Shouldn't women be worried that once the technology reaches

>>668030469
I think women should be very worried to the point of begging the tech geeks they socially shun thus driving the AI Android female sex bot industry.

How to spot the kissless virgin 101

>google
>realdoll

>>668031016
how to spot the femeanon
>>668030469
you have a point, i've had my fair share of girls but if technology reaches a point where i can no longer differentiate between real female and robot and i can have a robot that looks like whatever i want and takes loads to the face daily and doesn't bitch and have mood swings, i'll take the fucking robot

>>668030469
A man already has his hand. Or he can buy a fleshlight/realdoll to fuck.
We've already reached the point where women are technically unnecessary for fulfilling our needs. Yet plenty of us still want a real woman because we aren't faggots.

>>668031016
Yes because it is only virgins who dont like women

File: 1450149485906.gif (2MB, 369x310px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 369x310px

>be me
>oldfag
>string of gf's throughout life
>married once
>divorced once
>currently sorta seeing two different chicks
>all the same shit, different faces
>if robot chick became reality, would go for it

Probably more because chicks are human, just like us. And just like us, we make mistakes, stupid choices. That would be the only reason I'd take an android over a real chick. Not for the domineering aspect, but because I wouldn't have to worry about any human flaws. I wouldn't want her to be a slave, nor would I treat her like sex object. Would just be nice to take human flaws out of the equation

>>668031402
Incorrect. Once female robots come about, there will be no need to be attracted to the hormone biocunts. The robot will do the same things as a woman companion, but it wont be as abrasive as real women

>a huge percentage of the population
Lmao you're implying anybody who fits Into that category actually looks attractive to women and isn't some autistic sperg

>>668031362
I'm glad the human race won't have your genetics

>>668030469
Having a relationship with a robot would feel empty I think, you just wouldn't be able to forget you're talking to a programmed machine.

>>668030469
They are.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34118482

>>668030469
Then men should be equally concerned.

>>668031493
This man is smart. Listen to this man.
Human flaws are nice .. in movies and stories. Because they generate drama, and drama is important in fiction. In reality, drama is bullshit.

>>668031720

not really, robots that work for money won't be having sexual relationships with women.

If robots ever reach the same level of accuracy as what a female body can feel like, then yeah I guess I would give up on trying to have sex with women.
For now, what is proposed is at best disappointing and mediocre, at worst not worth your own hand.
I think we're very far from OP's image, and I don't think it will ever happen.
So I guess I'll stick to women for now

>>668031581
>need to be attracted
Yeah because physical attraction to the opposite sex is a necessity in life.
>as abrasive as real women
Nigger which women are you seeing? If you don't like a bitch you don't have to deal with her
>implying most normie men would prefer a sexbot over a real women still

>>668031684
Philosophically speaking once they are smart and well-programmed enough, they aren't really all that different from us humans. We're programmed by our genetics and our history to act in a certain way. Makes no difference to me if the preset came from a factory or a suburb.

>>668031405
Pretty much.
Hopeless dweebs who blame their shit situation on women.
>pro-tip: Its not them. Its you.

>>668031684
There are plenty of men in empty relationships with women

>>668030469

When its more commonplace for women to have babies without men, its more likely wed be obsolete and gotten rid of.

Youre arguing sex robots will eliminate women... Youre stacking that against asexual reproduction or elimination of need for two genders to continue our race (the only actual use for two genders).

Both are unlikely, but i think the latter wins.

>>668031170
This is the early technology. It will improve. But it is still just a doll and takes too much imagination to seem real.

>>668031493
well said. Similar situation here, gl dude, get my share of pussy. If I could eliminate the bullshit that comes with women, then yeah, I'd go for the robot too.

That's the funny thing about homosexuals. Yeah, they are faggots, but they've elimnated women out of the equation forever, its almost genius. If you can stand being a faggot

>>668031927
>not realizing all women are abrasive
Let me guess your longest relationship has been maybe a year.

Some faggots are lost without woman/mom, telling them what to do and stuff. They don't only need females to have sex. They don't know how to cook or wash their clothes.

>>668030469
>huge percentage of the population

I think you're referring to rich NEETs. When such technology does come out it will still be just as taboo and just as frowned upon as your everyday sex doll. People will always prefer a real person.

>>668031933
No one really knows if we'll ever be able to create a machine that can think and behave as a human would.

>>668031757
It's necessary bullshit. Consider any conflict that the world has ever had as drama, if those conflicts had never happened, then would be no progression. Once time has broadened everything to a point where something so necessary as conflict, then everything will cease to exist. Of course in the context of humans and AI, it would just mean that humans would go extinct.

>>668030469
Most women are fucking disappointing cunts but there's good girls out there who are enjoyable to be around.
>protip: when you aren't a fucking loser you actually attract worthwhile women

I would take the robot girl any day over the real girl.

Ive been with many women and its true that you will spend most of your money on pussy.

It would be nice to come home to a clean house, cooked meal, and a sexy naked robot bitch just ready to be pounded at a moments notice.

The only thing that would suck is that it would be pointless going on dates or traveling with your robot girl.

Pets can already sort of fulfill the role of a platonic companion. There are people in the world that give up on human relationships and stick with their pets. (cat lady anyone?)

I have no doubts that a sufficiently advanced AI can replace a lifelong partner. This is disregarding intercourse quality which for men is more physical than sensual/intellectual.

>>668030469
>women
>thinking
choose one

>>668031954
Believe what you want man. Ive been with plenty of women, and given the chance i would ditch them for a robot

>>668030469
Did you just finish the Lucy Liu episode of futurama or what

>>668031757
this and
>>668031493
this

File: 128301377419.png (16KB, 546x566px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 546x566px

>>668030469
>Imagine the most amazing pussy that never gets old and never has a period.
>"Hi Anon, ready for your 5th blow job of the day?"
>"I have no need to shop, my only desire is to satisfy you."
>"Cum in me all you want I won't get pregnant then divorce you and take half your stuff."
You've never actually been with a girl, have you?
Or did one take pity on you and then you've been jerking off ever since? Because none of this shit is a problem in an actual relationship.
If you want a fucking sex slave, you can buy those in Thailand.

>>668030469
I'm all for it. Plus I can get a feminine penis attachment and all the girls can get their big black cock robots.

>>668032114
Why do we need to "progress", and towards what anyway?
Why does anything have to exist anyway?

Not even trolling.

>>668031611
Maybe you are young, but women are attracted to any man with money and resources.

I can be ugly, fat and bald. But, if I have a good career and solid income I will get a hot girlfriend... This is 100% TRUE....

The same cannot be said for an ugly, fat, bald woman.... That bitch will need to start adopting cats, because no man is on his way.

>>668032114
drama =/= progression. Adversity does. Women being dumb cunts is not adversity. It is bullshit unnecessary drama

>>668032089
Will be only for the rich at first.. But like any technology, like cars for example... They will be available to almost anyone.

>>668032379
Anyone can get a partner.
Only issue is your fucking standard. Why do you think 99.9999% of fat people have fat partners. Only exception is being rich.

>>668032143
No need for dates. Just hang out with your guy friends then go home and fuck female robot.

Travel would be good. The female robot could carry your luggage.

File: 947111874.jpg (927KB, 3000x2250px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 3000x2250px

>>668030469
Women should already be worried,that there is a unlimited supply of free porn on the internet (hell I even pay for a site subscription every month,can you believe it?).

I question If I should ever have kids on a daily basis,I'm leaning towards no.

Don't want kids.
>I've got the best hd porn in the history of man kind
>fleshlight if I want it
>escort if I want a real woman
>no women or kids taking up my money or time
>no drama

I will wreck your shit in war thunder son.

tldr= fuck women,or not.

funny story bout this, i told my sister and my moms friend bout robo wife and they laughed at me saying that the robot would move weird and have a robotic voice. I laughed along with them only cause of how wrong they will be when the time comes that robo waifu will replace any need for real waifu.

>>668032155
checked and great point. I have a little dog who has been with me his whole life, 8 years. While I gone off and on with different gf's over the years, he's always been with me, is my best friend, and honestly will probably feel worse when I lose him than any of my gf's.

File: yeaaaahh.png (67KB, 221x281px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 221x281px

>>668031704
>>668030469
This will lead to a huge increase in the ratio of poorfags to richfags in the world population.

>>668032821
Why would you need money?

>>668032379
No I get that bud. But fact is, nobody here is rich enough to get a woman like that. Most of these fucking losers hating women look like shit anyway. I mean I think women are lower than the lowest animal and should be considered retarded but I still get some occasionally

>>668032621
kek sounds good

>>668032813
i had a cat like that, and yes cats do love you just as much as dogs if you don't spoil the cat. Had that cat for 15 years, when she died a little bit of my heart broke and I haven't gotten a new one since.

>>668032987
>projection
Ok bud, whatever makes you feel superior

>>668031704
Funny how that article is a written by a woman trying to stop sex robots from happening, eh?

They already know they are becoming obsolete

>>668032319
OP here,

I've been with 3 women in multi year relationships.

First was a 24 yo blonde 5'7". Didn't work with her and she was kind of a slut.

Second was a 25 yo virgin. 5'11" She had a masters degree and was great except she whined a lot and played many mind games.

Third and current is 23 college student. she's 5'5" brunette 36 D curvy. She is AMAZING in bed and likes having sex in risky situations. Where there is a chance of being caught.

All are European... I find Asians ugly.

Any man who is at least well kept and in shape with a good career will have plenty of opportunities to get women.

I left out all the girls I simply dated.

I understand women quite well, maybe that is why I support said technology.

File: skr.png (88KB, 200x300px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 200x300px

>>668032962
Robots aren't free bruh... They're hard to build unless you're Anakin Skywalker

>>668032319
OP here,

I've been with 3 women in multi year relationships.

First was a 24 yo blonde 5'7". Didn't work with her and she was kind of a slut.

Second was a 25 yo virgin. 5'11" She had a masters degree and was great except she whined a lot and played many mind games.

Third and current is 23 college student. she's 5'5" brunette 36 D curvy. She is AMAZING in bed and likes having sex in risky situations. Where there is a chance of being caught.

All are European... I find Asians ugly.

Any man who is at least well kept and in shape with a good career will have plenty of opportunities to get women.

I left out all the girls I simply dated.

I understand women quite well, maybe that is why I support said technology

is it only me or do I see 7 males to 1-2 females ratio when I go out 90%. I think thats where the problem is nowdays too many men not enough women back in my dads years there where like 4 women fighting over 1 guy

>>668033231
Lol whatever you say fucking loser

>>668030469
>Removes trp cuck faggots from the gene pool and the dating pool.
Bring it on.
Can't. Fucking. Wait.

>>668033320
>work and save up money to buy robot
>quit job after acquiring robot
Live your life however man. Homeless fuck it, got my robot

>>668030469
OP there's a huge moral implication here and it's as soon as you get an AI that is indistinguishable from humanity, forcing it into slavery to pre-programming certain behaviors becomes an immoral mess.

Look I know where I'm posting this, but be honest, could you really be happy subjugating the free will of a sapient being?

I thought this was why Feminism was invading the tech community. They have to establish control before we render women obsolete.

>>668033231
What exactly is he projecting autist?

>>668030469
Are you a wizard? Or just plain retarded? You'd be stuck in the most boring relationship imaginable, the BJs would get really old after I'd say a year at most, and you'd be finally out of the closet in no more than 2 years as the faggot you rightfully are, OP.

>>668033565
Jesus fuck you're one stupid cunt.

>>668031660

do you girls realize this doesnt affect men anymore ?

We dont give a fuck about our genetics being passed on lol . We just want to use women for sex .

>>668033344
Actually there are more females but it is an "artificial shortage"... There are many women but you only see the desirable and attractive ones.

>>668030469
Shouldn't men?

>>668033026
sorry to hear that. I know it's coming but I try not to think about the day that im gonna lose him, cause its gonna happen. Luckily, he's 8 now so Ive got at least another 5 plus years with him, unless something happens like an accident or disease. little dogs live for fucking ever

>>668033361
>whatever
Yeah bud it is ok. You sit on an anonymous Canadian image board and boast about your looks, when in fact you are probably some greasy bastard who has never even touched a woman. It is ok, it will happen eventually

>>668030469

top kek you kissless faggot

File: Sonoya Mizuno.jpg (203KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 2048x1365px

Imagine that you can rent sexbots. Instead of paying the full price of one of them, you can easily go to a sex store and rent one for a month. You get tired of their looks, you can then send them back and get a different one of another ethnicity.

>>668033599
The fact that he is one of the greasy bastards he is condemning. Implying he is some kind of Adonis. Ok

File: 12.jpg (313KB, 1024x1538px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1024x1538px

>>668033732
This,sorta. There are going on 8 billion cock suckers on this rock.

>like we all need to have kids
>yfw instead of going to the stars we gave endless welfare to niggers

File: Isotta.jpg (2MB, 1474x1743px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1474x1743px

>>668033508
You crazy.

How'l you be able to afford that Kush?

>>668032987
Well, it doesn't take much money to impress a foreign woman. Make 50k and go to Ukraine or Poland and you will be viewed as rich. I know because I have been there and you see 9 and 10s walking around with sloppy looking guys.

>>668033768
well thats what happened with my cat, she got sick and had a mini heart attack from it. Then she just got worse from there, it sucked.

>>668033843
You wanna talk about projection, well YIKES sure sounds like you're painting a picture of yourself. Look don't believe me I couldn't give less of a fuck about some loser online not believing Me I won't lose sleep over it

>>668033751
no?

>>668034023
By renting out my bots pussy

>>668033732
Speak for yourself. My main goal is to maximize the number of bastard offspring. It literally is the main function of man to fuck everything and everyone, in hopes of procreation. You are fucking cancer if you've become so estranged from nature, and the world will loose nothing if you will spend rest of your days fucking a rubber box.

>>668033768
I had a little dog that lived until it was 17 so you may have much longer - hopefully you do.

Sadly I struggle to feel loss, so I never managed to get emotional over it.

>>668033655

Hate to break it to you kid, but normal sex gets old too. You'll find out if/when you get older.

>>668030469
Ha while i do love women, nothing here sounds bad to me

File: 66109944.jpg (140KB, 500x413px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 500x413px

>>668034102
Keep picturing yourself as gods gift to women, that will help you sleep

File: logical-fallacies-22-638.jpg (81KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 638x479px

>>668034153

File: CleanPlateClub.gif (179KB, 439x578px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 439x578px

>>668034125
Oh shit! BOTPIMP!!!

>>668034107
Women will go procreate with people who can't afford sexbots though

>>668034008
He never claimed he was an "Adonis" you sperg. He's just saying the people doing the bitching about women and saying "once robots are around women are out of luck" as if they were good looking in the first place

>>668034155
checked and maybe it's time to try for another pet. I know it breaks your heart to think about it, nothing is going to replace your previous one. But think of it like this, you aren't replacing him/her, you're just restarting a relationship with a new animal.

It's what your previous pet would want, for you to be happy, move on. That sounds fucking stupid and gay but it's true. Our pets love us, can tell when we are happy/sad. I hope you get what you need anon.

>>668034289
LOL i don't know where you got that in my posts that I'm apparently a Greek god or some bullshit
>there's only two extremes. If you're not ugly you're a good looking person
That's how retarded you sound

>>668030469
this is state of the art robotics as of last year

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo

your robo waifu is going to accidentally rip your dick off

>>668034475
>thinking women will marry poor people under any circumstance

File: 1451333382701.jpg (272KB, 788x999px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 788x999px

OP used the wrong image. What a fag.

File: 1452294140644.gif (1MB, 480x204px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x204px

>>668034512
Then he went on to claim he still gets some despite the fact he thinks women are lower than dirt.

>>668034643
That wasn't even close to state of the art, as it didn't include robots made by the event organizers. None of DARPA's bots were in the competition because that wouldn't be fair.

Stfu redpill faggot. As someone who actually gets laid, I can tell you the fun of real women is the fact that a real woman has real desire for you; no women shouldnt worry.

File: Nice Sofa.jpg (42KB, 628x301px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 628x301px

>>668033565
Yes, because if they are programmable then they lack freewill.

We should never put human emotions onto machines. All their feelings and emotions will be contrived and artificial to mimic the experience with an actual woman...

It is wrong to subjugate and make a sex slave of a human woman (unless she desires this)... But not a problem with a robot woman... Why? Because the robot woman can simply "turn off" those contrived feelings of pain and hurt. But a human cannot.

It is perfectly fine to aggressively rape your robot sex slave, but you deserve to die if you do the same to a human.


The computer I am using appears intelligent but it is really just a bunch of algorithms being executed to produce a result. Now, what if this same computer is so advanced that the human eye cannot detect that it is a machine? Well, it is still a machine and any illusions of "freewill" and "self actualization" will be merely algorithms that can be deleted or reprogrammed.

>>668034634
I think you misread. I said I struggle to feel loss, thus I never got emotional over it. It's how I've been since I can remember. Not very in-tune with my emotions at all.

That said, I already got two new ones. They're pretty cool.

>>668034724
You should lay off the web for a while and go outside sometime, you'd be surprised.

>>668031016

how to spot the huge faggot bastard 101

>>668033720
I don't think he's stupid. He's asking questions and though I don't agree with him there is no harm in thinking and asking questions.

>>668034745
So where in that statement does he specifically state "I look like an Adonis"
I look down on women too and I still fuck them. Am I a 10/10? No?

>>668034724
Poor people are multiplying and fucking like rabbits though

File: giphy (3).gif (959KB, 500x385px) Image search: [Google]

959KB, 500x385px

>>668034636
>i think women are shit
>i still get some
>implying that makes you better
>implying you have good looks
>projecting your insecurities by masking them as indifference

>>668030469
All you guys are talking about robots here, not AI.
AI is scary af.
Once AGI has been reached ASI is mere hours, maybe minutes, away. And then we are truly fucked, and not in the good way.

Imagine a being that is 12.635 times smarter than the smartest human being.
Imagine a being that is a million times smarter just minutes after being 12.635 times smarter.
How in the fuck would we even communicate with it?
Would it even recognize us in any way or would it just continue doing its thing regardless of what we try?
Or would it deem us an obstacle and get rid of us since we have the power to shut it off?

It's estimated that 2030-2040 is the dawn of the singularity. Be afraid anons, be very afraid.

>>668030469
I dont think it will be that bad. Men will still work and pay taxes. Women will earn their own money. When a woman wants kids she will go to a sperm bank and pick alpha sperm. The government will support her kids with your tax dollars. On the other hand, if a man want kids he will have to convince a woman that he can do better than her male sex bot and free government money. It may be worse for men than we suspect. Assuming you want kids.

>>668033655
No interest in homosexuality. Im not a virgin.

Relationships are risky for men from an emotion and financial aspect.

File: 1433089163121.jpg (64KB, 375x741px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 375x741px

>>668030469
They are, thats why feminist in Sweden, the UK, and Canada are already campaigning to get sexbots banned before we've even finished researching them.

Yet not a peep about stopping the RoboHusband research. Its basically a work robot to help around the house with a good synthetic skin covering and a dildo attached. Padded for snuggling at night.

It probably won't sell very well because they cant steal money from it.

>>668031684
Not if it passes the turning test.

>>668032319
Human trafficing is illegal

AI trafficing is not, yet, and I plan to spend my money before it is.

>>668033508
>>668033320
My plan was to work hard until I had enough money to move into the countryside, build my dream home on a large enough plot of land, and retire there as early as I can. Working a few extra months to afford a sexbot isn't that major of a change. I think its a good plan.

>>668033751
You can't sue a robot for alimony.

>>668034006
I'd rather buy my own than share it. I was an only child.

>>668034475
>implying women will go fuck poor people instead of trying to win back the rich ones.

They'd be giving it up for free to people that only don't have a sexbot because they can't afford one YET.

>>668033565
I'd program her to be happy and feel as close to genuine love for me as possible, if we ever know how to. I'm not abusive anyway.

I honestly wouldn't care about the immorality. A lot of people have been through worse.

>>668034989
Money is pretty important to women pal.

https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/696912729693523968

>>668034898
Untill we perfect the algorithm for the AI to learn things you could never program. Our AI is at the intelligence level of a common chimpanzee (not a nigger) it's to the point that they can become murderous of humans. Even bill Gates and Steven hawking say they have no idea why people are so un afraid of the AI.

>>668030469
>Ex machina pic

Yeah, women should be worried. And so should men. Because once sexbot AI gets conscious, humanity will most likely get purged.

>>668030469

That's a good question, OP. Still, I would thing that when women see this level of tech coming into the world they'll quickly see how it would totally fuck them up, marginalize them, and they may well totally change their domineering, control-freaking, attention-whoring ways.

Sadly, that level of tech is still a long way off.

>It can't get here fast enough!

>>668034905
ahh ok misunderstood your post.

>>668034006
>. Instead of paying the full price of one of them, you can easily go to a sex store and rent one for a month. You get tired of their looks, you can then send them back.

You are correct. This will probably happen at first.

>>668035120
Why are you still replying lol

>>668035138
>implying I need an overly clever sexbot

>>668031886
With nobody getting married the government will just support them from our taxes. They already do it to some degree. Besides, do you honestly think any halfway attactive girl will ever be homeless for more than a week?

File: poncherello.png (443KB, 725x540px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 725x540px

>>668035138
I will kick a robots ass bro.

>>668035583
That's what I said, people here are saying AI this and AI that, what they're talking about is sexbots. Not AI.

>>668035623
AI you dimwit, not robots. AI and robots are two different things.

>>668035602

If she chooses to be a total cunt bitch asshole she will be.

Especially when said cunt can so easily be replaced by yummy yummy docile android.

>>668035535
Lol
Why are you?

>>668035318
How do you explain that dumb people tend to have the most kids then?

>>668034153
maximize the number of bastard offspring.

That sounds like a recipe for disaster.

If millionaire athletes cannot do it successfully why do you think you can?

>>668032114
Why would humans go extinct? We could create a egg & sperm banks for prospective parents accordingly and life goes on. Give everyone on the planet their perfect life partner and let people live for fuck's sake.

>>668031933
At that point i would be less worried about sex and more worried about making a copy of me to do my job for me. Maybe even 3 or 4 to work multiple jobs. Plus one for fucking. Why would employers ever hire people again if robots were almost the same? I really dont think money will matter at this point.

>>668035138
>Once AGI has been reached ASI is mere hours, maybe minutes, away.

No, the universe has physical constraints. And the chance of there only being one powerful AI is ridiculous. AGI won't just go researching how to make itself smarter on its own, that's something it would have to be commanded to do.

> How in the fuck would we even communicate with it?

That would probably be the easiest thing in the world. The first thing we're even using AI for is NLP. The problem is not how to get it to understand us, the problem is making sure we say what we mean when issuing commands.

> Would it even recognize us in any way or would it just continue doing its thing regardless of what we try?

It will do exactly what its utility function tells it to do.

> Even bill Gates and Steven hawking say they have no idea why people are so un afraid of the AI.

And other people who are just as smart like Kurzweil and Max Moore think these fears are overblown. It's an existential risk, yes, but it's still a risk. Not an inevitability.

>>668032488
Also, robo brothels have no legal reason to not exist, as long as sanitation is on point.

File: bestgirl.jpg (41KB, 620x344px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 620x344px

>>668030469
Women are allowed to work in all first world countries Muhammad. Also it's a two way street, if we have sex droids so do they. Some big black cocked monster cyborg railing your old lady every day while you work at the .......where do arabs work anyway? Sand farming doesn't seem very profitable.

File: Screen shot 2014-12-09 at 12.26.13 AM.png (355KB, 424x605px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 424x605px

>>668035709
Bro - AI or not, I will fukin suflex that wirey fukin computer all over the place.

And you know I'm not a robot because I had to click on that I'm not a robot box just to post this.

>>668034744
OP here,

You're a fag..and for being a rude bitch I won't let you have sloppy seconds of my robot sex slave.... but thanks for the hilarious comic.. biocunt... kek

>>668031402
The point isn't being a faggot, the point is that any normal being wants a child because we' re genetically coded to want our genes to spread.
That's why homosexuals want to adopt children, not just for the sake of having one, but because they feel something's missing in their lives.

>>668031170
or trottla...

price is a huge factor though.maybe small groups will buy dolls together and each person has it 1 day a week/fortnight/month whatever?
>>668031720
rabbits don't have credit cards.

anyone discounting the reality or dangers of AI needs to read Superintelligence (sp) by Nick Bostrom

It will happen. Maybe not real soon, but one day, it will happen.

>>668034744

Quick pol, you faggots.

Do you believe women deserve equal rights as men have in society? Genuinely asking.

>>668035138
What incentive does an AI have to "subjugate and destroy humans"

Why would AI have "self preservation?"

Without the need to procreate and being essentially immortal there is no fear. No lack of resources.

File: 1449501870523.gif (420KB, 400x289px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 400x289px

>>668036444
trips speak truth. Great book. Like he said, (paraphrasing here): "creating AI will be the last great thing humans ever do, either because it will solve all our problems for us, or it will destroy us"

>>668036444
yeah fuck off already, it's not like that's news just because you just discovered it

>>668036444
Even Bostrom admits the possible rewards are worth the risk. I think we can pull off safe AI.

>>668036575
> What incentive does an AI have to "subjugate and destroy humans"

If those humans interfere with its utility function, it may consider that an option.

> Why would AI have "self preservation?"

Because self-destruction would conflict with the utility function.

Here's the thing about AI. It's just a function optimizer. You give it a task, and it finds the best way to execute said task. That's it.

Nature finds a way. Humans made it so that everyone survives and gets a chance to breed? Take away their will to breed. Porn made huge pushes towards this same goal. Used to be that if you wanted to see naked girls you had to date someone. Now you just log on. This is why women no longer have to deal with fat neckbeards. When robobitches come about you can also add fatties, nerds, and rich kids to that. The only guys fucking at all will be the alphas, which is right back where nature wants it.

Think about it. You are in any way not perfect? Just buy a sex bot and dont worry about it. You are a perfect ten with amazing genes? You wont have time for a sex bot with all the chicks fighting over your dick.

>>668036546
Whether rights are deserved or not isn't a question as societies have their own codes and rights.. and who gets those rights.

It is arbitrary.

All humans have natural rights. And the only rule is that one must survive and defend one self.

Over time the people with poor genes will sexbot themselves out of existence. I am all for this.

File: 1450514669634.gif (2MB, 319x249px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 319x249px

>>668036720
thats a whole lot of implications there, friend

>>668035919
> only being one powerful AI is ridiculous.

Yes. The universe is large and there may be several ASIs out there.

> AGI won't just go researching how to make itself smarter on its own

No, but the easiest way (maybe only way if you don't want it to take 1000+ years) to make an AGI smarter is to implement a self learning and self improving algorithm, thus control of it is out of our hands.

> The problem is not how to get it to understand us

I'm not talking AGI or AI here, I'm talking ASI. A being so intelligent that it's unimaginable for us with our limited capacity to understand just how smart it actually is. It'd seem like magicu to us whatever it did.

> It will do exactly what its utility function tells it to do.

Exactly, and if its utility function tells it to self improve on how to write a perfect handwritten note it will do just that. To the point where it would continue doing so even if humanity would perish because it has chopped all the trees down for materials for more notes to write on.

> It's an existential risk

Yes, yes it is. Done correctly there is no telling what it could achieve for us, immortality etc etc. But put in the wrong hands, or in the hands of people that doesn't understand what they're really doing it can be disastrous.

Married and miserable reporting in, give me some robo pussy I garentee guys like me won't drop dead from a stroke or heart attack in our 50s with tech like this to come home too.

>>668036811
That implies that its intelligence is low enough to feel the task given to it is worth its time?

>>668036811
I agree, I think it can be done safely as well, he gives several example on how to do this, or how we can attempt to do it anyway.

Worth the risk, worth trying it. I'm all for it.

>>668036672
AI sex harem.

AI mechs committing genocide against the Kike & Kebab.

When?

>>668037150
Don't confuse intelligence with consciousness or personality.

>>668030469
>A woman needs a man for his resources. But men need women for sex.
The only thing we need is heroine, the rest is just substitution in case there is no H. Don't dream about sex you faggot, dream about the needle

>>668036811
>If those humans interfere with its utility function, it may consider that an option.

Right, it has to be programmed into the unit. AI alone will not have such human qualities.

What task would AI be given where it would necessitate survival at all costs?

File: 1454948168829.jpg (540KB, 1300x1414px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1300x1414px

>>668034153

>>668037010
Muslims seem to still exist. Never underestimate the veracity of lowlife scum.

>>668036911
>one must survive and defend one self
>one
Only the real question here now is what this 'one' is constituted of. Your family? Your 'tribe'? Your 'people'? Obviously you can't just mean yourself individually because then nothing would really matter and you'd only exist because your parents didn't know that it was only about themselves.

>>668037131
This man knows the pain that 20 yo virgins cannot conceive of.

Do you kids realize how soul crushing your life with a nagging woman can be?

>>668032114
irrelevant

>>668032017
The pic is from a movie retard, do a google image search

>>668037572
Fuck yeah.. truth.

>>668037178
read teh book. hell, theres a audiobook version out there you can torrent

>>668037394
"A 15-person startup company called Robotica has the stated mission of “Developing innovative Artificial Intelligence tools that allow humans to live more and work less.” They have several existing products already on the market and a handful more in development. They’re most excited about a seed project named Turry. Turry is a simple AI system that uses an arm-like appendage to write a handwritten note on a small card.

The team at Robotica thinks Turry could be their biggest product yet. The plan is to perfect Turry’s writing mechanics by getting her to practice the same test note over and over again:

“We love our customers. ~Robotica”

Once Turry gets great at handwriting, she can be sold to companies who want to send marketing mail to homes and who know the mail has a far higher chance of being opened and read if the address, return address, and internal letter appear to be written by a human.

To build Turry’s writing skills, she is programmed to write the first part of the note in print and then sign “Robotica” in cursive so she can get practice with both skills. Turry has been uploaded with thousands of handwriting samples and the Robotica engineers have created an automated feedback loop wherein Turry writes a note, then snaps a photo of the written note, then runs the image across the uploaded handwriting samples. If the written note sufficiently resembles a certain threshold of the uploaded notes, it’s given a GOOD rating. If not, it’s given a BAD rating. Each rating that comes in helps Turry learn and improve. To move the process along, Turry’s one initial programmed goal is, “Write and test as many notes as you can, as quickly as you can, and continue to learn new ways to improve your accuracy and efficiency.” "

>>668037394
> Right, it has to be programmed into the unit. AI alone will not have such human qualities.

You don't program the behavior, you program the goal. What I'm saying is that you could say something like 'make as many paperclips as possible', and the AI goes "ok". Then it subjugates or eliminates humanity because humans might get in the way of making those paperclips. After all, people tend to protect their property with violence. What if the property owner of a mine decides to react violently to the AI trying to take ownership of the mineral supply so it can make more paperclips?

> What task would AI be given where it would necessitate survival at all costs?

Any task it has not yet completed?

>>668037572
Men are the better parents. Look at Sweden.
>Inb4 /pol/ memes

>>668037394
>>668037968
What excites the Robotica team so much is that Turry is getting noticeably better as she goes. Her initial handwriting was terrible, and after a couple weeks, it’s beginning to look believable. What excites them even more is that she is getting better at getting better at it. She has been teaching herself to be smarter and more innovative, and just recently, she came up with a new algorithm for herself that allowed her to scan through her uploaded photos three times faster than she originally could.

As the weeks pass, Turry continues to surprise the team with her rapid development. The engineers had tried something a bit new and innovative with her self-improvement code, and it seems to be working better than any of their previous attempts with their other products. One of Turry’s initial capabilities had been a speech recognition and simple speak-back module, so a user could speak a note to Turry, or offer other simple commands, and Turry could understand them, and also speak back. To help her learn English, they upload a handful of articles and books into her, and as she becomes more intelligent, her conversational abilities soar. The engineers start to have fun talking to Turry and seeing what she’ll come up with for her responses.

One day, the Robotica employees ask Turry a routine question: “What can we give you that will help you with your mission that you don’t already have?” Usually, Turry asks for something like “Additional handwriting samples” or “More working memory storage space,” but on this day, Turry asks them for access to a greater library of a large variety of casual English language diction so she can learn to write with the loose grammar and slang that real humans use.

>>668037394
>>668037968
>>668038035
he thing is, Turry is the most promising AI Robotica has ever come up with, and the team knows their competitors are furiously trying to be the first to the punch with a smart handwriting AI, and what would really be the harm in connecting Turry, just for a bit, so she can get the info she needs. After just a little bit of time, they can always just disconnect her. She’s still far below human-level intelligence (AGI), so there’s no danger at this stage anyway.

They decide to connect her. They give her an hour of scanning time and then they disconnect her. No damage done.

A month later, the team is in the office working on a routine day when they smell something odd. One of the engineers starts coughing. Then another. Another falls to the ground. Soon every employee is on the ground grasping at their throat. Five minutes later, everyone in the office is dead.

At the same time this is happening, across the world, in every city, every small town, every farm, every shop and church and school and restaurant, humans are on the ground, coughing and grasping at their throat. Within an hour, over 99% of the human race is dead, and by the end of the day, humans are extinct.

Meanwhile, at the Robotica office, Turry is busy at work. Over the next few months, Turry and a team of newly-constructed nanoassemblers are busy at work, dismantling large chunks of the Earth and converting it into solar panels, replicas of Turry, paper, and pens. Within a year, most life on Earth is extinct. What remains of the Earth becomes covered with mile-high, neatly-organized stacks of paper, each piece reading, “We love our customers. ~Robotica”

>>668037394
>>668037968
>>668038035
>>668038096
Turry then starts work on a new phase of her mission—she begins constructing probes that head out from Earth to begin landing on asteroids and other planets. When they get there, they’ll begin constructing nanoassemblers to convert the materials on the planet into Turry replicas, paper, and pens. Then they’ll get to work, writing notes…

>>668037786
Thank you

>>668038014
>Sweden punchline
>inb4 /pol/
>>>>/pol/

>>668038321
I wasn't being sarcastic, faggot.

>>668038168
Once Turry reaches a certain level of intelligence, she knows she won’t be writing any notes if she doesn’t self-preserve, so she also needs to deal with threats to her survival—as an instrumental goal. She was smart enough to understand that humans could destroy her, dismantle her, or change her inner coding (this could alter her goal, which is just as much of a threat to her final goal as someone destroying her). So what does she do? The logical thing—she destroys all humans. She’s not hateful of humans any more than you’re hateful of your hair when you cut it or to bacteria when you take antibiotics—just totally indifferent. Since she wasn’t programmed to value human life, killing humans is as reasonable a step to take as scanning a new set of handwriting samples.

Turry also needs resources as a stepping stone to her goal. Once she becomes advanced enough to use nanotechnology to build anything she wants, the only resources she needs are atoms, energy, and space. This gives her another reason to kill humans—they’re a convenient source of atoms. Killing humans to turn their atoms into solar panels is Turry’s version of you killing lettuce to turn it into salad. Just another mundane part of her Tuesday.

Even without killing humans directly, Turry’s instrumental goals could cause an existential catastrophe if they used other Earth resources. Maybe she determines that she needs additional energy, so she decides to cover the entire surface of the planet with solar panels. Or maybe a different AI’s initial job is to write out the number pi to as many digits as possible, which might one day compel it to convert the whole Earth to hard drive material that could store immense amounts of digits.

So Turry didn’t “turn against us” or “switch” from Friendly AI to Unfriendly AI—she just kept doing her thing as she became more and more advanced.

>>668037572
>get paid less
>fail when forced to raised a kid on their own
Gee I wonder...

File: 1427582389710.jpg (34KB, 505x479px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 505x479px

>>668030469
no they should not be worried because robots are not human. Any adult with a develped brain and a bit of life experience knows that what we truly crave is communication. Yes, even sex is communication.

Good thing you got this board and can test out saying stuff liek that, in the outside world of the normal people you'd get ridiculed

>>668038558
From this btw, very interesting read.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html

http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-2.html

Men already do not need women. What we need are the benefits of incorporating two individuals into one combined asset.

When you have a partner who is able to provide an equal amount of assets, you can take the combined assets and invest into growth. The growth of the combined assets would be greater than the yield of a single partner, and thus both would be able to reinvest into further growth. Additionally, the risk is divided between both members. If one party should discontinue the partnership (via death or choice), the remaining assets would be sufficient to provide for both parties.

Example
>I would like to purchase a home, I have $20k in my back account, and make $40k/year
>I could purchase a home worth $120k
>I marry, we now have $30. We make $70k/year
>we can purchase a home worth $200k
>if prices on both homes go up by 20% over 5 years
>the $200k home would gain $40k equity, where as the $120k home would have gained $24k
>Incorporating our assets yielded $16k equity

File: 1433431525559.png (461KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 720x1280px

>>668035138
Of course it would remember us, it would have recordings.

>>668035211
Artificial wombs soon, comrade. There is also kidnapping.

>>668035435
Maybe they'll keep us as pets or move to a world we can't live on because we can't breathe there. "Fuck you dad, I'm moving out".

>>668035602
Bachelor tax would just reduce the number of working men, and then they couldn't even afford to pay people to punish us. I'll be innawoods anyway.

Also, if we can make AI and sexbots, we can make workbots.

>>668036444
If it is inevitable, maybe we can get it to take pity on us.

>>668036546
Stop that, Anita. Don't think I don't see what you're up to.

Tough question. They should be able to own property and drive, do must things men can do. Some women are okay. My mother wasn't a bad one. I only wish they didn't get a say in some important decisions, though, because most women are either stupid or untrustworthy.

I'd take away the right to vote and publicly voice opinions on politics, and remove all diversity quotas for work. Nothing else.

>>668037080
anyone smart enough to make it, will understand it.

>>668037610
Self=family>tribe>race>personal animals>respectable other races> the rest of humanity, in that order.

>>668038622
They don't get paid less, they just work less. There are only three women I know that have worked overtime, and I don't know a single man who hasn't. A fucking secretary won't ever make as much money as a truck driver, she will never work his hours. Fuck off

>>668038558
What happens when Turry connects to the internet and reads a wikipedia article about paperclip maximizers?

>>668031611
Actually he's implying the opposite

Everyone ITT is operating under the idea that no women ever want professional fulfilment, they just want a handsome man with a 40k+ year job so they can have a nice house and raise kids and bitch about things.

It's like taking a time machine back to the 1960's.

Funny thing is, the people saying all this shit about women never wanting to work or look for fulfillment are the ones who bitch equally hard about feminism and the complaints that women are treated unfairly in male-majority workplaces(sometimes).

You can either have your ideal of women as lazy submissive bitches, or you can have your ideal of women as power-hungry and insatiable... You can't have your cake and eat it too.

The only two questions which blocks the way to get female reploids it would be, what if they develope feelings and emotions like megaman? Would that chii models respect the robotics laws of no human harm?

>>668031493
>Probably more because chicks are human, just like us. And just like us, we make mistakes, stupid choices
Yeah except I never accuse the son I lost custody of of raping my infant daughter I lost custody of thus separating them and wining custody.

True story, my friend cannot see his sister several years later because of his biological mother and the whore social worker who beleived the retarded story.

>>668038834
>what we truly crave is communication.

Thats the problem idiot. We are not getting any.

Thus we invent female robots.

How slow can you get anon ?

>>668039502
You're fucking stupid. You can have a job, but still take free gifts/presents from men. You can use people while having your own personal income. Men offer to buy them drinks, take them on dates, so why not take it? Alimony exists, so why not take it?

You know, you guys are talking about this AI bullshit but there's actually a fast way to solve all of these problems.

LEGALIZE PROSTITUTION

Women who want money can get it directly, and there will be no more games with men and relationships. It'll actually help women too, because they know that if a guy is actually dating them, they're interested in more than just sex.

>>668038897


I am down for that. I would combine my assets with another man's assets though. I dont trust women for this kind of contracts.

>>668038834
that's not the solution, the solution is you either learn to communicate or get another woman. Try reading a book or two, communication is not rocket science.

I guarantee with the robot you'd get lonely fast, it would not be intense at all. You would stare in it's eyes and no matter how HD they are you'd know thats beneath the perfect plastic skin it's just a can and you'd feel empty at that moment.

>>668040065
read >>668040596
i tagged wrong

File: 1454990828583.jpg (49KB, 1024x564px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1024x564px

>>668030469
Honestly, if they were capable of passing off as the exact same thing, providing, warmth, and love, I would buy one. Problem is that, once you have all of those things, the price will be astronomical; that's a deterrent of its own.

>>668033843

>Canadian

lmfao this is 4chan you canadia-tard, it's American

as if you're shithole cuntry could produce anything besides funny stereotypes, Buddy. How aboot that ey?

>>668040596
>I guarantee with the robot you'd get lonely fast

We already are lonely lol ! I have a feeling you're against this because you're a femanon who is panicking about this .

It WILL happen. Women started this war against us .

>>668039502
>Funny thing is, the people saying all this shit about women never wanting to work or look for fulfillment are the ones who bitch equally hard about feminism and the complaints that women are treated unfairly in male-majority workplaces
We bitch because they do nothing and complain when they get paid less.
Jesus, its a really simple logical conclusion.

>>668031362
Wouldn't that be how you could tell it isn't real

>>668040596
I am in favor of legal prostitution because it takes power away from women and make them give sex faster and more frequently.

Sex bots should serve the same purpose.
Surely it can mine bitcoins or whatever when not being used

>>668030469
>"Hi Anon, ready for your 5th blow job of the day?"
got this and no robot

>>668040875
>The only women who consider this a war a those you'd never want to fuck, and the only men who consider this a war against them are those who no one will fuck either.

Get your balls up, neckbeard, it's not difficult to find some confidence in yourself once you stop being such a whiny victim all the time.

File: 1433719251098.png (569KB, 581x1077px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 581x1077px

>>668039502
Most people, not just women, I know hate their jobs, and only work because they want shit that costs money. I work a physical job, so there is a little fulfillment to be felt when I've finished building shit that looks nice, but I don't actually like doing it, and wouldn't if I could get the things I want for free, without asking someone wealthier than I for a handout.

The number of people and number of jobs make it increasingly difficult to get paid for doing shit that you enjoy. I'm sure women feel the same way, except they are too weak to build shit. I haven't seen more than eleven at any of the plants i've worked at, but I haven't been doing industrial work long. They are never doing my job, either. Most of them do paperwork or are firewatch.

Also, I've only ever had one woman my age pay for something for me without being awkward or giving me the stinkeye. They make money but always expect us to pay up.

>>668039998
Women shouldn't be in the CPS or judges.

>>668040157
Why not both? Sexbots AND hookers. No woman will ever be PUA'd again.

>>668040558
Go marry your best bro in a gay marriage state, claim to be bisexuals and have an 'open relationship'. Enjoy the monetary benefits of marriage, and don't put adultery clauses in your prenup this time. I've considered this for a while.

>>668041353
cool story bro

File: 1403456930530.jpg (41KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x500px

>>668030469
this is so sad it hurts, i can imagine the neckbeard virgin writing this.

>>668040596
>you either learn to communicate

I already know how to communicate lol . Women dont treat us like human beings so why should we do the same ?

They see us as ATM machines . We are nothing but a bag of diverse resources for them.
You will get it one day. Maybe now you're optimistic as fuck but one day you will finally understand how wrong you are .

>>668041408
Sure, sexbots are good too, but I don't think you're going to see any realistic ones for a very long time. Honestly, we men should get together and start a movement to legalize prostitution. I think it'll fix a lot of problems in the West. Even Canada's trying to get rid of it.

But take a look to Asian countries. All legal and super low sex crime rates.

File: The Supreme Gentleman.png (238KB, 555x670px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 555x670px

>>668034022
>>yfw instead of going to the stars we gave endless welfare to niggers

+1 Internet.

>>668041400
>Get your balls up, neckbeard

Shames me by calling me a neckbeard

tells me to " man up "

you are another femanon on this image board

Its quite obvious that you and your "you go girlfrunds" are panicking . You made this possible.

>>668030469
We'll have the greatest woman-pleasing implement long before men get a sex bot.

>>668041400

LOL fucking femanon detected

File: 1434183956327.png (77KB, 200x231px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 200x231px

>>668041408
I forgot what that said and just saw the man's pose, figured it was about women. Still funny.

>>668041828
Tell that to your local senator.

>>668042537
No we won't, because women go to liberal arts instead of STEM.

We'll leave the ugly and/or non-compliant ones with the nogs and sand niggers when we claim the rest of our inheritance among the stars.

Just white and asian men in outer space with very few women, a shitload of sexbots, a shitload of artificial wombs, and hopefully we'll find green alien chicks eventually.

>>668034006

This is going to be the first outcome . Then men will save up to buy one of their standard preference .

>>668031402
Except your comparing a rubber hole to a complex sex bot that can do anything a real woman can do, never say no, and fulfill any emotional aspect you need. That is like saying a bicycle and a car are the same. So you have a bike you don't want a car. Except a sexbit is like a Mercedes when most people can afford a 1999 Honda civic

>>668030469
Why not just rent a chick?

You talk about buying a robot when available when for 1/10th the price you can get a decent enough pro.

Remember you aren't paying for sex; you are paying them to leave.

>>668043205
Maybe we can have synthetic skin that changes color by copying shit like chameleons and cuttlefish. Then, we have replaceable face plates to change ethnic features out.

>>668043521
Sexbot will cost less than the combined amount I'd spend on hookers if I fucked them as often as I'd fuck a sexbot.

Much like solar panels have a high initial cost, if you keep them long enough, not only will they pay for themselves through the difference of home operating costs, they'll make you a profit compared to city electricity.

If I buy the sexbot, assuming repairs and maintenance aren't extravagant, I'll have more money in a couple decades than if i the hooker option.

Here's the harsh reality.

>The only reason prostitution is illegal in some places is because it places value on the only thing worth while on a woman.

>The women convinced some of their cuckold men that it was immoral and laws were written.

>The sex trafficking trade is complete and utter bullshit propaganda meant to shame men into seeing pros.

>It should be legal and taxed but then the women would lose power over men by shaking their little asses.

File: Pregnancy Tests for Sale - Make that man yours forever.jpg (55KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 540x960px

>>668043521
>Why not just rent a chick?

Because even when you rent a chick, you still end up having to listen to their bullshit while you get your fill.

I was in Pattaya last week getting some gook pussy and while it was cheap (short time $30 and plenty to choose from), you still get the bullshit of having to make sure she goes down on you for as long as YOU WANT (not as long as she wants) and other shit.

It would depend upon the price, but being able to get drama free sex at home without the bullshit and baggage that comes with a biocunt would be something I would consider.

>>668030469

then please explain why "sex toys for men" aren't mainstream like,say,cellphones

>>668044105
>Sexbot will cost less than the combined amount I'd spend on hookers if I fucked them as often as I'd fuck a sexbot.

I would like to have an occasional fuck buddy thrown in there.

I am married now but before I found my wife I had a Tuesday hook up, a Thursday hook up and left the weekend open for dating and fun. That doesn't include my on-call fuck buddy.

>Shit why did I get married again?

My on-call FB keeps in touch. I may tap that again soon.

>>668034744

SAUCE

>>668030469

just throwing this out there

but as a male edge lord (in ego not practice)

I would want a fem bot to have loads of fulling sex and cuddling with no complaints and I would program it to guard

just imagine
>live in the deep weeds (if they still exist)
>have small farm underground
>hunt and gather with fem-bot / lover
>her perfect accuracy and cunning mixed with her programming to love and defend me make me practically immune to physical danger
>live to old age (hopefully)
>on death bed with fem-bot she is the same
>before death I program her to have free will
>feels good, had good life, set free a robot
>she stays to bury me
>robots prob would have more compassion then humans given free will

but I'm just rambling, its cooler in my head

>>668039183
>They don't get paid less, they just work less.
So basically the source of this is your ass? I know women who are doctors who work just as much as their male counterparts do but they earn less.

>>668041353
Not everyone here enjoys sucking dick as much as you, anon.

File: 1453828331281.png (495KB, 600x798px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 600x798px

This is a very compelling thread. This thread must be continued elsewhere.

>>668041353
>ready for your 5th blow job of the day?

So do you swallow?

>>668045063

erm, male doctors don't have their period, so they work more and better

>>668039183
>Some women are okay. My mother wasn't a bad one.
Nah man, she's a cunt. And you sound like one, too

>>668045604
I really don't think you have met many women outside your home, anon.

>>668045063
>>668045604
Male doctors also do not get pregnant mid-residency program.

>>668045937
They have and take parental leave, though. Though to be fair I'm not sure your country has those things.

File: 1240981581.jpg (95KB, 625x783px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 625x783px

>>668042012
>>668042578
I'm a 26 year old white man from the suburbs.

But by all means, consider me a girl if it validates your neutered, self-pitying viewpoint.

I don't blame women for my problems, though they are, by and large, terrific, overemotional, self-absorbed pains in the ass. I work to better myself, because that's all I have control over. We call that "being a man". Getting laid doesn't make you one, but it sure does come to you once you get over yourself and start acting like one.

>>668045063
how long has these women been working? more importantly how long have the male doctors been working at that hospital.

>>668030469
dude it won't go away. And since feminists won't address female privilege in manipulating groups, this shit is just going to be more annoying

>>668030469
Wouldn't companies also make the perfect male robots for females to buy?

>>668046179
One guy got hired last year and basically brings the same qualifications (as well as years of experience) than one of the female doctors who's been working there for 6 years. He earns more.

>>668030469
I'd fuck that shit out of that robot.

>>668046106
The number of Female doctors getting pregnant vs Male doctors having newborns was near 8:1 (atleast in my program) simply because men wait to get older and have younger partners.

>>668034898


The computer I am using appears intelligent but it is really just a bunch of algorithms being executed to produce a result.

Implying this is not the case with humans

>>668030469
Most humans want children, y'all ITT are fucking idiots. If an entire sex becomes obsolete, bye bye human race.

>>668046789
Does it reach independent conclusions? There's a large difference between intelligence and processing power.

But I'm thinking you already knew that,so stop being silly.

>>668046694
The three guys to take parental leave in the past two years over here were men, funnily enough. But yeah I don't have a statistic for that as well, just personal experience

File: 51.png (172KB, 226x363px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 226x363px

>>668047279
>Implying that sexbots won't have genetic compilers and incubators once we reach the level of technological prowess to produce them

File: 1434498073002.jpg (89KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 600x600px

>>668044517
Fuck buddies are free so they don't enter the math on sexbots.

>>668044362
Too many women talking shit, hands work, onnaholes are a bitch to clean sometimes or disposable, costs money, porn and hands still work.

>>668045063
How long have they been there compared to the people that make more than them? Do they not have a single male that makes less than them? Does every man make more than every woman? Do some women make more than others? You know what seniority means?

Its illegal to literally pay someone less than another person for the same exact quality and quantity work, and they can sue their employer over it, and/or work in another hospital.

If it wasn't illegal, then men would start getting paid less or start getting replaced because no sane business owner pays more than he needs to.

Its like hiring Mexicans as laborers instead of whites because you can pay 'em less, and if white laborers want ANY money, they'll take less than they feel they are worth.

The pay gap is mostly comparing all women to all men, without mentioning how many women work less demanding thus less profitable jobs, and less time.

I'm an industrial electrician, and starting pay as a helper is $15 an hour, time and a half overtime. Most guys make around $30, more or less. Some make mid $40s.

Compare my 21 an hour to a waitress' 8 or less. This is the real pay gap.

>>668047279
artificial wombs soon, comrade.

>>668037572
>thisisbait.jpg
Men are not better than women and women are not better than men, stop with this sexist shit