>Shaft

crab is a fiend

>>134158819
that's her exposed jaw
she's a cryptoskeleton

>giant eyes
>ok
>giant ears
>not ok
Explain

File: [Commie] Owarimonogatari - 09 [62979818].mkv_snapshot_24.10_[2015.11.30_03.15.28].jpg (250KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1280x720px

wew

>>134158858
Everyone knows that the eyes are objectively the best part of the human face while the ears (and the nose) are the ugliest.

Don't make fun of big ears, your queen Yukarin has cute big ears

>>134158819
>That sure is a big ear.
For you

>>134158993
>nose
>ugliest
You'd be slapped in your stupid face in any art school. Nose defines like 80% of facial aesthetics

>>134158819
I want to nibble on it.

File: tmp_10266-14467140719981513490762.jpg (37KB, 600x528px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x528px

>>134159103
I came here just for this

>>134158993
>nose
>ugliest

File: 1438403989721.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>134159142
then why is no nose/insignificantly small nose so perfect?

checkmate, 3d

>>134159191
Damn, this guy's got a point holy shit.

>2015 November
>watching TV streams of Bakemonogatari
>a show from 2009


I want poorfags to go away

>>134159142
>art school

File: 3d4.jpg (95KB, 752x976px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 752x976px

>>134159258
>buying BDs

>>134159162
Was getting keks part of your plan?

>>134159191
I've got your back bro

File: 1436075937322.png (73KB, 448x300px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 448x300px

>>134159258
>Implying TV stream

>>134159191
The simple answer is that because anime girls aren't percieved by your brain as actual human beings, therefore the same standards of beauty aren't applied. There too far removed from reality or even uncanny valley

>>134159393
Which is why they're better than 3dpd.

/thread

File: 1447628322245.png (488KB, 637x481px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 637x481px

>>134159420
>/threading yourself

>>134159393
>drawing ugly things as ugly things is more pleasing than drawing pleasant things
Yeah no fuck off with your "art" bullshit faggot.

>>134159509
Are you replying to the right person?

>>134159528
Noses are not pleasant to look at, the more realistic it is the less pleasant it is to look at it. The logic of "hurrhurr anime doesnt real" is retarded as well, you can look at a stick figure and identify it as a human. The main point of anime is exaggerating the aesthetic points of a human and minimising the ugly points, like the nose.

>>134159609
Ah okay, I somehow thought you were saying that anime is unpleasant to look at and that 3dpd is pleasant.

File: 1391560592181.jpg (432KB, 705x997px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 705x997px

>>134159393
Damn, that's a very solid argument. The failsafe is that you said "aren't percieved ... as actual human beings", and the original post >>134158993 said "part of the human face", and so any potential for me to redirect to a discussion about 2D aesthetics is nullified. I'll concede this one to you.

But now I say that to begin with, 2D girls are more aesthetically pleasing than 3D girls, do you have a response to that one?

>>134159703
>2D girls are more aesthetically pleasing than 3D girls, do you have a response to that one?
Nope, can't argue with that.

>>134159703

>do you have a response to that one?

the only valid response is to agree

>>134159258
>not keeping TV and BD releases for all Shaft shows

>>134159874
Why?

File: 1441089401349.png (842KB, 800x1092px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 800x1092px

>>134159794
>>134159836
good to see that at the end of the day, we actually agreed all along

>>134159703
Nah it's a retarded argument, "2D" is just a meme. Sorry for breaking it to you but everything you percieve is 2D, humans don't have organs to percieve 3D. The brain can only calculate distances based on experience but the image you get is still just a 2D picture. So when it comes down to it whether you're looking at a person or a drawing you're still just seeing a 2D picture, and anime girls are more pleasant to look at because their pretty parts are focused and the ugly parts are minimalised. So yeah no noses are fucking ugly and that's that.

>>134159191
Even in 3D a little nose is considered prettier than a large nose. That's why negroes are ugly af.

File: 499198-kazutaka.jpg (119KB, 606x416px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 606x416px

>noses are pretty

>>134159935
You're seeing two 2D pictures.

>>134159935
You forgot that Humans have 2 eyes.
Having two eyes effectively enables you to see in 3D, after all the third dimension is depth, and 2 eyes enables us to not only perceive in X and Y, but also in Z.
The brain does this by measuring the difference of a given spot between the two eyes, the further apart the image, the closer (or further, depending on order) the object relative to current focus.

File: ac2d7e4ff5bfd1b8d435d31b6c7ce86d.jpg (70KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 640x425px

>>134160080
Unless you lost one of your eyes. But yeah still that's not 3D vision just making assumptions based on 2D pictures. And why "optical illusions" exist.

>>134160144
If you have a wall in the middle of the road with a well done picture of a road painted on it you'll walk straight into it. So whoopdiedoo there's your precious "3D vision" idiot.

>>134160187
Maybe if you lost an eye.
Sorry m8 but anyone with more than one eye would easily spot the wall no matter how well done the painting.
Now if someone took a photo of it (3D projected onto 2D, losing it's depth information), that's a whole different story.

>>134160226
Oh and i meant someone taking a photo of the wall, not the street.

>>134160226
> that's a whole different story.
No it's not, it's still just a flat surface and you perceive it as space. That's not 3D vision dumbass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ujqdZhg4QU
You can just write it off as "hurrhurr he's an idiot lol" but that's how human vision works. You don't see in 3D you just see 2D pictures.

>>134160293
Since the brain perceives depth by comparing 2 2D images then sure it can't be all that reliable, but the depth information is still there, it's like watching a movie in 2D and then in 3D, you can really tell the depth with 3D glasses, it's the same thing in real life.
Close one eye and you suddenly lose the ability to tell depth when staying still.
Obviously that man just wasn't paying attention to where he was looking.
Are you going to next claim that humans don't see in 2D because someone ran into someone else?

>>134160293
No, he really just is an idiot/not paying attention. You can even see in the video it only looks like there's a store if you look at it from the right angle, and you always look at it from two different angles IRL. Sure, because of the incredible pattern recognition abilities of the human brain, you can be tricked into thinking that 2D is 3D, but you can always tell the difference if you focus.

>>134160389
Remember that you are looking at a 2D video which has been stripped of all it's depth information.
Anyone paying attention would be able to tell the store is fake even from the "right" angle.

>>134160375
Holy fuck you're retarded if you don't realise how making assumptions based on 2D images is not fucking 3D perception then there's no helping you. Try grabbing a cola out of the screen next time too, because you perceive it as "depth". So yeah but no "real" things and drawings are both just 2D pictures, so arguing about 2D and 3D is retarded. We're not fucking bats there's no difference, only what's percieved as pretty and what isn't and noses aren't pretty.

>>134160445
God you're fucking retarded.
If you can perceive depth, NO MATTER HOW IMPERFECT, it's still fucking 3D you cunt.
Human eyes aren't fucking perfect either and they make assumptions based on radiation wavelength.
Does that mean we don't see 2D or even color either? but of course we do fuckface.

File: 4c84bdd30589a52b80ad4663257bfbf3.jpg (94KB, 600x777px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x777px

>>134160530
>strawman
The eye can't tell the distance a photon traveled from the atom came from you retard. All it can do is intercept the photon. That's why you'll get a 2D picture and everything else is assumptions. Here you can tell that the girl is in front of the guy but is she? It's just a picture on a screen, and never even actually existed in space. That's your "depth" right there idiot. Assumptions made by the brain, nothing more.

File: eternalwings1.webm (3MB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 540x360px

>>134158819

>>134160620
Actually, there is no depth in the image at all.
The only thing supporting the hypotheses that the girl is in front of the guy is the fact that her foot overlaps the guys foot.
And if not for that, you could argue that the girl is in front if you make certain assumptions about the size of her body.
But other than that, it would be perfectly reasonable to say that the girl is actually behind the guy.

The only way to settle this once and for all is if this was a 3D scene.

>>134160620
Also, you are completely missing my point, and basically you're a fucking idiot.

>>134159344
>1280x720
poorfags pls go

>>134160707
It's still the illusion of being a 3D space when it's actually nothing just photons from a screen.
>>134160726
>hurrhurr we're bats WE SEE IN 3DDDDDD
Idiot.

>>134160666
This game was awesome

>>134160750
1920x1080 anime is redundant.
Do you also pad every character in your text files with 20MB of null bytes?

>>134160777
>1920x1080 anime is redundant.
Come on kid no need to make excuses, just download more ram.

>>134160766
>It's still the illusion of being a 3D space when it's actually nothing just photons from a screen.
Yes, it's an illusion, when did i imply it wasn't?
Again you're missing my point fucktard.
Having two eyes makes it less of an illusion because there is actual depth information there.

If that girl was not overlapping the guy at all, and if it was a 3D scene, you would be able to certainly tell that the girl is in fact in front and not that she just has a unusually big body.
Why the fuck do you keep making it out as if i somehow implied that you can see depth information in 2D images "just cuz"?
Of course you can only see depth information in an actual 3D space with 2 eye balls.

>>134160900
> you can only see depth information in an actual 3D space with 2 eye balls
Except that's an illusion, you're still just seeing 2D pictures.

>>134160946
Yes, but also depth.
Just fucking admit it you stupid cunt, Humans can see depth, wether it be from assumptions is irrelevant because 2D vision and color and every other fucking sense is also assumptions and can be unreliable sometimes too, just not as much as depth perception.

>>134160946
And just to clarify, depth perception isn't just "HURRR HER FOOT OVERLAPS THE GUYS FOOT", look up how depth perception actually works and how the brain does it before you try arguing this topic again.

>>134159465
>being alpha enough to /thread myself
Ayy lmao

File: that's a big submarine.jpg (125KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1280x720px

>>134158819

File: 1429439636822.jpg (86KB, 769x1000px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 769x1000px

>>134161262
>JoJo

The mind fills in the blanks on 2D idealizing it for you.

File: 1409088999964.jpg (59KB, 531x471px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 531x471px

>>134161296
>visible hair