The fuck did you have to make the template resolution so high, OP?
Because they can't think of anything interesting to say about Shakespeare and he's the only other writer of the period they're familiar with. Faust, Hero and Leander, Edward II, The Jew of Malta, Tamburlaine, and Dido are all fantastic.
>still thinking Hegel's legacy has ANYTHING to offer
Agreed on Rand though, it's the same kind of cancer as Marx is, only opposite. In short - unworthy of a grown man's attention.
Freud a shit but you gotta admit that the novelty and thoroughness of his approach makes him sort of relevant. Same goes for Marx, except that he's got good ideas as well (rejecting Hegel and God to name a few)
Sanders is a politician, no new ideas and no worth, but has somewhat of an edge on other politicians in that he manages to sound sincere?
>throwing your vote away
literally nobody knows who this man is
Why are they in the same picture with a legitimate filmmaker?
I'd say every Tarkovsky film is a masterpiece and I suggest all seven of them, but I think Stalker is the greatest.
Paradjanov's best would be Color of the Pomegranades.
Vertov's undeniable masterpiece is of course Man with a Movie Camera.
plebeian: likes a handful of canonical writers with a few mediocrities mixed in; prone to accepting common misreadings and seeing the history of literature as progressing from strict arbitrary rules to free expression
contrarian: comes in many varieties, including:
-believes many talented and brilliant women writers have been cruelly denied eminent positions in the canon and deserve to be ranked among the best of their period
-maintains that all great literature is at bottom atheistical or 'daemonic' in some way, and every great writer was shocking and misunderstood in his own time
-thinks literature has lost its way some time between the renaissance and the modernists, and that all good literature must be moral
-is absolutely certain that at least half of the canonical writers are vastly overrated hacks, including Shakespeare
Patrician: this I don't know. I'm just a shitposter on 4chan. All I can say for sure is that the patrician reads a lot.
Having Warhol, who did plastic anti-art and pop-pictures for money top Bergman, who was and is objectivly the single greatest cinematic person to ever live discredits you as a person
I think Tarkovsky is a pretty cool guy. Eh fights back at soviet censors and doesn't afraid of anything
She said that her only inspiration and teacher was Aristoteles and I think that she proved him right in one thing.
Women are intellectually uncomplete men
Can someone make a shop of Hume doing pic related, I want to spam it on /sci/
obviously. look at the ignorant cocksucker look in that 20 year old's glimmering darwin eyes. then go to the mad gettysburg motherfucker who's been through shit, lived through shit and wrote to tell of whom shoulders we stand on.
cut back to the glittering cocksucker on the left
>liking tolstoy is contrarian
>dostoyevsky is not a contrarian
you do not know fucking ANYTHING about russian literature in history context, do you
you do not know anything ab