Whats your opinion on PTEX? Is it the future or is it just a

>>579525
ptex is dead and its been dead over a decade

>>579525
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3084911

worth a read

>>579525
anything disney or dreamworks comes out with is total shit tier stuff beside their animation.

mats are shit.
lighting is shit.
models are shit.

File: 83238575327.jpg (376KB, 2000x1076px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 2000x1076px

>>579572
u wot

File: BH6_still_Baymaxhug.jpg (3MB, 4096x1716px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4096x1716px

>>579572
wtf m8
u wot indeed

>>579593
it took 300 people 1000 hours to render this one frame utilizing 5 miles of render farm

>>579598
somehow i doubt that

>>579599
its in the correct ballpark, honestly

File: 1420427640947.jpg (13KB, 196x178px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 196x178px

>>579598
Of course it takes that much time and resources when you wanna come up with a solid 90min movie that requires modeling, uvs, texturing, shading, lookdev, lighting, layout/camera, rigging, animation, set dressing, crowd simulation, hair, particles/vfx, post-prod AND im not even including audio, developing new technology along the way, all the pre-prod story development, research, and direction. Its like you can't even fathom the amount of work that represents

>>579603
pls, we are talking about one frame here

>>579603
I didn't know audio adds render time :^)

>>579605
they don't make one frame, they develop everything considering the whole thing

>>579606
kek i know m8 i was talking resources, this other anon is surprised that 300 ppl can be involved in making a disney movie...

>>579609
>they don't make one frame, they develop everything considering the whole thing
no, they develop maybe 30 sec, pitch it to the toppest of bosses and if not approved try again. They have to make entire theme parks in multiple countries off this shit. Do you even know anything about anything ?

>>579621
we were originally talking about visual quality (materials, lighting, models)

so yeah, nice try fggt

>>579656
that is what im talking about

>>579566
thanks anon

>>579525
>170 textures
why...

>>579775
Weird isn't it, when i look at that Chicken i'd say he has like 10