Post your results.
>shilling your gay site
Well son... What began as stage for autodidacts of economics and libertarian political theory would argue with the disingenuous shitposters and banner men of folk wisdom ended with a miasma of bots, recycled threads, and influx of mobile normalfag shitposters after the Trump election. But in the end it didn't matter because the rabble was chased away when the happening came; they ran as far as they could on the day of rope as /pol/ loyalists united against their common enemies. The Jew were kicked out of the entire West this time back to Madagascar and many succulent penises were saved from circumcision and hook-nosed homosexuals. The negro blight was bulldozed into the ocean, and then we set our sight on the Mexicans. It all started there... on that Mongolian basket weaving forum where you could post anonymously on while sporting the insignia of a cute anime girl. We wuz kings my boy. We wuz kangz.... an... Well that's a story for another day.
>>130470243
Someone post that really feelsy comic
The Rise of Leftist hate crimes
Given all the rhetoric the leftists have been putting out its surprising this hasn't been happening since Donald's election. What else are you seeing annons? Share what you got
>below is bystander footage of the James T. Hodgkinson shooting(just quaky camera footage, no shooter shown)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp86tn-zG_M
Shooting a congressman, especially a Republican congressman, is not an act of hatred; it is an act of love for your fellow prole.
/pol/ approved music thread.
Please no niggers.(unless it's jazz)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2Ccbjp3hCg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFR_eBXK3p0
/pol/ BTFO
>>130470025
I shot children in Afghanistan. Tell me where he was then.
Daily reminder that the ENTIRE 20TH CENTURY was PREDICTED by American eugenicist Lothrop Stoddard in his book "The Rising Tide of Color Against White-world Supremacy" in 1920.
How can a man be so based?
I strongly recommend reading this book.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard
>Some of the predictions that he made in The Rising Tide of Color were accurate, not all of which were original to Stoddard or predicated on white supremacy. They include Japan's rise as a major power; a war between Japan and the US; a second war in Europe; the overthrowing of European colonial empires in Africa and Asia; the mass migration of non-white peoples to white countries; and the rise of extremist Islamism as a rival to Western civilization because of religious radicalism. (Stoddard was Anti-Islamic and would publish the book The New World of Islam in 1921.)
bump
very interesting, thanks
And? What was the end game? Did he predict a non white genocide in the future too?
>>130470612
He did actually.
I'm about to start his book on Islam, "The New World of Islam"... I hear it's pretty redpilled too
Every second of every day, they always talk about how much they want to murder all white men and rape all white women, and impregnate them with their shitskin dna.
They love to talk about how the offspring of a shitskin or gook and a white woman = success. Athletes,etc.
But conveniently, any offspring of a white father+ethnik mother is a 'failure'. Mostly because they can't brutally dominate white women due to their white fragility / White Y chromosome.
If anything, they're just proving that they truly are self-hating shitskinned subhumans, worthless genetic trash who DESPERATELY want to be WASHED CLEAN of their subhumanity, by growing inside of a white woman's womb. Trying to escape its subhumanity.
But they don't see it that way - They only care about whether or not an organism is capable of brutally dominating white women, because they're all angry incels who got rejected by white women. My question to you guys - How do you put up with them everyday? At what point do you stop having endless discussions with these rape-and-murder-obsessed self-hating ethniks?
Do you guys just ignore their obsession with rape and murder and white women, or do you just keep discussing it over and over?
>>130471022
id rape her desu
My fellow Americans, will I see you on the mountains soon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOMIIjOMSMI
Also, legioncuck got assblasted.
What do we do, realistically, about the overpopulation problem? Assuming no happening will ever happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgyumGSF9-4
>you'll probably hate this guy, but he offers a viewpoint
What "problem"? Most developed countries have stable or falling birthrates. Only Africa and other shitholes have increasing populations.
>>130469411
>overpopulation problem
its a globalist propaganda. opposite is true. people are not getting married and are not having children, since bommer generation and their mentees in charge give you 0 fucking reasons to do so.
written in 2000. Now its 2017. Clear agenda and planned. So fuck your overpopulation shit.
https://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm
>>130469411
kill the niggers
/pol/ I do masturbate 5 times a day, and don't understand when you call me a degenerated, what is wrong with masturbation? It's a health way of relieving stress and getting pleasure.
nobody cares
This thread was moved to >>>/bant/1094075
A word from Popehat, on June 17, 2017:
Last night a popular alt-right troll disrupted a controversial modern production of Julius Caesar staged with a Trumplike figure in the lead role. Some people are incensed at this production and arguing that it depicts and encourages the assassination of Trump himself, and that fury has built to the point that random theaters with "Shakespeare" in their name are being threatened by imbeciles across the land. Never mind, for the moment, that Shakespeare's plays are shot through with blunt commentary on the politics of his time, or that staging Shakespeare to comment on contemporary politics is common and nearly as old as they plays themselves, or that the same thing has been done with an Obama-like Caesar with very little fanfare, or that the entire point of the play is that Caesar's assassination is self-indulgent folly that leads to disaster. People are angry.
One angry justification for disrupting the play goes like this: liberals do this to conservatives, so this is fair play. We're just imposing liberals' rules on liberals. Liberals disrupt conservative speakers on campuses all the time, and if that's okay, why isn't this okay?
This way lies madness and destruction, the excuse to abandon everything we believe. We follow our principles because they're right, not because everyone agrees with them. We follow them in adversity and in the face of opposition and even injustice. We give due process — a jury trial — to a cop who shot a motorist even if a very good argument can be made that the cop executed the motorist without due process. We defend the free speech of Nazis and communists who would deny it to us if they had power. At one point, I would have been able to say that we don't torture people even if they torture.
The "eye for an eye" theory of respecting free speech is particularly pernicious because it represents the worst sort of collectivism, something the principled Right ought reject. Note that people who say "apply the Liberals' own rules to the Liberals" aren't disrupting, say, an Antifa rally or the meeting of some Berkeley student group that advocated shutting down a conservative speaker. They're disrupting other people entirely, on the theory that everyone they deem part of the nebulous collective "Liberal" deserves to be silenced because someone else in that nebulous collective engaged in silencing behavior. The actors and playgoers in New York, under this theory, deserve to be shut down because they stand responsible for the acts of all "liberals" everywhere. (The suggestion that anyone going to see Julius Ceasar must be a liberal does not reflect a very healthy self-image amongst the Right.) This closely resembles the logic of hecklers on college campuses, who argue that nearly any conservative speaker stands responsible for Klansmen and neo-Nazis and overt bigots everywhere. It's contemptible and can be used to justify doing nearly anything to nearly anyone. It's the sentiment behind saying American Muslims may fairly be oppressed because Christians are oppressed in Saudi Arabia — even while celebrating our nation having greater freedoms than Saudi Arabia.
And yet, the "we're just applying their rules to them" theory has some heft. It's not because of the nasty, disruptive little totalitarians themselves.
Antifa scum and pseudo-educated campus thugs are not legitimate foundation for any adult's philosophy. No, the bit of plausibility comes from the reaction of people in authority, people who ought to know better, people whose conduct is somewhat more fairly attributed to a larger political groups. A few hysterically censorious kids screaming for a professor's termination for crimethink do not threaten the foundations of free speech, but Yale lauding them does. Relatively few thugs disrupting a speech and even physically assaulting a professor don't call into question the culture's support for free speech, but Middlebury offering weak slaps on the wrist and shrugs for that violent behavior does. A violent mob in Berkeley does not undermine the legitimacy of free speech doctrine — a mob is a mob — but Berkeley's timorousness or indifference in the face of violent censorship does. Students furious at a professor disagreeing with them don't call into question the nation's commitment to freedom, but state officials refusing to guarantee a professor's safety do. In short: the regrettable behavior of officials who have failed to stand up to disruption of speech are the people most responsible for legitimizing further disruptions of speech, whoever commits them.
But we can, and should, do better. Commitment to free speech as an American value — as an element of American exceptionalism — has always required tolerating evil and injustice and idiocy. We don't refrain from disrupting speech because the speakers deserve it, or because we've been treated fairly by the speakers or their allies. We refrain from disruption — and ought to punish those who disrupt — because free speech is the necessary prerequisite of a society based on individual rights and freedoms. It's the right that's the gateway to all other rights. Shrugging and abandoning it as a value is an abandonment of our commitment to all rights.
Counterpoint: the only way low-IQ sub-humans are going to learn the consequences of their actions is by turnabout.
We can pretend to take the high road all we like but that is not going to change the nature of r-strategists who need instant amygdala relief.
It's like dealing with a yappy dog: you don't try to reason with it, you don't tolerate it, when it acts out you smack it on the nose until it learns to stop.
>Responsible for the deaths of over 50 million whites in a useless war
>Countries send their best men to war ,this causes dysgenics, wich is why you see so many effeminate, beta deviant yurocucks today.
>Jews win the war and and then control the narrative forever.
>Strengthen ((((Marxism))))) worldwide
Really made me think.
>>130468948
Yeah, I'll give the guy credit for creating an efficient economic system that benefited the businesses AND the workers while growing the nations economy, but the guy needed to calm the fuck down with all the invading, he should have stopped after taking Austria and the Sudetenland. He also shouldn't have euthanized the disabled or killed the Slavs and Jews.
>>130468948
>wanting the self determination of your people
>everyone around you denies you that right
>take the lands with your people in it by force
>"YOU'RE SUCH AN AGRESSOR, STOP LIBERATING YOUR PEOPLE FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS"
>proceeds to get raped by the jew
Yeah, nah. Hitler was a symptom, not the disease. It starts and end with (((you know who))).
>>130468948
The Jew already rules you if you thought that he is responsible for WW2
>the White community can & should do more to root out extremists. You should encourage them to do so. Urgently. #FinsburyPark
really made me think
Well, /pol/? What is it about white genetics that contain the beta genes while other races (with the exception of Asians and Indians) are all alphas?
People in K-selected societies are naturally more generous and compassionate. This behavior isn't really suited to the r-strategist sub-humans who take advantage of such behavior.
I'm not /pol/. Your jewy insults have nothing to do with me or my race. Saged
>>130469200
THIS
anyone on here actually very well off finacially? like playing with money so much you dont give a fuck?
looking at my £2500 debt, even though its not much at all for some. it cripples me never able to pay it back... constantly struggling. even though i work my arse off.
i found £10 on the floor yesterday because i could eat. thats how shit is. not being able to do anything. because every pay day youre broke again.. and now you need to borrow
more. EVIL CYCLE
>>130468908
You are either a rat living on welfare, or a financially illiterate individual.
Manage your life better.
Check my flag and you'll understand.
>>130468908
i feel you m8. including all college and credit cards I'm not even $10k in debt but still broke as hell. $15/hr wage, paid weekly and still having to bust my ass on weekends to afford gas and proper food. i try to be wise with my money but that doesn't always account for the bullshit life throws at you on a daily/weekly basis.