Robot Exodus

>>435744
Robots being the social outcast community on /r9k/

Our lifestyle is coming more and more under attack by people who don't fit in who insist that we don't belong.

>>435741
Add a new rule. If anyone says they have had a girlfriend ever they should be banned.

It should be covered under normieposting, but people who say "lol i'm a loser with no friends but i have a gf guys" should be banned

>>435751
>Add a new rule. If anyone says they have had a girlfriend ever they should be banned.

I think the rule against normie-posting and stating you're a non-virgin will scare off most if not all of those types.

People have had girlfriends in preschool or had have girlfriends that they never had sex with and so on.

The rules can't be insanely strict otherwise we will just create wizardchan.

>>435752
A board catering towards social outcasts and the social outcast style specifically.

Just as /lgbt/ is a board that caters toward the lgbt crowd and the lgbt lifestyle specifically.

ALSO:

Current /r9k/ thread:
>>>/r9k/26274956

>>435741
Strong support.

/r9k/ has become a mess, and 4chan is already somewhat of a de-facto safe haven for male shutins (let's get real, female "shutins" are not really). So let's take it one step further and make a board about it, and all those who are upset with "frogposters" will be happy because /r9k/ can return to the "original self" that they seem to remember so fondly with all the lonelyfags gone.

File: 1443754883665.gif (711KB, 200x331px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 200x331px

>/r9k/ thread on page 3

>>435756
>People have had girlfriends in preschool or had have girlfriends that they never had sex with and so on.

Which is still more than I ever had so I DEMAND these normies are kicked out

>>435779
As long as they are still virgins it's good. If they so much as imply they aren't one, it's an offense.

>>435782
it's not the act of sex that pisses me off, it's that they are still capable of earning genuine affection from another human being.

perhaps we just have different views

>>435741
Why ask for a board when there's a whole website dedicated to wizards?
Ever heard of wizchan?

>>435741
watch normalfags get mad because they hate us so much they don't want us to have our own board. I'm down for this, robots are a massive demographic on 4chan, it seems fair we should get a board to discuss our interests.
>>435798
Why ask for a history board on 4chan, ever heard of /r/history? Why ask for a videogames board on 4chan, ever heard of neogagf? How new are you?

>>435804
There's already another chan dedicated to this specific topic. The problem you guys are having is /r9k/ is too popular. wizchan is full of and dedicated to wizards. Your board that you want already exists.
And with your logic you're right. Why have any other boards? Just delete 4chan. Other websites service the same niches. Maybe wizards and the like will actually go outside.

>>435808
>There's already another chan dedicated to this specific topic
Yeah and there's already other sights dedicated to history, videogames, art, politics, I could go on. If you were to take your argument to it's logical conclusion 4chan would only have one offtopic board and then several boards for the discussion of Japanese culture.
>just delete 4chan
You're an idiot, I'm not going to reply to any of your posts after this so don't bother.

Bump for justice.

>>435823
Create your own fucking /wiz/ already. You can do it on reddit, or 2*4ch, or even make your own website. What's stopping you? Hell, why aren't you posting on wizchan, that site is exactly what you want?

>>435798
OP is not a mod there. That's why.

>>435836
See
>>435811

I have work in 30 mins so I'll make a thread later tonight to get more robots to join up

Feel free to make /r9k/ threads about /wiz/ after the current one reaches bump limit, but remember to post the rules I posted and link the /qa/ thread and same strawpoll

>>435847
>work
>WORK

Get the fuck out and never come back, you filthy normie. /wiz/ must be for NEETs only. Anyone who implies having a job or ever had a job must be banned, that's in the rules.

>>435855
fuck off neet, you do nothing to deserve anything, simply live off the backs of the working robot. Parasite.

Get er doneeeeee

>>435741
I disagree. As someone who goes to /r9k/ it has never been a board meant to cater to losers, neets, virgins, etc. You freaks inhabited the board when /b/ got too boring.

Having a whole entire new subset of rules that are basically the opposite of what 4chan is, is completely counter intuitive to the idea of 4chan.

>1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
It's irrelevant. It's an anonymous website. Even if they say they are female it is still unknown. What you are asking is to ban people that trigger you. You can use tumblr

>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins
This almost guarantees and underage user base. There are just too many instances of introverts and even people with extreme social anxiety somehow getting laid. Eventually the board would become like wzard chan.

>3) No gay threads, but mentioning yourself to be gay is not a bannable offense
WTF WHY? What's even the point? This rule makes no sense. So you're all straight virgins who hate fags? Bullshit.

>4
again you're asking for people to be banned because they triggered you.

>5
Only rule that makes technical sense

>6
Another nonsensical rule

Advice, go to wizard chan dude. If you literally cannot handle this website then you shouldn't be on it.

>>435741
Instead of creating new board just remove gay porn, traps, fags, and women from r9k. Redirect anyone with vagina to facebook or tumblr. Just remove vag from r9k.

>>435864
Piss off fag, what difference does it make if there's another board for our demographic, it's literally no different than us going off to wizchan.

>it has never been a board meant to cater to losers, neets, virgins, etc.
it was an unwritten rule, the increasing prevalence of types that don't fit into these groups coincides with a decrease in the board quality and an increase of it's similarity to modern /b/, which is where these faggots, yourself included most likely, came from.

>Having a whole entire new subset of rules that are basically the opposite of what 4chan is,
not true, if anything they're meant to bring it back to it's roots, where your identity outside of the board didn't matter, you didn't come here to make a fucking online persona of yourself, it was a community of anons.

As a blanket rebuttal to all of yours, these rules ARE necessary because they keep the board content on topics that are actually enjoyable instead of it becoming a self-deprecating circle jerk of egomaniacs and hedonists, like /b/.

>>435901
the issue isn't just with gays, but all things of a sexual nature, there's frequent porn threads and threads where porn finds its way into anyways. The issue isn't with gays, it's with people making this a /b/ 2.0

>>435910
then just make an extra 2 rules
1.ban everyone who somehow needs to express their gender for no reason "fembot here"
2.ban any sexual stimulating thread that was posted for no other reason but to dump porn regardless whether it's straight or gay

File: 1454709104513.jpg (1MB, 2310x1781px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2310x1781px

>>435798
Because we're not all wizards, some of us just don't want to deal with the bullshit of the every day. We just want to escape on a board of like-minded bots every now and again.

/R9K/ isn't specifically set up to prohibit the trash we're stating our grievances against in this threa, and because of that, we're being flooded with normies who weren't here longer ago when that sense of the board culture was still present. We just want a place where that sliver of culture can still exist and thrive. I honestly don't understand the ranting opposition to this idea.

>>435921
in all honesty a ban on females would probably be the best move, there's no denying they just don't fit in. Of course, they can get around that by not stating their gender anyway, which would achieve the same effect but hopefully also push some other females away from lurking or posting too.

New thread is up on /r9k/

>>>/r9k/26285694

Its not too late to change your Hikkimori ways!

>>435804
That's a retarded comparison, wizchan is functionally near identical to 4chan while those other sites operate completely differently. This proposed board is simply unnecessary.

>>435855
This post right here is why OP's idea will never work. It's just going to be a bunch of shitflinging over what does and does constitute "normie" and people trying to one-up each other over how much of a loser they are and claiming anyone who is less of a loser doesn't belong.

/r9k/ is fine as is. If you're butthurt that people have lives you perceive as better than yours then you should go to a "safe space" site like tumblr. The glory and tradition of 4chan is people who despise one another being thrown into a house together. /v/ for example is filled with people calling each others' tastes shit, and I for one wouldn't have it any other way.

>>435741
UPDATED RULES:

1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins

3) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are black

4) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not NEETs

No matter how many times he is asked, OP never answers these questions:

Why not go to wizchan, a site that's exactly what you describe?
No board on 4chan has ever banned anyone for who they are, why should there be a board only open to a small minority, going contrary to everything 4chan's openness is about?

Last time OP tried a strawpoll on /r9k/, he got completely BTFO by everyone. Now he made another in the hopes the results are more what he wants.

>>436308
>>436324
we just want women to stay away...

Bump. I support this

>>435759
That's not what r9k was before you neckbeard degenerates invaded it.

>under attack by people who don't fit in who insist that we don't belong.
That is literally what you are doing and have been doing since the resurrection of r9k. Kindly fuck off to wizardchan.

>>435741
Three things.

1. I don't think Moot or Hiro would see a Strawpoll as a reason to make a new board. I know I wouldn't.

2. Why not just go to Wizardchan? It's that, but for the whole website. It wouldn't be hard to be on two different sites at once.

3. Related to the second point. It being a board on 4chan isn't going to hide your power level when you talk to people. It can't.

>>435759
Show me where the /lgbt/ rules say that straight people are not welcome and will be banned on sight.

>>436337
Why does it bother you so much that women exist? If a woman posts something on /r9k/, that shouldn't be a reason for you to go all buttspazzled.

File: 1410093078319.png (686KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 1280x720px

>>436506
>Why does it bother you so much that women exist?
welcome to r9k

File: 1443938132950.jpg (77KB, 550x512px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 550x512px

New /r9k/ thread is up

>>>/r9k/26308515

Please mook make it happen we need a refuge.

File: 1449634384156.png (136KB, 468x445px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 468x445px

japmoot pls we need shelter from the normies. pls give us a germany

File: kitty.jpg (7KB, 216x174px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 216x174px

voted

>3) No gay threads, but mentioning yourself to be gay is not a bannable offense
The tragic tale of the homosexual robot just keeps on getting sadder.

So tragic is his story that even other robots shun him away.

>tfw no bf

>>437038
homos can be as promiscuous as women. That's why.

File: 1427693618067.png (159KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1000x1000px

Ok lads, Rule 5 has been updated:

5) In addition, advice threads, relationship threads, and camwhoring/hookup/"rate me" threads should go on /adv/ - Advice and /soc/ - Cams & Meetups respectively. This includes omegle threads.

This means that if you have relationship feels or want to make relationship threads, take them to /adv/ or /soc/

>>437051
**relationship threads, posts mentioning relationships

I support this board. Please make it happen, Emperor Hiro.

Arcanine regular here.

Sounds completely great. Arcanine can revert to being the more refined, intelligent /b/ like it used to be before all you feel faggots came along.

Please make this happen.

File: 87yyg.jpg (59KB, 495x660px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 495x660px

Too vague in concept yet restrictive in posting rules. Just create 2 new boards:

/as/ -Autism and social anxiety
>Destination for talking about social difficulties

/dep/ -Depression
>Containment board for sadfucks, make depression/suicide threads banned everywhere else.

The idea is fine, but why not make your own site for it?

>>437095
That wouldn't solve the stuff OP wants to solve.
/as/ would be filled with people with active social lives

>>437086
No, it would be all the younger people currently on /r9k/ that only like to whine about their lives instead of actually discuss things.

>>437095
>/dep/ -Depression
hurr durr gf left me ;(

>>437095

>am I autistic? I was trying to hook up with this grill when...

>boo hoo so sad my BF/GF left me oh noes...

File: 1418621185939.jpg (146KB, 708x664px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 708x664px

Ok, I did rule simplification to make things less vague and more realistic in the implementation and enforcing of this board.

1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.

Exceptions:
-the use of hookers for sex
-having been raped/molested

3) Do not make porn threads or post porn for the sole intent of fawning over for but NSFW posting is allowed.

4) Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle), hookup, and "rate me" threads should go on /soc/.

Original Rules vs Reduced Rules
http://strawpoll.me/6750086

>>437131
****Forgot to add on #4 regarding relationships

>4) Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle),hookup, "rate me" threads, and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/.

>>437131
Rule 4 includes the shitty sexual anime posting faggots making circlejerk threads, right?

>>437137
I'm not sure what you mean. Can you give an example?

>>437142
https://desustorage.org/r9k/thread/25681648/#25681648
This is an extreme example, but any of this kind of trash. The whole cropped doujin "lewd" crew.

>>437146
it doesn't have to be completely naked to be porn, but the picture seems to be used as a reaction image instead of something for fapping.

If it's semi-nude (or maybe not even nude at all ie. bikinis, etc.) and intended to be fawned over, it's still porn.

>>437154
But the problem is the cancerous posters that just dawn over each other's dicks.

>>437157
how do you suggest we remedy that problem

>>437163
The original rule 3 in the OP would cover it. It would be a catch all for the cock obsessed, obnoxious cunts.

>>437165
We would need a reworded rule and be specific in that case.

When people see 'no gay threads' they might think gay robots can't talk about being a robot and it relating to being gay and not think of the example you brought up.

How would you word it?

The idea is fine. But why not make your own site for it?

>>437166
Maybe a little add-on to rule 4, stating "no flirting with other users". Flirting in general would only make some people feel insecure and piss other ones off, after all, even if it's not the absurdly degenerate kind. The board is for the social outcasts, after all, meaning those who don't have the skills, confidence, or both to act that way with other people.

>>437186
Well keep in mind that this board is meant to be a random board for the robot community, so there's going to be some shitposting as you can't reduce all of it.

And with 'flirting with other users', it can get kind of vague.

I think the best thing we can do is keep the reduced rules, have the board created, and see what happens and maybe add a no gay threads or some variation like that later on only after it's proven to be a problem with the other rules as they are.

>>437131
can you add a rule where people cant keep posting shit like rose threads tfw no belly gf threads or high test threads

>>437131
Much better

>>437195
It's a random board so Rose/Ashley threads can exist but belly gf threads and high test threads won't pass under rule #3.

>>437199
you should reword rule 3

>>437203
how so

>OP actually thinks this will happen

How retarded does one have to be?

>>437199
That's fucking ridiculous. If you don't ban Rose threads what's the point of the whole board?

>>437204
the rule should be split into global rule #3 and a no threads with the purpose of fawning over someone or something

File: 1448581465815.gif (1MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x200px

>>435741
This is a great, let's make it happen!

>>437146
Wow these people are absolutely fucking shameful, there definitely needs to be a rule against that, especially since it wouldn't pertain at all to a /wiz/

There should be a "no forming consistent pointless identities through tripcode usage" rule. Fuck, that should be a global

>>437212
I'm going to have to disagree with that because at that point it becomes oddly specific and there's more and more room for bad rule enforcement.

My primary goal on the rules are to reduce normie-posting against robots.

If a board of social rejects want to make a thread on some person they like, they can do it since it's a random board.

File: 1446666215184.jpg (251KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1024x1024px

>>437205

Why so buttblasted over this? Even if the board is added it wont even effect you in the slightest.

>"S-STOPP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE"

This is a real problem with millennials

>>437221
they would be able to shit up /b/ or /r9k/ with those threads

>>437225
I'll keep it in mind but I won't make a change just yet. I'll suggest it later when /r9k/ is more active so we can get more voices on it

>>437222
>"S-STOPP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE"

That's exactly what OP is crying about. He wants his own board because he's buttblasted about people he doesn't like posting.

This is a real problem with millenials.

File: 1446666462428.jpg (122KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 360x360px

>>437230
That is true, and im not for or against the board. But IMO the added board couldn't do any harm and if reaction is not positive it can be removed.

File: 1446665845908.jpg (18KB, 280x280px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 280x280px

>>437234
Hence getting asspained about it is dumb. and brings me back to.

>"S-STOPP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE"

It doesn't affect you directly if you are not going to participate.

>>437234
The problem with such a board is that it would send a signal that 4chan is no longer open and inclusive to everyone. Then you'd suddenly have girls-only boards, gay-only boards, black-only boards, and so on.

But, this won't ever happen obviously. OP won't get his own exclusive board despite thinking he's a special snowflake.

File: WhiteArmyOfficers.png (774KB, 826x379px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 826x379px

God Save /wiz/!

File: 1446666424558.jpg (11KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x300px

>>437240
I thought about that and you gotta admit that the community drives lots of people away already creating that "inclusive to everyone" environment. I think the board idea is sound but some rules are impossible to police and non-realistic.

>>437249
Destroying* not creating.


haha marijuana

>>437240
when has 4chan ever been inclusive to anyone? furries, animeshitters, girls have all been shit on constantly for years
>you'd suddenly have girls-only boards, gay-only boards, black-only boards
there is nothing wrong with this and there is zero reason to be against it

vote /wiz/

File: 1389568198282.jpg (319KB, 960x1243px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 960x1243px

Remove rules 3 and 6 and apply these rules to every board.

>>437281
Fuck off anime degenerate shit stain faggot

File: -03.jpg (23KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x388px

Mentioning you are a female should be a bannable offense, and same goes with cam-whoring and rate-me threads / post your face.

>>437131
>>Exceptions:
>-the use of hookers for sex
>-having been raped/molested


Fuck off, it's /wiz/ you dumb faggot. There SHOULD BE NO meet me / hook-up threads, and absolutely u7der no circumstances tell people you sex.

Op's a faggot and not even a robot.

FRIENDLY REMINDER
FRIENDLY REMINDER

In case you haven't already seen them, this is the new set of rules which have been reduced from the original rules. Please vote.

>>437131
>>437136

>>437303
>Exceptions:
-the use of hookers for sex
-having been raped/molested


Voting no, because you're a dumb faggot who is only opening the gate to potential attention-whores.

>>435741
>incels
>robots

You're a pack of failed normies.

>>437311
The board's appeal is designed to be more broad than wizardchan but not so broad as to include normies.

this is the absolute stupidest idea i've ever heard

>>437314
just change the rules of /r9k/

I think these rules are a little too strict, I don't think the mods would agree to it and it resembles tumblr-tier "don't trigger me" nonsense that is not in the spirit of 4chan

being blunt wouldn't work either, calling the board "board for mentally ill loser NEETs" wouldn't work, it would just invite shitposting and trolling instead of the real discussion about feels and problems that /r9k/ used to have in abundance

I don't know what the answer is, "outcasts" is an idea but leans too heavily towards inviting shitposting, "support" leans too much towards tumblr, "wizards" leans too much towards shitposting

"robots" might work, it implies we are NEET losers and male, but doesn't expressly state it, so there is less whining about it and more discussion

>>437051
we can't talk about relationships? that would be confusing

>>437131
rule 1 is too direct and would just invite shitposting, the goal should be to convey that the board is free from the "btw im a grill" meme without encouraging anyone to talk about it, to make it a given, if anyone starts complaining about it people can say "what did you expect" and leave it at that instead of "879 replies and 125 images omitted" every time a girl speaks

>>437199
Fuck that, man. Rose shit and general person worship is cancer.

OP wants a board dedicated to school shootings? Heh, some of you guys are

(USER HAS BEEN V&'D FOR THIS POST)

>>435751
I'd support this rule because it would mean I'd never have to see your fucking disgusting normie ass posting ever again.

>>436212

underrated post

>>437283
That's a video game.

The idea is fine. But why not make your own site for it?

>>437367
because I like the robot community on 4chan, I know how to use 4chan, and like 4chan as a website.

You could easily go to bodybuilding.com instead of /fit/ or letterbox instead of /tv/ and so on and so on.

>>437303
I think the rules are good, but Id rather see them apllying to /r9k/ than to a completley new board.
It would make /r9k/ obsolute and could lead to the smae path as wizardchan.

>>437131
sounds great, why don't they just implement those rules on /r9k/, they would work great with board culture, normalfags would get BTFO, no need for new board.

>>437369
This, make hiroshima nagasaki senpai apply new rules on r9k instead of creating new board and dividing userbase on r9k. We just need to get rid of women and homosexuals, that's all.

>>437370
Hiroshima obviously wants to restore /r9k/ as an OC board

>>437372
We need to get rid of /r9k/.

>>437368
so we should strive to ban some kind of threads like you mentioned(attention whoring, etc...)
and also some normie comments
>"Me and my highschool crush are happily together for 3 years. Why are you such an social outcast? You are just a bitteer nice guy,..."

>>435751
You should be banned the minute it's created.

>>437373
and it should be, but these "Why dont you suck some delicious fem dick"-threads are just cancer and everything else than original

>>437375
new rules are here

>>437131
>>437136

no restriction on normie-posting like before, but there is restrictions on relationship posting, camwhoring, etc. like before

My idea right now is that when /wiz/ is made, we can have a rough skeleton of rules and if specific problems crop up, we alter the rules.

File: 1421701465137.jpg (544KB, 1269x1226px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1269x1226px

>>435751
but what abot stories like pic related, they are obviously robot related

>>437380
there is always /soc/ and /adv/

Posts can always be linked from other boards to /r9k/

The problem with allowing relationship posting is that it opens up to the floodgates to normies. It's just a broad safeguard.

>>437382
sure but most of us dont like the /soc/ and /adv/ community, I think that totally banning past relationship storeis would exclude a lot of true robots.

Just leave the fuck-up stories and ban the boasting-attention whoring posts

>>437384
>I think that totally banning past relationship storeis would exclude a lot of true robots.
a majority of robots don't have past relationship stories.

>>437384
He's right>>437385

Past relationships are not the trait of a robot.

>>437382
so robots can't talk about failed dates? or even worse a robot who has been struggling to make it finally does and can't talk about their success story?

there has to be a better way of solving the normy problem

File: 12315454844.jpg (114KB, 730x520px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 730x520px

>>437385

>b2 me 2012
>spend all my money on a prostitue because I want to just feel the touch and the warmth of a woman, even if its fake
> not even have sex with her, just lay in bed for houres beside
>no money anymore, try to flee the country
>come back after two days sleeping outside in the over fucking storm of the century
>try to kill myself, too weak
>go to /wiz/ to post about my past relazioonship, get banned

/just/

You guys should come up with a set of rules that moderators who aren't robots would actually enforce.

Hint: "no girls" is not one of them.

File: 1273383168855.jpg (27KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 640x480px

>>437389
Actually, that's one of the exceptions under the non-virgin rule

You can mention sex with hookers or sex via having been molested/raped

>>437390
Robot moderators is the answer.

>>437391
but what if it havent been a prostitute, but just some random gold digging Stacey and I paid here via Michal Kors handback, expensive dates und such.

the heart of the story is the same, a failed past relationship.

or what if you had a kind of sweetheart, you are totally inn love and then she cheats on you with chad and dumps you before all your friends.

thats pretty robotic if you ask me.

here have some self made pepe to persuade you

>>437394
iam in favor of this

>>437395
that's going to be very very rare. The majority of robots don't exhibit experiences with gold digging Stacies where they have sex with them.

I think it's better off we just use that rule to fend off normalfags because I can promise you that there will be more normalfags posting about their gfs than people in your example posting about that.

>>437394
You are highly unlikely to get one.

>>437397
than we as community should we spot these kind of posts, call our robot moderator to ban them individually

File: 1414736670707.gif (1MB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x188px

>>437400
>moderators being that good

it'll be harder to do that way.

>>437402
We should have at least to janitors to moder8(?)

>>435741
even if there are som unclearities, I would like to thank OP for staying true to our home
and i hope we can together can meke /r9k/ great again or a great new board

thread-theme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4pTejRBxSc

>>437406
/pol/ would be a better place for something like the image you posted. because that is also a good den of woman hate, plus they'd be more open to people referencing relationships and sex.

Also i suggest cummunity moderation.
>i don't trust a janitor or mod from reddit to make a good robot stick

>>437131
Sounds pretty nice. It would keep the board the way it was intended to be.

File: 1322917897650.jpg (57KB, 514x564px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 514x564px

>>435741
How about you kill yourself already instead?
Your kind has been one of the biggest cancers for years here so you finaly offing yourself would be a great help.

>>435741
What is even the point of such a board?
/r9k/ is already a containment board, so why split it up more?

>>437430
>/r9k/ is already a containment board
>roastie and beta orbiter threads
>stacy and chad threads
>failed normie threads
>/soc/ threads
>/pol/ threads
we just want a board where those kind of threads get deleted

File: 1454724419215.jpg (12KB, 411x283px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 411x283px

>>437432
/pol/ threads are fine though because /pol/ is very often right.

>>437417
Also we shouldn't make the board about being neet because then lazy attractive people would just inhabit it

>>437432
You want a restricted /b/.
You already have that, either accept what you got or it may get taken away from you too.

>>437432
>we just want a board where those kind of threads get deleted

>What is wizchan?

Frankly if it is too boring over there then there is only one group to blame.

>>437439
also make it hidden

>>437446
No then it would be dead.

>>437429
With this board we wouldn't see each other.

>>437395
>or what if you had a kind of sweetheart, you are totally inn love and then she cheats on you with chad and dumps you before all your friends.
How could that relationship even have started without the guy being normal and socially skilled.

>>437430
The problem is that OP is butthurt he can't ban people he likes. The irony is that many robots would actually consider him a normie and he'd be one of the first to be banned from the board.

>>437442
Funny how OP wants a board that's exactly like wizchan except with his own versions of rules. And somehow he expects it to not be shit and have higher traffic than wizchan.

why shouldn't women post?
do we give you the heebie jeebies or something?
at least when girls get in there you get the motivation to work harder and maybe even find yourself someone you like, this is just plain misogyny and it's uncalled for.
it's just a stupid idea all over, what is it even about? what are the main subjects?
how to be a virgin 101?
how to not live a happy fulfilling life without feeling guilty about it?
how to win in the pathatic olympics and win other's sympathy and pity?
how to die alone and be forgotten until your corpse starts to smell bad enough for others to notice?
this is just ugly and i have no idea why anyone would waste their time with that, just go to /b/ where you belong and stay there it was made so undesirables such as yourself don't spread around the boards and ruin it with your toxic views and stupidity.
and now what you want to make multiple boards? HAH as if that will ever happen.
moot himself deleted /r9k/ from the disgusting molding fog it formed in this site, it's the worst thing to ever happen and now you want us toaccept you t o make even more boards related to that parasitic infestation?

only an idiot would listen to this bullcrap and not pat an eye over how as stupid as pedicures it is, not only are you going to increase the costs of maintaining 4chan up and running but you'll draw even more shitposting '''''redpilled''''' manchildren all over the place.

please think before you talk or you will regret it sometime in the future, you can hide behind your screen all you want but in real life things like this don't slip by easily.

hopefully your wife will help you in over coming your troubles and aid you in your theraby/recovery... Oops sorry i forgot you're just another loser manchild who plays with his legos while pooping his diapers, no wonders you never get what you want unless mommy agrees to.

File: tantrum-o.gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x180px

T. WAHHH I WANT MY OWN SEKRIT CLUBHOUSE INSTEAD OF GOING TO WIZARDCHAN!!! WIZARDCHAN DIDNT ACCEPT ME AND I AM A SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE!!!
Nah, you should just fuck off.

>>437374
go back to facebook woman.

I would also like a board where the growing NEET and social outcast class is welcome.

C'mon mods and site creators, it's just another board, is it so much to ask?

How much "misogyny" is posted on this website? Imagine if it was all contained in a single board. Look at /his/, nobody makes history threads on the other boards now that there is a dedicated history board.

>>437591
There is a site already for that, it's called wizchan.

>>437594
What does that have to do with the need for a board for NEETs on 4chan? Are you really advertising and suggesting that 4chan users should migrate to wizchan?

>>437599
>need for a board for NEETs on 4chan
>need

There's as much a need for that as a board for furries or pedophiles or Nickelback fans. A board that's an exclusive club to a few special snowflakes is against everything 4chan is about.

>>437601
There's actually a huge need for furries and pedos, why there hasn't been a board created for either of them is bizarre. My little pony got their own board but not furries? Makes no sense. There's even more need for a board for social outcasts, recluses and various other male rejects, this need will continue to grow because there is a growing amount of NEET virgin males who have no place in modern society.
>A board that's an exclusive club to a few special snowflakes is against everything 4chan is about.
The very fact there are boards divided based on different topics and interests shows that 4chan is based on splitting people up into communities.

>>437605
>splitting
Give us one example of someone being allowed to post on one board but not another, purely based on who he/she/it is. The fact is that anyone can post on any 4chan board, that's the very basis of 4chan.

File: smugwojak4v2.png (32KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x400px

>>435741
This [spoiler]is a great idea except I don't want it to replace /r9k/. I'd like the two boards to co-exist[/spoiler].

I think it sounds like a good idea if you remove the replacing /r9k/ part. The Robot9000 is a very unique feature that deserves to have it's own board.

>WAAAAAH WE WANT OUR OWN BOARD

It's never been done in the history of 4chan. No group of people has ever been given their own board, least of all such an unlikable one. Besides, you can't even define what a "robot" is. By some people's standards OP is a normie and should be banned. The definition of a robot is a race to the bottom, on who is the biggest loser of them all, and everyone else is a normie.

>>435741
Why not making new board called /gaylordtumblrNSFWlgbtSJW/ and move all women, fags, and normalfags there?
r9k for robots, pits of hell for women.

>>437729
Robots are male versions of tumblrinas, so they would go on that board too.

>>437803
>Robots are male versions of tumblrinas
this

File: thumbs up dog.jpg (55KB, 792x589px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 792x589px

>>437540
I like you

>>437540
>why shouldn't women post?
women can post but alluding to the fact that they are women is just a vain attempt at attention and since /r9k/ has been taken over by failed normies, any thread where a poster claims they are a female derails the entire thread
this happens every single time

>>437540
>why shouldn't women post
they can, but they can't attentionwhore and disclose it
as it stands, women post on r9k for one reason, to get the attention of and exploit virgin robots for their own purposes
they feel no draw to board culture, no connection to the people, no empathy for them
all they see is a board of unused tools they can try to get to do whatever it is they want if they only disclose their gender
/wiz/ wouldn't allow this, wouldn't allow them to try to get some kind of power over the other posters and exploit them

honestly though
>>/r9k/26338143
perfectly demonstrates why we need a different board with stricter rules about it
women and normal people come to r9k to kick the cage of people who have had shit lives and try to deal with it their own way
they don't think of them as people, just entertainment for the night
they come in, drive some robot to suicidal thoughts, and then leave and laugh about it and post on r/4chan about how cool they are and how funny the robots are

>>437509
>>437442
>>437430
>>437594
>>437678
>why don't the tranny fags just go to tumblr instead of getting lgbt?
>why don't the lifting fags just go to bodybuilder forums instead of getting fit?
>why don't cooking fags go to pintrest instead of getting ck?

this argument is bad, there are a lot of communities of 4chan that could have been told to fuck off to x website instead, but they got their own board
/wiz/ would be no different, slightly different rules than 4chan, but the same as wizchan

>>438274
>kick the cage of people
Just make "do not antagonize the losers" a rule and everybody wins

>>437540
well r9k literally killed few people already, just leave them be, don't rustle their jimmies idiot woman

>>438274
>women and normal people come to r9k to kick the cage of people who have had shit lives and try to deal with it their own way
>they come in, drive some robot to suicidal thoughts, and then leave and laugh about it and post on r/4chan about how cool they are and how funny the robots are
And then the whole world blame loners for shootings

>>438281
And none of those boards were made for a particular group of people and banning everyone else. They made were to discuss topics, not segregate people. Why is that so hard to understand?

>>438274
How is it the fault of anyone but robots themselves if just the mention of being a girl or non-virgin causes them to go apeshit? Don't you realize that you are the ones enabling attention whores?

I had to give up on /r9k/. Just look at the threads up on there. All trash.
I couldn't really blame the mods if they want to appease their userbase.
Mods can't turn the tide or go back in time. If the board is overwhelmed with simpering dickheads and more sensible people like me left years ago, who exactly is the moderation for? Not me, that's for sure.

>>438264
>post alluding someone is female derails thread
>it's the fault of the female and not the desperate autistic virgins who pounce on it

Feel- and frogposters should be purged, not rewarded for their retardation. The entire point of anonymous communication is that people shouldn't care whether you got something to fuck or not.

>>438346
read my post again, carefully
I literally said women can post and it's the fault of the failed normies that the thread is derailed

>>435928
>R9K
Stopped reading

>>435798
Because OP wants to be in control of the board in some way. This is a fucking retarded idea, because 4chan couldn't field enough staff who would moderate it and take it seriously. Look at any other board and tell me if rules are extremely enforced and everything runs smoothly. Nope. The regular r9k is as good as its going to get for people like OP.

New /r9k/ thread is up
>>>/r9k/26347445

>>438751
Keep it up, this is entertaining. This is the largest amount of butthurt concentrate I have seen in a while now.

File: tumblr_lx7ntrusAA1qzug70o1_500.gif (57KB, 318x634px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 318x634px

>>435741
Totally wizzed out.

Support.
There's currently too much friction on /r9k/ between people who think it's their outcast safe space (reeee) and those who want to use it as the place on this site for general better-ish quality OC discussion.

Both things are valid.

File: 1444170246411.jpg (20KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 250x250px

Should person worship threads be banned?

Vote Now!
http://strawpoll.me/6764875

Should OP be banned? Vote now!

>>438774
>doesn't provide a strawpoll

Now we'll never know

>>435741
Please make this happen. /r9k/ is so infested with normies now. REEEEEE

>>435741
I have another rule.
Anyone who posts on /r9k/ or /wiz/ for more than 2 days consecutive or makes more than 10 posts on either boards or both boards is ip banned from posting an other boards except /tv/ /pol/ and /v/.
if countainement board must be it must be done right

>>435741

So basically /r9k/ without shitposting? You ask too much anon. Even if the mods abided by the new rules to punish people for normie posting they'd stil do it to mock you.

Shitposting, no matter how much we wish it would go away, will not leave.

>>438781
Someone who posts on /wiz/ should instantly be banned from all other boards. After all, it's the board of outcasts.

>>436337
hahahahsa what
do you really believe that women would want to be near you?
hahahahhah

>>435741
As someone who posts on /r9k/ from time to time but isn't a robot, this isn't a bad idea. I'd make a couple changes though.

1. Don't replace /r9k/ with /wiz/. Give it a chance to stand on its own first. If it's failing then get rid of it.

2. treat /wiz/ like /mlp/. Robots get their own board, but they're banned from shitting up the rest of 4chan with robot stuff.

>>438792
it's easier for women to attention whore in a board like this.

Women ruin /r9k/ threads with their gender

ie.
>thread about women not being able to be fembots
>women says they can and no man wants her
>men ask her out
>makes excuses as to why they're wrong and she can still be lonely
>says she's a berniefag and super liberal
>some guys tell her she's stupid and she uses that as an example of how women can be fembots
>men still are asking her out
>thread ends up with her comparing qualities of her suitors to be her bf
>404s before she chooses one.

>>438788
this.
Mods make /wiz/ and keep wizards contained only on that board.
it will improove the rest of the site tremendously

>>438796
hahahahaha you are a parody of a human being

File: Fembot_dates_a_robot.jpg (157KB, 750x1254px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 750x1254px

>>438796

>>435741
you might as well just call the board MRA, kek

File: 200_s.gif (55KB, 357x200px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 357x200px

>>437540
>why shouldn't women post?
That's like saying
>Why shouldn't women be allowed into this gentlemen's club
>why shouldn't women be allowed in this male barber shop?

It's not they aren't allowed, it just needs to be stated it isn't meant for them. Women by in large can't sympathize with a whole array of male issues.

>>438804
>woman forced to date within her league and not get chad
>gets mad about it and blames others

nice meme

>>438346
the purpose of the board isn't to be an ego-stroking session, that's we're trying to eliminate as many references to ones identity as possible, the fact you can't grasp that is indicative of your raging egocentrism, you're the kind of person we DONT want on the board.

>>438811
Way to miss the point.

>fembot asks robot on a date
>tries to genuinely be interested in him
>robot is a smelly, boring loser
>he doesn't try even the slightest to get her interest

And you wonder why you've never kissed a girl. It was her duty to like that guy, right?

>>438814
>guy who is socially awkward is socially awkward
>girl who isn't socially awkward is angry at him for it
>girl still proclaims she's socially awkward

more at 11

>>438814
>this one greentext is representative of all robots

I haven't any words to describe your autism.

File: 1451885552134.png (1MB, 1503x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1503x1600px

Ok, let's do some polling on the rules. Robots in support of /wiz/ only please.

>Should person worship threads be banned
http://strawpoll.me/6764875
>(new poll) should gay threads be banned but mentioning you are gay be allowed?
http://strawpoll.me/6765718

also discuss why or why not in reply to this post.

>>438825
support on you op! we need a board for us!
normie scum GET OUT!

>>438825

>raidpoll

Seriously? Are you people retarded? Why do dumbfucks on this board keep using this?

I'm kinda torn on this.

On one hand the proposed rules are absolute bullshit and the board would be a horrible one. So I'm against it.

On the other hand getting the easily triggered, thread derailing, spamming, crybaby autistic manchildren out of the current /r9k/ would improve the board quality significantly. Like any other containment board (like moot did with /mlp/). So I'm for it.

I don't know.

>>435751
If you've literally ever had a woman smile at you in a kind and caring way you are a normie.

Agreed. Normalscum ruined and dragged down the quality of /r9k/ and turned it into a /soc/ /attentionwhore/ /bait/ /facebook-reddit/ /maymay/ central.

GIVE US /WIZ/ and make it so that mentioning that you're a female is a bannable offense.

>>437803
>>437806

Nice false equivalency.

>>437540

Because women shit up every thread because they cannot resist the urge to attentionwhore/post.

>>438860
>false

>>437540
I was gonna shitpost n bait but this here is some rank S baiting. I concede anon. You are truly king.

>>438814
Holy shit please kill yourself you roastie piece of scum.

>>438788
this except for /b/, /trash/ and /qa/ tbdesu

>>435741
there pretty much already is this, lainchan just added a /feels/ board

>>435741
>Specifically we want a board designed to cater to social outcasts.

You have an entire fucking website full of boards that cater to social outcasts. It's called 4chan you entitled little faggot.

File: 1417890501182.jpg (15KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 225x225px

new /r9k/ thread is up complete with the current rules and three strawpolls

>>>/r9k/26355715

File: 1401422575662.jpg (82KB, 623x527px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 623x527px

I don't get why there is so much opposition to this. I browse /r9k/ (not as frequently as I used to), and there is definitely more of >>435823 than I remember from before.

It feels like eternal september in a sense; the original culture of the board is being destroyed by people who are solely interested in justifying their insecurity by poking fun at the less fortunate, and it is just not a good experience to browse anymore.

Wizchan is not a good substitute, for the obvious reasons pointed out dozens of times in this thread alone.

I'm not really the target demographic of /wiz/, but it definitely is a good idea. I mean, if you can somehow rationalize having /pol/, /int/, /his/, and /news/ as four separate boards when one would suffice, giving the downtrodden robots a board for themselves after they have been talking about it for 3 years at least doesn't seem bad at all.

File: death_korps_of_krieg_sniper_by_dollbutcher-d31k0yc.jpg (120KB, 774x1032px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 774x1032px

Reporting in support of /wiz/

>>439035
You are definitely right. I've been on /r9k/ ever since Moot brought it back. It's changed greatly.

The biggest problem is that the culture has been eroded so badly that it's now just normie central.
Keep /r9k/ as the "OC random board" it was originally meant to be, and let the robots who built their own culture for so long have their own board.

We don't fit in over on the other chan, and we do not want to. 4chan is great, and making this board would give a large amount of posters a new and truly adequate home.

>>439041
I really think the naysayers just haven't really thought this through.

There are literally no downsides of this. The people who poke fun at robots don't have to deal with the robots anymore, because they are on their own board, and the robots don't have to deal with the others either, for the same reason.

The whole "adding this board is stupid and will destroy 4chan!!!" argument was repeated the exact same way back when /mlp/ was added. Look now, everyone is happy, because pony stuff that many people didn't like has been restricted to that board, and everyone is happy as a result.

A /wiz/ board would have a similar positive outcome.

>>439044
I agree completely.
I'll be honest, /r9k/ has gotten so bad that even I have stopped maining it recently.
It's just slower moving /b/ at this point. You get one feels general a day if you're lucky, and that's just about the only remnant of the robot culture that was prevalent even just 6 months ago.
I think the biggest blow came when Mercer shot up the Oregon school. /r9k/ got national attention and it hasn't been the same since.
The people who poke fun at robots would have to find somewhere else to go. Without robots on /r9k/ and with the rules of /hiki/, they'd have to find somewhere else to go, or start making genuine quality posts.
/hiki/ poses no threat to 4chan whatsoever. /mlp/ has stricter regulations than those we're looking to guide /hiki/ by.

I really see no negatives to this, everyone would be happier this way and we could have our own proper home, as opposed to be remnants on slow /b/.

File: 1427696567290.png (451KB, 1986x1655px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1986x1655px

Poll for the new name of the board is up.

Vote now:

http://strawpoll.me/6767987

I have a suggested change on rule #3 on the updated rules here: >>437131

new rule:
3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over <unless it is related to a discussion> but NSFW posting is allowed.

the addition was put in < >

>>435741
I Agree with everything until
1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

Fuck that, Some Women are social outcast's.

If you don't allow women, there would need to be a board for non-normie women. Segregation is a bad thing.

>>439084
This exact point has already been addressed many times in this thread.

Short answer: it seems like a good idea, but it just won't work.

There are other avenues for female social outcasts, but that is not the intent of this board.

>>439084
women past puberty can't be social outcasts

[spoiler]THIS NEEDS TO BE A [spoiler]HIDDEN[/spoiler] BOARD[/spoiler]

>>439085
What's wrong with having women on the board? I don't feel like reading through all the replys ITT, So give me the gist of it.

A Large problem for me is that it's sexist, It would be like making a /pol/ for people from a certain region.

>>439087
Yes, they can. Are you retarded?

>>439091
No they can't. As a woman, there will always be men willing to date you.

File: 1418264815531.jpg (9KB, 243x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 243x250px

>>439082
I retract this suggestion

the current rules will remain the same until further notice and are posted here:

>>437131
>>437136

>>439089
>>439091

I'm not trying to call you out on this, but it is very obvious that you are not the group that this board is intended for.

If that is the case, why bother getting your panties in a bunch trying to make rules about it? If you don't like ponies, would you bother /mlp/ with your wacky ideas for new rules? If you have no interest in sports, would you bother /sp/ about your wacky ideas for new rules?

It just makes no sense to argue about a boards rules that you won't be using anyways.

In all honesty, the people pushing for this board are the ones who have browsed /r9k/ for a very long time, and understand fully what caused /r9k/ to go to shit, and you don't.

File: mouknow.gif (359KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 500x250px

>>439092
Yeah, there will always be men willing to date women, but the women might not be interested in men. Ever think about that?

>>439097
>but the women might not be interested in men. Ever think about that?
yes, and that means the woman is making the choice of being an outcast

men have to earn the right to a relationship while women just have to say yes.

hence why beta orbiting females is a thing and not for males

>>439097
Do you really think a robot can think of anyone but himself? Why do you think they're such fucking losers that will never get their autistic little board?

>>439098
>choosing to be an outcast
>implying you """"""choose""""" to have a variety of disorders.

Furthermore, What if that person in particular is grotesque Beyond recognition?

>>439103
Lizzie Velasquez, dubbed the 'world's ugliest woman' has a boyfriend.

Men love to save the damsel in distress.

also please redirect this to the /r9k/ thread
>>>/r9k/26355715

>>439104
I'm not "redirecting" to the r9k thread. Having 2 Generals to shill your dream board is sad tbqh famila.

Anyway, You forget to answer my concerns about the women who have a variety of disorders.

>>439109
>having two generals is bad
/qa/ helps us show the admin
/r9k/ helps us raise awareness

go to the /r9k/ thread please.

>Anyway, You forget to answer my concerns about the women who have a variety of disorders.
men will still date them. That's it. what disorder do you have, missy?

>>435907
Nothing is enjoyable on /r9k/. You're all fucking insufferable hateful assholes.

>>439116
Yet normies like you keep coming there, and many of you have admitted that you do it to feel better about yourselves.

>>439112
>girls can't be robots
>nonvirgins can't be robots

As long as you base your entire whine crusade on these, your board will never happen. Never. How stupid do you have to be to not realize that?

>>439179
well that is how it works

not everyone is a robot. You may think that being a robot means you just feel down in the dumps sometimes despite having a gf, plenty of friends, and a great life ahead of you, but that's not how it works.

>>439180
4chan has never had a board that restricts posters based on who they are. Why should an exception be made now? And such a dumb one at that?

File: 1417844970315.png (13KB, 528x424px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 528x424px

>>439193
you're talking about it as though it were some sort of rule that they can't do that and that doing so would violate some form of law

who cares until the admin address us. Only then is the matter really decided.

>>439194
You obviously are a newfag who doesn't understand what 4chan is about. You're on the wrong site. Why not go to 2*4 for this, it's exactly designed for this?

>>435741
Posting and discussing dogs or cats in positive light or as pets should be classified as normie posting and thus banned.

>>439196
Mentioning you have a penis should be a bannable offense. After all, a true robot has no use for it and would have castrated himself.

>>439199
Why did you reply to me?

>>439201
It was a logical continuation of your post, no?

>>439215
No.

>>439222
Ah, well, who cares. We're posting on a completely shit thread anyway.

>>439245
Yes.

>>435741
I told Hiro to not create your board.
I'm a girl btw :3

>>439253
It's not like he or anyone else would even consider it. Certainly not with the moronic "rules" OP wants.

>>439253
but youre not

This board is never going to happen because a section promoting misogyny will simply be too damaging for 4chan and may even possibly invoke lawsuits, but also, you're a fucking retarded faggot who doesn't understand that there is already a seperate chan for this bullshit of yours.

Piss off.

File: retard_alert.gif (480KB, 493x342px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 493x342px

>>439432
>invoking lawsuits

>>439447
Gamergate.

>>439452
Hiro isn't Moot. I'm pretty sure he didn't like the controversy gamergate and fappening brought but it wasn't as if 4chan as about to be sued into oblivion.
Besides a board promoting misogyny is a farcry from specific doxes and personal attacks during gamergate.

>>439458
Those doxes and personal attacks were owned by the content posters.

If 4chan is to establish a board specifically for misogyny, as /wiz/ would no doubt be, then 4chan will be liable for its existence, meaning views of misogyny can be tied to Hirohito and the website.

That's how you invoke lawsuits.

>>439460
What would the lawsuits be for?
It's perfectly legitimate to have a website promoting misogyny.
You realize there's a number of popular enough websites basically dedicated to misogyny and related things?

>>439465
A very clear example of discrimination, and I should not have to explain to you that discrimination is illegal in the US. The combination of "no women allowed' and a single glance at the board to see countless of women hate threads would be reason enough for 4chan to get into shit.

>Litteral wallow in self pity board.

Jesus fuck just get a Psychiatrist already. There are many who are free if you can't afford it.

>>439475
I forget Doj where are you from again? Was it Holland?
Seriously you are way off the mark.
>Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
This would not be illegal in the US.

>>439480
That rule in itself is sexism, and just reaffirms it.

>>439482
Sexism isn't illegal :^)
Either I'm taking the b8 or you're uninformed about US law.

>>439483
Sexism is a form of discrimination. Discrimination is illegal.

>>439484
It's a bit more complicated than that Doj.

>>439485
Can you explain how? If it's more complicated than that, why was Gamergate an issue?

>>439480
>This would not be illegal in the US.

Of course not. No clue what that guy is on. It is, however, very stupid, and that's why it won't happen.

File: 1418523359011.jpg (101KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x800px

>>439195
>I can't backup my argument
>so I'm going to insult you

>>439432
>section promoting misogyny would be damaging
we still have /pol/

>invoke lawsuits
haha, that's not how laws work. Private websites can ban and allow literally anyone they want because they are private websites.

And you guys forget that Hiro didn't bat an eye when he found out there was a suicide pact on his board.

>>439510
So since you're not dead yet, apparently, remind us why 4chan should do something never done before in its history, which is to give a special exclusive board limited to only a few users, with rules made by you?

>>439522
>4chan hasn't done something before
>therefore it's not allowed because I as a user say so

again, nothing you say matters at all regarding this until we get an opinion from the admin

>>439522
The board is not limited to only a few users.
The content of posts themselves is restricted but that's true on almost every board.

>>439510
Pol is a political board. There is nothing wrong with it. There is however, something wrong with its posters.
>All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
4chan isn't liable for this. The posters themselves are.

>haha, that's not how laws work. Private websites can ban and allow literally anyone they want because they are private websites.
4chan is hosted in the united states, therefore requiring its content to be in line with United States law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of_computing
There's a reason global rule 1 exists, and it's because of this reason alone. I seriously can not comprehend how fucking retarded one must be to be devoid of a minimum degree of common sense needed to derive this without having to be educated about it.

>And you guys forget that Hiro didn't bat an eye when he found out there was a suicide pact on his board.
Suicide is not illegal in the united stats, therefore he is not legally obliged to do anything about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_legislation#United_States
At most the people who formed the alleged suicide pact would be liable for "assisting or encouraging suicide", but I actually haven't heard a single thing about this and would like for you to shed some light on what event you are referring to.

>>439522
This is the average /r9k/ user, sadly. An incredibly entitled manbaby who demands (including but not limited to): sex, relationships, social acceptance and generally just being catered to in every way possible as they managed to develop a "mommy's special child" syndrome, which they retain around the age of 20.

I honestly vouch for the destruction of /r9k/ and subsequent permanent removal of these cretins either due to their shitposting reaching into normal boards or their willing departure to Wizchan. It would definitely make the website as a whole a better place.

>>439524
And you seriously expect to be given your own board with rules you made? Very stupid rules at that, which let you ban anyone you don't like?

>>439526
>no girls allowed
>no nonvirgins allowed

That's pretty restrictive. A large amount of the userbase banned just because of who they are. Which other 4chan boards do that?

>>439527
Yep, this is just asking for a /specialsnowflake/ board. He keeps bringing up /mlp/ and /lgbt/ as examples, not realizing they are not at all parallel to what he wants as his board.

>>439534
Where does it say that?

>>439537
Rules 1 and 2?

>>439539
That doesn't state women and non-virgins are not allowed it simply states they cannot post about that aspect of themselves.
A brony may post on any board but he cannot post about mlp.

>>439541
A brony can post on a board and say he is a brony. Someone who is not a brony can post on /mlp/ and say so without getting banned. Understand the difference?

OP at first had the rules as "no girls and no nonvirgins" but then backpedaled. He thinks he made a very clever workaround saying "They can post, they can't just mention they are girls/nonvirgins".

No board bans people for who they are, and you know it. There's no reason why you should be special snowflakes and get a board which bans everyone whose existence triggers you. 4chan by its nature is inclusive.

I agree, I am sick of normies that can understand that there are people with social anxieties and so on. /r9k/ is full of low tier normies that are trying to make themselves feel better by mocking us. like yesterday there was a guy claiming that I lie when I say that I am 25 years old virgin.

>>439532
Which is exactly what the bad chan as a result to Gamergate wants to accomplish, mind you.

And exactly what Wizchan is about.

I just don't understand why these autists don't just go to either one of those locations.

>>439548
Your patheticness should not be the subject of a conversation anywhere outside of /adv/, you dense motherfucker.

>>439552
edgy fags like you are exactly what ruined /r9k/. this whole logic I am on 4chan I have to shitpost to look like dense motherfucker.

>>435741
>Posters cannot reference themselves

So you can't say shit like I am X years old, tall, black hair, etc...

For what purpose?

>>439562
>Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
>Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins.
why would you stop reading in the middle of sentence?

File: loki.png (42KB, 186x219px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 186x219px

>>439562
>>439565
>anon reads literally half of sentence then hurries to make post

>>439565
In other words, women and non-virgins are not allowed and banned on sight. There's a site that does that called wizchan, which is what you want. 4chan isn't this kind of site. Hell, you could even make your own infinity-chan board that you can moderate however you want.

>>435741
This is the most autistic shit I've ever read. Kill yourself OP.

>>439580
You must not come to /qa/ often.

>>439581
Eh, /qa/ was pretty good for a while when it was still relatively unknown. Now it's just being used as /q2.0/, and it's pretty much nothing but shitposters whining about getting banned and autists demanding bans for people that trigger them.

>>439561
No, john, you are the shitposter, as evident by your disregard for actually using this website as a medium for discussing. Please take your godawful hateful /b/ secret club mentality to that board exactly

I've been browsing /r9k/ since day 1, but sadly I have more or less abandoned the board now.
Re-instating the robot really pissed me off. It's like slavery, once it gets abolished you just can't re-instate it.

>>439580
good, the board isn't mean for you then

>>439603
>tripfag talking to anyone about quality

How could you when you're vomiting shit right now?

File: 1452196545682.jpg (379KB, 1111x597px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1111x597px

>>438297
>"do not antagonize the losers"
underrated post

BUMP LIMIT REACHED
NEW THREAD
>>>440016
BUMP LIMIT REACHED
NEW THREAD
>>>440016
BUMP LIMIT REACHED
NEW THREAD
>>>440016
BUMP LIMIT REACHED
NEW THREAD
>>>440016
BUMP LIMIT REACHED
NEW THREAD
>>>440016

>>439571
>let me tell you all about things I know nothing about
The reason these threads are so controversial is the sole reason that people are getting upset about possibly being excluded from a community, a community that just doesn't exist anywhere else as opposed to the variety of places they have to go.

Normalfags have this desire to just fit in to everywhere

>>439546
>it hasn't been done before thus it can't be done
One of the absolute worst arguments that's being used repeatedly by idiots.

Why can't you ban a particular type of user from posting?