>>7768187 It's because the Jews are secretly aligned against Christians with the Muslims.
Think about it, they've been working together all along and are just trying to trick us. The had some phony war that literally only lasted 6 days. They spout over the top rhetoric to each other and yet never have real conflict.
Jews did 9/11 which allowed to them exert control over American freedom. Muslims provided convenient scapegoats and a target that is literally a desert filled with shiites.
The WTC had a plane sever the outer columns and inner core. WTC wasn't a traditional skyscraper, with the outer columns holding the buildings weight to increase office floor space. The heat weakened the steel, and the incredible weight of the upper portion created a procedural structural failure. There is a reason the upper portion of the tower leaned in the direction of where it was hit, proceeding afterwards to fall straight down after the framework gave out.
I'm sure you all know that the second tower hit was actually the first fall as the plane hit lower and the framework collapsed first under more weight.
7 WTC collapsed, because, you know, a giant fucking tower fell on top of it. There was concerns that the World Financial Center across the west street would collapse and/or have to be rebuilt, and it had significantly less damage.
So far the most "conclusive" evidence of a conspiracy is the thermite claims, which is usually just people pointing at steel columns that had been cut by clean up crew after the tower had fallen; or claiming that thermite just simply existed, and then making fun of people who say it just doesn't exist.
>>7768393 Im suggesting that there was a source of thermite in the towers.
>>7768395 That's an absurd claim that molten steel was being created by oxidizing steel. There is not enough exothermic energy to be turning steel to liquid. And to add, they're talking about freshly ground Iron. Im pretty sure that there wasn't too much freshly ground iron below ground zero after just a few days. But just to clarify, you are suggesting that rusting steel or iron has the potential energy to completely liquefy itself. I just want to put that in plain English so everybody knows what you are suggesting
>>7768421 I understand that part. But the amount of hydrogen being released by the oxidation would be an inconsequential amount. Especially when all of the steel eventually becomes oxidized, there would no longer be a fuel source.
>>7768187 You can't really compare some modern hotel to a monster-sized decades old concrete skyscraper. >>7768189 This is correct. But it can obviously weaken the steel enough to give away under the overwhelming pressure of half a skyscraper above it. >>7768195 Yes. The plane crash played a big part in making the towers collapse. >>7768198 Debris from the north tower ripped off some big chunks on the side of the building facing the wave of debris. But ultimately it was the fires that brought it down. >>7768199 nice meme >>7768200 newfag >>7768206 The planes cut several core columns and the raging fires weakened the rest. Without the fires, they would've survived. >>7768211 explain >>7768212 this >>7768216 it was hit by an object, in this case it was debris and not a plane. the fires brought it down though, not the debris >>7768217 yes >>7768219 nice meme >>7768220 that's aluminium and it didn't stay molten for weeks >>7768224 are you retarded, the steel should either be saggy or normal, you may be talking about the molten aluminium >>7768236 retard >>7768245 this, but let me correct one thing WTC1 did not fall on top of WTC7, only a few moderately sized chunks >>7768254 liquid aluminium* >>7768368 >cheezburger >>7768381 liquid aluminium*
>>7768393 he doesn't even understand the generally accepted one >>7768405 yes >>7768411 the main reason why the fires fucked shit up so hard was the sloppy fireproofing >>7768416 it was liquid aluminium >>7768421 dumb frogposter >>7768427 it was a collapse of massive proportions but i don't think it would heat up that much >>7768428 they didn't collapse it, it collapsed by itself
WTC2 (South Tower) >plane hits building on the side >cuts away several exterior columns and a few of the core columns >sloppy fireproofing blown off by the impact >people are instantly killed >fires engulf the impacted floors >the lack of fireproofing exposes the steel columns supporting the floors >part of the floors start to sag >because the plane hit one side of the building, the building wants to lean to that side and the stress builds up >saggy floor planes give away and land on the floor below >floor planes keep giving away >fires keep raging >more floor planes falling down >the exterior columns are now almost on their own as the floor planes that connected them to the core are now gone >the columns cant take it anymore >the building starts to lean, the tiny leaning puts enormous pressure on the columns >they cant take it >a fuckton of concrete is weighing them down >they finally give away >as seen in some close-up videos, they bend until they crack and then the entire top of the building slams into the floor below >all that energy is now released >tears through the rest of the building and kills everyone besides a lucky one or two i think >since it was leaning, the collapse put more stress on one side of the building so parts of the other side are still standing after the collapse, but being on their own, they give away and fall down after mere seconds
same shit in WTC1 but the plane hit dead center so the core gave away first, not the exterior a simulation of the collapse would be cool as fuck, seeing that monster of a building give away only ones i can find are shitty blender animations though with fucking jenga planks ffs
>>7768381 >ground zero Precisely. At least 2, probably 3 micronukes were used that day buried in the granite directly below WTC 1,2 and probably 6. Truth be told is was the only way to dismantle the asbestos tower complex safely, but no one would have ever agreed to that. In fact Controlled Demolition who cleaned up most of it, loaded debris on slow boats to China, were asked about demolishing the structures prior to 11 of 9 and refused to even quote the job, unpossible to do safely.
9/11 was revolutionary from an engineering-standpoint. up to 2001 large buildings would be deconstructed for millions and millions of dollars by professional companies that used millisecond-timed, carefully calculated explosions - and even then, the buildings sometimes wouldn't collapse symmetrically.
now we know that all of this was naive and nonsensical: you don't need expertise, explosives or careful planning to bring down a ~50-story building. just start a small office fire and it'll eventually come down by itself and fall into its own footprint.
i now make a living bringing down large scyscrapers for the government with nothing but a box of matches and some office furniture. ask me how, i make 19.000$ a month and you can, too.
>plane flies into building >building then collapses
>but the collapse can't have been caused by the plane
What are you, 5? In fact no, even a fucking five year old would understand what happened
The only reason anyone questions this blatant causal relationship is that they have grown up thinking no one could ever attack their mighty country and the only way this could possibly happen is if it was self inflicted
>>7769717 It was more >no way our mighty country was unprepared for such a low-tech attack It's a kind of snobbery I guess. We would much prefer to be killed in a convoluted conspiracy involving holograms and space lasers.
>>7769719 >>7769720 >>7769723 Good luck trying to reason with those people though. Its almost as bad as those "The ISS is a blimp/hologram" and "the moonlanding was faked because rockets down work in vacuum"
>>7769719 Has anyone considered the possibility that the airplane was no airplane at all but an alien aircraft? And that maybe there are Muslim space aliens that have a fuel that burn a million times warmer than jet fuel?
>Hyperbole is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech. In rhetoric, it is also sometimes known as auxesis (lit. "growth"). In poetry and oratory, it emphasizes, evokes strong feelings, and creates strong impressions. As a figure of speech, it is usually not meant to be taken literally.
>Hyperbole may also be used for instances of such exaggerations for emphasis or effect. Hyperboles are often used in casual speech as intensifiers
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.