each other. I assure you. They don't even need dildos.
>>
>>140787575
You're appealing to the ambiguity of words to argue that nature itself is ambiguous. That is incorrect. Mankind doesn't even need to exist for what is true to be true and what is false to be false. Get over yourself.
>>
File: 1426214579985.jpg (50KB, 546x640px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 546x640px
>>140787618
>Why would a man care about whether or not a woman is experiencing pleasure
Are you a sociopath
>>
File: 50659311_p7.png (271KB, 600x800px) Image search:
[Google]
271KB, 600x800px
>this thread
>>
>>140787696
Brah. Men are naturally meant to rape women when they feel sexual pressure. Consent is a social construct. Millions of years of evolution have gone into ensuring that men will impregnate women when they follow their own desires. Focusing on what the woman wants from the encounter only confuses the situation and usually displeases the woman.
Always have consent, and all, but when the act starts don't be a pansy.
>>
File: are_you_fucking_serious (3).jpg (33KB, 704x396px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 704x396px
>>140787652
>You're appealing to the ambiguity of words to argue that nature itself is ambiguous
That's not what ambiguous means you fucktard. Literally the foundation of logic lies ultimately on some set of axioms that can be changed to give rise to different formal systems. Nothing on Earth can definitively say which set of axioms are more "true" than the others, and certainly not a dumbass on /a/ like you.
>what is the Tractatus
Wittgenstein already completely fucked up the concept of seeking truth in language. It's as if you're still stuck in Plato's time and parroting his faggot beliefs.
>Mankind doesn't even need to exist for what is true to be true and what is false to be false
Figures. Fuck off back to your cave.
>>
>>140787335
My example in the final portion of the post was meant to be incorrect. But you simply refuse to accept that I'm saying that more sexually normal does not mean more straight. You only misrepresent my argument. Why would you do that? I'm not even trying to disprove you, I'm only trying to define my argument. I'm just trying to get my feet off the ground and you are not willing to address my real argument.
I do not, have not, and will not contest your definition of normal, sexually normal, etc. WE AGREE ON THIS. But you MUST accept that no matter how you define this term, it is not "synonymous" with straight.
I do not know where to go with this. You are reading my posts and misinterpreting them. This is my fault. But having admitted that, WHY WON'T YOU STOP USING THAT MISINTERPRETATION? Replying to and refuting a misinterpretation is meaningless, unproductive, and frustrating. For the love of god, give my posts the benefit of the doubt and assume that I understood and accepted the term you created, "sexually normal". IT'S YOUR FUCKING TERM I COULDN'T USE A DIFFERENT MEANING IF I WANTED TO. Because this ISN'T my first debate, I actually understand that basic fucking rule of human conversation. Go reread my posts with the knowledge that I did not, will not, and CAN NOT misuse a term that has no meaning outside of this thread.
>>
>>140787771
How would you know whether or not that's what ambiguous means? You don't know what it is that I was trying to say in the first place and the sentence isn't reliant at all upon the subject matter. I could have put any two adjectives there and the sentence would have been correct.
Logic pertains to the human understanding of things. If you think that logic is like some sort of mana or life force, you're deluded. Mankind exists in reality, and reality is not dependent upon mankind. The intellectual pursuits of man, such as the study of logic, are entirely based in the perspective of man. It's only hubris to suggest otherwise.
You're just pretentious. Get over your own ego.
>>
File: 1449182038960.jpg (61KB, 356x327px) Image search:
[Google]
61KB, 356x327px
>>
>>140787862
>strawmen: the post
Come back after you've taken a foundations of mathematics course.
>logic doesn't seek truth
>hurr anything counterexamples you give are not examples of truths
Fucking retard.
>>
>>140787824
Was it really meant to be incorrect? It seems perfectly correct to me. That's yet another disagreement between us, then.
And why would I let you "get your feet off the ground"? If your "real argument" is so fearful then obviously that isn't in my best interest. Don't take it personally. Stop being so timid. Make it a matter of life or death for me to understand your points. Make the audience know your points and make the audience disapprove of me not knowing your points.
You DO disagree with my definition of sexually normal if you disagree that the definition of sexually normal is synonymous with straight. I won't suddenly stop thinking so just because you want me to. Prove me wrong. If you wanted to talk about something else, that's your problem.
>>
>>140787618
once again, you apply your own preferences to all of mankind. This is human nature, but it something the rest of us learned how not to do during puberty.
Your experience is limited to yourself. Other people's minds are not the same as yours. There's not some mysterious entity called "consciousness" that all people have the same fucking version of. You have a brain. You feel differently than other people with different brains. We are not clones.
When you conflate subjective conclusions and logical conclusions you are beyond redemption.
>>
>>140787922
I want to have sex with the yuyus and mom-sensei.
>>
>>140787936
I made no deliberate attempt to misrepresent you. To your accusation of fallacy: A mere accusation of fallacy with no rebuttal is called "fallacy fallacy" and is not valid. Fallacious reasoning should be easier than any other to prove wrong. So do it. I, for one, can't understand what it is you want from this conversation. Your point doesn't seem to make any sense to me at all.
>>
>>140787958
Your brain commands you to have sex. If it does not, it is a defective brain. This is a biological certainty: That all mammals are driven to procreate with the exception of the defective ones. I don't want to believe in the possibility of "Defective humans", so I won't. We're fundamentally the same in this matter. I don't want to rape a woman, but I wouldn't pleasure her properly if I was overly concerned with her feelings.
>>
>>140787941
Definitions are directional
synonymous means bidirectional
are you trying to say that you are using the term sexually normal as a more fun way to say straight? no? THEN IT'S NOT SYNONYMOUS
>>
>>140788087
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. "biologically, sexually normal" is the same thing as "straight". You've been so eager to be agreeable that you haven't interrogated this disagreement.
>>
>>140787980
>I made no deliberate attempt to misrepresent you
You're right, you simply did not understand, and naturally a rebuttal was not possible. You've also committed a "fallacy fallacy fallacy" here since you invoked the "fallacy fallacy" under the assumption that a rebuttal was possible, whereas the problem indeed lies within your posts.
>I, for one, can't understand what it is you want from this conversation.
And that's why I told you to take an introductory course to foundations of mathematics or a symbolic logic course.
>>
I feel bad for the guy trying to debate with a literal monkey
It can't be helped
>>
>>140788123
What didn't I understand? And I didn't invoke "fallacy fallacy fallacy" because I genuinely explained that I didn't understand what you were trying to prove. And considering that your entire post was a fallacy, what was I to do?
Are you really telling me that you came here to tell me to study math and logic? Thanks for the advice, now beat it.
>>
>>140787980
You rebut a fallacy by addressing the fallacy, not the conclusion the argument reached using the fallacy. Your fallacy was rebutted and your conclusion rendered invalid but you made no attempt to create the conclusion without the use of you fallacy.
But why did that happen?
probably because you still don't understand where you went wrong. Let me make it clear. It's >>140785410
>>
>>140788174
>What didn't I understand?
Pretty much the entire post that you deemed as a fallacy. Ask yourself that.
>And I didn't invoke "fallacy fallacy fallacy" because [omitted]
In case you didn't notice I was taking the piss out of you, autistic retard.
>Are you really telling me that you came here to tell me to study math and logic?
>what is reading comprehension
Are you seriously this stupid, or can you truly not understand the intention of what I said? It was to make you understand my point about truth by the way, in case you couldn't figure it out.
>>
File: f46d5de494d904e4bd18e3eca12a1989.jpg (296KB, 724x1023px) Image search:
[Google]
296KB, 724x1023px
I want to drink milk from Okaasan's big fat tits while she caress my ochinchin with her soft hand.
>>
>>140788254
That isn't true. You rebut a fallacious argument by calling out the fallacy and demonstrating why its conclusion is false. Your misunderstanding of this fact is probably why you think you can just imply a rebuttal and leave it at that. Explains the appearance of autism, frankly.
And what fallacy did I make? How was I wrong? Tell me.
>>
>>140788291
>all this shitposting
>this is the post that will be banned
sasuga fucking life
>>
>>140788270
What didn't I understand about the post? Use your words. Put yourself in my shoes, my autistic friend. Try to understand my perspective instead of just turning your brain off when I contradict you. There's probably no reason for us to disagree in the first place.
>>
>>140788325
>What didn't I understand about the post?
That what is provably true or false relies on what axioms you accept. How fucking stupid are you that you need this kind of handholding and spoonfdeeding? I'm not your mother. If you want someone to coddle you like this you can always just go up the staircase of your basement and ask your mother to present her teat for you to suckle on, fucktard.
>>
>>140788374
You never said the word "provably". That's an entirely different thing. All this time we've been laboring under misapprehension. Jeez. From the way you represented yourself to me, I thought you were insinuating that there is no such thing as truth if not for human reckoning of it. I couldn't understand why you sought to contradict me when I contradicted you. You should have cleared up this misunderstanding to begin with.
>>
>>140788407
>You never said the word "provably". That's an entirely different thing
I fucking knew you're gonna pull this. Are you seriously thinking there is some form of truth out there that isn't provably so? Holy shit
>>
>>140788437
When did I ever insinuate that? You're arguing against your own self-doubt. How confusing.
>>
File: ara_ara.png (262KB, 1380x366px) Image search:
[Google]
262KB, 1380x366px
>>140788458
>this retarded
Let me spell this out for you: I've shown that provably true statements are dependent on the axioms that are accepted (let's call this P), and therefore provable truths are "subjective" (let's call this Q). We then have P implies Q.
Let's let P1 be the premise that "all truths are provable", then P + P1 implies "all truths are subjective", which we call Q1. You contradicting Q1 is denying the antecedent, which means that we have ~Q1 implies ~(P + P1) (~ means "not"). This gives either ~P or ~P1. Since we've already established P, it must be the case that you think ~P1, i.e. not all truths are provable.
Clear? Don't think you can weasel your way out of symbolic logic,dumbass.
>>
>>140788620
Provable truths are subjective, but "truth" is not. The human understanding of truth is subjective, but truth is not. That's the entire disagreement we've been arguing about. I have only been arguing against the argument "True can be false". In the future, do put yourself in the shoes of others and try harder to understand.
>>
>>140788662
Why not address the part where you denied that truths can be unprovable? Why are you dodging this?
Just to be clear: I know fully well that you can't, but I want you to suffer for your stupidity.
>>
>>140788693
Thinks*, not denied
>>
>>140788693
I never did. You misunderstood. I am being entirely honest. Get over your logic student pride and realize that you jumped to an incorrect conclusion.
>>
File: are_you_serious.jpg (35KB, 221x344px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 221x344px
>>140788728
>I never did. Get over your logic student pride and realize that you jumped to an incorrect conclusion.
I'm actually unaware that someone can be this fucking stupid. Either you're a moron who can't understand predicate logic or you're an obscene liar that chose to ignore an entire post illustrating step by step how you did exactly that. And for your sake I hope it's the former
Also I'm not even a logician, I'm a topologist.
>>
>>140788834
Just because I disagree with you about the course of events doesn't mean that I'm stupid. Anybody can scroll up. I never cared for this "unprovable truth" argument. I only ever believed that you were trying to argue "True can be false". That's the whole truth. Get over your ego already and realize that you've been mistaken.
>>
File: [DeadFish] Aria the Origination - 03 [DVD][480p][AAC].mp4_snapshot_10.10_[2016.01.11_22.55.58].png (89KB, 211x240px) Image search:
[Google]
![[DeadFish] Aria the Origination - 03 [DVD][480p][AAC].mp4_snapshot_10.10_[2016.01.11_22.55.58].png](https://i.imgur.com/Dvebgfd.png "[DeadFish] Aria the Origination - 03 [DVD][480p][AAC].mp4 snapshot 10.10 [2016.01.11 22.55.58]")
89KB, 211x240px
>>140788879
>I never cared for this "unprovable truth" argument.
Address this, because your entire argument relies on it.
>h-hurr I'm just going to keep calling you wrong even though I've been shown multiple times that I'm wrong
You're making me mad here anon. You won't like me when I'm mad.
>>
>>140788934
I don't have to prove that I never did something. That's ridiculous.
>>
File: 1406691498178.png (127KB, 500x488px) Image search:
[Google]
127KB, 500x488px
>>
>>140788302
I have explained and rebutted you fallacy at least 5 times, let me do it again.
> What is normal factually = what is straight.
Now let me day right now that out of context this is fine. But you were replying to my post, which contained
> I see that there's a correlation between normality and heterosexuality but I don't think something more sexually normal is more sexually heterosexual.
This is the first time that I attempted to state a core tenant of my argument. Now, I can feel you misinterpreting this, and although I've put it in as many ways as I could, I'm going to try one more time to put it in no uncertain terms.
1. The following statement is false:
2. if something is more sexually normal, then it is also more heterosexual.
You tried to prove this statement wrong by stating:
3.The following statement is true:
4. if something is more heterosexual, then it is also more sexually normal
As you can see, you stated something true. Something I cannot rebut. However, it did not apply to my argument. So, I proceeded over many posts to explain your error to you. Do you understand now?
>>
>>140788962
You did deny that truths are provable though. So you need to justify this.
Go on, don't be shy.
>>
>>140788973
Foomy looks like an Undertale character.
>>
>>140788988
You're moving the goalpost. I never did such a thing and I couldn't possibly prove an absence of such a thing. Why would I ever disagree with such an obvious statement? Scroll up and realize that you jumped to a conclusion out of pride.
>>
>>140788984
If I disagree with you, don't expect me to ask you to prove me wrong. You presented a statement, I presented a contrary statement. You were thereby invited to try to prove me wrong. You were meant to argue in general terms and offer every piece of evidence you had, explaining why you came to your own conclusion and why you weren't taken by mine. Get your foot in the door, friend. Don't wait for the argument to be given to you.
>>
>>140788988
>>140789028
somebody quote somebody saying this and we can all laugh about whichever anon's careless mistake.
>>
>>140789028
>denies symbolic logic
>literally ignoring posts that demonstrate the fact that you did deny that all truths are provable
I seriously hope you're trolling. I refuse to believe someone this dense and dishonest exists in this world. The concept of a Neo-Venezia literally would be destroyed by a person like you.
>>
>>140789104
He said this: >>140787378
In response to my statement "Right or wrong is an unchanging constant that has nothing to do with the consensus". He showed that certain hypotheses transcended the "Agreed upon axioms" and that the dictionary was wrong. I was merely arguing that what is true is true and what is false is false. He was arguing that the word "true" was wrong.
>>
>>140789136
You just keep piling on my crimes and growing more and more confident that I'm guilty.
>>
>>140789190
>He was arguing that the word "true" was wrong.
Nice strawman.
>dragging a 3rd party into this
Shows how insecure you are lmao.
>>140789218
Because you are. And provably so too. See >>140788620 if you want a refresher. Feel free to point out any "mistakes" you see there.
>>
>>140789257
I'm genuinely misunderstanding your argument, then. Dude, really, what was wrong with my interpretation? Tell me. I'm desperate.
>>
>>140789257
Would it have been better for me to say "He was arguing that the human understanding of truth was wrong"? I can't understand what it is you want.
>>
>>140789278
>interpretation
There's no interpretation here. I've always been fixated on this "truth is universal" shit that you keep parroting.
>Tell me. I'm desperate.
I'm afraid the prereq for this is literally symbolic logic 101. Look up basic predicate calculus. It'd literally take you a few minutes, if you're sincerely willing to learn.But judging by your post history here I doubt this.
>>140789321
I'm saying your statement "truth is universal" is incorrect.
>>
>>140789360
True is true and false is false. That statement is factually correct no matter what. That's what I've been saying. What's true is true. Human understanding of truth could be wrong, but truth is never false.
>>
>>140781640FINDSAWAY
>>
>>140789078
I proved you wrong with >>140785860
This is the first time of many that I tried to explain that you had just made a logical fallacy about squares and rectangles. The first time I pointed this out I did not explain the nature of this fallacy, because I did not think it necessary. In future posts, I did, but I did not get through to you.
Now that you finally do understand, you're blaming me for not doing a better job of explaining a basic logical flaw to you? Well, sorry for not doing a better job, it's the first time I've ever met someone not in grade school that needed it explained. I certainly imagined that you did not realize where you made the error as opposed to not understanding logic itself (I still suspect this).
>>
>>140789406
>True is true and false is false. That statement is factually correct no matter what.
So that's an axiom that you accept, which I've shown to be in direct contradiction to what we know now about foundation of logic. You're literally unable to prove this axiom and yet you think that you're able to make statements based on it? Absolutely despicable.
>>
>>140789424
You contradicted me again, I contradicted you again. That's all that happened. If you think that you somehow proved me wrong, you should realize that I later clarify that I was defending the point "biologically, sexually normal" is straight, and not just "normal". In context, I think that's clear.
>>
>>140789452
But you're wrong. No value for "true" could possibly contradict the statement. Even if you were to set it to "Not true", the statement would still be correct. It would be "Not true is not true" or "False is false", which is correct. The statement isn't able to be contradicted.
>>
>>140789452
I have to agree with this post. Yes, true is true is the axiom we use but even identity is an axiom.
>>
>>140789496
So you're saying that in your formal system you have a statement A such that A and ~A? Do you have any idea how fucking ridiculous that is?
What am I saying, of course you don't. Let me show you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion
>>
>>140789550
No, I'm saying that IF the subject is ~A then the statement would still be correct. I know about the principle of explosion, I've studied logic before. You're trying to prove a statement wrong that cannot possibly be proven wrong. No matter what value you assign to A, the statement "A is A" will never be wrong.
>>
Excuse me, is this the room for getting hit on the head lessons?
>>
>>140789607
I just hope we reach 600 posts.
>>
>>140789584
>I've studied logic before
>can't even understand basic symbolic logic
And now you're literally lying. Fucking fantastic
>You're trying to prove a statement wrong that cannot possibly be proven wrong. No matter what value you assign to A, the statement "A is A" will never be wrong.
What I've shown is that your axiom is unworkable, since it allows you to prove literally every single statement. If you think you can derive any truth from the formal system based on this axiom then you're beyond fucking stupid.
>>
>>140789623
We did it champ
>>
>>140789607
No it isn't
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y
>>
>>140789476
You say you made a contrary statement when in fact you contradicted the converse of my statement. CONTRADICTED THE CONVERSE
CONTRADICTED THE CONVERSE
you didn't contradict my statement at all retard
>>
>>140789638
The "axiom" proves nothing more than that A is A. Friend. I'm not trying to derive anything from it other than that A is fucking A. You want A to be B? Fine. B is B. Shocker. The statement is correct. Hence that my initial statement "True is true" was correct. You miserable sophist.
>>
>>140789672
That isn't true. Let me outline it here:
1. The following statement is false
2. What is straight is normal
-
1. The following statement is true
2. What is normal is straight
You see, you set "true" for the bottom one and "false" for the top one. So it wasn't a converse at all but rather a contradiction. It doesn't matter what order the terms were in. "A+B" is the same as "B+A".
>>
What happened to futa and sexuality
Why are we arguing about letters
I can't fap to letters
>>
>>140789682
You're a fucking idiot. You literally demonstrated yourself that ~A is provable from A itself, which is literally what A and ~A is.
Also you made a mistake, ~(true is true and false is false) is (true is not true) OR (false is not false). So even your statement that A and ~A are both true is false. Congrats, you've ousted yourself as a complete moron agian.
>>
What are you doing today /yys/? I just had a coffee, listening to Kyary and planning to fap to ss.
>>
>>140789744
You're so egotistic that you think you can disprove an invincible statement. Tell me: What value for A could possibly disprove the statement "A is A"? I remind you that saying ~A gets you "~A is ~A" which is correct.
>>
>>140789794
>invincible
>disprove
You're a massive dumbass. Reread what I said about your statement. I said that it was unworkable and gives you a garbage formal system, I didn't say anything about provability you dolt. Fucking retards I swear to fucking God.
>>
>>140789785
>fapping to secret scissoring
Sick bastard.
>>
>>140789785
Watching X-Files, playing video games, jerking it to onee-chans. Same old, same old.
Why hasn't this thread died yet? It's been on page 10 for over an hour? Is /a/ slower than I remember?
>>
>>140789785
This is not /yys/this is not my /yys/ ;-;
>>
>>140789848
I've already said that I don't care about whether it's "workable" or not. The statement is correct. That's what I care about. There is no possible way to disprove the statement. I was not wrong to begin with, I am not wrong now. You just have your head so far up your ass that you won't admit you jumped to a hasty conclusion and wound up trying to argue against something that can't be proven wrong.
>>
>>140789722
but you said synonymous. you said straight←→normal
Thread posts: 616
Thread images: 251
Thread images: 251