/d/ mod/janitor shenanigans

>>879449
Maybe OP got banned or various images weren't /d/ enough.

>>879473
I'm not sure what the metric would be for an image being /d/ enough, especially since there doesn't seem to be any common theme between the both posts that were deleted or spared.

The new mod doesn't know shit about how things run around here, apparently.
He's probably too "into" it and is excited to "moderate" a fetish porn+discussion board. Least that's what I imagine is what's happening

File: 1481310980645.png (2MB, 2900x2200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2900x2200px

>>879449
I got a warning for posting this in that thread, saying it wasn't /d/ related.

>>879516
Maybe the mod doesn't think it counts as hentai unless the picture meets a quota of visible dicks, nipples and pussies.

>>879551
Possibly. Although I made a dumb >tfw no giant gf joke while posting it so that might have been why.

File: conquest___selena_by_herretik-daj1w2g.jpg (119KB, 692x1153px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 692x1153px

>>879553
True. Sure, it's a hentai board, but the quality should at least be average.

>>879556
Even so making a harmless joke while posting actual content shouldn't be enough to get a deletion/warning.

>>879556
>>879556
>sure its a hentai board
Anything you say from this point should be ignored in regards to post quality. Long as its not western, or reaction images that are not /d/-related, who cares?
Moreover, its not the moderator's job to go through each post and prune everything like its his own fucking garden. If it is, what's the point of using this place over reddit?
Technically I can dump images better there anyways through imgur galleries, and by the way things are going here, the community isn't that much worse.
I got banned for 24 hours for explaining that a size artist wasn't feeling suicidal, but quoting a video game. Tell me why I was banned for that. Even removing my post, I could *maybe* understand, but banning me? What is the point of using this place then, tell me?
Moreover, he removed plenty of high quality images, which is the greater point of this board, no matter the content of the posts themselves unless they're blatant, board-ruining spam (like 1/4th of a page's worth)
Either way, you shouldn't get a warning for posting
>tfw no giant gf
in a size thread, that might as well be a tradition at this point. The mod needs to be talked to, and only respond when he's called to actually remove something via a report, or when he notices something bad's going on. He shouldn't be roaming the threads, looking for people to step a hair out of line to remove their posts.

File: 1268300685394.jpg (270KB, 1111x840px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1111x840px

Strange times these are, things have been fine until now. The mod probably just needs time to adjust to what is actually acceptable by each board/thread standards.

Ether that or wait until someone flags something and using best judgement instead of being gung ho.

>>879563
>>879567
>inb4 these posts get removed and bans are issued

File: 1475693150344.jpg (82KB, 850x569px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 850x569px

How the fuck is this Lolicon? At the end of the show they are all 18+ so this should not fucking count. This new mod or whatever needs to get his shit together.

>>879563
I was thinking it's the mod going crazy because he wants to delete everything that isn't obviously porn in his eyes, as per >>879516
. I hope not since that's dumb as hell, just because the mod can't fap to it doesn't mean other people don't find it erotic.
I mean safe pictures of lolis get deleted from /d/, presumably because something posted there is implied to be for sexual, so why would other pictures get deleted for not being sexual enough.

Got warned for saying thanks to an anon (along with a size related image) about making "quality" posts.
Also for discussing non hentai stuff (along with a size related image) for talking about things other than hentai.
I always cared to post content.
Guess small talk ist verbotten on /size/ atm.
I won't bother posting for a while if he doesn't stop deleting things left and right for every little thing.

>>879571
Canonical age means nothing when it comes to deciding whether or not content is loli.

Not that that particular image is loli, of course.

Just copied from the thread:

>"Apparently one of the images (didn't specify which one) i posted was violating rule 2 of /d/??? I dont see any of my images "depicting bestiality, guro, scat, or generally seen to be "extreme" in nature".
Most of the pics have been cutesy in nature..."

There was no specification of what post it was nor what it actually violated except "/d/ rule 2" and was given a 15 minute ban. If im going to be banned in some way i would at least like to know the specifics, if its justified or not.

Why is this an epidemic now? We had no troubles before and if something was way over the top it was taken care of by the thread and the mod would only come in if something was a real problem.

It would be nice if a mod could take some notice of this thread...

>>879563
>Anything you say from this point should be ignored in regards to post quality. Long as its not western, or reaction images that are not /d/-related, who cares?
Global rule 6, moderators are literally the arbitrators of post quality. Not saying what happened is right or wrong, just pointing out it is their job to determine post quality.

File: CxiqGcQUQAAL_DF.jpg (208KB, 1240x1754px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1240x1754px

>>879715
Yeah, and it seems like someone has taken it upon themselves to just delete things for the hell of it. Like, what's wrong with this image, seeing as it was deleted from the OP. It's good quality, eastern, obviously not loli or furry, doesn't contain guro, scat or anything too extreme, etc.

The paranoid part of me thinks that this guy just has it out for the regular giantess thread. The giant male/giantess vore threads have been unmolested even though they're very similar in terms of the content being posted/quality of discussion.

File: 1481499860106.jpg (221KB, 1478x893px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1478x893px

>>879715
Other sizefag here.
The pic in >>879740 was deleted (twice)
But the one i am posting wasnt
Some anon posted like 5 sketeches from the size artist and only one was deleted.
It has fuck all to do with quality
He also deleted on topic discussion

>>879747
Honestly, it'd be easier to just assume the mod clicked a bunch of things mostly at random.

On this topic, I was just warned for posting one of Tenohira's 'new' CGs. Someone care to explain that one to me?

>>879749
The one with the white haired girl?
Probably because the guy is almost cut out, would be a legit mistake if it wasn't for the rest of the thraed

In short the new mod is a tool
Either discipline him or fire him if he can't do his job right. The place was fine without this person on the team, and will continue to be fine without him. He's done nothing of any use as far as anyone is aware, and seems to be a net negative
At best, he's horrifically erratic, and is a heavy detriment (albeit unintentionally) to this board.
At worst, he's a fucking tumor that will ruin this board for a long time.
Just fire his ass, this place was going fine without him, and its not like the job was a big deal in the first place.

In addition to a bunch of pictures getting deleted at random, every single post that didn't have a picture got deleted no matter how on or off topic it was. That's pretty ridiculous.

>>879790
The guy could at least post why he's deleting so much stuff and explain himself. Some of the posts were not only deleted but the posters were banned or received nonsensical ban-warnings.

File: He does it for free.png (4MB, 1800x1600px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1800x1600px

Mod is simply deleting posts he dislikes.
There cannot be any other explanation for this.

I just got a day ban for posting this

http://desuarchive.org/d/thread/7151594/#7156382

What the fuck is even going on? Is /d/ being turned into an image only board with no discussion allowed or something?

File: mirai.png (1019KB, 1095x1190px) Image search: [Google]

1019KB, 1095x1190px

>>879943
The .webm was perfectly fine too, unless the 1 second view of completely clothed mirai is grounds for a ban. If that's the reason it's kind of ridiculous that he'd be so anal about it since there's been an oppai loli thread that's been up for days.

>>>/int/68579097
>>>/int/68576064
>>>/int/68578742
>>>/int/68575623
>>>/int/68573240
>>>/int/68578947
>>>/int/68576993
>>>/int/68571860
>>>/int/68576518
>>>/int/68579427
>>>/int/68579250
>>>/int/68579296
>>>/int/68579226
>>>/int/68565042
>>>/int/68579304
>>>/int/68578984
>>>/int/68572942
>>>/int/68571716
>>>/int/68579502
>>>/int/68574817
>>>/int/68578622
>>>/int/68573399
>>>/int/68579509
>>>/int/68578337
>>>/int/68578741
>>>/int/68578055

mods_?

>>879571
Maybe the new mod is from Australia and thinks that any girl without a D cup is a loli.

>>880112
It's probably because it's video game footage which is technically not hentai.

Even then I've seen it posted plenty of times before with no problems. Are the new mods really going to be this fucking pedantic about whether something is 100% within the boundries of hentai on a porn board?

>>880143
Fuck off with shitty meme already. That was one retarded politician in Adelaide and no, "small breast" porn isn't banned. I'm guessing you're Burgerstani. They tend to latch onto retarded stereotypes and memes based on ignorance in respect to Australia. The fucking morons have the hide to refer to the nation as a prison colony when in fact it wasn't before becoming a nation and in fact the American states was a convict settlement to much larger extent than the Australian states were partially used as. But let's not let reality get in the way of a braindead fucking meme.
I hate people.

This is strange. I haven't been to that thread in a few weeks but material that isn't outright pornographic has always been allowed in that thread. It's why I liked to go there, since it is generally a pretty tame fetish.

>>880593
hell even the stuff that did get pornographic was generally allowed.

I think the mod is fucking with us at this point or trying to stir things up...

>>880610
maybe, in his deletion wave he deleted all of my posts of any real contribution and just left my single shitpost + my two other posts complaining about him.

>it's a nu-boi mod tries to establish a new set of secret rules known only to him and shape the board to his own interests

oh man yeah because that worked so well every time it was attempted before in the past 10+ years *rolls eyes*

>>880655
>hes setting up a patron account as we speak
"Know my set of secret ever changing rules for just $10 a month!"

No random deletes in the last 24 hours or so, has the problem been dealt with?

>>881101
Maybe this thread prompted some behind the scenes changes, but I wouldn't count on getting an answer.

Almost a shame because I was enjoying seeing giantess art posted on /qa/.

>>879449
/d/ has the worst moderation team on the site. Just ignore the board and post in /aco/. The /aco/ mod only deletes furry and loli porn but allows anything else, even Japanese art. The /d/ team only wants Futa to be on /d/ so just give them what they want and leave the board to die.

>>879790
/d/ was killed back when Aspergo purged western art.

>>881142
I don't know who this is since I never bothered to learn who the fags were
What happened, papa oldfag?

>>881151
Pretty sure Aspergo is just the name of the bad guy from Deadpool.

>>881151
>>881151
Someone who has Aspergers, in this case the mod who sperged out on /d/ last year.

He still deletes shit whenever he's bored and stops by it seems.
Just not as rabidly as the previous days.
Poor clumsy giant Seaport Hime did nothing wrong...

Someone post
>tfw no giant girlfriend
and place bets on how long it takes him to notice and go on a delete rampage again.

>>881640
maybe she shouldn't have stepped on that ketchup factory

>>881778
I get that guro is not allowed, but it's a fucking stretch calling faint patches and dots of red "gore".
That anon has posted the picture, what, three times? And it's been deleted every single time.

The mods as of late have gotten worse and worse. Corruption and incompetence is running rampant now, and worse Hiro is pretty much nonexistent at this point now. Nothing is ever going to change on here now, and things will only get worse from here on out.

>>881949
Or maybe it's the userbase that's gotten dumber because you still haven't realized that you can go to IRC and ask mods directly about what's going on instead of complaining about it here. I do not understand why people still have it in their heads that this is the place to ask mods questions.

The /jp/ thread got posts from a mod because someone went to IRC.

>>881968
Mod spotted.

Hang yourself, Hotpocket.

File: akarin half.png (133KB, 328x520px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 328x520px

>>881973
>mods pls help
>mod spotted, kys xDDD

leave forever

>>881980
Don't worry, the IP count increased with that post so he's probably just a shitposter.

I still don't get why loli isn't allowed. Is it because of legal issues (land of the free and all that) or is it simply a case of 'stop liking what I don't like'.

>>881994
Because nobody would advertise on/sponsor a website with lolicon on it.

>>881994
It's the former. 8ch has loli if you want some of that, though.

File: moderation.png (272KB, 498x695px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 498x695px

>>881973
>>881949

>>882000
I wouldn't mind the moderation if it was more like this.

>>881980
>mods pls help
>in a thread literally telling the mods to fuck off

Not only are you modcucks illiterate but you're also Weebshits. Could it be any worse?

>>882069
>>>/pol/

File: (you).gif (847KB, 480x336px) Image search: [Google]

847KB, 480x336px

>>882069
>legit question for /d/ mod
>calls others "weebshits"

you might look up what kind of board /d/ is before you continue acting like a retard.

>>882092
>>882092
Further proof that Weebs are worse than bronies.

>>882092
Do the rest of us a favor and don't reply to false flag posts like that one.

Janitor or mod has been too delete happy. its ruining the quality of threads in /d/

Which i get, it must be to police /d/, but still.

File: d19e67aa80ac5c4cceddfd7c9132dfa0.jpg (264KB, 1149x800px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1149x800px

If I see you guys still complaining about this problem 1 day from now and not a single one of you has made a move to ask a mod directly on IRC, I will conclude that none of you actually care all that much about this issue.

>>882000
Cute as fuck.

File: 1404814421682.png (161KB, 1141x829px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1141x829px

>>882258
talking to people is scary, i'd rather talk at people!
besides, it looks like it's calmed down a bit. if i get another 3 day ban because the mod thinks schoolgirl = loli then i will consider it

>>882258
We have. People either get

A. Ignored by the mods

or

B. End up getting banned from the IRC

This has been going on since /aco/ got made. The mods kept silencing anyone who was talking about the shit they pulled and no reason was given at all. Its like why the mods ignore the fact that /v/ has zero moderation and janitors who delete threads they don't like instead of deleting the clear shitposting ones.

>>881968
But the mods, or you, constantly ignore everything we say. Worse, they/you ban people from the IRC as well. Face it, the mods/you don't want us to complain about the problems because then the mods/you would actually have to do work.

>>882830
I mean, I can certainly understand being resistant to interacting with people unless you're absolutely forced to. But it does sound like this problem is still persisting, so you may be forced to.
As for me, I don't use the thread so I don't particularly care to do it myself, but I use /qa/ a lot so when I see threads like this I like to make a point of telling people they have more options than shouting into the air.

>>882000
If it was this it would be fine all day

>>882841
>>882847
I'd like to see some proof of this. You'll forgive me for not taking your word for it when I have seen proof of mods responding to people who talk to them on IRC, and literally no proof of mods banning people for asking them questions. It makes me think you're merely trying to force a narrative of mod corruption.

Newfag here, link to IRC so that one of us could take action if we so choose?

>>882859
#4chan @ Rizon.net

If you go there and they actually respond, screen cap every single thing they say.

>>882865
#4chan @ irc.rizon.net

>>882847
this doesn't make any sense in this context. policing the thread like the mod was doing earlier and deleting every post that didn't meet his mysterious standards would be way more work than just ignoring stuff.

>Still being surprised that /d/'s mods can't stop shitting the bed