Poetic justice, karma or just plain satisfying outcomes
Sorry you have to put up with my shitty filenames
This is no karma.
Either its a tried insurance thing
or a dumb ass thinking that he can outbrake/stop a notorious left side driver.
In both cases as a judge i would trhow him in jail and take his license for eternity for this stupid thing about pride.
this is jst a dumb bitch and a dumbass, both knowing what they did.
They are otherwise good.
didnt saw this one coming.
Looks like an officer.
I wish he didnt shoot the robber, but it would be deserved, at daylight and on a frequented street.
Looks like he was just an idiot in the wrong place.
Thats the best you could think of?
It seems to bother you really hard and you dont know what to say or how to argue.
I bet you argue with someone with an argument agains, you can refute it with an insult.
Or was that an offer? You know who offers cock are gay or bi?
So are you Gay or bi?
>The popularity of the headbutt video got this guy 2,700 subscribers and he got the motivation to start a motorcycle vlog he always wanted to make because of it (he says this in the followup video)
Wow, it actually is karma, but the opposite kind, positive karma.
Go on multi-quote poster, give your shitty opinion on this too.
Cat plays with baby thinking it's ok.
Mom watches and films going 'Teehe garsh this is ruuuurl funny'
Baby gimp whacks cat and cat pounce pushes baby off bed.
Conclusion: Mother is stupid, Cat is hilarious.
That's just not alright, he could've just called the fucking police on him after immobilizing him, not fucking punch him, but at the accent i recognize the loo shitter, so i am not even surprised, fucking Indians.
I agree police force is too excessive. Punishing somebody permanently and irreversibly is not justice. It could be argued this was in self defense, but if police were properly trained to deal with conflict, the officer could have dealt with the situation using nonlethal force. Lethal force should be a last resort; was shooting that guy really the only way the officer could have handled that situation? It seems like police don't see civilians as valuable humans like themselves that have lives.
Their protest movement is explicitly to block streets in high traffic areas. That's the whole reason they're there. They do it at airports, malls, etc. especially around holidays.
Note the locking hands to create a human wall.
Clearly you've never been shot at. Had the idea you were going to be shot at. If anyone is stupid enough to 'play' with someone who has a gun, they're stupid enough to die.
End of story.
I feel sorry for whomever had their legs collide with that idiot. I remember a similar incident happened at another theme park I think in California. The guy who wandered in the path died, and the person in the rollercoaster lost her legs.
I don't care if they're protesting the most inane useless shit, I don't care if you're 10 minutes late to a job interview, that was not justified.
Seriously, review your life and what has caused you to think that it is ok to send someone to the hospital or the morgue over blocking traffic.
It's hardly a question of whether it was worth it or if the officer, from hindsight ought to have done something different.
The guy clearly posed enough of a risk, was aggressive and uncontrollably drunk/high and was wielding a weapon and charging the officer with it.
If you were in the policeman's place with a gun in your hand and a guy still crazy enough to charge you, you would have shot too, because at that point there is no telling what the crazy fucker will do. It is far better to train an officer to defend himself and the rest of the public first than allow a risk like that to be unmet with a force to stop the guy.
I do agree that ideally a taser could have done the same job, but for one thing they can be unreliable (NOT something you want to deal with with a crazy fucker charging you) and for another when someone actually attacks you out of nowhere, the second most effective means of stopping them is not what you are instinctively going to reach for.
No, it isn't. It's a typical protest tactic that's been used by a variety of groups for longer than you've been alive.
Although it's not their main form of protest, the black lives matter people have done it in a few cities recently, which strikes me as counterproductive if they want white people to give a fuck about their situation and help them avoid getting killed by the police.
It's one thing when police instigate and escalate a situation to the point where they're legally justified in using lethal force, but this doesn't look like that kind of situation. If you attack a cop, with or without a weapon, you deserve whatever you get and nobody owes you any sympathy.
I know the story. Guy is an off duty police officer in south america, he shoots that first guy I think like three times with a .40 sw and another one twice. One of my favorite videos on capacity and the reality that even if you fire 20 times you'll probably only hit em 5 times.
nah in the original video apparently the truck driver was salty because that biker goes up and down the road really quick, and he was yelling at the biker for it because he could hit his kids who play in the road sometimes.
It's one of those situations where they're both assholes, but the guy in the truck went out of his way to be a fucking dick
They were jaywalking. It is illegal and they understood the risks they took participating.
If you walk out into the middle of a road, protesting or not, and are not prepared to be hit by a car, you are a fucking moron. Plain and simple. The gene pool will be better off without these people.
Their deaths or serious injuries were not justified by their being in the middle of the road, or even by their protesting (if that's what they're doing). Their injuries were however incurred as a result, and it was an unsurprising outcome.
As an American I fully agree with this, how hard would it have been to shoot at the guy's legs? Not very hard at all, but we're all to quick to rack up a kill and call it self defense. It really sucks man. I had someone break into my house a few years back, was able to detain the intruder with an oak sword until police arrived to arrest him and all he walked away with was a broken wrist, and just a few months ago a man up the road a ways shot his daughter five times in the chest and killed her because she came hoke late and he thought she was an intruder. Shits fucking dumb man, makes me sad to be American.
Look at these bleeding heart asshats and laugh.
Don't assault people who have guns, police or not. It tends to get you shot, and, no, we shouldn't feel bad for these people. A metal pole and most every sturdy blunt object can very easily be used to beat a person to death.
Ultimately, it's not a matter of weaponry when it comes to "peaceful" compliance from the populace. That this police officer was patrolling alone and initiated contact alone likely contributed to the citizen's agitated decision-making and subsequent death. The psychological advantage of numbers cannot be overstated.
>Man with a firearm and authority to kill a minority?
>Shit dog, I gotta assault him!
It's like when people text while crossing a busy street in the middle of the road instead of a crosswalk.
It's called evolution when they die.
>How hard would it have been to shoot at the guy's legs?
I fucking hate it when people say this(I hear it a lot, mostly from liberals). There's so many reasons why this statement is stupid. First of all, its way harder to shoot someones legs than it is to shoot their center mass, especially if they are moving, and if you are scared its even harder. Even if you do manage to hit someones legs, there's no guarantee that they will go down. Secondly, if you shot someone in the legs in a self defense situation, when you go to court you could be sued for it, since if you had enough time to shoot someone in the legs in that kind of a situation, your life wasn't endangered enough to warrant that kind of force. A police officer would loose his job and be imprisoned for trying to pull some John Woo bullshit.
Center mass isn't a shot to kill you dumb fuck, it is literally the only safe shot to take. Why do you think that cops can pull off some Max Payne shit and shoot a charging attacker anywhere they want?
the most beautiful thing is that fucker laying in that terrible pain, motherfucker.
For those who wonder the thief is trying to give some excuses, talking about "he's doing for his woman", and then givin the all shame that it could be possible, asking for help while he was pointing with that gun against the biker.
And then is the robberpal, who just left at first sign of trouble, that's the kind of human garbage are made of these kind of people, shit I hate those bastards.
ohhhh man that's sad, for the legs, just for the legs.
Long time ago I had a couple of friends like this, one of them, like the bikeass, always tried to do some stupid stuff, til he got a little crush with a cap, he broke one leg and one arm, after that, I cut all kind of connection with those people, I wonder how is doing right now, this video got me nostalgic. I bet he is still doing stupid shit til now, he's almost 40, and I can assure he'll never grow up, he's like a 15 years old mental case. Poor bastard I hope he isn't at least dead.
People have places to go, it's nobody's right to stand in the middle of the road and block traffic just because they want to say something. Everyone who got run over in that video deserved it.
Rich suburban liberals who have never experienced violence, or black people who can't seem to grasp that the quickest way to get cops to stop shooting them would be to stop committing crimes.
You're not funny, you're not clever even though you clearly think so yourself, and you're shitposting. You're not contributing any content of relevance to the thread, and personally, I think you're an oxygen thief and a waste of space.
I'm not being a twat. You're just a fucktard that doesn't understand reality. There is no such thing as shooting not to kill. Let's count the ways:
First, there isn't a "safe" place to shoot a human. In the head and torso are vital organs. The arms and legs have major blood vessels that, if compromised, will cause a human to bleed out. Also keep in mind that only a relative handful of people have pinpoint accuracy with firearms. There is a certain degree of error from point of aim to point of impact determined by shooter's skill and circumstance. Spoilers: most cops aren't required to be excellent marksmen. For the most part, departments only require them to be competent with their issued pistol, and any further training is done at the officer's initiative.
Since we've determined that it's difficult to get exact placement of a shot in any reliable manner, let's further debunk the idea of shooting the attacker's weapon. Not only is this generally impractical, but also incredibly dangerous to the environment. Bullets don't just vanish if they miss a bad guy. Depending on cartridge, a pistol bullet can travel dozens to hundreds of yards once fired. A responsible shooter must be aware of what is beyond their target so as to avoid needlessly endangering the lives of others in the environment. This is commonly cited among the cardinal rules of firearm safety.
Lastly, why do we expect police officers to respond to lethal force with non-lethal force. Would you consider an aluminum bat a non-lethal weapon in the hands of a police officer? It's quite any easy thing to bash a human skull into pieces. Tazers and pepper spray are compliance devices meant to pacify already subdued suspects who continue to resist arrest. Firearms are self-defense devices meant to deescalate a deadly situation by force.
Yeah, I was going to say, only certain very high caliber guns will reliably drop a person instantly, and even then only if you hit them in certain places. Most of the time when a person gets shot, it takes a few seconds for them to pass out, during which time they can still run away.
I think each part of it was filmed separately, and then all merged together so that it looked like it was all happening at the same time but they could fine-tune timing and whatnot (not to mention minimize risk to the people involved)/
He's fucking fine and learned a valuable lesson. Most of the time a simple ass whooping does way more good than a run in with the fucking cops.
Shit if that faggot was a shade darker theres a good chance the cops would of gunned him down for holding a paint can at them when he threw his arms up.
Maybe if we didn't bring in the cops every time there was a minor altercation they wouldn't be murdering folks every other day. I know I'd be ready to if I had to listen to some whiny faggot try to explain why he vandalized private property.
Judging by the fact that literally everyone other than you in this thread posted that you should kill yourself, I'm gonna have to say your entire retort on that whole "subjective" thing was wrong.
Fucking. Kill. Yourself.
"Only faglords like multi-quote posts nigga, just kill yourself."
>be minute negroid
>trying to get a suitable education, hopefully move out of this shitty country
>maybe even this entire continent
>whatever, I'll settle for SA
>Jaroshawn is behind me
>I don't like Jaroshawn
>starts slapping my shit
>Dequawnique is egging him on
>teacher does fuckall
>get up, think about telling them off
>Suddenly, an image of a tiger appears in my mind
>"Hydrogen" starts playing
>3x combo 1500 points
Real life is not like the movies. It's actually very difficult to kill someone outright with a single bullet unless you should them in the head. Most gun shot victims die from shock, not the wounds themselves.
How about being a wage slave with a boss who doesn't give a shit, who's got kids to feed and bills to pay, and can't afford to lose hours or possibly a job because some people want to be assholes and demonstrate in the wrong place? Is that a good enough reason?
Yeah that's a good idea, let's use the grip of a gun that's ready to be fired to fend off guy that's attacking with a flag pole. surely the massive reach the flag pole affords could be overcome safely and if the gun fires, because, you know, the gun is ready to be fired and hitting someone with it could easily trigger it, the bullet will just disappear if it misses the bad guy
I was sitting there wondering if I'd be a much bigger tough guy, if some store owner came to kick my ass...then I remembered I'd never vandalize a storefront in the first place because I'm not an asshole...especially not one that doesn't realize the consequence of their actions.
"dont throw a tantrum"
>>Throws cynical tantrum on the basis that pride and other regular social constructs dont already rule my life and so i must highten myself by chastising some stranger on an anonymous board.
Lol i see what you did there little feminist. Cute. Can i have your number?
I was just thinking this. I mean I've never tagged any shit but after getting my face stomped? (apparently.) I would be coming by at 3:00 am and start throwing shit through their windows. I mean, he already knows where he lives apparently.
>pretending all crimes are equal
>implying you haven't passed a red light or downloaded some copyrighted song or such during your life
>implying stealing a hoodie should be a death sentance
You really expect Tyrese from the hood who's been told his entire life that crime is cool to give up? The kid in the video totaly deserved to get shot, no question about it. It's just a bit stupid to asume all criminals are as worthless as him
If I were the tagger, I'd probably carry a gun on me in case of shit like this. This still would qualify as self-defence, especially considering the assailant has video evidence of what happened.
Then again, physical violence carries a harsher punishment than vandalism. So he'd honestly have a decent enough chance to press charges.
black idiot literally had it coming.
you have MILLISECONDS to react in a situation like that, what's he gonna do?
Shoot once and hope the black kid doesn't retaliate? No you're gonna shoot to disable.
You're a police officer get called into a guy selling cough syrup illegally and this fucking kid starts screaming and running up pointing his finger at the cop in the shape of a gun? your hand is black and cops have shot people that are the same color as you for less, why would you do this?
Seriously the dumbest race.
He didn't die quickly the thief was shot but was just seriously injured, and pleaded for help. When first responders got there the officer made the medics look after the bike owner and then made them give statements to the cops on scene. By the time the medics got to treating the thief he bled out in handcuffs.
I was in Tokyo about 11 years ago and something similar to this was caught on video. The prime minister (Koizumi) actually went on TV the next day and called out the police for being pussies. He said there was no excuse for police officers to run away in the face of danger. The governor of Tokyo said something along the same lines, then ordered the police department to re-train their officers to not be women.
>It's is the contraction (abbreviated form) of "it is" and "it has." It's has no other meanings--only "it is" and "it has." - See more at: http://www.businesswritingblog.com/business_writing/2006/05/its_its_or_its_.html#sthash.wiNF3WTw.dpuf
Tazers and pepper spray are not that effective. About 10% of the population is completely unaffected by pepper spray, and tazers can be defeated by a slight bunch in clothing.
A metal pole on the other hand tends to be pretty effective no matter what.
>That this police officer was patrolling alone and initiated contact alone likely contributed to the citizen's agitated decision-making and subsequent death. The psychological advantage of numbers cannot be overstated.
That officer was probably patrolling alone because of budget. It's a numbers game, cities/counties/states only spend so much money on law enforcement, and they expect large areas to be patrolled. On top of that, they expect law enforcement to check on citizens who might appear intoxicated or in need of aid proactively.
The unfortunate consequence is bad situations can arise. Blame the purse holders and citizens for that.
On top of what >>907280 said, shooting a limb is actually more dangerous than shooting someone in the torso. Along with major blood vessels there is also an increased risk of hitting nerves or bone. If the person does not bleed out from the tightly clustered blood vessels being damaged, or die from the shock caused by the sheer amount of damage to the limb, they will likely be crippled in that limb for life.
This opens an opportunity for an aggressor to sue the person who was defending their self, as >>906946 pointed out, because morons like you, who don't understand shit about shit, would be sitting on the jury.
>shooting a limb is actually more dangerous than shooting someone in the torso.
More dangerous for bystanders perhaps, but certainly not for the person getting shot. Of course it's extremely bad to get shot in the extremities, but it's less likely to be fatal and easier to control bleeding. In order to bleed out quickly from an extremity wound, you need to do major damage to the femoral or popliteal arteries in the legs or brachial artery in the upper arm, all of which are narrow, deep, and surrounded by lots of tissue and bone. You've got a much better chance of hitting something important with a shot to the torso.
It's also far more difficult, and unlikely to stop someone. Legs and arms keep on working unless you do something catastrophic to a ligament or joint, and bullets don't do a lot of damage until they hit something hard. So what you're talking about is not the difference between hitting the legs vs. hitting the torso, it's hitting the entire rib cage/internal organs vs hitting the femurs. Any other shot to the legs is going to be a through and through.
still remember a story my dad told me about something my granddad saw when he was young. Fits the thread too.
>Granddad is walking down the street
>Butchers daughter (about 8yrs old) has just got a little kitten
>she is holding in in hers arms out side the shop playing with the other kids
>Someone comes by with a german shepard
>The german shepard knocks the girl to the ground and fucking eats the kitten
>Butcher hears screaming and sees his little girl covered in blood
>comes out the shop with a cleaver and chops the dogs head off.
Maybe I'm wrong, but if I remember correctly the story is like this:
>guy peacefully walking dog
>shirtless muslim sees dog
>muslims hate dogs as part of their culture
>muslims throws shit at the dog
>dog mauls muslim