Film General Thread

File: 14C376FB-9EC6-41A5-AE55-DB44E2B5BD70-3391-00000207364741EE.jpg (1MB, 1310x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1310x2000px

>>3050955
Wanted to try again and get a critique on my dslr scan here. I know I need a longer focal length macro to get less fall off but other than that lemme know. I'm thinking I'll just say fuck it and buy a v700, sell my k-3 kit. I don't shoot digital anymore anyways.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	MLF
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 12:30:13
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1310
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: 33800679755_cb28914a66_o.jpg (1MB, 1330x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1330x2000px

>>3050970
I'll bump with a few more. Don't mind the hair I never seen in this one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	MLF
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 13:59:36
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1330
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>color negs don't like to be underexposed
well i want to overexpose by just one step
but iam shooting aperture priority.....should i just check the light meter via aperture priority and then switch to manual or is there a better trick

>>3050988
Does your camera have exposure compensation?

>>3050970
You don't need a longer focal length. I scan with 50mm just fine. Are you stopping down? I typically shoot at f8.

You're scans are still very cyan, especially the second one. Try grey balancing and/or black balancing off the negative frame after inverting.

>>3050988
Use either exposure compensation (+1) or set your iso to 1 stop less (if you're shooting 400iso film, set your iso to 200).

>>3050991
yes...but i tought that exposure compensation is only for situations like having strong backlight with your subject standing infront of it :o

>>3050995
yeah i usually do that with my expired films
....
so i can basicly overexposure with the exposure compensation as if i would jump from
1/125 to 1/250 sec ? and even in little steps like
1/3 and so on ?
wow

>>3051001
Yeah if you set it to +1 exposure compensation it'll overexpose by one stop in Aperture priority, which is what you were looking for

File: 647934-21.png (359KB, 791x637px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 791x637px

>>3051002
i want to tell you how much i love you

Has anyone used the epson v330 here ?
i use the v750 in my university but can't afford an expensive one for myself...there are some v330 for 30 bucks in my area

>>3050970
>I'm thinking I'll just say fuck it and buy a v700
>wanting to downgrade your scans

File: runnin.jpg (2MB, 2262x1500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2262x1500px

Anyone have any tricks for shooting things in motion with a lower ISO? I want to catch more things going on but I don't like having to set my shutter speed to a lower setting. Can I set it to a higher setting and not really have to worry about exposure, or set, let's say, 400 ISO film to 800 on the dial?

>>3051026
There's no trick. Either you use a higher ISO film, use a wider aperture or a longer shutter speed. Setting your ISO dial to 800 will just underexpose your film by 1 stop.

If you're trying to capture motion in low light, either use a flash or push B&W film (like Tri-X or HP5) to 1600

>>3051018
my cousin has one. its super shitty, get at least v500.

>>3051029
ah damn, looks like i'll be looking for a new lens. i got some 800 the other day I'm dying to try out, and saw 1000 on the internet I want to order.

I have a om-1 and it has a mirror lock up feature to eliminate shake, and apparently it works for night photography, would that work as well? I just want to avoid my pictures coming out one big blur, and don't know much about the picture quality of 800 film.

All of these things I plan on learning as I go, but help is also appreciated

>>3051030
i see...thanks for the information

File: natura-web (1 of 1).jpg (611KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 1000x667px

>>3051031
Mirror lockup will only really help for situations where the camera needs to be perfectly still i.e. long exposures. It's not super useful for shooting handheld, and you obviously can't see through the viewfinder so focusing becomes difficult.

800ISO film looks great. Pic related is 1600 iso film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3051033
Thanks for that man(or woman) I really appreciate it! So I'll skip the mirror lock up and spring for the 1000, and I'll try out the 800 with no worries.

Also, nice shot! That's the kind of stuff I look for on here

I'm getting a nikon F with a fungusy 28mm lens. Can I put aperture "bunny ears" on a nikon lens that doesn't have them? Where can I get the aperture tabs?

>>3051048
>man (or woman)

Boy I haven't heard someone cuck that hard in a while.

File: scanns041.jpg (486KB, 1200x815px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1200x815px

Recently shot a roll of Kodak HIE (IR film) using a R72 filter. thoughts?

>>3051088
>Can I put aperture "bunny ears" on a nikon lens that doesn't have them? Where can I get the aperture tabs?
>he couldn't google this information or check ebay if such items existed
Boy I haven't heard someone cuck that hard in a while.

>>3051099
beautiful stuff, looks like some illustration from a fantasy book for kids.

>>3050955
wheres the best place to get film developed? also whats the best film currently in production?

>>3051109
not OP but the best place depends on where you live
the best film depends on a few things a) what you want to shoot and b) how you want it to look.
when it comes to black and white films, it is almost always best to dev yourself as it gives you far more control on how it looks. this can come with a whole lot of experimentation and trial and error, but as you go you will find that your film choice and the way you develop your film contributes a great deal to your look.

those of us with a lot of film experience can give you pointers as to a good film for you but there is really no all round best film.

>>3050573
>>3050594
>>3050605
Tried a holder that didn't touch any surface, however it didn't make much difference. The tunnel from lens to light table worked great, though depending on the negative there's still some faint reflections here and there but they are barely/not noticeable on the computer. Cheers for the suggestions guys

i have a superia 1600 from 2002 world cup. which iso should i shoot at?

Can someone post some slide film for me?

I need inspo to get back into that E-6 goodness. Please include photos of people too

>>3051177
Assuming it hasnt been kept in cold storage, add a stop. (3200)

good luck

>>3051187
FUCK meant shoot at 800.

File: tmp_29734-1478671584056-619054235.jpg (45KB, 329x399px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 329x399px

>>3051106
>doesn't understand the subject matter whatsoever
>never tried googling for the subject yet suggests someone else does so as if it were an insult in of itself

>trying this hard on a Inner Tibetan organic chemistry forum

File: image.jpg (88KB, 913x1272px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 913x1272px

Anyone have a good idea for storing Fuji packfilm shots in the go, keeping both negatives and positives free from dirt and sticking to each other?

Considering bringing a small family photo album to keep the positives in after they've dried, but I don't have a good way of storing negatives without them getting stuck to each other.

File: 19cs3pbxgemx.jpg (84KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1000x1000px

>>3051186
Just shot a roll of Astia today. Going to take a week to get back tho. In the meantime, an old slide.

>>3051222
Too much sky anon, imho.

I've been shooting 35mm film for about a year now and would like to get into medium format film. What's a good medium format camera to start off with? I'm a poorfag so something around $100-$150 would be ideal.

File: Yashica mat EM.jpg (265KB, 1011x1024px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1011x1024px

>>3051229
YASHICA
A
S
H
I
C
A

Also, you'll want to invest into a light meter since almost all MF cameras don't come with.

>>3051229
>Dirt cheap but the lowest of quality
Lubitel 166, Holga 120

>Great-ish and can be acquired for cheap
>TLR
Yashica A, Minolta Autocord, Seagull 4A
>SLR
Mamiya M645 1000S

>More expensive
>TLR
Rolleicord, Yashica MAT, Mamiyaflex
>SLR
Bronica SQ-Ai, Bronica ETRS/ETRSi

>Even more expensive
Mamiya RB67/RZ67, Pentax 67 (maybe)

>Meme-tier expensive
Mamiya 7, anything Hasselblad, Rolleiflex

Mind you this is not a complete list, just what I can remember off the top of my head. For instance I did not include any of the Fuji MF rangefinders.

I hope it helps you find something good without stretching you beyond your budget.

>>3051239
>>3051229
The Yash Matt 124g has a built in LM. You can pick up a used one pretty damn cheap if you don't mind it looking a little beaten up.

If you're not into TLR's then maybe a Kiev 60? They were manufactured up till like 1999 so you can get one in good shape for cheap if you search. But you'd have to purchase a LM too, so maybe the Yash is the cheaper option overall.

>>3051244

The inbuilt light meter is not accurate.

File: SF-011.jpg (947KB, 2079x2048px) Image search: [Google]

947KB, 2079x2048px

>>3051252
Yeah nah. It's spot on.

You just gotta use the right batteries.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2079
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:13 22:58:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2079
Image Height	2048

>>3051106

Lol butthurt

>>3051244
>But you'd have to purchase a LM too, so maybe the Yash is the cheaper option overall.
>have to purchase a LM
>have to

use a phone motherfucker

>>3051400

Best Android LM app?

>>3051404
just download like 3 free ones and keep the one you like best. They all work fine

Gonna be going on a little skiing trip this Saturday and I'll probably just pack my OM2 with me but it'll be my first try at shooting scenes on a snowy mountain.

Does anyone have any tips on shooting snow scenes? I know about keeping batteries warm, condensation on body/lens etc.
>Should I just pack some ColorPlus @ 100 in case I fuck it up since it's cheaper? I'd rather not waste Ultramax or HP5.
>I've read somewhere that +2 exp comp should work fine.

File: IMG_0501.jpg (1MB, 2408x2995px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2408x2995px

>>3051426
You'll be fine mate, just spot meter and know with snow your usually in high contrast scenarios so either your shadows are gonna have minimal detail or your gonna have blown out highlights on the snow. Just meter for what you want to keep. If your shooting landscape stop down get the snow and try keep some shadow detail, if you're shooting a subject just meter for them. Just think what you want as a subject in the photo. You shouldn't screw up that much, don't over think it. My photos arnt in that harsh of light and I probably could have underexposed a bit to get more snow detail.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2408
Image Height	2995
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 33044345615_26caae6fbc_o.jpg (2MB, 4986x7342px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4986x7342px

>>3051432
These are hard snap shits I know.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	MLF
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:21 19:10:04
Exposure Time	1/4 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4986
Image Height	7342
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: 33002685336_214e9b4fc5_o.jpg (2MB, 4962x7167px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4962x7167px

>>3051433
The last two are old scans and probably look quite different then they would if I had scans of their prints. The first is a print scanned.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	MLF
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:21 19:19:57
Exposure Time	0.4 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4962
Image Height	7167
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>3051432
>>3051433
>>3051434
They demonstrate perfectly what I've been wondering about though. Thanks for the info anon, I'll keep it in mind and just breeze through 4-5 rolls and see what happens.
I'm just hoping it won't be ridiculously sunny or incredibly windy. Maybe I should just pack my throwaway Miranda as well because I don't care too much about wrecking it.

>>3051099
very nice, cool ethereal look to it
would look better without the white border imo

>>3051435
Yeah depends how much hiking you're doing, things can definitely get rattled around. Best luck shooting.

>>3051446
Not a lot of hiking, I'm more worried about having to clean the lens if the wind blasts snow in it or falling/dropping the camera and having water seep in. Cheers man, thanks again.

>>3051426
Take some Velvia for the early sunset if you are on a south facing slope.

File: Avoriaz3.jpg (562KB, 638x850px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 638x850px

>>3051466
muh colours

>>3051466
I've been meaning to try out Velvia for ages now. If I can get my hands on a couple of rolls before then I definitely will, thank you for reminding me.

File: c8f79acf28cc9fbf7dba0a7dd7d21390_400x1000.jpg (105KB, 400x320px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 400x320px

>>3051456
If it's really snowy a trash bag/shopping bag and UV filter is all you need, unless you are dropping your camera of course but that is never a good idea unless it's an F5 and you want to dent earth.

>>3051473
Kek, rigging an improvised weather shield doesn't sound like a bad idea honestly. I'll have to check and see what the weather will be like but I might as well have one ready just in case.

I've never dropped a camera, I'm just really dreading the inevitable moment when I will. Or I could just get the ETRSi with me and use it as an anchor in case I am about to fall off a cliff.

File: avo2smaller.jpg (1MB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x997px

>>3051476
You don't need anything fancy desu, doesn't take any space either, just make sure it's easy to reach for when the weather turns. Downside of the ETRSi is if you fall on it, you will break.

Also I don't know how long you are going but really try to sit out until sunset on top of the mountain. Mountain sunsets are epic.

Pic sorta related, French Alps, god knows which film, probably superia, Nikon F, 50mm

File: warm.jpg (546KB, 1200x815px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1200x815px

>>3051099
Thank you for posting this. Now I know what I want to use the rolls of 120 IR film, that I have, for.

Print it at Fomatone MG Classic 132, maybe use a warmtone developer as well. Or just sepia tone Fomabrom 112

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1200
Image Height	815
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:04 20:39:30
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	815

>>3051489
Lovely tones, thank you for sharing this. I hope I'll get to be on a similar setting, albeit probably not that late in the day. It will depend on the rest of the people in my little group. I'll try to make the most of it either way.

Heh, it's an impressive little beast to carry around and use. How do you like the Nikon F? I've only heard great things about it.

>>3051496
Thanks.
The Bro sounds sweet, I need to get in MF but my Plustek sort of locked me in 35mm.

I've had the Nikon F since forever, it's all the essentials and nothing superflous, everything mechanical and engineered to a ridiculous standard. A reliable brass brick with a massive viewfinder. It's the camera I carry the most.

I also have an F5, the contrast is massive, as is the size. All in all probably one of the most capable cameras ever made, the focus motor is beastly and with a big lens you can feel the glass being thrown around in the barrel. The light meter is way better then you would ever need for film. It's essentially a cheatcode for film.

Would recommend both.

>>3051099
I usually dont like nature but that's very nice.

>>3051588
I just got it, I will be using it a lot. I am mirin' the film scanner though. I'll have to save up for a while before I can afford one myself. My advice for buying into MF is look around as much as you can. Deals pop up but it takes a while before finding something you want that won't blow up your budget. But you probably know that already.

I see, it sounds like a dream camera. Sturdy and no-bullshit functional. And the F5 is practically its bulky AF sibling with the best light meter ever. Haha I probably need to stop gearfagging before I'm stuck eating crackers for a month, my wallet can't take it.

I basically found my father's OM2n and use it as my main. Bought some more Zuiko glass for it and I swear by it pretty much. Then I wanted to try a cheap modern film SLR body so I got an EOS 300V for pennies with an OM-EOS converter and use it as a backup.

As far as I'm concerned, along with the Bronica, other than maybe getting a scanner and chems I am done with gear.

Just wanted to share that I bought an Eos 100/Elan with a 35-135 USM yesterday for $25.
Reduced from $50 because it's "broken". (It didn't have a battery)
Such a nice camera. Super smooth to shoot, nice "HP" viewfinder.
Almost finished a 27 roll of Agfa Pro200 yesterday :)

>>3051618
Hah nice, the lens alone costs almost triple the amount you paid. Keep an eye out in case the film door stops playing nice and have fun.

File: scam follow up.png (34KB, 806x315px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 806x315px

>>3049321 →
About those cheap kodak portra etc I found on ebay the other day, I messaged that guy asking if it was it legit. Ebay emailed this to me today. Stay safe lads.

>>3051628
It seems like more and more of these scams have been popping up lately, almost always selling Portra

>>3051476

I dropped my digital camera last week.

Went scuffing along for like three feet.

It seems relatively okay except for some scuffs and a broken lens hood.

>>3051629
I found it as well and he was selling agfa and a lot of other stuff as well

>>3051629
is film photography really that lucrative, or do they have lots of constant scam surveillance on everything else already or something

can I scan my film with a 50mm f/1.4 lens?

Does it have to be macro? I'd shoot/scan with a 5D classic.

>>3051755
If you don't use a macro lens you'll simply get low resolution

The 50mm f2.5 macro is cheap enough and there's always the 70-300 sigma macro

>>3051757
>70-300 sigma macro
no
>>3051623
The lense has a little fungus, but it just seems to be behind the front element, which looks like it comes off easily enough.
And it did have some of that black sticky degraded foam on the shutter blades, but I got most of it off with metho. I actually mainly bought it to sell, I have another one, and it has lost the click detentes in the mode dial, which is a bit of a pain, but aside from that is a good beater body for flash photos.

Why does Fuji make such better film stocks than Kodak?

>>3052016
superior nippon film, folded 1000 times

>>3052016

Depends on your definition of "better".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHIBbaSZcGg&ab_channel=BenHorne

Are shatbeds not actually as bad as people make them out to be? Cause this shit seems pretty impressive, or is it just a good scan because of how large the film is? I'm looking at a v700 for medium format but unsure of how good the results are going to considering how much smaller the film is.

>>3052100
Most flatbeds will resolve grain on 400 speed B&W film as long as it isn't Delta 400 or TMY. Much more comes down to how good your film is, and how good your lens was, than to scanner quality.

But by all means, spend on a v700. It's a good scanner. Expensive as well. But it'll certainly stop you gearfagging about shatbeds any further.

>>3052128
I use a v700 at my college and find that it does a shit job of 35mm and 120 negs but if you get a good wet print and scan from the 8x10 it works great.

For 30 bucks it'll do fine for posting online, just don't expect any killer prints out of it.

>>3052212
my bad, this was meant to be a reply to this
>>3051018

File: IMG_20170405_152248.jpg (475KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 720x1280px

Just found a huge batch of old Kodachrome slides! Will update as I scan then.

File: IMG_20170405_152724.jpg (267KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 720x1280px

A sight for sore eyes this is.

>>3052258
>>3052255
Jesus Christ Amon let's see um.

File: Barbed-Wire-Around-House.jpg (991KB, 1000x678px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 1000x678px

>>3052264
Alright. Here is one.

It looks like they were taken during the Vietnam War, and that many of them are extremely graphic. This one is an exception.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Created	2017-04-05T15:57:02-05:00

>>3052283
post graphic ones pls

>>3052283
Your dad's or some other relative?

Post graphic ones.

>>3052288
>>3052290
I'm not sure who they came from. Maybe I'll post the graphic ones in a rekt thread on /b/. You all know what Kodachrome looks like.

File: Vietnam-Street.jpg (648KB, 1000x676px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 1000x676px

>>3052283
This one isn't too bad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Created	2017-04-05T16:18:54-05:00

File: Soldier-Post.jpg (539KB, 1000x680px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1000x680px

This guy looks pretty badass.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Created	2017-04-05T16:22:41-05:00

>>3052292
>Maybe I'll post the graphic ones in a rekt thread on /b/.
retard. post them in the photo board maybe?

>>3052292
Go for /hr/ then if you don't want to post here.

>>3052292
If you post them somewhere else link the thread here pls.

File: DSLRcuckscan69RVP50.jpg (1003KB, 2235x900px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 2235x900px

>>3052100
m8, he shoots fucking 8x10, of course the resolution is going to blow you away.
Shatbedding is true degenerate behaviour.
Witness this DSLR cuck scan of some 6x9 Velveeta. This format has just more than one quarter of the vertical resolution of 8x10, and about 1/3 horizontally. So if we're calling my 6x9 scan about 70 megapixels, an 8x10 scan at the same magnification would produce a 700MP file. Woe betide the computer attempting a perspective deformation on that file.

File: IMG_20170405_084210.jpg (121KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x800px

>>3052100
If you have a good digital camera I'd suggest buying a macro lens over a flatbed scanner. You get better results, it will b faster to scan with, and you'll add a piece of equipment (the macro lens) that you can use for other things. A flatbed scanner can only do one thing and it's not very good at it.

Off to the lab I go.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:04:05 08:42:11
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	5.5 EV
ISO Speed Rating	38
Exposure Time	1881/250000 sec

>>3052368
How much are dev costs for you?

File: IMG_20170405_163510.jpg (113KB, 600x640px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 600x640px

>>3052384
¥648/roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:04:05 16:35:11
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	2.0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	92
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

need your opinions /p/

eversince i got the fuji xpro1 i started to carry my camera almost everyday with me taking photos, mostly street. later i bought the contax g2 with it's 45mm
3 years later the xpro1 broke. i wanted to buy another body bc i have the 18mm f2 and the 35mm f1,4 still and it's a good camera
im photographing lots with the contax g2 lately and i love film photography

now im not sure if i want to buy the fuji ga 645 or the digital fuji xpro1 lol
the thing is...i don't have much shekels sooo
should i invest in the fuji ga645 or roll with the xpro1 bc somehow digital photography is still usefull...i borrowed the x100 as a backup and it's too small and not that good as the xpro1 ....

>>3052432

The Fuji 18mm and 35mm f 1.4 are literally the two worst x-mount lenses ever made. Terrible autofocus speeds, and very mediocre optics.

Give an X-T2 or a6500 a try and you will be blown away.

If you want to change mounts or formats, now is the time to do it before you actually buy a good x-mount lens.

>>3052441
>>3052432

Oh, and give Fuji a call. Warranty is most likely up, but if you ask nicely and get a rep having a good day they might repair it for cheap.

Probably cheaper than buying new.

File: Trix_002.jpg (482KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 1000x750px

>>3052432
The GA is a great camera and can be had for ~$300. Guess you need to decide if you want to be without a digital camera.

Pic from my GA

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: DSC_0220.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

Newbie here.

Help.

What do I buy?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Sony
Camera Model	402SO
Camera Software	32.1.D.0.419_0_f900
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:06 10:45:28
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3840
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3052482
A 400 speed colour negative film

Super Premium or Superia Xtra (or one of the combo packs) would do you well.

>>3052441
>35 F1.4
>mediocre optics

Uhhhhhhhh

>>3052482
If you're shooting 35mm, the Acros 3 packs and some Microfine developer to smuggle back home to develop them in.

>>3052487

It really is though.

The 35mm f 2 is better in every way.

>>3052484

Thanks, got the Superia X-tra 400 since it was dirt cheap.

Went with 24 shot rolls too so I can finish them faster.

>>3052501

I am home though.

But why would I want to develop them myself instead of sending them off?

File: Portra160_Ricoh_Apr 05 2017 281.jpg (624KB, 1400x1400px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 1400x1400px

Meanwhile....back in plebland....

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:05 23:06:30
Exposure Time	0.4 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-2.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: testtesttest.jpg (1MB, 1006x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1006x1500px

From a roll of Tri-X that expired before I was born

I pulled it to 200 in an attempt to counteract the aging effects, but the negatives were still very faint

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3052518
ricoh what?
ricohflex?

>>3052524
Diacord. Truly a fucking gem of the unknown cameras.

>>3052528
images look sharp as fuck. do you have the metered version?
also how does it compare to a minolta autocord or a yashica mat?

>>3052529
It's a Diacord L, so yes it has the meter, which is spot fucking on considering it's almost 60 years old (and doesn't require any batteries). Carried a lightmeter with me the first trip out and realized I totally didn't need it. I have never shot a Yashica or an autocord, but forum chat says the Diacord (not the Ricohflex) has a lens as good as the autocord. I picked this one up from a gentleman on apug. Best $130 I have ever spent. So much so, I will probably sell my rb67 kit, which I spent a bunch more money on. This thing is small, light, quick and easy to use, and I get quite a few keepers from it.

>>3052536
can you post more photos from it? might get one from a local guy, seems pretty solid.

File: 2016-11-06 lomo400lomo100McConnellsBeaverCreek01144.jpg (480KB, 1200x1182px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 1200x1182px

>>3052537
Some Lomo film...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Pro (for Sony) 10.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1182
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

File: 2016-11-03 hp500591 1.jpg (313KB, 1200x1158px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1200x1158px

>>3052537
Some hp5....and yes, I love my dog.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Pro (for Sony) 10.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-0.2 EV
Exposure Bias	1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1158
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>3052292
wtf no, start a new thread on /p/ and stop being a bitch

File: 2016-10-22 Lomo40007954.jpg (379KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1200x1200px

>>3052537
More Lomo CN

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Pro (for Sony) 10.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	0.4 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-2.1 EV
Exposure Bias	1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>3052518
>>3052541
>>3052543
These look slick as hell, what's your dslr scan set up look like? Those are some sharp ass photos. What's the optical structure of that lens?

>>3052388
Plus scans??!
That's pretty good?

>>3052552
its a tessar type, but better, most probably a direct xenar copy.

File: 16647353764_ffd5d60b36_b.jpg (229KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 800x533px

>>3052515
Because developing yourself is fun and cheaper.

>>3052553
Nah, dev only.

File: DC77BEAE-DA90-4CF4-9CD9-175BFC146D1C-236-00000065A10F50DE.png (53KB, 657x431px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 657x431px

>>3052554
Yeah just peeked online and it says it's a well regarded 4 element tessar fully coated. So like pic essentially.

>>3052564
That being said what's even the difference between the two just elements and their arrangement? Are they both 4 element lens? I'm interested in the physics of lens and how they work.

File: 2016-09-2803209.jpg (281KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1200x1200px

>>3052552
Lens structure question answered.

a6000>Nikkor 55/3.5>Huion L4s Light Pad>Lomography film holders>Capture One

Here's a wide open close focus shot on TMY

Crop to follow...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Pro (for Sony) 10.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-1.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

File: 2016-09-2803209 1.jpg (202KB, 897x897px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 897x897px

>>3052569
The vertical defects are due to mild corrosion on the pressure plate (this was the first roll through the camera). Scotch-Brite fixed that.

These were all single shot scans, no stitching.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Pro (for Sony) 10.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-1.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	897
Image Height	897
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>3052569

Got a picture of your set up? Interested in doing something similar myself.

>>3051001
Seriously?

>>3052574
Well, if you don't mind waiting for tomorrow, I'll take a few shots of the rig. I'm about 8 beers past bed time. Not sure I could take a clear shot at this point........

>>3052579

NO! I NEED IT RIGHT THIS INSTANT!

Nah man, whenever is fine. I wont have a roll to do it with for weeks.

I have an pretty nice macro lens and want to give it a shot.

>>3052581
I'm not a video guy, but I really should do one showing how fucking awesome scanning is with a tethered digicam. Shutter set to f12 on the keyboard, invert is automatic....life is good.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (253KB, 1500x1200px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1500x1200px

>>3052574
This is mine, probably similar to anons. A copy stand would work much nicer than a tripod as you can set it up once in the exact position needed and never have to change it, where as your constantly setting up the tripod and spending some time adjusting each time you scan. If you can find a copy stand for under $50 I'd recommend picking one up, if not just use your tripod.

File: IMG_20161103_215625.jpg (202KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 750x1000px

>>3052581
Here's mine. I use my phone instead of the iPad because I was getting reflections from due to the light source being too large.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:11:03 21:56:26
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	0.3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	310
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

>>3052622
>shoot film
>use sony to scan it

why filmfags are so retarded?

>>3052624
I fail to see any levels of retardation, but alright bud.

>>3052590
>>3052569

Light Pad? Like this?

>https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B012276XAE/

So just put the film on the holder, line up camera on a tripod and shoot?

>>3052476
Is this the 60mm one ? Also can you do proper portraits with that ?

>>3052665
Yeah that's pretty much the same one I have, you can buy better light tables built specifically for film but they get expensive quickly, these cheap ones work well enough though

File: ZDkzMWRhODFmYmI5OGM4YjM4NzJlZjgzN2FjOGZmZTdJBZMT_8AC928smUFhESb1aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmFkc2ltZy5jb20vZWUwYmI3Y2M4ZWExNTg4OTA4OGVjODVlNzQzMDU3NDdkOTk1OWI2MWJlNjczZjA4MzA3ZDBmNzI2ZTVkYmQ5YS5qcGd8fHx8fHw3MDB4NDY2fGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY.jpg (51KB, 700x466px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 700x466px

>>3052669

Awesome.

And for a film holder, something like this? I heard a simple piece of glass works too, but would this be better?

>>3052672
You'll have to wait for others to reply, I couldn't tell you as I don't use one

File: _DSC5542.jpg (418KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1000x669px

>>3050955
indians playing cricket in a parking lot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One 8 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	118 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	118 dpcm
Image Created	2017:03:07 19:26:21
Image Created	2017:03:07 19:26:21
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1000
Image Height	669
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Soft

File: Portra400_007.jpg (580KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1000x750px

>>3052665
I just use my smartphone.

Got the first roll for the gs645s back. Camera works great, I just can't take any photos worth a damn it seems.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:06 21:42:00
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	750
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3052738

That was 'scanned' with a dslr? What resolution are you getting out of the photos? Obviously much better than those fujicolor cds right?

And damn, I just don't have the guts to take a picture on a train.

I feel like I already stand out enough as a stinky gaijin, I don't want to stand out anymore.

File: Superia400_027.jpg (293KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1000x667px

>>3052741
Yep, scanned with my A7 with this setup. >>3052622


With 6x4.5 I can get around 5300x3950. Still getting the balls to shoot on the train, but there's so many great moments its hard to pass up. Regardless of if you take a photo or not, you're still a stinky gaijin. Might as well gaijin-smash your time in Japan.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:27 20:40:25
Exposure Time	2.5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	-6.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3052747
Thanks for the info.

I have an a7ii myself. Hoping I can take an almost FF shot of 135 film with the SEL90M28.

File: plant-9.jpg (221KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1000x750px

Going to Japan next year
would love tips

File: 04.jpg (584KB, 1200x720px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1200x720px

you do have the guts just do it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1200
Image Height	900
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2012:02:08 03:13:50
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1200
Image Height	720

File: seraphine_louis5.jpg (183KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 500x375px

gorge IR

File: FH010010.jpg (730KB, 1232x1840px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 1232x1840px

新宿御苑

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:02 17:03:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1232
Image Height	1840

>>3052747
This exposure is nuts, get that printed lad

>>3052843
I agree real nice

File: XGMR4TMR 06.jpg (757KB, 860x1280px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 860x1280px

Test shots from a Tamron 70-210/3.5 19AH. Bretty good for a zoom, the main drawback is how damn heavy it is.

File: XGMR4TMR 23.jpg (701KB, 850x1280px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 850x1280px

All these fucking doors.

File: XGMR4TMR 24.jpg (692KB, 862x1280px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 862x1280px

Last one.

File: BB.jpg (2MB, 2000x2010px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2010px

big boat.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	15014
Image Height	7232
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:04:06 02:10:10
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	2010

How do you get rid of the pixels on a cell phone display when DSLR scanning? I tried using a piece of glass because there's no way I can set any distance between the film/phone without loosing the light but that didn't work. Also how do you go about color correcting a color negs blue cast?

>>3051099
I shoot Rollei 400IR a bit.
Yours is one I wouldn't have tried since I'd screw up the exposure. Can as I ask how you exposed it?
With the Rollei I mostly go for something very sunlit and shoot f/16 for 0.5-1.0 seconds or the equivalent. It works alright but inside a forest like that I doubt I'd know how to get a decent exposure.

Stupid Question:

I understand that focal lengths differ between 120 & 35mm due the size of the neg.. However do apertures have to be considered differently?
I'm not a very lateral thinker & cant figure out if the f.stops will behave the same with (I assume?) a larger aperture due to increase in lense size ?

Have looked around on internet but cant find anything really, except a few formum posts saying you might underexpose a stop?

Hope thats coherent, Thank you

>>3052576
im not taking my life seriously so that's ok..

>>3051426
My advice for shooting snow is to bring filters and use them. Just leave a polariser strapped to the front, and with 100 ISO film that should let you access a more normal range of shutter speeds. Use a hood too. Put some tape over the metal film reminder on the back unless you want it freezing to your widdle nose, also a rubber eyecup can be nice. Oly's take nikon (standard) eyepiece fittings I believe.
Keep a spare pair of batteries in your pocket.
Again, re: condensation, don't throw out your plastic film canisters, keep your film in them even after it's shot.
Advance your film slowly; it's more brittle in the cold, and it's possible to get static arcing on your film in very cold dry conditions.

>>3052876
They do look bretty gud, what apertures were you using? Is the contrast good SOOC? I'm >>3051618 , it was my first time snapshitting with a pleb zoom in a long time, I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised as well.
>>3052877
Is this from the neg being fucked, or your scan being fucked?

File: DSLRScanning.jpg (455KB, 2138x795px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 2138x795px

>>3052888
You need to get the pixels out of your depth of field, or completely mask them with some kind of diffusion material. Using a phone is pretty retarded T B H.
Getting good quality light is the number one most challenging part of DSLR scanning.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:28 08:08:19
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2138
Image Height	795
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>3052957
The f stops behave exactly the same way. An f/8, 1/60th at 100 ISO exposure will be exactly the same on any film format.
The difference with larger formats is that you will get less depth of field for any given aperture, so your f/8 medium format shot will still have a considerable amount of background blur a lot of the time, whereas a 35mm shot might not.

>>3052911
the forest was not completely dark, quite a bit of sunlight was coming through the canopy.

I set my camera to 50asa and metered without the filter and then put the filter on before the exposure. I think it was f8 at 1/8s then shot one stop either side.

never tried the rollei film though so I can't say how it would be different.

File: Portra400_003.jpg (542KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1000x750px

>>3052843
Cheers, the little XA2 sure knows how to meter.

>>3052888
I bought a glossy, flimsy white folder and cut it into a smaller piece. It's perfectly translucent with no texture.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: 5gyKLLO.jpg (799KB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 3024x3024px

Hey, just getting started. Does anyone have experience with this lens? Hektor 73mm

>>3053034
This is a wild setup for someone who's just getting into film

>>3053050
It was given to me by a family member. It used to be my grandfather's.

>>3053009
I don't have anything besides a phone and using my laptop monitor seems pretty risky. I have a speedlight but it isn't remote triggered.

>>3053025
Could I use this directly over the phone and loose only a little light over the screen?

File: 6086237792_122dfc0138_b.jpg (184KB, 1024x689px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1024x689px

>>3053034
Leica glow, Leica glow everywhere.

It's a chrome band Hektor, from 1932, the rarest besides the first run.
It's bokeh is notoriously 'out there' which can give pics an incredibly dreamy vibe and can become gimmicky very fast if you shoot wide-open all day.

>>3053053
Sweet, never sell it, I wish I had all my grandfathers gear. His last wife who only married him for money at age 19 a mere year prior threw it all out when she found out he had excluded her from his last will.

>>3053061
Yes, that's exactly what I do. You can see it here. >>3052622

>>3053004
The inherent contrast is good, didn't have to boost it in post. Can't say so much about color rendition, haven't shot color with it yet.

>>3052877
Not sure what happened here, but I liked the way the composition turned out so posted it anyway.

>>3052747
fug

>>3053025
Hey where'd you find that folder? I'm in Japan too. Have tried looking for some cheap diffusion material back at home but couldn't figure it out.

>>3053150
Bought it at a stationary shop at the local Aeon mall.

>>3053025

I am using an a7ii w/ SEL90M28. I put the negatives on top of tablet screen (lifted off a little so pixels don't get focused on, pretty sure the negative wasn't completely flat, but was damn close), and shoot from a tripod.

Haven't shot a new roll yet, but found some old negatives from 1986 and started working on those.

After some experimentation, I get decently clear enough shots of the negatives (though a light pad and negative holder will make it infinitely easier I think), but am having absolute hell getting the colors right.

Any tips?

>/fgt/ - cucks and cuckscanning devices

>>3052354
All that work for one of the worst shots I've seen in my life. Stick to using a point and shoot disposable next time maybe.

>>3053195
see >>3052354
There are people who pay actual money to get scans that can't hold a candle to this, and you're calling me the cuck?

>>3053199
>All that work
>5 seconds to scan
>1 minute to stitch
>2 minutes to edit
That's a whole roll of 220 6x9 scanned at 70 MP in the time it would take a coolscan to do a single frame.
>one of the worst shots I've seen in my life
I'm sorry I don't crosspost my favourites on both fourchan and my personal social media, bb. I picked a reject that had an acceptably sharp and detailed section to share with the group.

I've kinda got a stupid question - what exactly differentiates different film cameras, other than how much you can tweak settings and shit?

Isn't most of the work done by the lens and the film itself, on film cameras? Between two film cameras using the same lens, film, and shooting at the same speed, aperture, etc, what will be the differences between the shots?

(important note: I know next to fuck-all about film photography)

>>3053241
You're pretty much right. Film cameras are just complicated boxes that film goes in, the majority of the image quality is dictated by lens and film.

That said, there are some key features that make some film cameras better than others. Viewfinder size, high shutter speed, motorised film advance, light meter, mirror lockup, build quality, interchangeable backs, modular design etc are all points of difference between film cameras that may directly or indirectly affect the final image.

If you're just getting into film photography don't worry about any of this. Buy a cheap SLR and a 50mm lens and go for your life

>>3053241
Nothing, you're exactly correct. The only caveat to this is that some cameras may have smoother shutters whose operation will contribute less vibration and result in a fractionally sharper image, but this parameter is so dependent on environmental factors and photographer technique that it's moot most of the time.
Some cameras are just more pleasant to use than others. Easier to focus, easier to achieve correct exposure, lighter, better looking, compatible with more lenses, better integrated to flash systems, different film advances.

>>3053241
>>3053245
>>3053247
Also, obviously, cameras that you like better you'll shoot more. Cameras are like cars in that regard, you can compare spec-sheets all day but holding it in your hand and enjoying using it trumps any other spec.

I shoot 90% of the time with a Canon P from the 1950s. Almost all of my other cameras are much better technically than this old thing, but it gets the most use because it fits well in my hand and it's just easy to use.

>>3053241
>>3053245
>>3053247
>>3053250
You could also differentiate based on film format.
Personally I prefer 120 and 4x5 film because I like to blow my images up when I print them, only real downsides are that the cameras are big and clunky and the film can easily break the bank. (like $4.50 for a roll of 120, $60 for 25 sheets of 4x5)

I'm happy with my Mamiya RZ67 for 120 tho, shit is great for doing studio work

>>3053260
Pictures don't convey how comically large the RB67 is. It's at least 2x bigger than it looks in pictures, shocked me when I saw one IRL

>>3053261
I really love working with it tho, despite how shitty it is to try to bring the damn thing anywhere

>>3053241
>Between two film cameras using the same lens, film, and shooting at the same speed, aperture, etc, what will be the differences between the shots?
two film shots made by the same camera with exactly same settings are different in that the grain pattern will be a new one each time. sure, it has a structure, but the way it goes will be new every time, thats the reason why when you see films at the cinema the grain appears to flicker and "move" incessantly, specially in static shots.

File: IMG_20170407_142532-01.jpg (1MB, 3622x2038px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3622x2038px

Oh boy, here right in time for the weekend.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Camera Model	ONE E1003
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:07 14:26:58
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	4135
Lens Aperture	f/2.1
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.79 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3622
Image Height	2038
Exposure Index	407
White Balance	Auto
Gain Control	Unknown
Time (UTC)	13:25:32
Date (UTC)	2017:04:07

>>3053284

My new camera was supposed to come in today. No tracking number though.

Hoping tomorrow, work starts up again Monday and I don't wanna go.

>>3050955
Just bought a Yashica MG-1 from an old camera shop thats closing down for $25. Good deal???

>>3053293
if it the it still works it was a pretty decent deal.

>>3052876
damn that is pretty.

File: nbhdhfy.jpg (2MB, 1330x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1330x2000px

>>3053080
Anybody else hear gonna keep a kit in good condition just for someone else in their family? I'm seriously thinking about getting a nice kit together and just putting it away, I got a feeling like film equiptment has depreciated as much as it could, and it might get harder in 20+ years to get a nice set up, also sentimentality of handing things down.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	MLF
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 14:36:58
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1330
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>3053188
Oh m8 for colours go into photo shop make a levels layer and adjust r/g/b values separately, clipping highlights and darks a little bit. You can check what's clipping by holding cmd or ctrl while sliding.

>>3053331
Well, I certainly will hand down my stuff to someone in my family. That said, I will keep using it until the time comes, just keeping it unused takes away from the sentimentality of it (since you didn't develop a connection/memories, with it).
Now that lomography basically calmed down thanks to instagram/snapchat I don't see the prices changing (for better or worse, some prices remained too high for some stuff).

Gear talk, fags.

I've got that springtime itch, I want to sell off about 600 worth of gear I'm not using to buy a Bessa R2A. I'd get a m39-to-Leica adapter for it and use my Jupiter-3 50mm f/1.5.

What's the /fgt/ sauna rumours say about the R2A? What about adapting Soviet m39/LTM stuff to M-mount? (I've heard the thing about early Jupiter-3 copies having Zeiss registration. Mine doesn't; I've tested it.)

>>3050955
I have a budget of around 150(maybe160)€ i will be going to a vintage fair tomorrow. I may be look for a yashika tlr, which one should i look for like literal model name?
Also as far as slr what should i be looking for?

>>3053331
I'm always buying cheap cameras for my friends. I only really have one camera on the go at a time so I have a collection of cameras circulating through my group of friends. I'll probably give them away to them if they ask

>>3053334
You have a Sony, so buy Capture One Pro 10 for Sony. I think it's $40. Learn to use it. It is a thousand times better for film scans than Lightroom. Photoshop has way more tools on hand, but isn't as streamlined for processing raws. And the BIG bonus is that CapOne does tethering, which is a godsend when scanning film. Once setup, one click scans, imports, inverts and applies a basic tone curve.

>>3053578
Quoted wrong post >>3053334
Meant to quote >>3053188

What should I shoot for my first roll of film?

>>3053581
kodak gold, colorplus or c200.

File: 17395744463_5e0626f412_b.jpg (385KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1000x1000px

>>3053581
Whatever c41 film you can get for cheap, except Kodak ultramax. That shit sucks.

After looking for awhile, I recently grabbed 17 rolls of Portra 400VC in 220. Hell yes

Where do yall find cheap film?

File: IMG_0626.jpg (355KB, 836x1000px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 836x1000px

>Ok mates Friday night
what're you guys shooting this weekend? What's in your cam bag? Got some Portra 400 in the c330 80mm + new grip and Om-2spot hp5+ 24mm. Got a little flash in the bag couple rolls and a 100mm oly lens too.

>>3053559 #
That sounds nice. I only have one other friend that shoots and sparingly.

>>3053389 #
I feel you about the connection and stuff, but the idea of getting a basically minty set up as a hand me down sounds way too sweet. I do guess all my equiptment now should last quite a while.

>>3053590
No where haha atleast not in Canada, I usually order from B&H.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	836
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3053590
you cant anymore.

File: 9e910f9fb7d5dc8fb996420a2f048581.jpg (157KB, 800x578px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 800x578px

>>3053261
>comically large

>>3053559
i gave a friend a konica pop. he became in love with film., now ill help him get a spotmatic. a filme fag is born.

>>3053594
the trick to have friends who shoot is to get them into it. point and shoots are fun at parties and everyone can use one

>>3053600
The GX680 looks like it'd be bigger than a lot of 4x5 cameras

>>3053600
nice imax rig.

File: IMG_20170407_210303.jpg (158KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 600x800px

>>3053594
What're you shooting photos of?

It's cherry blossom season, height of the bloom and it's rainy/cloudy. Was wanting to shoot lots of slide but the weather is so shit I am waiting until I'm out to load anything. May wind up shooting some 160NS on the Bronica but will take some rolls of Provia with me just in case the light gets nice. Also may head out at night to take advantage of the clouds + light pollution combo.

Pic from last night shooting some extremely expired Fuji 64T.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:04:07 21:03:04
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Custom
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	-3.4 EV
ISO Speed Rating	1001
Exposure Time	0.1 sec