>>25971746 You're a bitter virgin male on r9k. You hate women and believe utter bullshit about them. That's enough reason for any woman to hate and avoid you. Also your autism and virginity show, creep.
>>25971812 If you were a good man and respected the woman who gave what you wanted, you'd get sex. But you are not a good man and you mistreat women who give you the sex you want, therefore you will not get sex as a piece of shit like you does not deserve it.
It's hateful and hypocrite behavior to spit in the plate where you just ate from. Is that simple enough for your autism?
>>25971645 >Professor of women's studies lol she's a scam artist, scaming kids into studying a junk degree, of course she has to say this shit to reinforce the ideologue that is developed in womens studies
which is men are monsters and women are always victims / in the right
Holy fucking shit. Women actually think that in a "sexually liberated society," everyone gets sex.
I never got it until now. I thought they were just callous about ugly men being virgins forever. No, they are actually so fucking stupid that they think if they turn everything into a nonstop orgyporgy, then the vast majority of men will get laid as easily as they do, and all that matters is "being good in bed."
They think they fuck men who are "good in bed," not top-20% Chads.
I don't call them sluts until after sex. What is she going to do? Time machine herself to the night before and not have sex with me? It makes no sense. How can someone fuck someone then say they rejected them and didn't have sex because le slut shaming meme? It doesn't even matter because there are hundreds more cock hungry women.
They think they're all unique snowflakes and they're all attracted to different traits in men, which means "there's someone for everyone." They can't conceive of the idea that people are controlled by instinct and they're generally attracted to the same qualities. And there's also this: >>25972080 >well technically we're right, since you're not a real man if women aren't attracted to you
>>25972155 You take normal people's advice, change your mentality completely and get better. Which we all know you're never going to do so just kill yourself and stop polluting the world with your existence.
>>25972239 What is a good mentality? What if normal people give me the wrong advice? Why does a good mentality matter if I can just lie about it, and my body language? Why do I hate women if I respect them, and believe they aren't entitled to give out sex?
The main thing is incongruent body language. Lying is easy as fuck though, just tell lies like you are telling the truth and you'll never be caught. Since autists emote and body language manually we are experts at communication and manipulation.
A woman was kind enough to give you something nice you wanted, and in turn you insult her for it. Do you lack a brain not to see how this is hypocritical? You're encouraging women not to have sex with you since you can't appreciate them.
>>25972427 That's why he should just kill himself.
>>25972528 You're asking questions you shouldn't ask anymore at adult age. It's like you asking what is the result of 2+2, sure you can ask but it makes you look retarded and it shows your sorry pitiful lack of basic education. You are doing the equivalent of that in the social spectrum of things.
>But what if they don't want to give out sex to the best male of their choosing?
Sounds like something a self-hating woman would do.
>What if they didn't want sex at all?
Then they don't? Raping women is wrong and you shouldn't do it, anon.
>>25972695 Sorry you couldn't refute my point, senpai. If it's any consolation I thought you carried the "Retarded tumblr femanon" act pretty well. You carried it for way longer than I thought you would.
>>25972781 >But proving that 2+2 = 4 is actually really complicated and involves using rings and algebraic fields
Suuuuure look at all those algebraic fields in all those elementary schoolkids' book. Man 6 year olds need a degree for those. Cut out the bullshit, retard.
>What is the best man that a specific woman can have? Is that even a question to ask? Depends on the woman. Generally speaking, not you.
>Why is a woman self-hating if she doesn't want that man Because it's only logical and healthy and normal to want only the best for yourself. Are obvious things too hard for your retarded little brain? Serious question.
>>25971645 I've never had a problem with girls. I can date anyone I wanted really. My friend gets rejected all the time though but he lives in LA. The thing is that women are taught to be useless fucking trophies. They become materialistic and superficial. LA you see every girl thinking she's Angelina Jolie and treats everyone like she's a Stacy. The problem is beta cuck makes with money. Why should they love my friend when all he can offer them is a comfy life with a steak every night. When she could have chad cock and have some beta cuck pay for it all with his $100k Intel paycheck? Im not even very attractive and I get thousands of guys looking at me and messaging me on okcupid and offering to let mgr live in their mansion and shit. Im a fucking neat loser tranny and I get this treatment. My friend is a musician, a bouncer, an actor (hes currently hired as an actor in a major horror film), and hes competed at the national level for fencing. Hes also really an 8/10 and has a huge 7inch dick. Women are horrible people. I don't know why my brain wants to be one. They just want something bigger and better and have to do less work for it.
"Slut" does not imply that one thinks poorly of her though. It has no moral implication. It's just a word used justifiably and desirably for a woman who will go all the way right away, and undesirably for a woman in whom to invest time and energy in as a long term mate.
>>25971753 Most people who resent "experienced" people do so because they berate us over our lack of it. Why the fuck should I change to please such shitty, mean-spirited people? I bet you're thinking the same thing. Both sides do this, and you're only adding to the hate. At the risk of sounding like a 14 year old scene girl, you're a fucking hypocrite and should die.
Shitposting is "knowingly contributing low quality, off-topic, or ill intentioned posts." Which is what you're doing by making deliberately obtuse questions.
>How do shitposting and misogyny/disgust for women correlate?
You're bitter you're so worthless and repulsive you can't get a companion, so you come over and start or feed shitty threads like this to vent your hatred of women by attempting to project an unsavory image for all women. Duh. That's why this board is shit.
>>25973347 >Most people who resent "experienced" people do so because they berate us over our lack of it
Not exactly. They berate you for being repulsive, entitled to something you don't deserve, lazy and not willing to earn it which correlates to being entitled, and hypocritical about the people who are stupid enough to give it to you.
But some of the greatest minds in history have been "misogynists" in that they regard women as generally inferior in regards to reason and intellect.
This meme that women only fuck men who have high opinions of women in general, or that men who don't get laid must therefore be misogynists, is exactly that; a meme which has been disproven too many times to count.
>>25973481 >entitled You're insulting people simply for being virgins. I'm talking about that, not whatever the fuck you're trying to change this to. You shitheads harass and shit on me for not having sex, so I hate you. You get pissed that someone dares to speak against your norms and try to make absurd accusations about "you just hate us because you got rejected xD". It's fucking retarded and so are you. You and your lifestyle is hated because you can't just shut the fuck up and leave other people alone.
>>25973607 That's why lesbian sex is the only good sex and all women should be encouraged to have lesbian sexual relations when not having sex for procreation. Only another woman can have sex with you and give you the respect and love you want after.
>>25974031 But they were failures in the sense that they were proven wrong in their belief. As individual cases they might not have been failures in other areas but that's irrelevant to you or anyone else here since you fail on all fronts.
How would you prove 2+2=4? I'm 28 and have a masters degree and I don't even know where to begin. I've never done anything with proofs and shit. That pure math and theoretical shit might as well be greek to me. I did statistics and babby calculus and that's all I needed. Where do you live that 6 year olds are world class mathematicians?
You, or whoever >>25972319 is, and other here, continue spewing the falsehood that if you're getting pussy you must be a good person, if you're not you must be bad, if you think well of women you'll get them and if you think poorly of them you won't.
We know these are lies. There are good men who don't get shit, and men ranging anywhere on the spectrum from run of the mill asshole to downright evil who have women on tap.
Women are attracted to dominance above all.
>And some of the greatest minds in history have stated the exact contrary, as great women have proved the misogynists wrong
Nope. You're extrapolating a few rare outliers to be an example of women as a whole. The fact remains, as I said; women are generally inferior in regards to reason and intellect.
That word again, yet not once has a single example of hypocrisy in men been mentioned in this thread. What do you think that word means? We can tell you the word you confused with hypocrisy and you might come closer to making sense next time you attempt communication.
>>25971645 Oh, yeah because the average sorority girl puts so much effort into being good in bed. Get real, "Terri Conley".
They just lay there taking the dick, that's all they need to do. And don't act like Chad doesn't call her a slut after banging her either. Funniest part is that the number one slut shamers are OTHER WOMEN. Jealous women gossip and throw the "slut" word around far more than men do.
Nah, I think guys who pump and dump and don't take care of their offspring are bad boys. A sizable portion of those is niggers. The races would be better represented if you people got to have sex too but thankfully you don't.
>>25974355 >There are good men who don't get shit Like who? You? Men who shitpost about women on the internet? You are not good men.
>In the poll of 5,000 women for Thats Life! magazine, 45 per cent said they told "little white lies" most days. The favourite untruth was "of course you don't look fat", with "these shoes were only 10" in second place.
Common, white lies. No problem.
>NINETEEN out of 20 women admit lying to their partners or husbands, a survey on attitudes to truth and relationships has found.
>Eighty-three per cent owned up to telling "big, life-changing lies", with 13 per cent saying they did so frequently.
>Half said that if they became pregnant by another man but wanted to stay with their partner, they would lie about the babys real father.
>Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of their partner.
>And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease: this rises to 65 per cent among single women.
>Jo Checkley, the editor of Thats Life! , said that while many women now lied to avoid hurting their partners feelings, covering up the truth about a baby could have far more damaging consequences. She said: "Modern women just cant stop lying, but they do it to stop hurting other peoples feelings. It could be argued that these little white lies simply make the world go round a little more smoothly. But to tell a man a baby is his when its not, or to deliberately get pregnant when your partner doesnt want a baby, is playing Russian roulette with other peoples lives."
>Elsewhere, 49 per cent would "kiss and tell" to the media for 25,000 if they had a one-night stand with a celebrity; and 38 per cent say they would marry purely for money.
Women in aggregate are inherently shifty, snake-in-the-grass parasitic fuck holes. It is fact. It is known.
>>25974788 >asks for proof that men who shipost about women on the internet are bad >gets it in its most extreme form, any post from r9k will also do since being an insufferable faggot is disgusting to any normal person >makes a whiny post in response
When and where's the next beta going to go on a killing spree? You people are dangerous.
She wrote a paper in which she tried to debunk that women are less likely to accept casual sex from a stranger... if that stranger is a celebrity. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21171789
She is admitting herself that what matters to women is perceived social status, that is, not the man itself but how much the rest of the population values him (in other words, women can't think for themselves) AND YET the cunt says if a man doesn't get casual sex it's his fault.
>>25973051 "your friend" it's ok anon, your "friend" sounds decent enough, just think of it that he's sifting through all the crap to get to his diamond in the rough. Why the f would he expect to find a decent girl in LA anyway? it's cancer there
>>25974848 Your source doesn't sound or look credible, it looks and sounds like sensationalist gossip crap created exclusively for clickbait. I am wary to believe everything I find on the internet without checking the source first and so should you, it makes you look like a retard otherwise. Also how does it relate or disprove my post at all? It is a fact this people is overwhelmingly male.
>>25974937 >the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense
That's exactly what you males do though. You claim to have honor, honesty and integrity and then you spit where you eat by mistreating women who'd be kind enough to give sexual favors to you. You are hypocrites.
>>25974958 It's what you people would do by your own admission. How does it not matter? Why would anyone take the risk with someone who's declared themselves hostile?
That's not hypocrisy. We look down on women because they let us use them. It's not hypocritical that I enjoy steak but think cows are gross and stupid. You don't understand thethe situation.It would be hypocrisy if we said we should never call women a slut and then call her a slut. Using a girl like a slut, and then calling it what is is not hypocrisy. It
>>25975593 >It's not hypocritical that I enjoy steak but think cows are gross and stupid
Yes it is, because if you were honest with your though you'd either stay away from something you find gross and stupid or you'd have no ill thought about something that you enjoy and see cows for the good and useful beasts they are. Instead of think bad of something you enjoy, which is exactly what being an hypocrite is.
>>25975593 The fact you enjoy using girls but you think less of them for letting you makes you an hypocrite, because you are contradicting yourself by degrading what you enjoy. That is illogical behavior. Either you don't enjoy, therefore you think badly of it and do not engage in it, or you enjoy and think highly of it and do not degrade it. That what's honest, non-hypocritical behavior would be.
>>25971645 >you aren't bothering to try to be good in bed If they were turned down, how would she know whether he was good in bed or not.
Chads call women sluts after they fuck them. Chads are just socially capable enough not to let women know what they really think of them, it is only salty betas who shout "SLUT" afterwards, which I admit is wrong but doesn't really give the bigger picture.
>professor of psychology
The fact she has not looked at the bigger picture proves she did not earn her position, like many female professors.
>>25971645 I would neither date nor marry a slut/whore/roastie as much as the next guy but this does makes sense, For example, If you're getting a resupply from your drug dealer, you don't say "You're such a disgusting criminal, I'm gonna report you", just my two cents.
>>25976055 >>25976118 nope. hypocrisy is a word with a definition -- look it up. sorry but you aren't able to impose or invent your own for it. i'll wait for you to point out, specfiically, the hypocrisy of calling women sluts who are sluts but still enjoying fucking them. (hint: there is none). one can do & enjoy a lot of things but also realize they are stupid, worthless, or a waste of time. there isn't even an incompatibility, let alone hypocrisy.
>>25976241 >>25976247 >how so? Men and women are different, so there can be no slut/stud double standard. >one can do & enjoy a lot of things but also realize they are stupid, worthless, or a waste of time
No you can't, because it's hypocritical to enjoy something and think ill of it. If you think it's stupid/worthless/a waste of time etc. you are not enjoying it, so either you are a hypocrite by pretending you are enjoying something you don't or you are a hypocrite by pretending you have distaste for something you actually enjoy. In either case you are being dishonest and contradicting which are the quintessential qualities of being an hypocrite.
>hypocrite >noun >a person who pretends to be what he is not
>hypocritical >adjective >professing feelings or virtues one does not have
>>25971645 Because it's *relevant* to the thread topic: >femanon here
I have mixed feelings about casual sex. I'm currently a virgin. Part of me wants to just get laid because I'm pretty horny and feel that I should because otherwise I'm scared I'll look back at my twenties and feel I "wasted" it. On the other hand, I tried casual making out with people and it backfired pretty horrifically in that I got overwhelmingly attached and it fucked me up.
So me personally? Even if social expectations around casual sex were lifted, and I were guranteed a good orgasm, I would still probably have reservations.
As for other women? It varies. A lot of my friends are already having casual sex, so I'm sure that this would just make them have more. I'm pretty sure more people would have sex if there were less social taboos around it. Seems logical enough. People would have more sex if prostitution was legal and readily accessible where I live.
I think cowadooty and lots of wii games are stupid and wastes of time but I still enjoy them. You can enjoy something and think it's stupid, smart, good, bad, slutty, ugly, the color red, etc. etc.. It's notnot hypocritical in the l
>>25977311 Not to mention impossible. Anon is lying to himself just out of spite for women not wanting to have sex with him. I understand them, I wouldn't want to have sex either with someone one so disgustingly pathetic.
>>25977259 If you think they're stupid and waste of time why don't you give them up for something more productive? Because you enjoy them? Then why are you complaining that they're stupid and wastes of time? Those are qualities you yourself listed as negative which means you do not enjoy it.
I enjoy arguing with you and I think you're a stupid cunt full of shit. This isn't hypocritical either. I enjoy lots of bad things. Kill la kill for example. Stupid shitty fanservice but it's just fun, kind of like drunk smash brothers. I'm not going in expecting Ulysses.
>>25977713 Can you string a sentence together without greentexting and/or making a complete ass of yourself? Read my first post and come back when you're not completely braindead. I think you need your bed.
I do lots of things, some of them bad. I enjoy them and this isn't hypocritical. I can recognize something as not being wholly food but having other redeeming features. In the case of Mario kart my nephew enjoys it, for smash Bros it's fun when drunk and we're wanting a quick and dirty group activity. I never said I only played call of duty. It's like alcohol. It's terrible stuff but I still enjoy it and drink a few times a month.
>>25977712 If you think something is bad, that means you are not enjoying is and are only pretending to yourself and to others that you do. That is hypocritical. I don't expect you to admit it because hypocrites can never admit their hypocrisy, instead they rely on self-deception to justify to themselves their behaviour. Doesn't change fact that you are a hypocrite and a delusional one at that.
>>25977807 If you think it's terrible stuff, you should quit it because it's clear you don't enjoy it.
>I can recognize something as not being wholly food but having other redeeming features.
And after putting all features on the scale one gives out a judgement, positive or negative. You can't give a negative judgement and still enjoy something, that is the act of an hypocrite. Either the good outweighs the bad, therefore the bad does not matter and is not even brought up, or the bad outweighs the good and a negative judgement is passed on, which is exactly what you're doing. Yet you're not willing to quit them. That makes you a hypocrite.
>>25977807 >I do lots of things, some of them bad If you admit they're bad why are you doing them? That is nonsensical. If they're bad, you should quit them. If they're not so bad, then they are not actually bad, therefore you should not call them as such.
>A 'lot of you' are calling them sluts after sex. >A 'lot of you' aren't bothering to try to be good in bed. >Therefore, women are turning you down for casual sex.
She doesn't define what 'a lot of you' is. It could be used to attack anyone and it's a withholding of information, which is a master suppression technique.
>Calling them sluts
Who? On what platform?
>A 'lot of you' aren't bothering to try to be good in bed.
The unspoken implication is that women are faultless- or are an entirely passive party that need to be given a good performance in bed, that sex isn't a two-way process. It reinforces the liberal sjw narrative where men are incompetent and can't do anything right and it ridicules the vaguely defined 'a lot of you' at the same time as well.
I think I see what's going on now . I'm dealing with weapons grade autism here. It's funny because I work with special needs children and even they don't engage in black and white thinking to this degree.
Enjoyment is independent of any other qualities except for how enjoyable the thing in question is.
Hypocrisy means something other than what you think it means.
I can't really break it down any further. Maybe try asking your handler to explain it to you in a way you'd understand.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.