If ghosts are real, can you provide one instance where a group

There is an astute possibility that ghosts are deterred by multiple humans, or multiple instances of sentience at the least.

>>19569821
doesnt sound logical

Our Lady of Lourdes

When Christ appeared to the disciples

https://youtu.be/6qSEi_sfaSU

>>19569806
If your real. Can you provide me with a group of 5 individuals who have witnessed you at the same time?

>>19570279
I am talking to you so therefore I am real

>>19570272
This is pure jewish trickery

>>19570689

bot, not a good one either

>>19569806
My mum and aunt were walking with a group of friends back to their hotel many years ago when they were on holiday as kids. Part of the route back was through a churchyard. They both swear do this day a hooded monk like figure appeared from behind a tree stump and floated around and vanished behind a large grave and wasn't seen again. They all ran back the other way and had to be collected to go back by their parents as they were too scared to back that way.

If ghosts exist, then why has no-one ever seen a ghost of a dinosaur?

>>19569806
that wouldnt prove anything, there is still mass hysteria

Ghosts are the colloquial explanation for sightings of extradimensional beings.

I'm not talking about parallel universes, I'm talking about lifeforms that exist in a higher order of literal spacial dimensions than we do.

Imagine what we'd look like to a two-dimensional being. Imagine the perspective of a two-dimensional being that perceives a two-dimensional plane, like the very surface of a lake. Imagine what your hand would look like reaching into that lake: the tips of your fingers five impossibly small dots, which grow larger, then begin to converge into an amorphous blob which shrinks and grows inexplicably.

That is an analog of what we are perceiving. We don't know how to make sense of it, so we personify it.

With all that established, it's not far-fetched to say that concurrent, identical sightings are physically impossible because observes occupy different places spatially.

Or they're fully cognizant beings of indeterminate origin that get a kick out of Michigan J. Frogging you.

Either way, science is an attempt at approaching correctness, and thus must change in response to contradiction; science that doesn't embrace the possibility of being wrong is religion. To assume that our current scientific understanding of the universe is both complete and correct is unironically the most insane belief posted on this board.

Apply skepticism to skepticism.

Fatima

>>19572205
Ah so you have also just read flatland

>>19572265
No, I'm listening to every Sagan audiobook.