Is the theory about this page legit or is it grasping at str

I think so...
http://www.tobeornottobe.org/math

>>19575683
Maybe Shakespeare wasn't Shakespeare.
There are theories that Shakespeare (and many other playwrights and authors) were aliases of Sir Francis Bacon. Bacon himself was a genius and prominent member (if not the head) of the Rosicrucians. He was the inventor of the biliteral cipher and often encoded his own works with it.

There have been claims that entire texts have been found within Bacon's' books, Shakespeare's plays, and the works of others. Orville Ward Owen deciphered the messages and published them in a collection of volumes called "Francis Bacon's Cipher Story." All of these are full of Rosicrucian symbollism. Manly P. Hall mentions this in his Secret Teachings too.

Maybe the bard from Stratford-upon-Avon could not have known enough to encode this information in geometry, but a man well-versed in the Mysteries could have.

take off your tinfoil drumpf'er, there is nothing paranormal about this.

>>19577053
It's a shame more people know little to nothing about Bacon. America succeeded to some degree on becoming The New Atlantis, but to a larger degree failed. Will there ever be another experiment that could fully encapsulate Bacon's vision?

>>19577191
kys go back 2 reddit faggot

>>19577381
you type like a 5year old faggot. But i agree.

>Are you Tobe or not Tobe
Kunta Kente

Dumb question, did our current set of latitudes and longitudes exist at this time?

File: Is_Shakespeare_Dead_cover.jpg (25KB, 397x604px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 397x604px

>>19577053
Mark Twain made an excellent argument in favor of the Baconist theory. But the idea that Shakespeare wasn't involved with his own plays is considered fringe.

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2431

It could very well be that a small number of people collaborated with Shakespeare, with the Bard doing the final revision. It's widely accepted that the Hecate scene in Macbeth was a later addition and possibly not written by Shakespeare.

>>19577594
no, those were defined in 19th century