Robot Exodus

>>26347445
this again
>im original

>>26347476
Yes, this again.

Do you think we'd give up our board so easily?

>>26347445
>Should person worship threads be banned (Ashley J./Rose)?
yes, it promotes orbiting, which inevitably leads to undesired discussions.

>Should gay threads be redirected to /lgbt/ but mentioning you are gay be allowed?
as a gay dude myself, I'm not bothered by gay threads being moved to /lbgt/ or /trash/, mentioning should be fine.

>>26347476
I support it

Have a bump so the normies can get triggered

>robots wanting a safe space

>>26347484
>we
>our board

You want your own board, not a board for robots, fuckface. You're not even a robot. If you were a true robot you'd also make rules that gay, black, or non-NEET people can't post.

>>26347647
the target demographic is a broader appeal than wizardchan but still with restrictions

If we had that extreme of rules, it would be a dead board

>>26347445
No
Yes
Its fine.

>>26347445
I'm throwing in /beta/ and /hiki/ for names

>>26347445
As a fembot, how will I find my internet bfs if I am not allowed to refer to myself as a woman?

>>26347476
OP thinks that if he whines enough he'll be given his own board. That 4chan mods and admins would use resources to create and support such a board, and let him make the rules. A board that is designed to ban nearly every 4chan visitor except for a select few.

>>26347730
>promoting and raising support
>finding agreeable rules
>whining

Why are you normies always so frustrated that we want to be left alone?

>>26347796
If you want to be left alone, why post on /r9k/ ? Hell, if you get so triggered by girls or non-virgins, just ignore their posts. It's not like /r9k/ was created to be your personal hugbox.

Besides, why not go to wizchan? That's an entire website just like you describe.

>>26347445

Why dont we just apply these rules to /r9k/?
/r9k/ has become the "story" board on 4chan.
The most feasible rules are the 3 and 4 on your list. There's no reason those rules couldnt be implemented.

There is literally no reason not to. Current /r9k/ is /b/ 2.0 and it's awful. Considering 4chan has always been full of social undesirables, there should be a board

Also I'm throwing in my bid for /hiki/

>>26347840
Why did you have to come here?

>>26347844
Hiroshima obviously wants /r9k/ to be its intended purpose with the robot being implemented.

>>26347844
Rule 4 already is in place for /r9k/. As for rule 3, it's too subjective to enforce, but it's not like we get many porn threads to begin with.

File: 1427961120072.png (640KB, 1000x968px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 1000x968px

>leaving /r9k/ to be taken over by roasties

>>26347889
You're a newfag who probably hasn't been on 4chan for long. Otherwise you'd know the history of /r9k/.

>>26347925
Rule 4 also prohibits posts and threads regarding relationships and omegle threads, as they are /soc/ threads

>>26347970
>/r9k/ made for it to be /b/ with OC
>social outcasts start populating the board
>deleted
>brought back without the robot by social outcast demand
>"Rare Pepes" and Oregon school shooting memes bring normies and they start amassing

File: 1454096076097.jpg (12KB, 271x309px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 271x309px

>>26347445
>BLAAA BLAAA BLAAA
>WAAH MUH VIRGINITY
>rose
>BLAAA BLAAA BLAA
>WAAAH IM TRIGGERED BY GIRLS

This is now a /rose/ thread

File: 1450794044309.png (1MB, 798x1136px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 798x1136px

>>26348035
normies hate not being included in something

File: 1454952446101.png (460KB, 728x720px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 728x720px

>>26348060
I don't know what normies are but good (or bad? idk) for them

File: 1443754883665.gif (711KB, 200x331px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 200x331px

>>26348109
I think this post showcases the need for banning person worship on /wiz/ (/hiki/?)

File: martisha.jpg (72KB, 460x700px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 460x700px

>>26348035
This is now a /prettygirls/ thread.

>>26347445
We need to make this happen. I am sick of normies but I refuse to take an aggressive action against the invaders. This is the most peaceful way for us to have peace.

>>26348035
>>26348109
>>26348146
Fuck off normies, we need our own board so you parasites could leave us alone. It's for your own safety that you let us be in peace. We have no wants for violence or aggression, let us be free from your aggression.

>>26348002
This.
I think it'd be good to have a /wiz/ board for our kind.

Maybe, just maybe, /r9k/ will reestablish itself as an OC board again.

File: 1443938132950.jpg (77KB, 550x512px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 550x512px

New poll!

Should person worship threads be banned on /wiz/?

http://strawpoll.me/6764875

File: qwzncCrJnbM.jpg (11KB, 233x186px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 233x186px

>>26348124
There isn't a /wiz/ and there never will be. And who the fuck would worship rose in /wiz/? They wouldn't.

>>26348146
Shes pretty.

>>26348187
>our own board
Nobody gets their own board. Especially not a group that can't even be accurately defined.

>your aggression
You're the aggressors here. When people just mention they are girls or not virgins, you get all assblasted and triggered. You could instead just accept that everyone is on 4chan side by side.

File: smugwojak4v2.png (32KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x400px

>>26347445
This is what I'm thinking about the current topics:
>Yes. (but Smug Wojak could be one of the mascots of the board)
>Yes.
>/khv/, /grim/, /dep/, /baw/, /cry/, /whi/, /ree/, /virgin/, /wap/ (wizards and apprentices).

I see "no advice" part of rule 4 has been removed. Does this mean /adv/ice can be shared on the board?

>>26348236
But we are defined by the rules I have posted

male socially awkward virgins

File: metart_paloma.jpg (140KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1024x1024px

>>26348222
These models they find are always so stunning.

File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>26348187
If you wanted to be left alone you wouldn't say rose in the OP. You say rose you get roseposters. Its not rocket science.

Or are you such a newfag that you didn't know this?

>>26348236
If people come here only to say they're nonvirgins and then talk about how good they have it that's clearly only intended to ruin a robots day.

Normies only come here to make robots feel bad.
It's not like there's anything else to gain from it.

>>26348242
>I see "no advice" part of rule 4 has been removed. Does this mean /adv/ice can be shared on the board?
is there a reason it should be?

In previous /qa/ threads we discussed that self improvement threads should be allowed (MGTOW essentially) and so I don't see why

>>26348281
>Normies only come here to make robots feel bad.
But that's not true at all. You might as well say that robots come here only to attack normies.

There's no escape virgins. Those kids in Oregon lost their lives so now you lose your precious little board.

>>26348060
Whait is that rose?

File: for wiz.png (101KB, 908x286px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 908x286px

>>26348290
it is true.
> You might as well say that robots come here only to attack normies.
but we were here first. It's ok, though. Just support /wiz/ and you'll be here last.

>>26347445
rule 1 is sexist. it should be:

> 1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are a man OR women.

>>26348290
I said:
>Its not like there's anything to gain from it.


Now disprove it.

What else are you trying to reach by normieposting here if not trying to make robots feel bad?
Robots make robot posts because they know they are accepted here.
Normies post here because they know they're unwanted and want to hurt and annoy others.

>>26347844
/r9k/ was originally the greentext board. It was great, until it got overrun with frogposters and NEETs

>>26348236
NO. WE NEED OUR OWN PLaCE. For too long you guys have tormented us in the real world. Some of us are robots by choice. Others, like myself were unfortunate to be born into robots, you guys come here waving you dicks around as if it's something to be proud of just because you were born better than some of us is disgusting. I hate you guys for making us more depressed than we should. I could understand if you tried to help us with good advice and support but you don't! You mock us, you steal our humor, and you Blantenly demonize us to no end. We only want peace, but you guys want to push or limits. You pushed us far enough to ditch this board for a new one. So just leave us alone, let us have our own board and you can keep on with your normie ways without any aggression from us. Please just stop.

>>26348332
You keep posting that lame drivel you made two weeks ago as if it were some kind of divine revelation.

>>26348340
Man in the norm, if you don't mention your gender you're a man, therefore nobody says they're male.

You're right that this would be correct but seen practically it makes no difference.

>>26348340
>rule 1 is sexist.

>>26348341
>Normies post here because they know they're unwanted and want to hurt and annoy others.
Are all robots actually this delusional?

>>26348384
is*

Fuck.

>>26348390
I'm helping ya out OP.

File: 1422157633653.png (139KB, 375x360px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 375x360px

>>26348390
forgot my smug reaction face

>>26347445
>normies on this board don't want /wiz/ to be created because they know they won't fit in

>>26348419
>Are all robots actually this delusional?
do you think male virgins who can't properly socialize care to hear about you fucking 3 girls at a party last weekend and how your girlfriend is so amazing?

>>26348437
This, they wouldn't have victims to mock if it weren't for us.

>>26348437
>normies on this board KNOW /wiz/ won't be created because it's a retarded idea and mods/admins/hiro would never do it

>>26347445
>Should gay threads be redirected to /lgbt/ but mentioning you are gay be allowed?

Absolutely. No gay threads. No gay porn.

Gay people are welcome if they are not here just to tell us how gay they are and how great it is.

>Should person worship threads be banned (Ashley J./Rose)?
Eh. Not sure. It doesn't really matter so much, they only take up one thread.

/wiz/ is good enough.

Good job with changing the rules.

>>26348421
>>26348428
ban tripfags as well. i'm sure your just doing this for this thread, but they need to go.

>>26348460
They also wouldn't have memes if it weren't for us. It was our memes and board culture that brought them here in the first place.

An /r9k/ without us would quite literally be /b/ complete with non-offensive outdated memes.

>>26348471
>Good job with changing the rules.
Thank you. I figured that if we are to be actually considered, we have to have simple straightforward rules.

nothing subjective like banning normie-posting.

>>26348486
I'm actually a new tripfag, I made an introduction thread aswell ^.^

>>26348361
>you guys have tormented us
Nah. I certainly haven't. You're imagining things most likely.

>born into robots
What does that even mean?

>you guys come here waving you dicks around
I barely see any of that.

>I could understand if you tried to help us with good advice
People do try, time and again. Every single time it's the same end result, angry robots jump on the poster with insults and total denial. You guys don't want to be helped.

>We only want peace
Sure, you glorify school shooters and laugh at normies/stacies being killed.

>let us have our own board
It's called wizchan.

>>26348524
>I made an introduction thread aswell

pls no.

did it get a lot of hate?

>>26348486
Tripfags have their uses when it's actually used properly. If a tripfag really bothers you though, just filter them like I do or you can select the option to force anonymize all posts (4chan X add-on)

Fuck all that noise. Just leave r9k for the wolves. /b/ was once like r9k, then facebook/reddit/twitter users infested it and turned it into shit. those same shit flingers are now smearing there shit over the rest of the boards and dont respect board culture. the only board that hasn't completed fell yet is /a/.

Just start a new board with wiz mods and keep these fuckers out. r9k is turning into /b/ lite

>>26348548
Not yet, I'm waiting for it.

Would you do me the favour and start it pls?

>>26348562
link it I coulnt find it

>>26348452
It's more like, everyone is having a casual conversation. Then someone might mention his ex gf and how he's depressed because of that.

How do robots react? With vitriol and hatred and screams of normie gtfo. That kind of behavior doesn't deserve to be rewarded, which is why you'll never get your own board.

File: 1416359336455.jpg (142KB, 740x732px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 740x732px

>>26348603
>Then someone might mention his ex gf and how he's depressed because of that.
>ex gf
>depressed

>"""depressed"""

>>26348555
Tripfags are kinda mascots of /r9k/.
Being a famous tripfag is a way to feel sucessfull. how did I end up with an life so empty, fuck.

>>26348555
fair enough 8r9k has the rule:

DO NOT USE TRIPCODES FOR NO REASON.

If they are used as they were meant to, then it's fine. This means that using them to identify you when it is needed for the purpose of a thread, you are free to do so. Doing it for attention, is not OK. Violators will have their post edited. Repeated violations can lead to a ban

>>26347704
I disagree. /wiz/ is the ultimate name. Wizards (not that the board isn't also for apprentices) show the most robot virtue as they have proven no wish for mortal desires for 30 years

I'm with you op! Needs to be created. We can't spend another day sharing this board with normies! This is a robot board!
I don't know why normies or whores, are so butthurt about it. It's a win win situation
They have this board for the shitty Chad's threads... And we got our new one with our depression!
I think that is because they are only here for us. To make fun of us, to laught at us.
to mock of us.
So they can have a boost to their self esteem.

why not just call it /autism/ for neurotic control freaks such as yourself

>>26347445
ain't there a wizchan already?

>>26347966
We are all soldiers without an army, /wiz/ is where we will unite

>>26348652
rules are too strict, website is dead, and there is no sense in leaving 4chan for something that can just so easily be made into a board.

ie.
>like fitness? Just go to bodybuilding.com
>like videogames? Just go to gamefaqs
>like television/movies? Just go to letterbox

>>26348547
Don't deny it. You probably show your friends post from here and laugh at how pathetic we are when it was you guys who pushed us down this low in society. Whorish women, power hungry men, and safistic fucks like yourself ruined our lives permanently. Why don't you want us to leave. I don't owe you anything. I am not you monkey to entertain you. I am a human fucking being that failed in the game of life. Just like you, I only want to be happy. Why don't you leave us alone already.

>>26348680
You're not asking for a board, though. You're asking to be a mod who can ban anyone he doesn't like.

>>26348652
>>26348680
creator of wizchan is a crippled dwarf and is not a virgin

>>26348701
No, I'm not

Just sticky these rules to the front page of a new board

>>26348718
You're not asking for a board. You're asking for rules which involve banning anyone who triggers you. Boards are about a topic to discuss.

>>26348024
Here you go
>>26348598
I'm so lonely and empty that even attention in form of hate makes me feel happy, so do as you please

>>26348632
We could make tripfags a selected handful whose life stories are known.
Like we all know eggman, if we know he posts, the meaning of the posts changes.
Same should be for all tripfags.

>>26348697
You just went into full ragefit mode without even reading my post. You're beyond hope, unfortunately.

>I only want to be happy
Now this is complete and utter bullshit. If you wanted to be happy, you wouldn't be raging on a Mongolian cave paintings board. You'd be doing something that makes you happy. You want to be angry, you want to be miserable.

>>26348747
like /lgbt/ right?

>>26348747
The topic discussed is how shit our lifes are.
Hence, people with good lifes aren't welcome.

>>26348701
Go to mlp and tell the guys over there " dude seriously you are all fucking sicks... You are mentally ill you are not normal.. Fuck you all losers kill yourself"
and let's how almost instantly you are gonna get banned.
Same here.
That's the idea of the board. Where we can share common feels or talk about I don't know ehm.. Depression or how sad is our life.. I don't fucking know.
But if one Chad came into that place and start talking like
" kkill yourself you fucking faggots you are all delusional what a bunch of manchild Bastards start working out brah fucking pathetic fat virgins "
deserves a ban too.
There's a place for anyone. You cant go to lit and talk about TV shows.
that's the idea.

>>26348794
/lgbt/ bans straight people on sight, right? Go there right now and mention you're straight, and post a screenshot of your ban.

>>26348846
>gets BTFO
>changes goalposts

nice

>>26348795
4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board where anyone can post comments and share images. There are boards dedicated to a variety of topics, from Japanese animation and culture to videogames, music, and photography. Users do not need to register an account before participating in the community. Feel free to click on a board below that interests you and jump right in!

>>26348822
>" kkill yourself you fucking faggots you are all delusional what a bunch of manchild Bastards start working out brah fucking pathetic fat virgins "

Shitposting that could be worthy of a ban. But the rules you're trying to create here would ban someone for, say, mentioning having had a gf. See the difference?

>>26348547
Is what they deserves.
Normies and stacies make fun of us. For a lifetime. And when a glorious Lord comes into a school with a gun and kill them. It's just what every normies and stacies deserves. But it's obvious that your tiny brain can't comprehend that.

>>26348778
Your missing my point. I can never be happy. My family is gone, I have no friends, I live all alone, I owe a lot of debt from going to school to get a stem degree that I was peer pressured to get both by my parents and by the educational authority, and I suffer from severe anxiety to the point where there are days where I starve because I am to scared to go out and buy some food or order pizza. You are essentially telling me to be myself and automatically be happy when. I have gone through so much suffering that I cannon longer find happiness in reality. By communicating with other robots, I can at least have a reason to be Live at this very moment. To share frustrations and interest and laugh at our memes. For once, I don't feel alone when. I talk to robots.

>>26348876

See

>>26348794

Not every board is about an interest.

>>26348861
>gets BTFO
>changes goalposts

You're talking about yourself, right? It was pointed out to you that boards are about a topic, not about rules on who is welcome to post. You then cite an example, which is so obviously wrong you're easily disproved.

Once again, name one board on 4chan that's made for a certain group of people and everyone else is banned.

>>26348876
> Japanese animation and culture
hikikomori is part of japanese culture

we want a hikikomori board

>>26348952
so tell me then what is /lgbt/'s board topic?

>>26348972
/lgbt/ - LGBT
This board is for the respectful discussion of LGBT lifestyle and the LGBT community.

No mention about straight people not being welcome.

>>26348954
>want a hikikomori board
>gets banned from it because he's not a hikikomori

That'll be irony in its purest form.

>>26348939
You're exactly the kind of person who should get away from /r9k/ and into therapy. This board is poison for you. It will only drag you deeper into despair, as everyone tries to drag everyone else down to their level.

If you want to be happy, close the 4chan window and never look back. Start building your life again.

>>26349005
Your complaint was that boards have to have topics

and here we want the same thing

/wiz/ - Wizards
This board is for the respectful discussion of hiki lifestyle and the hiki community

>>26349097
Sure. No need for rules that ban anyone you don't like, see? No banning girls or non-virgins or people that trigger you.

>>26349074
I'm poor.mi can't afford to go to a therapist who probably won't even have experience in dealing with people like me. In fact, I went to a therapist many years ago only to be prescribed medicine that I refused to take because it made me feel more empty than I already feel.

>>26349097
What you're saying would only be remotely applicable if posting "I'm straight" at the beginning of a normal post followed by regular /lgbt/ discussion would be banned in /lgbt/.

Instead of making up rules why not just copy the rules of wizchan.

Their rules are not perfect, but are strict enough to keep normals away.

Harsh rules and discipline are the only thing that can sustain such a board

>>26349168
REEEEE STRAIGHT PEOPLE GTFO MY BOARD

Oh wait, that doesn't happen on /lgbt/.

>>26347445
Person worship should be banned, keep it on normal /r9k/. Rose threads are cancerous.

>>26349153
You certainly need something to turn your life around. /r9k/ certainly won't help, on the contrary it will only make you feel worse. You may get temporary relief but in the long run it's bad for you.

>>26349207
I've been posting there for months and I've never been banned for being straight or stating I'm straight.

>>26349152
Imagine someone posting about how much he loves fucking girls as a cis man and how degenerate gays are.

Would that be acceptable?
I guess not faggot.

>>26347445
just make your /MRA/ board and get over it. it's funny you want to call it /wiz/, guess it's more fun to think of yourselves as not a bunch of faggots.

>>26349250
what you don't get is that women are literally incapable of being robots

straights and gays operate differently. Gays don't orbit straight people like robots will orbit a "fembot"

File: 1454852658326.jpg (143KB, 750x1254px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 750x1254px

>have a gold chance to get a gf
>completely screw up everything by own will
>i-its just because we are like that...r-roasties!

>>26348795
YOU get it.
I like you. I think that limited brains of the normies can't understand that asimple thing.

>>26349152
>>26349207

fuck off.

If you want to be sucking dicks, >>>/lgbt/
Go fuck yourself.

>>26349315
Women can just say they are women and men will flock to them wanting to date them.

The picture you posted is her complaining about being a loser but not getting chad and having to date someone within her league.

congrats on a failure of an argument

File: laughing_jameson.jpg (142KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 800x533px

>3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over for but NSFW posting is allowed.

For what reason?

>>26349373
We have enough porn boards and don't want ours to turn into one. That helps it turn into /b/

>>26349305
The /lgbt/ vs /wiz/ comparison isn't my work. I just posted to prove the existence of /lgbt/ does not support the idea of /wiz/.

Bottom line is there is no way you can have a board where you can enforce rule 1 and 2. You can have a board about robots and in it you can ban extreme shitposters who purposefully avoid the subject and post the opposite but you can't ban anyone who isn't a robot.

>>26349315
retarded post that was probably b8

>>26349400
but there is a way to enforce it. If someone mentions they are a woman or mentions they have had sex, they break them rules and everyone can see it.

If you're a woman or a nonvirgin, just don't reference that you are.

>>26349316
Thanks anon, that was the first compliment in the last 3 days.

>>26349400
Also forgot to add:

When I said "You can have a board about robots" I meant that as a template subject. I don't actually think you can have a board about robots since it's not that good of a subject.

>>26349425
I didn't mean enforce technically. I meant that a board having those rules would never be hosted on 4chan.

>>26349252
Imagine someone posting perfectly on topic, respectful hiki discussion. And then he offhandedly mentions not being a virgin.

By these rules, he would be banned. It obviously doesn't make sense to anyone but the most dense idiots.

ban all pics of roasties

>>26349305
It sounds like you'd rather want your board called /womanhate/ or /gayhate/ . Perhaps that's what you should request instead, it's a more descriptive name, and for sure mods will be more willing to create it for you.

>>26347715
>>>/soc/

originolli postarolli

>>26349490
This.

You get banned from /lgbt/ if you post about how degenerate gays are.

You don't get banned if you stay on topic while stating you're straight.

>>26348002
>>brought back without the robot

newfag detcted. It was at least a year of new9k before the robot was deactivated

>>26349361
You're not very bright, are you? The point was that a robot was given a great chance to get a girl, and he didn't make even the slightest effort. In fact, he actively did things that would have repulsed anyone.

>>26349490
>guy is able to pick up a woman successfully without raping her
>somehow is still a hiki
your logic doesn't exist

>>26349490
>>26349532
If it was to be enforced that strictly I'd be against it senpai.
But I really think it's just supposed to keep people from talking about prior relationships and how they fell to shit.

Robots never had a relationship and can't relate. They can only be envious that these people have experienced one before.

>>26349570
He never mentioned the poster was a hiki what the fuck?

>>26349548
AYOOO HOLLLL UPPP

so yous be tellin me

let me get this straight

you tellin me

shiieeet

you tellin me

a socially awkward person is socially awkward?!

>>26349570
Why couldn't someone who is a hiki now have had a gf/bf some years before?

Besides, it's not a board for hikis. It's a board for the discussion of hiki lifestyle.

File: 1449466961730.png (22KB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x188px

>>26349612
>this isn't a board for gays
>it's a board for the discussion of the gay life style

>>26349601
Being a socially awkward person automatically prevents that person from taking showers, wearing clean clothes, or having a job. I see.

>>26349595
>talking about prior relationships and how they fell to shit

And how is that a bad thing? In fact quite a few robots will have stories like that.

>>26349636
You're trailing the discussion about 15 minutes. Read up.

>>26348290
So you've never seen normalfags coming here and being aggressive and shitposting and even admitting that they're just doing it be a it's fun to piss off robots?

>>26349673
I wrote why its bad directly a line below.
Finnish reading before answering please.

>>26349717
Of course it happens from time to time. This is 4chan. It happens on every board. Have you never seen robots go out of their way to attack people they perceive as "normies" and derail threads by reeeeeeing perfectly normal and respectful posters? That happens all the time too.

>>26347445
>Should person worship threads be banned (Ashley J./Rose)?
yes
>Should gay threads be redirected to /lgbt/ but mentioning you are gay be allowed?
yes
>Names for the board instead of /wiz/
/wiz/ is fine, but why make a new board instead of just implementing these rules on /r9k/?

File: 1446694020151.gif (2MB, 292x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 292x200px

Ok, enough bantz, lads. Back to business.

Robots in favor of /wiz/, please vote in the following polls in regard to the rules (person worship and gay threads)
>>>/qa/438825
>>>/qa/438825
>>>/qa/438825

reply to this post for why you support whichever you voted for.

/r9k/ should die out. It shouldn't be replaced. If it is replaced by /wiz/, then /wiz/ needs to be a hidden board.

>>26349756
And you're totally wrong. "Robot" is a vague definition to begin with, but few people would argue that having once had a gf prevents someone from being a robot.

>>26347484
>Do you think we'd give up our board so easily?
But what are you doing with fleeing to a new board?

>>26349758
That's not just sadism as when the normalfags. The robots are fighting to make the kind of place they want to have and need to try to get the normalfags away in order to make that kind of place.
That's absolutely not the same as going out of your way to inflict suffering just because it's fun.

>>26349780
I would love this so much. If we could just get this without Hiro plastering a giant "NEW BOARD" announcement I'd be happy.

>>26349820
Read again a moron.
Most robots have never had a gf, hence they can't relate and are just envious.

Obviously non-virgin tripfag camwhore appreciation threads needs to be forbidden.

>>26349820
Any definition of robot that makes it possible for gf-havers to be robots is shit.

>>26350021
This
people who think you can only be a robot if you're a basement dwelling neet are wrong though. I'm 19 and in college, but I haven't even had the chance to fuck up that bad yet, but I'm definitely still a robot.

>>26350077
translation:
I'm a special snowflake who sometimes feels down in the dumps so I'm a robot.

So we're sticking with the ban on females? Tough luck, fembots. Can't say I support it one bit, but seeing as we want to remain petulant and exclusive, I guess I can use the board even with the knowledge of injustice.

The rules are still too strict, in my view. Let's not allow any normie posting, sure, but banning people for so much as mentioning a potential relationship is nonsensical. Some robots are pursuing a normie lifestyle. Should they not be allowed here? Should they be barred as soon as they achieve a little success in their pursuit?

I think /bot/ would be a good name for the board, if it gets created.

File: 1427946378913.jpg (131KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 600x480px

the problem with /r9k/ now is that is it /soc/ lite (post ur eyes robots, dick rate threads, etc)with /lgbt/ spillover (do you like traps, why don't you like dick, if you can't get a gf then why not be the gf, and more)

the old robot 9k was so much better without all of this bullshit.

File: 1412021548994.jpg (193KB, 1312x978px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1312x978px

>>26347445
no it is a silly idea if you want to be an edge lord go to redit

>>26350114
fembots don't exist and there's no reason to post about relationships on /wiz/

just go to /soc/ and talk about it.

It's a good general rule to help curb the normie shitposting

>>26350109
>you can only be a social outcast if you are a completely retarded fuck-up
>there is no gray area, only people who have it as bad as me can be labeled robots
who's the special snowflake now?

>>26350114
And no one brings up the reason why this would never work: everyone complains about normies posting, yet no one can provide a definition of what a "normie" is. Every robot will have a different definition, which is basically "anyone who is not as pitiful a sack of shit as I am".

>>26350203
still you. You're a completely normal run of the mill person but just insist you're part of a group you really aren't to make you feel unique

>>26350219
and that's why I have very broad general rules on people who all robots can agree are simply incapable of being part of the community

>>26350244
If you'd pull your head out of your ass for a minute, you'd realize not everyone agrees with your rules. You simply want to ban everyone who triggers you. Hell, some would even say you're no true robot and should be banned from this board you're trying to create.

>>26350166
I'm not gonna fucking argue about fembots for the thousandth time, but I'm just gonna say that they do fucking exist, and your being a stubborn, bitter, juvenile fuckwit doesn't invalidate the facts. They're rare, sure, but they exist, and even if it's only an inconvenience for a small minority, it is an inconvenience nonetheless, and one which entirely without justification or reason. It's incredibly childish to exempt females from the board just to feel better.

/soc/ is for normies. If robots want to post about relationships, they shouldn't be forced to seek out a relevant board. We can redirect almost any post to another board; should we? No; this should be a place for robots to convene and discuss the struggles, which needn't be exclusively robotic, that robots face.

>>26350373
>believes in fembots
opinion invalidated

>>26350274
the supporters of /wiz/ do support the current rules

the only people raising a rucus are the normans that are against the idea of a /wiz/ board.

and shown by the polling, 75% of voters want /wiz/.

>>26350373
Just like non-virgin robots exist, and robots who have had relationships. But people like OP aren't interested in a place where they can discuss their robotness in peace, all he wants is a board where he can ban anyone who triggers him.

Of course, OP is too deluded to not realize that no board on 4chan would ever be created with rules such as 1 or 2.

>>26350244
This post:
>>26350274
Also, instead of these circuitous and ambivalent rules which dance around the heart of the intentions you have for this board, why not just work on defining normie and robot, remove all the current rules, and then employ the agreed-upon definitions to implement new, simple rules that don't seek to witch-hunt.

Better yet, have no rules at all and just ban troll posts, having established this as a board designated for robots. What's wrong with that?

>>26350414
I have expressed disapproval for the board's implementation as the plans stand, and I am most assuredly a robot. You've started your "no-true-Scotsman" mud-slinging before the board even started! Way to defy the expectations for the board.

>>26350461
I already defined the general characteristics of a robot and in doing that can reduce and simplify the rules

No women, no nonvirgins minus the exceptions, and no relationship posting

these are the golden trio of rules that will help curb normies, but you will of course insist that women can be fembots, and you will of course insist that nonvirgins can be robots, etc. etc.

As it stands now, as I already said, most people that are in support support the current rules.

>>26350522
Ok, that's just your opinion in the 25% and as opposed to the 75%.

I don't see why you don't want this board. It's a group for social outcasts and losers.

File: smug.jpg (55KB, 612x513px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 612x513px

>All of this Normie shilling to prevent the new board

A girl looked at me once, am I banned from the new robot board?

>>26350591
Also ban the fucking weaboos/avatarfags

>>26350682
avatarfagging is already banned under global rules

>>26350682
now your just being retarded and picky

>>26350727
Do you really want 15 threads at a time about "tfwnobf" and the fucking hamster?
They are part of the destruction of /r9k/. Fucking /a/ ruining all boards

>>26350552
>>26350586

>As it stands now, as I already said, most people that are in support support the current rules.

You have absolutely 0 evidence of this. This is false consensus bias at its finest.

>I don't see why you don't want this board. It's a group for social outcasts and losers.

It may be, but it's not being done right. With these restrictions in place, all the board will evolve to be is a place for robots to wallow in self-pity, misanthropy, and angst.

"watdo with this grill" posts will be replaced by "ALL FUCKING STACIES SHOULD BE BURNED AT THE STAKE" shitposting. "How can I improve my social skills" will become "i JUST WANT EVERYONE TO FUCKING DIE ALREADY". "I think I'm starting to become a normie" is overshadowed by "Let's all kill ourselves tonight, dubs choose how I do it."

You know what this board will become; don't deny it. Less restrictions, more diversity of topics=better board.

Also, as has been pointed out, there is no way this board will get created if you want to explicitly exclude females, regardless of whether it's the right thing to do or not.

>>26347445
I think one of the biggest problems of the /wiz/ concept is that non-virgins are not alowed.
I don't want a board wich is full of normies like /r9k/ but I think failed normies should be alowed

File: 1420131508457.jpg (29KB, 555x644px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 555x644px

>>26350811
>You have absolutely 0 evidence of this. This is false consensus bias at its finest.
given that I've made this whole movement and kept track of it with polling, I'd say I have evidence. There is a vocal minority and a vocal majority, but you just can't stand being in the minority.


>With these restrictions in place, all the board will evolve to be is a place for robots to wallow in self-pity, misanthropy, and angst.

what restrictions? I already said self improvement threads are allowed. There are no rules against being happy, just against women, nonvirgins, /soc/ shit, and porn. That is literally the rules right there. That's it.

You're just grasping at straws and also just creating strawmen. As if we would fall into despair with a lack of normies. Don't give yourself so much credit. Your kind is the reason that 399 people approve of creating this board.

>>26350811
>less restrictions
>better board

look at /b/

>>26350916
>I don't want a board wich is full of normies like /r9k/ but I think failed normies should be alowed
you're allowed, just don't reference you having had sex. That's all.

>>26350919
I'm a fucking robot, for the third fucking time, you immature fuckwit. You're literally acting like you're an autistic five-year-old.

"I don't approve of this, as a robot."
"Oh, okay, whatever you say, NORMIE."
"I'm a robot."
"Alright, NORMIE."

Grow the fuck up.

You gave no evidence that the majority of people were in agreement on the rules; you just fumbled with an answer and spewed some meaningless repetitive shit once more. I am in the minority often enough; I couldn't give less of a shit if I was again, and you accusing me of giving a shit is, again, immature as fuck.

I'm not creating any strawman; I think you're just trying to reference fallacies like a cringeworthy fedora fuck. Tell me which strawman I've set up and I will gladly concede my wrongdoing.

I'm not saying we would fall into despair without normies; we don't need them whatsoever. I just have the foresight to realize that this board will become incredibly toxic very quickly, as we seek to terminate not only normies but references to normie behavior.

>>26351102
>I'm not creating any strawman; I think you're just trying to reference fallacies like a cringeworthy fedora fuck.
because you keep using them
> Tell me which strawman I've set up and I will gladly concede my wrongdoing.

ok
>"watdo with this grill" posts will be replaced by "ALL FUCKING STACIES SHOULD BE BURNED AT THE STAKE" shitposting.

>"How can I improve my social skills" will become "i JUST WANT EVERYONE TO FUCKING DIE ALREADY".

>"I think I'm starting to become a normie" is overshadowed by "Let's all kill ourselves tonight, dubs choose how I do it."

k thanks

Create /wiz/ and watch /r9k/ shrivel up and die and eventually be deleted because it'll essentially become /soc/ but with more memes and attention whoring/person worship

>>26351238
How the fuck were these strawmen, you absolute fucking dolt? These are my own arguments; I didn't even attempt to frame them as yours. How the fuck can I erect my own fucking arguments as strawmen?

Please tell me this was a joke. I don't want to believe you are just this dull. I fail to see how someone so unprofessional and superlatively stupid can manage to wipe his own ass, let alone start a new board.

>>26351299

Fuck off normalfag. You have your own board

>/soc/

>>26351299
strawman -
attacking an exaggerated or caricatured version of your opponent's position.

I support the idea of creating /wiz/ or its equivalent as well banning normies, women and shitposters.

If we ever get the board, I just hope that the moderation is good enough although I don't have hope since mods themselves are shitposters (see swaglord).

>>26351384
Right, thanks for the definition. The portion of my post you greentexted was entirely my argument. I didn't frame it as yours and then attack it. I am legitimately beginning to think you are mentally deficient. Did it really take you three posts to realize what a strawman is?

>>26351490
>I argue that the current rules will provide ample environment for robots
>you exaggerate how robots would act and say this is what would happen so it's wrong

>>26351530
Still, it was my argument, not yours. This isn't a strawman. Just get over the fact that you were too stupid to correctly identify logical fallacies.

>>26350916
OP clearly wants his own board. He's not interested in creating a board for robots, he just wants a board without girls and non-virgins because they trigger him. Notice how those two are the first rules, and the ones he's completely unwilling to budge on. Even when shown girls or non-virgins can be robots, he just shouts back la la la can't hear you.

He's trying to say, oh it's a hiki board or neet board or whatever, but of course he's lying. And he actually thinks anyone would be stupid enough to fall for it. His rules 1 and 2 are the reason why the board won't ever be created.

>>26350919
>what restrictions?
Rule 1: no girls
Rule 2: no non-virgins

If you think 4chan would ever create a board with such rules, you're too stupid to even breathe.

>>26351904
>Even when shown girls or non-virgins can be robots, he just shouts back la la la can't hear you.
oh, and when was I shown that?

I'm going to break it down the best I can for fags.

The LGBT community and lifestyle is centered around sex and having multiple partners. That is to it's name the complete opposite of robot culture. You see proof enough in gay threads. All they do is flirt with each other, share pics, and sending one another emails and locations to hook up. Someone tell how that is in any way robot related? The only reason why they are bitching is because they want to be included in everything. They don't care what X stands for they just want to be apart of it because "Us fags can do it too like everyone else!" and the media constantly pushing them, making them think they are welcomed anywhere no matter the circumstance.

I hope this clears the air with this topic.

File: 1451841156100.gif (2MB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x405px

>>26351904

>Even when shown girls or non-virgins can be robots.

They can't because they are failed normies.

A wizard (or robot) knows they are one but they don't try a flaunt it.

>Chad didn't hit on me today either. I'm so sad...I'm a girl and robot just like you guys!

>I fucked a chick once it felt great and was amazing but then I became a robot. The rest of you can relate right? You've all fucked a few women right? Oh, you haven't? Not even one? HA HA HA WTF you loser....Uh, I'm still a robot like the rest of you guys right?

>>26352523
>Hey, just because I have a gf doesn't mean I'm not depressed. I'm just like you robots!

>This ugly guy tried to hit on me. It hurts being a fembot -_-

>tfw you're a robot but girls keep giving you attention

>My last ex boyfriend was so abusive to me. After that I was a fembot ever since!

422 votes for yes

excellent progress

>>26352820

1.) GF with depression.
go to /adv/ or sob about it on /soc9k/ still has the gf something real robots have never had.
2.)Ugly guy hits on you.
So terrible. Ugly when it comes to women these days is anyone 7/10 or below.
3.)robot but get attention
failed normie off to /adv/ or /soc9k/
4.)Chad #987986 hit me.
Bad but hey /adv/ is there for that. Then she can meet Chad #987987 on /soc/