Brings a tear to my eye
https://vid.me/8PhB
>>131206663
Stop with this fucking cuckbec is based meme they are literal cuckolds and the most faggot PMs are from Quebec
>the trudeaus are from Quebec the only reason Justin isn't born there is because his dad worked in Ottawa
Any claypool fans here?
You need to listen to real music, anon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBMOc24_aIw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_sa-wHG0rE
Tell me about the Taco Bell, why does it cater to millennials?
>I NEED BIRTH CONTROL
>you pay for it
>>131206535
no birth control = pregnancy = you pay for abortion? = you pay for childs life?
>>131206535
It costs a lot less than paying for a nigger's welfare
>slavs
>white
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-nevuFhwAQ
>argentina
>white
>this is the face of /pol/
PFFT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH YOU CANT BE SERIOUS
this is the face of normie neoliberal marxist multiculturalism -- a dying breed.
the new generation is preparing and educating themselves. they are gaining positions in finance, industry, and government. they are all natsoc or ancap right, and they will dominate. not saying it's right or wrong, just pointing out the sociological trend. the left is dead, and we will absolutely see natsoc order from the top-down in six to 10 years, possibly much sooner.
Why do t you just adapt to globalism?
>>131206301
Don't
>>131206442
i like my diversity just not in the way liberals use it
I'm a nationalist and a globalist.
Why are liberals so adamant on stopping "global warming"?
If we go past the supposed point of no return and shit really does hit the fan then we'll see a massive reduction in the global population, and if nothing happens then that's great too.
Liberals tend to be vocal about overpopulation,the supposed catastrophic effects of global warming is the most ethical solution to the overpopulation.
Burning coal is literally the best choice forward,.
They literally can't think for themselves, that's why they laugh at/shout down opposing ideas. They can't substantiate how solar or wind energy will help but rather scream at you "it's settled science!!!!" Scientists are turning their backs on the global warming meme since they changed the name to the vague, "climate change" and they admitted a bunch of the data was fabricated. The dumbass liberals are worried about the non issue that is "climate change" but embrace the eradication of western civilization through bringing in millions of Muslims to civilized countries.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/refugee-admissions-halved-under-trump/article/2627002
>>131206176
http://archive.is/Oe0cc
>>131206400
Stopped using the Norwegian proxy?
>>131206176
Good.
Why don't they solve the healthcare problem by using prayer healing meetings?
http://time.com/4802874/unemployment-rate-may-2017-jobs-report/
U.S. Unemployment Rate Hits 16-Year Low Despite Slower Job Growth
How is the american economy so strong?
>be american
>4.7% unemployment(full employment)
>companies will literally fight of candidates
>even unskilled labourers are making $20/h now
>university grads make 70k starting and 120k after 5 years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWP_95eSLBI
Peace to Hamas and the Hizbollah
OBL [bin-Laden] pulled me like a shiny star
Like the way we destroyed them two towers ha-ha
The minister Tony Blair, there my dirty Kuffar
The one mister Bush, there my dirty Kuffar...
Throw them on the fire
you see di national front man dem, dem a dirty kuffar
di ku klux klan dem a dirty kuffar
di bnp man dem a dirt kuffar
ronald regan was a dirty kuffar
di minister tony blair him a dirty kuffar
di one mister bush him a dirty kuffar
di national front dem a dirt kuffar
tro dem in di fire
>>131206147
Music is haram.
>>131206420
there my dirty kuffar
Hezbollah are based. Their main focus is killing kikes.
Goey, the STD ridden penis-clam of evergreen straight college wants You for propagating the race war being orchestrated by Jewish billionaires and Goyim of the same degree.
One thing that makes most political discussion between radicals and non-radicals difficult is the fact that most radical political ideologies require a complete or near-complete overhaul of standard political systems in order for their specific policy proposals to be valid and applicable. For example: a fascist white nationalist living in the United States might want to enact a eugenic policy providing white women with IQs exceeding 120 with strong financial incentives to reproduce as much as possible, but this proposal must either assume the existence of a hypothetical white ethno-state, or a political situation in which it were feasible for the laws preventing such eugenic policies in the US to be overturned. It would also assume a cultural climate in which doing such would not cause a civil uproar. In other words: such a policy could not be applied in the current political state of the US. Therefore, i order to accurately theorize about such policies, an alternative political system must also be proposed in which said policies could feasibly be applied, thus if a fascist, a Marxist, an AnCap, and an American Republican wanted to have a political debate, everyone involved would have to argue their entire ideologies against one-another, which would take so long as to make any real discussion nearly impossible.
[CONT.]
This effect is somewhat curbed by the existence of platforms like YouTube, in which a fascist, Marxist, AnCap, and American Republican can each post long videos laying out their entire ideologies in detail for viewers (including each other) to watch at their leisure, but it also reduces the likelihood of viewership in the first place as potential viewers are not likely to wish to spend their time entertaining many hours worth of opposing political media unless they were already interested in the topics at hand prior to encountering said media. This is rare, however, and so the question becomes "how can I get people interested in my ideology by means other than theoretical explanation?"
This is where symbolism, direct action, and controversy come in. Those who are able to make the biggest waves and appeal to the emotions of the masses will attract the largest number of potential followers to their cause. A great example of this is Donald Trump, who won the US election despite being generally very vague about his policy proposals and his overall political vision. He made a few key points very powerful by making sure they were emotionally charged. If he had been a fascist, he probably would not have won, but he certainly would have gotten people talking seriously about fascism.
Political debate is the domain of intellectuals, not of masses. intellectuals can often be converted by strong arguments, but even they are usually more susceptible to deep emotional appeals than to sophisticated rhetoric. Such rhetoric is undoubtedly important, but is mostly the tool of political leaders, not of those who are actually building the political structures with their blood and tears.
So, for all radicals, the keys to power lie in the creation of myths, symbols, and blocs of strong and dedicated men willing to die for what they believe in, not in air-tight logical trains and airy sophisms.
[CONT.]
tl;dr - if whites are to survive the demographic changes of the 21st century, we must stop trying to persuade everyone through carefully-crafted arguments, and start organizing into powerful groups and making ourselves known through controversy and symbolism. This is the essence of fascism.
bump
>plane lands
>clap
>be born
>get put on meds
>go out
>get shot
>go study
>put in debt
>eat american (((food)))
>get sick
>no insurance
>fucking die
such is life in the great lang of the free
>the door automatically opens
>tip the door
>work 358 days a year. 1 week vacation
>never leave the USA ever in my life
My life, the post