That's it, which one of you did this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3PC8b39QfA
The ADL and SPLC are already furious, don't you dare abuse the comment section of this video.
>>133495127
>hey rabbi...
I wonder who
Woah. So THIS is the power of protestantism.
>>133495000
Wtf whites?
Why is a women allowed to be priest?
>>133495000
Nothing wrong with gluttony, shitlord
>>133496324
a NIGGER woman
Why do we hate capitalism
>>133494629
because you guys are idiots.
>>133494629
Because competing for resources is hard
>>133494629
>>133494683
>>133494712
>Reagan you're dead just shut up.
Is monarchy the superior form of government?
Modern countries are filled with career politicians that only want personal gain. And you "gain" by being corrupt and useless. Instead of fixing issues that got you elected you perpetuate them to get reelected....
What if the success of you and your whole bloodline is bound to the success of your country? What if your countries fall would mean the death of you and your children?
Face it. Monarchy fits far better to human nature than what we have today.
>>133494562
>Bellarmine
>"But where governance is in the hands of aristocrats, indeed the people have their own order when they are subjected to the aristocrats, but the aristocrats have none among themselves. Democracy lacks order in a far greater degree, since all citizens are of the same condition, and they are all judged to be of authority in the commonwealth."
>On Democracy
>"[T]he end of government, however, is the unity of the citizens among themselves, and peace, which that union appears principally to be centered on, that all might think the same, wish the same and follow the same. They will obtain it much more certainly and easily if one must be obeyed, rather than many..."
>"It is a stronger state, in which there is a greater peace and concord among the citizens, indeed the combined strength dissipated among them is itself stronger: but a greater unity is where all depend upon one, than where they depend upon many, as was proved above, therefore, monarchy makes both a stronger state, and itself is the best government."
>>133494562
>>133495056
>On Rome and Republics
>"Certainly the most powerful republic of the Romans could scarcely count 480 years, as many years from the expulsion of the kings even to the reign of Julius Caesar. But under the monarchs in the east from Caesar even to the last Constantine, it endured for 1495 years without interruption, in the west, however, from the same Caesar even to Augustulus around 500 years, and from Charlemagne even to the present emperor it has been nearly 800. But for the 480 years that democracy flourished in the Roman Empire, the republic was not always ruled in the same manner: from the beginning yearly consuls were created, a little after they added tribunes, then the consuls and tribunes were taken up, creating the decemviri; after a year these were thrown out, and again the consuls and tribunes were recalled not rarely, even dictators and as many military tribunes were brought in with consular power. Therefore, no one form endured long, nor could they all reach the age of noble kingdoms together."
Republics are always temporary. The age of secular republics is coming to an end.
>career politicians that only want personal gain.
so it's no different than a monarchy? or oligarchy or which ever political system you install.
because man is driven by greed and power
Reminder that the lead singer of this band is an actual midget and is likely rapper Joe C, who allegedly "died" in 2000.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy-SiZSlmhI
>>133494288
Prove to me these aren't the same person.
>protip: you can't
>being this insecure
I'm not in favor of giving the state control of the net. I know it would have knock on effects that would cause more trouble down the road, which would be "solved" with more interventionism. I also understand that if ISPs became oppressive, it would open up new avenues for different ways of delivering bandwidth by competitors, such as satellite.
Ancaps/libs, inform the uninformed.
How does NN give the state and tech firms the ability to censor and control the net?
>>133494279
i'd love to cum on her tits
>>133494633
checked
>>133494279
Piss this shill off, write a comment to the FCC supporting net neutrality:
https://advocacy.mozilla.org/en-US/net-neutrality-comments?subscribed=1
> Net neutrality is fundamental to free speech.
Without net neutrality, big companies could censor people and perspectives online. Net neutrality has been called the "First Amendment of the Internet."
> Net neutrality protects small businesses and innovators who are just getting started.
Without net neutrality, creators and entrepreneurs could struggle to reach new users. Investment in new ideas would dry up and only the big companies would survive, stifling innovation.
> Net neutrality allows consumers — not big companies — to choose what they watch & do online.
Without net neutrality, ISPs could decide you watched too many videos on Netflix in one day and throttle your Internet speeds, while keeping their own video apps running smooth.
WTF i love trump now!
>Trump has driven jews to brink of extinction
when?
Truly anotha Shoah.
>>133493932
No, it's Trump supporters who are driving (((conservative))) thinkers to extinction.
Blame the comet all you want, but it's the dust that will kill you.
I'm sorry but I don't see the difference
All I see are 3 fascist that care more about spreading authoritarianism than their nations well being
>>133493437
>authoritarianism
>pretending that word means anything
>>133493437
>fascism is synonym of authoritarianism
>>133493615
this anon is right
all governments have authority
When mom and dad come from aboard to visit you
>>133493251
Abroad*
>>133493251
Haha world politics has become a sitcom
>>133493251
Stay based, Schlomo
Okay we do all know what "liberated" Mosul means:
It means Iran's victory and thus Shia militias' victory.
How do we stop Iraq from becoming a Shia nation?
(See next post)
>>133493249
>“The liberation of Mosul is a symbol for putting an end to terrorism and it is a victory celebration for Iran, Iraq, Syria and all the regional countries fighting the grave issue of terrorism.” - Shia leader Hassan Rouhani
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2017/06/20/525979/Iran-Iraq-Israel-Daesh-rouhani-Abadi-terrorism
>"Part of the offensive against ISIS has been carried out by mostly Shia militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces. Many are backed by Iran and seek to spread Iranian and Shia influence in Iraq. Iranian authorities boast about the role these militias have played."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/defeat-of-isis-1.4201961
>>133493249
>>133493309
Shia's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shit >>>> sunni's
>>133494575
>ya hossein yaaaaaa hossein yaaaaa hossein yaaaaaa ali
>lash tf out of you
>repeat over & over
= shia
Was the shooting of Philando Castile justified?
If it's a Negro, it's justified.
>>133493081
is this guy dead?
>>133493571
yeah
how do we achieve forgiveness from indigenous Australians?
the concept of "Australia" itself was based on the crimes against these people.
this county can't continue forward with this issue unresolved
what do we do?
>>133492118
>Abos
>people
Anon, I have some bad news for you
>be me 19
In school they don't teach us anything about history
Not even the nuking of Japan
Don't expect me to know anything about history
>>133492118
Put them all on reservations and let them kill each other and die of alcohol poisoning. Stop feeding them.
Why are nordcucks and slavshits so obsessed with nature? I think i saw a document where Swedish guy had sex with fucking forest and you always see slavic music videos and such with them drinking some goat milk in a strawhut
>>133492085
Because we have nature unlike you sand dwellers. Also Slavs are sub-human.
https://youtu.be/KvtT3UyhibQ
Nords are elves compared to disgusting desert mongrels.
>>133492085
Mneh, I wouldn't be proud of being from a barren desert wasteland, either.
>>133492027
is that how americans build houses?
no wonder they get destroyed so easily
>>133492027
>not being a fat fuck investment banker pulling in five times as much in a year as construction workers do while getting liposuction every few years
Lmao get out poorfag
>>133492180
Those are Amish people building a barn or something
I keep hearing the second amendment is to protect you from government tyranny. And this is implied to be domestic governments, which makes no sense, instead of foreign governments, which actually makes sense.
Which implies that the framers of the constitution spent all that time setting up a intricate system of checks and balances, but then apparently the emergency switch is the second amendment, where a militia can retake the government.
So the second amendment allows the government to function like some third world banana republic that has a military coup every three months
Final question, in the civil war, if the north was so tyrannical, why did they just leave and start their own country, rather than using their constitutional right to retake the government
ib4 A FUCKING LEAF
>>133491917
It's not surprising that you have no grasp whatsoever of government or history considering that your "country" has neither.
>>133491917
It wasn't to start their own country, rather decide on how America should be formed. North (Federacy and Unified Government) vs South (Autonomous States and Independent Functionalities)
And it's because we have an unwritten agreement with the government that we'll give you the tools to rule over us...but we have the guns if you fuck up or displease us.
>>133492168
fpbp