Why aren't there more passionate conservatives in Hollywood today? We need strong men that are willing to stand up for American values like pic related.
I've seen this post like 43,000 times before. Why do /pol/ shills repeat the same baseless cliches and buzz words over and over? You have no evidence for that claim, either kill yourself or go back to your containment shill board.
That stuff at least exists and is debatable. It's far more understandable to make an argument that the races are equal than it is to argue for the existence of characters that might as well be from Lord of the Rings.
>muh conservative buzzwords
Robert Downey Jr. although he won't admit it
obviously Mel Gibson
Craig Ferguson hinted at it
Basically the left has a sort of monopoly on PC and can adjust it to make you out to be a bad human being if you say the wrong thing.
its because the type of person that becomes an actor is a film school faggot who wants to show off, aka a typical liberal
the conservatives in hollywood are behind the doors and not making a big scene to show off and impress everybody with glitter and dance
why are libshills so hateful and sociopathic?
>on 4chan since its inception on and off
>last couple years regularly get told to go back to tumblr because I'm not a 70 IQ old religious woman who shills for stormfront
it's funny that you subhuman garbage edgy neo-nazi children started believing 4chan is for you at some just because the admin made a containment board for you. you're so unintelligent that you still don't understand /pol/ is a containment board even though it's one of 3 shitholes mentioned in the rules of the site along with /mlp/ and /b/.
do you think they realize how stupid they sound?
Arnold Schwarzenegger of course
He details in his book how he was the only conservative in Hollywood while he was acting his way to the top though I'd actually consider him a complete centrist since he is way too socially liberal to be an actual conservatist aka caveman
They're both very left-wing since they're both in favour of liberal democracy, from the 1848 revolutions to now there has been nothing but the political spectrum being skewed more and more to the left, the only governments in the western world that could be considered "right" are the Vatican and Liechtenstein.
Because receiving an education and succeeding in life generally leads you to become more liberal. At the extremes of wealth and power are conservatives because they're cynics and it's easier to manipulate and exploit idiots.
>the spectacle has destroyed language to the extent that people now believe conservatism is liberalism
>witchcraft and magic
Yes, because when I think of self-proclaimed witches and wiccans named Sage and Moonbeam, opening my heart chakra and finding my spirit goddess, I think of staunch Conservatism.
>this is le art! fuck conservadumbs! xD *taps fagbora*
unless its projections of your mental illness
>easier to manipulate and exploit idiots
Top kek m8. The most miserable people I know are liberals, to say nothing of their amazing ability to prove themselves dumber than I could possibly dream of week to week.
>I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce, and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.
top lel you tell him fellow 4channer, lets rek his problematic beliefs and give him a taste of social justice for a change xDDD he'll learn that true 4chan is about communism and furry acceptance xDDDD
>he actually thinks there's a difference between conservatives and liberals!
>he actually thinks there isn't
There's nothing wrong with thinking people who pledge allegiance to either side are brainwashed idiots, but to say there's no difference between liberals and conservatives is flat out wrong.
Clint Eastwood's not really a "conservative" the way you seem to think he is. Even he thought he shouldn't have spoken at the RNC.
"I was an Eisenhower Republican when I started out at 21, because he promised to get us out of the Korean War. And over the years, I realized there was a Republican philosophy that I liked. And then they lost it. And libertarians had more of it. Because what I really believe is, Let's spend a little more time leaving everybody alone. These people who are making a big deal out of gay marriage? I don't give a fuck about who wants to get married to anybody else! Why not?! We're making a big deal out of things we shouldn't be making a deal out of."
>being this indoctrinated
I bet you think voting matters.
why do you think this?
conservatives THINK that the U.S. has one singular culture, but in reality the U.S. has NO ONE culture. the U.S. simply has pop culture as a mask of all the different cultures that have immigrated here over the years.
Liberal and Conservatism are now used as synonyms for Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Conservatism respectively in the US.
The Democrats are far from Liberal in the original sense. Liberal meant that they would focus on liberty and equality. This meant that people would be treated fairly and equally by their government and that they would have the liberty to do what they wish as long as it didn't infringe on the liberty of others to do what they wish. Modern Democrats took that to mean that welfare should be handed out to buy votes and that people do not have the liberty of free association and more importantly free disassociation.
Modern Republicans are just Democrats 30 years ago.
Democrats are running the country into the ground and Republicans are chasing them, thinking it's a foot race they want to win.
not that guy and I get what you're saying--"liberal" and "conservative" have just become party identifiers and aren't reflective of what the ideologies have historically meant. Moreover, the power of each party to actually change government policy is much weaker than most people realize, given the intransigence of our national bureaucracy.
But to say there's no difference between the two is an exaggeration. There are obvious differences on social issues. How important those issues are in comparison to, say, trade policy (it is impossible to find differences here) and foreign policy (in practice they are nearly the same) is another matter.
>taking sides because someone told you to take sides, because they gave you a choice to take sides on, because you have "freedom"
>Modern Republicans are just Democrats 30 years ago.
There is no historical parallel for the current state of the Republican party. Neo-conservatives completely dominate it, and have made foreign intervention at the behest of Israel into its core platform.
Republicans and Democrats are both completely in love with the AIPAC. That's why the wars don't stop and that's why Israel doesn't get defunded. It's completely foolish to think anything other than that. Also, the warmongering isn't completely limited to defense of Israel, but also to making sure that the US dollar continues to be the reserve currency for oil trading.
The most disappointing thing about Republicans as opposed to Democrats in defense of Jews is that the Jews are usually the complete opposite in terms of values compared to what many Republicans profess to value. They're smut peddlers, thieves, anti-gun, neo-liberals, etc. but because there are so many Post-1960s Style Christians in the Republican party they get unwavering support. The Democrats, on the other hand, are birds of a feather when it comes to American Jewry.
>directing Jersey Boys
Why do you hate trees?
Because Hollywood doesn't like conservatives and the fact that most of them are crazy as fuck.
I consider myself something of a paleo-conservative along the lines of the Rockefeller Republicans. I really loathe today's conservatives because they all nuthug Ronald Reagan despite the fact he fucked up plenty and they whitewash or ignore his screw-ups. Like amnesty for illegal immigration; they overlook that a lot.